Difference between revisions of "Priority profiles"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fact checking and referencing needed)
(need editing/rewriting)
Line 355: Line 355:
 
*[[Phil Thomas]] blank page
 
*[[Phil Thomas]] blank page
 
*[[Political Consulting]] ? does this need work?
 
*[[Political Consulting]] ? does this need work?
 +
*[[RAND Corporation]] This is heavily reliant on wikipedia & references contain full urls
 +
*[[RSe Consulting]] needs an intro or some background & referencing style needs attention
 +
*[[Reginald Hall]] needs edited, perhaps just formatting with headings & referencing style needs attention
 +
*[[Rocket Science]] needs an edit? or formatting, more wikified in places
 +
*[[Shell]] would benefit from a general edit, formattign and references need wikified
 +
*[[Royal Parks]] would benefit from some background or an intro. references needed too
  
 
===tone and language need attention===
 
===tone and language need attention===

Revision as of 18:13, 14 September 2007

Pages that need checking and editing

Fact checking and referencing needed

need editing/rewriting

tone and language need attention

  • Barney Jones deleted as was pointless bitching IMO Phil Chandler 12:01, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - restored previous edit and edited for tone and referencing, --David 22:42, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)
  • Baroness Chalker of Wallasey edited for questionable laguage - prop. needs fact checking Phil Chandler 12:03, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Emma Gilpin Much stuff about TIME mag removed as it belongs elsewhere. Edited for potential libel. Phil Chandler 12:04, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Finsbury can we say "Stephen Liar Byres" ? (No we can't and now we don't. Phil Chandler 12:05, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - Er, well, yes we can since it is in a passage quoted from Private Eye --David 22:23, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)

referencing needs attention

formatting needed

Needs wikified