Difference between revisions of "LM network"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Culture Wars defunct)
 
(261 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The LM network or LM group is a superficially loose and informal network of individuals and organisations sharing a libertarian and anti-environmentalist ideology. Its constituent organisations are led and largely composed of people associated with the defunct Revolutionary Communist Party and its principal publication [[Living Marxism]]. The network has no public presence or acknowledged existence. The strongest link is between the largest and longest established entities, [[Spiked]] and the [[Institute of Ideas]], established in 2000 by close associates and operating from the same address. However, associated entities typically have overlapping personnel, themes, views and techniques, and promote one other.
+
{{Powerbase:LM network: Resources}}
 +
The [[LM network]] or LM group is a superficially loose and informal network of individuals and organisations sharing a libertarian and anti-environmentalist ideology. Its constituent organisations are led and largely composed of people associated with the defunct [[Revolutionary Communist Tendency]]/[[Revolutionary Communist Party]] (RCP) and its principal publication [[Living Marxism]]. The network has no public presence or acknowledged existence. The strongest link is between the largest and longest established entities, [[Spiked]] and the [[Institute of Ideas]], both established in 2000 by close associates and for many years operating from the same address, Signet House 49-51 Farringdon Road EC1M 3JB, previously the offices of [[Living Marxism]] <ref>”[http://www.locallife.co.uk/islington/business-consultants.asp?pageno=3 LM Magazine]” Local Life website accessed 7th June 2010</ref>.  Thus [[Patrick Hayes]] affirms in his twitter profile "I work for spiked www.spiked-online.com and the Institute of Ideas www.instituteofideas.com...". <ref>[http://twitter.com/#!/P_Hayes P Hayes] Twitter website acc 29 Oct 2011</ref> Associated entities typically have overlapping personnel, similar themes, views and techniques, and promote one another.  The network's funds and staff numbers are relatively limited as is its influence.  Perhaps of most concern are those LM associates who have obtained influential positions with other organisations and the network’s extensive youth oriented programmes.
  
−
The Institute of Ideas’ Director [[Claire Fox]] concedes, ‘Certainly, there is a network of like-minded people. Some people do come from an RCP background, because we have a long intellectual history together, and we do work together sometimes…’<ref>Chris Bunting, [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=193769 What's a nice Trot doing in a place like this?], Times Higher Education, 28 Jan 2005, acc 21 May 2010</ref> Former editor of [[LM]] and [[Spiked]] and continuing Spiked contributor [[Mick Hume]] confirms, ‘The network of people I live and work with contain lots of people who were members of the RCP.’<ref>Andy Beckett, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/1999/may/15/weekend7.weekend2 Licence to rile], The Guardian, 15 May 1999, acc 21 May 2010</ref> while Spiked and Institute of Ideas contributor [[Dolan Cummings]] explains ‘I never left the RCP: the organisation folded in the mid-Nineties, but few of us actually 'recanted' our ideas. Instead we resolved to support one another more informally as we pursued our political tradition as individuals, or launched new projects with more general aims that have also engaged people from different traditions, or none. These include Spiked and the Institute of Ideas... ‘<ref>Dolan Cummings, [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/printable/3954/ In defence of ‘radicalisation’: Critiques of Hizb ut-Tahrir focus less on its dodgy politics than on its intellectualism. But what’s wrong with a devotion to the debate of ideas?], Spiked, 12 Oct 2007, acc 21 May 2010</ref>
+
The rationale for profiling the LM network on Powerbase is not any one of its main characteristics but rather their combination;  these being: advocating policies which benefit corporate interests, as set out by the [[Institute of Ideas]], corporate funding, a significant focus on influencing youth; the number of organisations it operates; and a lack of transparency about its origins, methods, scope and purpose. This profile is necessarily extensive and detailed because of the network's disparate nature and the lack of formal public links between its entities.  
  
−
Many of the organisational and campaigning approaches used by those in the network are, not surprisingly, characteristic of the RCP, including: the creation of a range of organisations without apparent formal links; the launching of multiple campaigns; the use of extensive and extended debate; the adoption of contrarian and controversial positions; the use of martial terminology; and the early adoption of leading edge communication techniques.
+
[[Image:Living Marxism No 1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The first edition of [[Living Marxism]], November 1988, edited by [[Mick Hume]].]]
  
−
A defining characteristic of the network’s entities are their positioning as catalysts for debate or irreverent challenging of established orthodoxy. In practice, this enables the promotion of the views of the network and its sponsors on almost any topic, under the guise of free enquiry.  Their principal underlying themes of economic development and freedom from regulation benefit corporate interests and the larger and more established organisations explicitly seek sponsorship, either directly or via PR companies or free enterprise think tanks.  Several of the entities target young people while others are sector or issue led. The network's entities are increasingly seeking partners overseas.
 
  
−
Individual ex-RCP members with links to the network have assumed influential positions elsewhere, particularly in the media and sciences.  More generally, higher education is the most common occupational sector of associated personnel, followed by the media.  Many have past or current links with the Universities of Kent, Sussex and East London. Details of some of those associated with the LM network are available via LM network at the bottom of this page.
+
[[Image:Lm.gif|thumb|right|300px|The logo of [[LM Magazine]] after it changed its name from [[Living Marxism]] at issue 97 in February 1997.<ref>'[http://web.archive.org/web/19980218145236/www.informinc.co.uk/LM/LM97/index.html Welcome to the new-look LM]', ''[[LM]]'', February 1997, retrieved from the Internet Archive of 18 February 1998, accessed 27 October 2010</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
==Methods==
 +
The Institute of Ideas’ Director [[Claire Fox]] concedes, ‘Certainly, there is a network of like-minded people. Some people do come from an RCP background, because we have a long intellectual history together, and we do work together sometimes…’<ref>Chris Bunting, [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=193769 What's a nice Trot doing in a place like this?], Times Higher Education, 28 Jan 2005, acc 21 May 2010</ref> Former editor of LM and Spiked and continuing Spiked contributor [[Mick Hume]] confirms, ‘The network of people I live and work with contain lots of people who were members of the RCP.’<ref>Andy Beckett, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/1999/may/15/weekend7.weekend2 Licence to rile], The Guardian, 15 May 1999, acc 21 May 2010</ref> while Spiked and Institute of Ideas contributor [[Dolan Cummings]] explains ‘I never left the RCP: the organisation folded in the mid-Nineties, but few of us actually 'recanted' our ideas. Instead we resolved to support one another more informally as we pursued our political tradition as individuals, or launched new projects with more general aims that have also engaged people from different traditions, or none. These include Spiked and the Institute of Ideas... ‘<ref>Dolan Cummings, [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/printable/3954/ In defence of ‘radicalisation’: Critiques of Hizb ut-Tahrir focus less on its dodgy politics than on its intellectualism. But what’s wrong with a devotion to the debate of ideas?], Spiked, 12 Oct 2007, acc 21 May 2010</ref>
 +
[[Image:LM-logo-200.gif|thumb|left|300px|[[Living Marxism]] logo circa January 1997 from their website www.junius.co.uk]]
 +
 
