Difference between revisions of "Priority profiles"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(need editing/rewriting)
(formatting needed)
Line 792: Line 792:
 
*[[Procter & Gamble: Products and Projects]] needs formatting, wikified and attention to references
 
*[[Procter & Gamble: Products and Projects]] needs formatting, wikified and attention to references
 
*[[Procter & Gamble: Who, Where, How Much?]] formatting needed (perhaps edited) needs wikified and references fixed
 
*[[Procter & Gamble: Who, Where, How Much?]] formatting needed (perhaps edited) needs wikified and references fixed
*[[Progress Education Trust]] formatting excess paragraphs needed and referencing style needs attention
+
*[[Progress Educational Trust]] formatting excess paragraphs needed and referencing style needs attention
 
*[[Project 21]] formatting needed for excess paragraphs, referencing style needs attention
 
*[[Project 21]] formatting needed for excess paragraphs, referencing style needs attention
 
*[[Public Policy and Regulation Initiative]] needs formatting, and wikified and attention to references.  This might even need a more through edit.
 
*[[Public Policy and Regulation Initiative]] needs formatting, and wikified and attention to references.  This might even need a more through edit.

Revision as of 11:49, 27 July 2007

Pages that need checking and editing

Fact checking and referencing needed

need editing/rewriting

tone and language need attention

  • Barney Jones deleted as was pointless bitching IMO Phil Chandler 12:01, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - restored previous edit and edited for tone and referencing, --David 22:42, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)
  • Baroness Chalker of Wallasey edited for questionable laguage - prop. needs fact checking Phil Chandler 12:03, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Emma Gilpin Much stuff about TIME mag removed as it belongs elsewhere. Edited for potential libel. Phil Chandler 12:04, 22 Jun 2007 (BST)
  • Finsbury can we say "Stephen Liar Byres" ? (No we can't and now we don't. Phil Chandler 12:05, 22 Jun 2007 (BST) - Er, well, yes we can since it is in a passage quoted from Private Eye --David 22:23, 25 Jul 2007 (BST)

referencing needs attention

formatting needed

Needs wikified