Difference between revisions of "Priority profiles"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(referencing needs attention)
(referencing needs attention)
Line 675: Line 675:
 
*[[PhRMA]] external links contain full url, no references in text and people need wikified
 
*[[PhRMA]] external links contain full url, no references in text and people need wikified
 
*[[Burson-Marsteller]] the refernce numbers are out of sequence and notes and refs contain full urls
 
*[[Burson-Marsteller]] the refernce numbers are out of sequence and notes and refs contain full urls
*[[Quadrant]] no refs in text 2 external links at the end
+
*[[Quadrant (magazine)]] no refs in text 2 external links at the end
 
*[[R.G. Godson]] lacks reference section
 
*[[R.G. Godson]] lacks reference section
 
*[[RBS]] full urls in refs
 
*[[RBS]] full urls in refs
Line 717: Line 717:
 
*[[Ronald A. Bailey]] references need wikified and numbered, formatting might improve page
 
*[[Ronald A. Bailey]] references need wikified and numbered, formatting might improve page
 
*[[Rothamsted Research]] ref style
 
*[[Rothamsted Research]] ref style
*[[Roy Maclaren]] refs lack footnotes
+
*[[Roy MacLaren]] refs lack footnotes
 
*[[Royal Academy of Engineering]] mixed ref style
 
*[[Royal Academy of Engineering]] mixed ref style
 
*[[Royal Society]] reference section
 
*[[Royal Society]] reference section

Revision as of 19:34, 14 September 2007

Pages that need checking and editing

Fact checking and referencing needed

need editing/rewriting

tone and language need attention

  • Barney Jones deleted as was pointless bitching IMO Phil Chandler 12:01, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - restored previous edit and edited for tone and referencing, --David 22:42, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)
  • Baroness Chalker of Wallasey edited for questionable laguage - prop. needs fact checking Phil Chandler 12:03, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Emma Gilpin Much stuff about TIME mag removed as it belongs elsewhere. Edited for potential libel. Phil Chandler 12:04, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Finsbury can we say "Stephen Liar Byres" ? (No we can't and now we don't. Phil Chandler 12:05, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - Er, well, yes we can since it is in a passage quoted from Private Eye --David 22:23, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)

referencing needs attention

formatting needed

Needs wikified