 +
In his statement announcing the closure of LM magazine in spring 2000, LM editor Mick Hume promised that “The LM-initiated Institute of Ideas, a series of events planned to take place from June to July, will go ahead in partnership with major institutions in London, including the British Library, the Royal Institution, the Royal Shakespeare Company, the Royal Society of Arts, Tate Modern, and the Union Chapel Project. A new company, the [[Academy of Ideas]], has been set up by Claire Fox to coordinate these events.”
 +
 
 +
He also stated that “As for the post-LM future of magazine publishing, watch this space”.  Mick Hume was the first editor of Spiked, launched shortly afterwards.
 +
 
 +
Many of the organisational and campaigning approaches used by those in the network are characteristic of those used by the RCP, including: the creation of a range of organisations without apparent formal links; the launching of multiple campaigns; the use of extensive and extended debate; the adoption of contrarian and controversial positions; the use of martial terminology; and the early adoption of leading edge communication techniques.
 +
 
 +
A defining characteristic of the network’s entities are their positioning and presentation as catalysts for debate or irreverent challenging of established orthodoxy. In practice, this enables the promotion of the views of the network and its sponsors on almost any topic, under the guise of free enquiry.  Their principal underlying themes of economic development and freedom from regulation benefit corporate interests while the larger and more established organisations explicitly seek sponsorship, either directly or via PR companies or free enterprise think tanks.  Several of the entities target young people, while others are sector or issue led. The network's entities are increasingly seeking partners overseas.
 +
 
 +
Individual ex-RCP members with links to the network have assumed influential positions elsewhere, particularly in the media and sciences.  Members of the network write regularly for mainstream news publications, particularly the Independent, which publishes an occasional series of Battle of Ideas thought pieces, Prospect and Huffington Post (UK) and appear on topical radio programmes, notably the [[Moral Maze]].
 +
 
 +
However, higher education is the most common occupational sector of associated personnel.  Many have past or current links with the adjacent Universities of Kent, Canterbury Christ Church, Sussex and East London. Their influence on the latter is particularly evident in UEL units [[London East Research Institute]] and [[Rising East]].  Details of some of those associated with the LM network are available via LM network at the bottom of this page.
 +
 
 +
An example of how the network operates was when LM associates [[James Heartfield]] and [[James Woudhuysen]] set up a building industry consultancy [[Audacity]] <ref>"[http://www.audacity.org/people.htm People]" Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref> and sought funding from building companies <ref>"[http://www.audacity.org/sponsors.htm We need your support]", Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref>.  The consultancy then published Heartfield’s book ‘Let’s Build’ calling for government support for the building industry <ref>"[http://www.audacity.org/buy.htm Buy]" Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref>.  Heartfield’s book was then promoted across part of the rest of the network: [[Birmingham Salon]] <ref>"[http://www.birminghamsalon.org/ Let’s Build event 8th June 2010]", Birmingham Salon website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref>, [[Spiked]] <ref>"[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/boxarticle/3395/ We need more houses, not divisive housing policies]" Spiked website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref> and [[WORLDbytes]]. <ref>"[http://www.worldbytes.org/shownpreviously.html Programme 7 Audacity Director Ian Abley on planning laws]" WORLDbytes website, accessed 5 June 2010</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Internet freedom.png|thumb|left|300px|[[Internet Freedom]], a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Libero.png|thumb|right|300px|[[Libero]], a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Transport Research.png|thumb|left|300px|[[Transport Research Group]], a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[Image:IoI small.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The Institute of Ideas: an [[LM]] project. Image from the LM website @ www.informinc.co.uk circa 2000 promoting the first Institute of Ideas event in June/July 2000<ref>Retrieved from the Internet Archive the [http://web.archive.org/web/20000207200115/http://www.informinc.co.uk/ LM] website of 7 February 2000</ref>]]
 +
[[File:IoI.png|thumb|left|200px|[[Institute of Ideas]], at the core of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Battle of Ideas logo.gif|thumb|right|200px|[[Battle of Ideas]], a project of the [[Institute of Ideas]], part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Academylogo.gif|thumb|left|300px|[[The Academy]], a project of the Institute of Ideas, a core element of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Battleofideasbanner.jpg|thumb|right|600px|[[Battle of Ideas]] banner noting the funding of the [[LM network]] by pharma giant [[Pfizer]], [[BT]] and [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s newspaper ''[[The Times]]''.]]
 +
[[File:Culture Wars.jpg|thumb|left|300px|[[Culture Wars]], a project of the Institute of Ideas, a core element of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Debating Matters.gif|thumb|right|300px|[[Debating Matters]] a project of the [[Institute of Ideas]] a core element of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:GU Logo Animated Text.gif|thumb|left|400px|[[Global Uncertainties Schools Network]] a project of [[Debating Matters]] which is in turn part of the [[Institute of Ideas]] a core element of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Belfast Salon.png|thumb|right|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Birmingham Salon.png|thumb|left|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Brighton Salon.png|thumb|right|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:East Midlands Salon.png|thumb|left|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Huddersfield Salon.png|thumb|right|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Leeds Salon.png|thumb|left|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Manchester Salon.png|thumb|right|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:NY Salon.png|thumb|left|200px|[[Salons]], projects of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[File:AFAF LOGO small.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Academics for Academic Freedom]] and [[LM network]] associate.]]
 +
[[File:SAFAF.jpg|thumb|right|300px|[[Student Academics for Academic Freedom]] the student equivalent of [[Academics for Academic Freedom]] a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Manifesto club logo.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Manifesto Club]] part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Maverick club logo.gif|thumb|left|300px|Logo of the [[Maverick Club]], circa 2000, a part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Spiked logo.gif|thumb|right|200px| Logo of [[Spiked]], a core element of the [[LM network]], circa 2011.]]
 +
[[File:YJA new banner.gif|thumb|left|600px|[[Young Journalists Academy]] is a project of [[Journalism Education Limited]] launched by [[Spiked]] a core part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Novo logo.png|thumb|right|300px|[[Novo Argumente]] the German magazine affiliated with the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Hands_off_the_human_footprint.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Hands Off The Human Footprint]] a [[Spiked]] campaign, part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Modern movement demo.jpg|thumb|right|400px|The one and only [[Modern Movement]] demo - a counter to the protests against the third Heathrow runway in February 2009.]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Audacity logo.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Audacity]], an [[LM network]] project]]
 +
[[File:Logo BigPotatoes.gif|thumb|left|200px|[[Big Potatoes]] part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Engaging Cogs logo.gif|thumb|right|400px|[[Engaging Cogs]], an [[LM network]] project]]
 +
[[File:Future cities.gif|thumb|left|400px|[[Future Cities Project]], associated with the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Global futures logo.gif|thumb|right|600px|[[Global Futures]], an [[LM network]] venture]]
 +
[[File:Mantownhuman logo.jpg|thumb|left|300px|[[ManTownHuman]] a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:CPCS-150x100.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Centre for Parenting Culture Studies]], associated with the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Generation Youth Issues logo.gif|thumb|left|300px|[[Generation Youth Issues]], a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Parentswithattitude.jpg|thumb|right|600px|[[Parents With Attitude]], associated with the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Pro choice forum.gif|thumb|left|200px|[[Pro-Choice Forum]], part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[File:Worldwrite_logo.gif|thumb|right|200px|[[Worldwrite]], part of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
[[File:Worldbytes.jpg|thumb|left|300px|[[Worldbytes]] part of [[WORLDWrite]], a project of the [[LM network]]]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Easynet logo.jpeg|thumb|right|200px|[[Easynet]], started by [[LM network]] associate [[Keith Teare]]]]
 +
[[File:200px-Cyberia Internet Cafe.gif|thumb|left|400px|[[Cyberia]] a business set up by [[LM network]] associate [[Keith Teare]]]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:ELSS Logo.png|thumb|right|300px|The logo of the [[East London Science School]] the first venture of the [[LM network]] into running an educational establishment]]
 +
 
  
 
==Funding==
 
==Funding==
−
None of the organisations associated with the LM network provides a breakdown of funders and how much they have provided. We do know, however, that they are funded by corporations that fund think tanks dedicated to promoting their interests in the political and media spheres.  For example, the pharmaceutical company [[Pfizer]] has funded both [[Spiked]] and the [[Institute of Ideas]] and two organisations with which the LM network has connections, the [[Science Media Centre]] and [[Sense About Science]]. Both are engaged in managing debate about scientific issues.   
+
None of the organisations associated with the LM network provides a breakdown of funders and how much they have provided. We do know, however, that they are funded by corporations that fund think tanks dedicated to promoting their interests in the political and media spheres.  For example, the pharmaceutical company [[Pfizer]] has funded [[Spiked]], the [[Institute of Ideas]]' [[Battle of Ideas]] in 2005 and 2006, the [[Debating Matters]] programme and two organisations with which the LM network has connections, the [[Science Media Centre]] and [[Sense About Science]]. Both of the latter are engaged in managing debate about scientific issues.   
  
−
As well as funding the LM network, Pfizer funds free market think tanks such as the US-based [[Competitive Enterprise Institute]] and [[Cato Institute]], the Netherlands-based [[Edmund Burke Foundation]], the Brussels based [[Centre for the New Europe]] (which also does work on climate funded by [[Exxon]]), the UK’s [[Social Market Foundation]] and the American Council on Science and Health, a deceptive front group. <ref>"[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/apr07_2/c1819  American Council on Science and Health]", BMMJwebsite, accessed 3 May 2010</ref>  Pfizer is a member of one of the most important global corporate lobby groups, the International Chamber of Commerce. <ref>"[http://www.iccwbo.org/id19696/index.html Links to ICC member companies]", International Chamber of Commerce website, accessed 3 May 2010</ref>  
+
As well as funding the LM network, Pfizer funds free market think tanks such as the US-based [[Competitive Enterprise Institute]] and [[Cato Institute]], the Netherlands-based [[Edmund Burke Foundation]], the Brussels based [[Centre for the New Europe]] (which also does work on climate funded by [[Exxon]]), the UK’s [[Social Market Foundation]] and the [[American Council on Science and Health]], a deceptive front group. <ref>"[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/apr07_2/c1819  American Council on Science and Health]", BMJ website, accessed 3 May 2010</ref>  Pfizer is a member of one of the most important global corporate lobby groups, the International Chamber of Commerce. <ref>"[http://www.iccwbo.org/id19696/index.html Links to ICC member companies]", International Chamber of Commerce website, accessed 3 May 2010</ref> What’s in it for Pfizer?  One clue is in the topics covered by the Debating Matters schools debating competition which include such subjects of interest to the pharmaceutical industry as: the value or otherwise of complementary medicine, NHS rationing of expensive drugs, clinical trials in developing countries, fertility treatments, genetic screening, anti-aging treatments, genetic engineering and animal experimentation.
  
−
Other corporations and corporate lobby groups that have funded the LM network are [[BT]], [[Cadbury Schweppes]], [[IBM]], [[Novartis]], [[Orange]], [[O2]], The [[Mobile Operators Association]] and the [[Society of the Chemical Industry]]. <ref>"[http://www.spiked-online.com/pdf/BrandManagersPack.pdf Spiked Brand Managers’ Pack]", Spiked website, accessed 8 May 2010</ref> These sources of funding are typical of lobbying or PR firms.  Unsurprisingly, some of the biggest lobby firms also fund the network.  [[Hill and Knowlton]] is one of the most controversial lobbying and PR firms in the world, having famously been behind the deception on the incubator baby story in Kuwait in 1990/91. It also worked for a long list of controversial corporations, including some from the oil, tobacco, pharma, fast food, and GM industry. It worked too for repressive regimes, including Egypt, Haiti, Indonesia, Morocco, Turkey – and China after the Tiananmen square massacre. Along with PR firm [[Luther Pendragon]] (which has worked for the Hinduja brothers, Macdonalds, Pepsi, the GM industry and others), Hill and Knowlton has put up cash for LM network events.  
+
BT is another major sponsor of the LM network. BT sponsored the Battle of Ideas in 2006, 2007 and 2008.  In addition, then BT subsidiary O2 sponsored five Spiked Debates during 2005, 2006 and 2007<ref>"[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/onlinedebates/ Online debates]", Spiked website, accessed 7 June 2010</ref> while another was sponsored by Orange.  The Mobile Operators Association is also on record as having funded Spiked. In return, BT/ O2 and other operators had the opportunity via Spiked to challenge public concerns about the perceived effects on health, child protection and the environment of mobile phones.
 +
 
 +
Other corporations and corporate lobby groups that have funded the LM network are [[Cadbury Schweppes]], [[IBM]], [[Novartis]], [[Orange]], [[O2]], The [[Mobile Operators Association]] and the [[Society of the Chemical Industry]]. <ref>"[http://www.spiked-online.com/pdf/BrandManagersPack.pdf Spiked Brand Managers’ Pack]", Spiked website, accessed 8 May 2010</ref> These sources of funding are typical of lobbying or PR firms.  Unsurprisingly, some of the biggest lobby firms also fund the network.  [[Hill and Knowlton]] is one of the most controversial lobbying and PR firms in the world, having famously been behind the deception on the incubator baby story in Kuwait in 1990/91. It also worked for a long list of controversial corporations, including some from the oil, tobacco, pharma, fast food, and GM industry. It worked too for repressive regimes, including Egypt, Haiti, Indonesia, Morocco, Turkey – and China after the Tiananmen square massacre. Along with PR firm [[Luther Pendragon]] (which has worked for the Hinduja brothers, Macdonalds, Pepsi, the GM industry and others), Hill and Knowlton has put up cash for LM network events.  
  
 
The LM network has also worked with other free market think tanks such as the [[International Policy Network]] (which took money from Exxon for climate change ’outreach’) and the [[Social Issues Research Centre]] (which takes money from the food, alcohol and tech industry and downplays the risks from their products). <ref>"[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/mar03_3/c484 The Social Issues Research Centre]", BMJ website, accessed 3 May 2010</ref>
 
The LM network has also worked with other free market think tanks such as the [[International Policy Network]] (which took money from Exxon for climate change ’outreach’) and the [[Social Issues Research Centre]] (which takes money from the food, alcohol and tech industry and downplays the risks from their products). <ref>"[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/mar03_3/c484 The Social Issues Research Centre]", BMJ website, accessed 3 May 2010</ref>
  
−
==Comment on LM network by George Monbiot==
+
==Comment by George Monbiot==
−
The following is an excerpt from an interview by Lobbywatch with George Monbiot about the LM network:<ref>Lobbywatch, [http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3876:interview-with-monbiot-on-the-lm-group Interview with George Monbiot about the LM group], 11 April 2007, archived on GMWatch website, accessed 21 May 2010</ref>
+
The following is an excerpt from an interview by Lobbywatch with [[George Monbiot]] about the LM network:<ref>Lobbywatch, [http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3876:interview-with-monbiot-on-the-lm-group Interview with George Monbiot about the LM group], 11 April 2007, archived on GMWatch website, accessed 21 May 2010</ref>
  
 
:Lobbywatch: Do you actually think there is a network of people concertedly working together as this LM group?
 
:Lobbywatch: Do you actually think there is a network of people concertedly working together as this LM group?
Line 29: Line 102:
 
:George Monbiot:  There are two reasons why I find it worrying.  The first is that the agenda they pursue appears not to be pursued overtly.  For example, when they ran the magazine Living Marxism it was very far from a Marxism journal - it was just about as far from a Marxist journal as you could possibly get.  And it seemed to me that the title was a direct and deliberate attempt to distract attention from the fact that this was a far right wing libertarian publication which was using the terms of the left to make it look as if the positions it was taking were new and unusual ones.  Whereas in actual fact they were very well trodden ones, but well trodden by people like the [[Libertarian Alliance]] who in theory were at the other end of the political spectrum.
 
:George Monbiot:  There are two reasons why I find it worrying.  The first is that the agenda they pursue appears not to be pursued overtly.  For example, when they ran the magazine Living Marxism it was very far from a Marxism journal - it was just about as far from a Marxist journal as you could possibly get.  And it seemed to me that the title was a direct and deliberate attempt to distract attention from the fact that this was a far right wing libertarian publication which was using the terms of the left to make it look as if the positions it was taking were new and unusual ones.  Whereas in actual fact they were very well trodden ones, but well trodden by people like the [[Libertarian Alliance]] who in theory were at the other end of the political spectrum.
  
−
In another part of the interview, Monbiot talks about the LM network's lack of transparency and their fondness for ostensibly objective debates (which are actually far from objective)"
+
In another part of the interview, Monbiot talks about the LM network's lack of transparency and their fondness for ostensibly objective debates:
  
 
:Lobbywatch: Could you give more examples really of how you see them as not being as transparent as they might be? ...
 
:Lobbywatch: Could you give more examples really of how you see them as not being as transparent as they might be? ...
  
−
:George Monbiot: The idea of them sitting behind what appears to be a front?
+
:George Monbiot: The idea of them sitting behind what appears to be a front? Well another example is the way in which you have got this great proliferation of organisations which all do the same thing and have the same people in it, but run under a host of different names. And perhaps, even more importantly, the way in which they stage debates which claim to be objective and even-handed debates but are totally controlled and managed.  And this is what the Institute of Ideas specialises in.  Where it will…it is very clever, it knows how to get famous names… because it will write to Melvyn Bragg or someone and say, ‘Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming to speak at this conference we are having in six months time - would you like to join them?’ and they say, ‘Oh yes’.  And then they’ll write to Fay Weldon and say ‘Melvyn Bragg, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming’.  Etc. And then they’ll say ‘Unfortunately, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ can’t come, but anyway we have got Melvyn Bragg and Faye Weldon’.  And that is how they operate.  So they get all these names together and everyone thinks ‘Oh look…look at all these big names doing this debate, it has got to be a really good debate’.  And then they will stuff the panels with these network people.  And then you’ll suddenly say ‘Well no, hang on, wait a minute - there’s [[Tony Gilland]], and there’s [[Juliet Tizzard]], and there’s [[Fiona Fox]] - what are they doing on the panel?’
−
 
 
−
:Well another example is the way in which you have got this great proliferation of organisations which all do the same thing and have the same people in it, but run under a host of different names.
 
  
−
:And perhaps, even more importantly, the way in which they stage debates which claim to be objective and even-handed debates but are totally controlled and managed.  And this is what the Institute of Ideas specialises in.  Where it will…it is very clever, it knows how to get famous names… because it will write to Melvyn Bragg or someone and say, ‘Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming to speak at this conference we are having in six months time - would you like to join them?’ and they say, ‘Oh yes’.  And then they’ll write to Fay Weldon and say ‘Melvyn Bragg, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming’.  Etc. And then they’ll say ‘Unfortunately, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ can’t come, but anyway we have got Melvyn Bragg and Faye Weldon’.  And that is how they operate.  So they get all these names together and everyone thinks ‘Oh look…look at all these big names doing this debate, it has got to be a really good debate’.  And then they will stuff the panels with these network people.  And then you’ll suddenly say ‘Well no, hang on, wait a minute - there’s [[Tony Gilland]], and there’s [[Juliet Tizzard]], and there’s [[Fiona Fox]] - what are they doing on the panel?’
 
  
−
==Associated entities==
+
==Organisations==
−
* [[Academics for Academic Freedom]] - Unqualified free speech
+
===Precursors===
−
* [[Audacity]] - Construction
+
*[[Revolutionary Communist Tendency]] (1977-1981) | [[National Organisation of Revolutionary Communist Students]] 1979 | [[Revolutionary Communist Party]] (1981-1996)| [[The Red Front]] (1987) |  [[Workers Against Racism]] (1978-?) | [[Smash the Prevention of Terrorism Act Campaign]] (1977-early 1980s) | [[Irish Freedom Movement]] (early 1980s to 1993) | ''[[Confrontation]]'', theoretical journal (1986-89) | [[The next step]], review/newspaper (1979-1994) | ''[[Living Marxism]]'' (1988-2000) | [[Ad-hoc Hands Off the Middle East Committee]], 1990 |
−
* [[Big Potatoes]] - Innovation
+
===Companies===
−
* [[Future Cities Project]] (together with [[ManTownHuman]]) - Planning/ architecture
+
The LM network has operated via a series of companies.  At first these were publishing companies, but from the mid 1990s as they branched out into the science communication world and the internet these became for profit companies which often employed significant numbers of LM network associates as well as being used to cross-subsidise other LM network entities.  Companies include (in date order):
−
* [[The Great Debate]] - Debating forum
+
*[[Junius Publications]] (1977-2000) | [[Informinc (LM) Limited]] (1997-2004) | [[JP Graphics Limited]] (1997-2003) | [[Cyberia]] | [[Easynet]] | [[CScape]] | [[Inset Press Limited]] | [[Academy of Ideas]] | [[Cybercafe Limited]] | [[Delta Bravo Limited]] |
−
* [[Institute of Ideas]] (together with [[Battle of Ideas]], [[Culture Wars]] and [[Debating Matters]]) - Debating fora
 
−
* [[Manifesto Club]] - Anti-regulation
 
−
* [[Novo Argumente]] - German online magazine
 
−
* [[Salons]] (Regional) - Debating fora
 
−
* [[Spiked]] (together with [[Young Journalists Academy]]) - online magazine
 
−
* [[Trasna An Domhain Go Leir]] - International analysis
 
−
* [[Voltaire]] - Swedish online magazine
 
−
* [[WORLDwrite]] (together with [[WORLDbytes]]) - International analysis
 
  
−
The LM network appears to have some influence with the [[Genetic Interest Group]], [[Progress]], the [[Science Media Centre]] and [[Sense About Science]].
+
===Defunct associated entities (with years of activity)===
 +
* [[Africa Direct]] 1995-1997
 +
* [[Campaign Against Militarism]] 1993-1998
 +
* [[Channel Cyberia]] 1996-1999
 +
* [[Chew On It Productions]] 2000 (inc. 2006) (dormant)
 +
* [[Culture Wars]] 1999-2013
 +
* [[Engaging Cogs]] 2006-2007
 +
* [[Families for Freedom]] 1996-1999
 +
* [[Feminists for Justice]] 1998-2000
 +
* [[Freedom & Law]] Active 1997
 +
* [[Genderwatch]] 1996-1999
 +
* [[Global Futures]] launched 2002 (dormant)
 +
* [[Inter-Generation]] launched 2009 {dormant}
 +
* [[Internet Freedom]] 1998-2006
 +
* [[Libero]] 1997-2000
 +
* [[Litigious Society]] launched 1999 by [[Global Futures]]
 +
* [[London International Research Exchange]] 1994-1998
 +
* [[Maverick Club]] 1998-2002
 +
* [[ME-WE]] 2003-2005
 +
* [[Modern Movement]] active 2009
 +
* [[Parents Against the Charter]] active 1991
 +
* [[The Progress Club]] 2001 (dormant)
 +
* [[Transport Research Group]] 2000-2008
 +
* [[Trasna An Domhain Go Leir]] 1999-2003
 +
* [[Workers Against Racism]] 1980-1994
  
−
==Defunct associated entities==
+
===Active associated entities (with year of launch)===
−
* [[Africa Direct]]
+
* [[Academics for Academic Freedom]] 2007 together with [[Student Academics For Academic Freedom]] 2007 - Unqualified free speech
−
* [[Campaign Against Militarism]]  
+
* [[Audacity]] 2000 - Construction
−
* [[Campaign for Internet Freedom]]
+
* [[Big Potatoes]] 2010 - Innovation
−
* [[Channel Cyberia]]
+
* [[Centre for Parenting Culture Studies]] 2007 - Academic network
−
* [[Families for Freedom]]
+
* [[East London Science School]] 2013 - School
−
* [[Feminists for Justice]]
+
* [[Fans For Freedom]] 2012 - Anti-regulation
−
* [[Freedom & Law]]
+
* [[Freedom in a Puritan Age]] 2009 - online magazine (loose association)
−
* [[Global Futures]] (dormant)
+
* [[Future Cities Project]] 2006 (together with [[Bookshop Barnies]] 2005 and [[ManTownHuman]] 2008) - Planning/ architecture
−
* [[Internet Freedom]]
+
* [[Generation Youth Issues]] 2007 - Children and young people's peer relations
−
* [[Irish Freedom Movement]]
+
* [[Hands Off The Human Footprint!]] 2009 - 2010 (inactive) anti-environmentalist
−
* [[Libero]]
+
* [[Institute of Ideas]] 2000 (together with [[Battle of Ideas]] 2005, [[Debating Matters]] 2003 and [[Global Uncertainties Schools Network]] 2010) - Debating fora
−
* [[London International Research Exchange]]
+
* [[Manifesto Club]] 2006 - Anti-regulation
−
* [[Modern Movement]]
+
* [[Novo Argumente]] 1992 - German online magazine (sister organisation)
−
* [[Transport Research Group]]
+
* [[Parents With Attitude]] 2002 - Debating website
−
* [[Workers Against Racism]]
+
* [[Pro-Choice Forum]] 1997 - Abortion studies
 +
* [[Salons]] (Regional) 2005 - Debating fora
 +
* [[Spiked]] 2000 (together with [[Young Journalists Academy]] 2006 and [[free speech NOW!]] 2014) - online magazine
 +
* [[Take a Liberty (Scotland)]] 2010 - Anti-regulation
 +
* [[WORLDwrite]] 1991 (together with [[WORLDbytes]] 2008) - Current affairs/ media training
  
−
Any information on The Litigious Society, Parents Against the Charter, or other past or present LM/ RCP initiatives would be gratefully received.
 
  
−
==Resources==
+
The LM network appears to have some influence with the [[Genetic Interest Group]], the [[Progress Educational Trust]], the [[Science Media Centre]] and [[Sense About Science]].  It also has links with [[The Free Society]] which uses as columnists LM associates [[Suzy Dean]], [[Claire Fox]] and [[Dennis Hayes]], carries articles by LM associates [[Dolan Cummings]], [[Shirley Dent]] and [[Tim Black]] and maintains front page links with LM entities the Future Cities Project, Institute of Ideas and Spiked <ref>"[http://www.thefreesociety.org/ Think Tanks/ Media]", The Free Society website, accessed 31 May 2010</ref>. The Free Society has as its policy director ex Tory MSP and hard right ex Chairman of the now disbanded [[Federation of Conservative Students]], [[Brian Monteith]].  The other principal organisations involved in the Society are the tobacco industry lobbyists [[FOREST]] and the right wing think tank the [[Adam Smith Institute]].  The Free Society was a partner of the 2008 Battle of Ideas.
  
−
* Andy Beckett, '[http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,295888,00.html Licence to rile]', ''The Guardian'', 15 May 1999.
+
Information on these or other past or present LM/ RCP initiatives gratefully received.
−
* Chris Bunting, '[http://www.thes.co.uk/current_edition/story.aspx?story_id=2019189 What's a nice Trot doing in a place like this]', ''Times Higher Education Supplement", 28 January 2005 (log-in required).
 
−
* [[James Heartfield]], '[http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/dec/20/mainsection.global Dave Hallsworth]' Obituary, ''Guardian,'' 20 December 2007
 
−
* Lobbywatch, [http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3876:interview-with-monbiot-on-the-lm-group Interview with George Monbiot about the LM group], 11 April 2007, archived on GMWatch website
 
−
* John McVicar, [http://www.truefacts.co.uk/articles/a0012.html The Scoop that Folded a Magazine] ''Punch,'' 29 May 2000.
 
−
* Don Milligan, [http://www.donmilligan.net Radical Amnesia and the RCP,] ''Reflections of a Renegade,'' January 8, 2008.
 
−
*George Monbiot, '[http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1102753,00.html Invasion of the Entryists]', ''Guardian'' (UK), Tuesday December 9, 2003.*David Pallister, John Vidal and Kevin Maguire, '[http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,341054,00.html Life after Living Marxism: Fighting for freedom - to offend, outrage and question everything]", ''Guardian'' (UK), Saturday July 8, 2000.
 
−
* Dave Renton [http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/living_marxism_rcp_spiked_online.html Living Marxism, spiked online and the RCP] ''Temporary Hoarding'', 4/8 March 2006.
 
−
*Andy Rowell, "[http://www.lobbywatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=91&page=1 LobbyWatch: SMC complaint]", April 2007. (This is an edited version of a submission made by Andy Rowell to the board of the Science Media Centre).
 
−
* Andy Rowell and Bob Burton, &#8220;[http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2003Q1/gm.html Rising Rhetoric on Genetically Modified Crops], ''PR Watch'', Volume 10 No 1, First quarter 2003.
 
−
* Andy Rowell and Jonathan Matthews, "[http://ngin.tripod.com/190303d.htm Strange Bedfellows]", ''The Ecologist'', May 2003
 
−
* Mike Small, '[http://web.archive.org/web/20070420054944/http://www.variant.randomstate.org/24texts/lmnetwork.html The Faction That Fools the World]' ''Variant'' Issue 24, Winter 2005, version placed in web archive 20 April 2007
 
−
* George Monbiot, "[http://www.lobbywatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=52&page=1 Freedom for whom?]" Times Higher Education Supplement, 11 February 2005.
 
−
* Usenet [http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=35250ced.26554211%40news5.newscene.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl1254803282d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26selm%3D35250ced.26554211%2540news5.newscene.com Discussion of RCP/LM front groups], from usenet, April 1998.
 
−
* Dave Walker [http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/Newint/Rcp.html Libertarian Humanism or Critical Utopianism? The Demise of the Revolutionary Communist Party]  New Interventions, Vol.8 No.3, 1998
 
−
* Martin J Walker, "[http://www.zero-risk.org/thebook.htm Brave New World of Zero Risk: Covert Strategy in British Science Policy]" (book), Slingshot Publications, 2006.
 
−
*[[David Webb]], '[http://realtoryism.conforums3.com/index.cgi?board=essays&action=display&num=1113685116 Liberalism - Let's Spike It!]", Part 2, Thread started on: Apr 16th, 2005, 4:58pm Originally published in the ''[[Salisbury Review]]'' Vol 21 No 4, June 2003, pp.25-28.
 
−
*David Webb, '[http://realtoryism.conforums3.com/index.cgi?board=essays&action=display&num=1113685188 Liberalism - Let's Spike It!]", Part 2, Thread started on: Apr 16th, 2005, 4:59pm Originally published in the ''[[Salisbury Review]]'' Vol 21 No 4, June 2003, pp.25-28.
 
−
*David Webb, '[http://realtoryism.conforums3.com/index.cgi?board=essays&action=display&num=1113685229 Liberalism - Let's Spike It!]", Part 3, Thread started on: Apr 16th, 2005, 5:00pm Originally published in the ''[[Salisbury Review]]'' Vol 21 No 4, June 2003, pp.25-28.
 
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:GM]][[Category:Pro-GM Lobbyists]][[Category:GM Lobby Groups]][[Category:Biotechnology]][[Category:Corporate Science]][[Category:LM network]]
 
[[Category:GM]][[Category:Pro-GM Lobbyists]][[Category:GM Lobby Groups]][[Category:Biotechnology]][[Category:Corporate Science]][[Category:LM network]]

Latest revision as of 21:27, 25 October 2014

LM network resources

The LM network or LM group is a superficially loose and informal network of individuals and organisations sharing a libertarian and anti-environmentalist ideology. Its constituent organisations are led and largely composed of people associated with the defunct Revolutionary Communist Tendency/Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) and its principal publication Living Marxism. The network has no public presence or acknowledged existence. The strongest link is between the largest and longest established entities, Spiked and the Institute of Ideas, both established in 2000 by close associates and for many years operating from the same address, Signet House 49-51 Farringdon Road EC1M 3JB, previously the offices of Living Marxism [1]. Thus Patrick Hayes affirms in his twitter profile "I work for spiked www.spiked-online.com and the Institute of Ideas www.instituteofideas.com...". [2] Associated entities typically have overlapping personnel, similar themes, views and techniques, and promote one another. The network's funds and staff numbers are relatively limited as is its influence. Perhaps of most concern are those LM associates who have obtained influential positions with other organisations and the network’s extensive youth oriented programmes.

The rationale for profiling the LM network on Powerbase is not any one of its main characteristics but rather their combination; these being: advocating policies which benefit corporate interests, as set out by the Institute of Ideas, corporate funding, a significant focus on influencing youth; the number of organisations it operates; and a lack of transparency about its origins, methods, scope and purpose. This profile is necessarily extensive and detailed because of the network's disparate nature and the lack of formal public links between its entities.

The first edition of Living Marxism, November 1988, edited by Mick Hume.


The logo of LM Magazine after it changed its name from Living Marxism at issue 97 in February 1997.[3]

Methods

The Institute of Ideas’ Director Claire Fox concedes, ‘Certainly, there is a network of like-minded people. Some people do come from an RCP background, because we have a long intellectual history together, and we do work together sometimes…’[4] Former editor of LM and Spiked and continuing Spiked contributor Mick Hume confirms, ‘The network of people I live and work with contain lots of people who were members of the RCP.’[5] while Spiked and Institute of Ideas contributor Dolan Cummings explains ‘I never left the RCP: the organisation folded in the mid-Nineties, but few of us actually 'recanted' our ideas. Instead we resolved to support one another more informally as we pursued our political tradition as individuals, or launched new projects with more general aims that have also engaged people from different traditions, or none. These include Spiked and the Institute of Ideas... ‘[6]

Living Marxism logo circa January 1997 from their website www.junius.co.uk

In his statement announcing the closure of LM magazine in spring 2000, LM editor Mick Hume promised that “The LM-initiated Institute of Ideas, a series of events planned to take place from June to July, will go ahead in partnership with major institutions in London, including the British Library, the Royal Institution, the Royal Shakespeare Company, the Royal Society of Arts, Tate Modern, and the Union Chapel Project. A new company, the Academy of Ideas, has been set up by Claire Fox to coordinate these events.”

He also stated that “As for the post-LM future of magazine publishing, watch this space”. Mick Hume was the first editor of Spiked, launched shortly afterwards.

Many of the organisational and campaigning approaches used by those in the network are characteristic of those used by the RCP, including: the creation of a range of organisations without apparent formal links; the launching of multiple campaigns; the use of extensive and extended debate; the adoption of contrarian and controversial positions; the use of martial terminology; and the early adoption of leading edge communication techniques.

A defining characteristic of the network’s entities are their positioning and presentation as catalysts for debate or irreverent challenging of established orthodoxy. In practice, this enables the promotion of the views of the network and its sponsors on almost any topic, under the guise of free enquiry. Their principal underlying themes of economic development and freedom from regulation benefit corporate interests while the larger and more established organisations explicitly seek sponsorship, either directly or via PR companies or free enterprise think tanks. Several of the entities target young people, while others are sector or issue led. The network's entities are increasingly seeking partners overseas.

Individual ex-RCP members with links to the network have assumed influential positions elsewhere, particularly in the media and sciences. Members of the network write regularly for mainstream news publications, particularly the Independent, which publishes an occasional series of Battle of Ideas thought pieces, Prospect and Huffington Post (UK) and appear on topical radio programmes, notably the Moral Maze.

However, higher education is the most common occupational sector of associated personnel. Many have past or current links with the adjacent Universities of Kent, Canterbury Christ Church, Sussex and East London. Their influence on the latter is particularly evident in UEL units London East Research Institute and Rising East. Details of some of those associated with the LM network are available via LM network at the bottom of this page.

An example of how the network operates was when LM associates James Heartfield and James Woudhuysen set up a building industry consultancy Audacity [7] and sought funding from building companies [8]. The consultancy then published Heartfield’s book ‘Let’s Build’ calling for government support for the building industry [9]. Heartfield’s book was then promoted across part of the rest of the network: Birmingham Salon [10], Spiked [11] and WORLDbytes. [12]

Internet Freedom, a project of the LM network
Libero, a project of the LM network
Transport Research Group, a project of the LM network
The Institute of Ideas: an LM project. Image from the LM website @ www.informinc.co.uk circa 2000 promoting the first Institute of Ideas event in June/July 2000[13]
Institute of Ideas, at the core of the LM network
Battle of Ideas, a project of the Institute of Ideas, part of the LM network
The Academy, a project of the Institute of Ideas, a core element of the LM network
Battle of Ideas banner noting the funding of the LM network by pharma giant Pfizer, BT and Rupert Murdoch's newspaper The Times.
Culture Wars, a project of the Institute of Ideas, a core element of the LM network
Debating Matters a project of the Institute of Ideas a core element of the LM network
Global Uncertainties Schools Network a project of Debating Matters which is in turn part of the Institute of Ideas a core element of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network
Salons, projects of the LM network


Academics for Academic Freedom and LM network associate.
Student Academics for Academic Freedom the student equivalent of Academics for Academic Freedom a project of the LM network
Manifesto Club part of the LM network
Logo of the Maverick Club, circa 2000, a part of the LM network
Logo of Spiked, a core element of the LM network, circa 2011.
Young Journalists Academy is a project of Journalism Education Limited launched by Spiked a core part of the LM network
Novo Argumente the German magazine affiliated with the LM network
Hands Off The Human Footprint a Spiked campaign, part of the LM network
The one and only Modern Movement demo - a counter to the protests against the third Heathrow runway in February 2009.
Audacity, an LM network project
Big Potatoes part of the LM network
Engaging Cogs, an LM network project
Future Cities Project, associated with the LM network
Global Futures, an LM network venture
ManTownHuman a project of the LM network
Centre for Parenting Culture Studies, associated with the LM network
Generation Youth Issues, a project of the LM network
Parents With Attitude, associated with the LM network
Pro-Choice Forum, part of the LM network


Worldwrite, part of the LM network
Worldbytes part of WORLDWrite, a project of the LM network
Easynet, started by LM network associate Keith Teare
Cyberia a business set up by LM network associate Keith Teare
The logo of the East London Science School the first venture of the LM network into running an educational establishment


Funding

None of the organisations associated with the LM network provides a breakdown of funders and how much they have provided. We do know, however, that they are funded by corporations that fund think tanks dedicated to promoting their interests in the political and media spheres. For example, the pharmaceutical company Pfizer has funded Spiked, the Institute of Ideas' Battle of Ideas in 2005 and 2006, the Debating Matters programme and two organisations with which the LM network has connections, the Science Media Centre and Sense About Science. Both of the latter are engaged in managing debate about scientific issues.

As well as funding the LM network, Pfizer funds free market think tanks such as the US-based Competitive Enterprise Institute and Cato Institute, the Netherlands-based Edmund Burke Foundation, the Brussels based Centre for the New Europe (which also does work on climate funded by Exxon), the UK’s Social Market Foundation and the American Council on Science and Health, a deceptive front group. [14] Pfizer is a member of one of the most important global corporate lobby groups, the International Chamber of Commerce. [15] What’s in it for Pfizer? One clue is in the topics covered by the Debating Matters schools debating competition which include such subjects of interest to the pharmaceutical industry as: the value or otherwise of complementary medicine, NHS rationing of expensive drugs, clinical trials in developing countries, fertility treatments, genetic screening, anti-aging treatments, genetic engineering and animal experimentation.

BT is another major sponsor of the LM network. BT sponsored the Battle of Ideas in 2006, 2007 and 2008. In addition, then BT subsidiary O2 sponsored five Spiked Debates during 2005, 2006 and 2007[16] while another was sponsored by Orange. The Mobile Operators Association is also on record as having funded Spiked. In return, BT/ O2 and other operators had the opportunity via Spiked to challenge public concerns about the perceived effects on health, child protection and the environment of mobile phones.

Other corporations and corporate lobby groups that have funded the LM network are Cadbury Schweppes, IBM, Novartis, Orange, O2, The Mobile Operators Association and the Society of the Chemical Industry. [17] These sources of funding are typical of lobbying or PR firms. Unsurprisingly, some of the biggest lobby firms also fund the network. Hill and Knowlton is one of the most controversial lobbying and PR firms in the world, having famously been behind the deception on the incubator baby story in Kuwait in 1990/91. It also worked for a long list of controversial corporations, including some from the oil, tobacco, pharma, fast food, and GM industry. It worked too for repressive regimes, including Egypt, Haiti, Indonesia, Morocco, Turkey – and China after the Tiananmen square massacre. Along with PR firm Luther Pendragon (which has worked for the Hinduja brothers, Macdonalds, Pepsi, the GM industry and others), Hill and Knowlton has put up cash for LM network events.

The LM network has also worked with other free market think tanks such as the International Policy Network (which took money from Exxon for climate change ’outreach’) and the Social Issues Research Centre (which takes money from the food, alcohol and tech industry and downplays the risks from their products). [18]

Comment by George Monbiot

The following is an excerpt from an interview by Lobbywatch with George Monbiot about the LM network:[19]

Lobbywatch: Do you actually think there is a network of people concertedly working together as this LM group?
George Monbiot: That is a good question and I think it could be answered in several different ways. There is a group of people who have more or less stuck together for a long time. To what extent they consciously organise under a single name or under a single banner, I don’t know - you would have to ask them. But that they have pursued a very consistent agenda for quite a long time and the fact that they have moved first of all into one industry, television, and then into another, science communication, more or less as a body, suggests to me that there is a coordinated programme of action.
Lobbywatch: We all have networks of people that we interact with. What makes this so different? Why do you find it so worrying?
George Monbiot: There are two reasons why I find it worrying. The first is that the agenda they pursue appears not to be pursued overtly. For example, when they ran the magazine Living Marxism it was very far from a Marxism journal - it was just about as far from a Marxist journal as you could possibly get. And it seemed to me that the title was a direct and deliberate attempt to distract attention from the fact that this was a far right wing libertarian publication which was using the terms of the left to make it look as if the positions it was taking were new and unusual ones. Whereas in actual fact they were very well trodden ones, but well trodden by people like the Libertarian Alliance who in theory were at the other end of the political spectrum.

In another part of the interview, Monbiot talks about the LM network's lack of transparency and their fondness for ostensibly objective debates:

Lobbywatch: Could you give more examples really of how you see them as not being as transparent as they might be? ...
George Monbiot: The idea of them sitting behind what appears to be a front? Well another example is the way in which you have got this great proliferation of organisations which all do the same thing and have the same people in it, but run under a host of different names. And perhaps, even more importantly, the way in which they stage debates which claim to be objective and even-handed debates but are totally controlled and managed. And this is what the Institute of Ideas specialises in. Where it will…it is very clever, it knows how to get famous names… because it will write to Melvyn Bragg or someone and say, ‘Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming to speak at this conference we are having in six months time - would you like to join them?’ and they say, ‘Oh yes’. And then they’ll write to Fay Weldon and say ‘Melvyn Bragg, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ are coming’. Etc. And then they’ll say ‘Unfortunately, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and Jesus Christ can’t come, but anyway we have got Melvyn Bragg and Faye Weldon’. And that is how they operate. So they get all these names together and everyone thinks ‘Oh look…look at all these big names doing this debate, it has got to be a really good debate’. And then they will stuff the panels with these network people. And then you’ll suddenly say ‘Well no, hang on, wait a minute - there’s Tony Gilland, and there’s Juliet Tizzard, and there’s Fiona Fox - what are they doing on the panel?’


Organisations

Precursors

Companies

The LM network has operated via a series of companies. At first these were publishing companies, but from the mid 1990s as they branched out into the science communication world and the internet these became for profit companies which often employed significant numbers of LM network associates as well as being used to cross-subsidise other LM network entities. Companies include (in date order):

Defunct associated entities (with years of activity)

Active associated entities (with year of launch)


The LM network appears to have some influence with the Genetic Interest Group, the Progress Educational Trust, the Science Media Centre and Sense About Science. It also has links with The Free Society which uses as columnists LM associates Suzy Dean, Claire Fox and Dennis Hayes, carries articles by LM associates Dolan Cummings, Shirley Dent and Tim Black and maintains front page links with LM entities the Future Cities Project, Institute of Ideas and Spiked [20]. The Free Society has as its policy director ex Tory MSP and hard right ex Chairman of the now disbanded Federation of Conservative Students, Brian Monteith. The other principal organisations involved in the Society are the tobacco industry lobbyists FOREST and the right wing think tank the Adam Smith Institute. The Free Society was a partner of the 2008 Battle of Ideas.

Information on these or other past or present LM/ RCP initiatives gratefully received.

Notes

  1. ↑ ”LM Magazine” Local Life website accessed 7th June 2010
  2. ↑ P Hayes Twitter website acc 29 Oct 2011
  3. ↑ 'Welcome to the new-look LM', LM, February 1997, retrieved from the Internet Archive of 18 February 1998, accessed 27 October 2010
  4. ↑ Chris Bunting, What's a nice Trot doing in a place like this?, Times Higher Education, 28 Jan 2005, acc 21 May 2010
  5. ↑ Andy Beckett, Licence to rile, The Guardian, 15 May 1999, acc 21 May 2010
  6. ↑ Dolan Cummings, In defence of ‘radicalisation’: Critiques of Hizb ut-Tahrir focus less on its dodgy politics than on its intellectualism. But what’s wrong with a devotion to the debate of ideas?, Spiked, 12 Oct 2007, acc 21 May 2010
  7. ↑ "People" Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010
  8. ↑ "We need your support", Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010
  9. ↑ "Buy" Audacity website, accessed 5 June 2010
  10. ↑ "Let’s Build event 8th June 2010", Birmingham Salon website, accessed 5 June 2010
  11. ↑ "We need more houses, not divisive housing policies" Spiked website, accessed 5 June 2010
  12. ↑ "Programme 7 Audacity Director Ian Abley on planning laws" WORLDbytes website, accessed 5 June 2010
  13. ↑ Retrieved from the Internet Archive the LM website of 7 February 2000
  14. ↑ "American Council on Science and Health", BMJ website, accessed 3 May 2010
  15. ↑ "Links to ICC member companies", International Chamber of Commerce website, accessed 3 May 2010
  16. ↑ "Online debates", Spiked website, accessed 7 June 2010
  17. ↑ "Spiked Brand Managers’ Pack", Spiked website, accessed 8 May 2010
  18. ↑ "The Social Issues Research Centre", BMJ website, accessed 3 May 2010
  19. ↑ Lobbywatch, Interview with George Monbiot about the LM group, 11 April 2007, archived on GMWatch website, accessed 21 May 2010
  20. ↑ "Think Tanks/ Media", The Free Society website, accessed 31 May 2010
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=LM_network&oldid=201349"