Difference between revisions of "Stockholm Network"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 64: Line 64:
  
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">"As far as I can see this is the end of the Stockholm Network as a network for European free market think tanks. It might however be the opening attempt at some sort of consultancy… Whatever, the whole thing is totally —— up: big time."<ref>Singleton, A. 19 January 2009. Telegraph. [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/8145947/freemarket_network_demands_bailout_for_pharmaceutical_industry/ Free-market network demands bail-out for pharmaceutical industry] Accessed 10 April 2010.</ref></blockquote>
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">"As far as I can see this is the end of the Stockholm Network as a network for European free market think tanks. It might however be the opening attempt at some sort of consultancy… Whatever, the whole thing is totally —— up: big time."<ref>Singleton, A. 19 January 2009. Telegraph. [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/8145947/freemarket_network_demands_bailout_for_pharmaceutical_industry/ Free-market network demands bail-out for pharmaceutical industry] Accessed 10 April 2010.</ref></blockquote>
 +
 +
==The Science-Democracy Debate==
 +
 +
In 2005, the [[Stockholm Network]] co-sponsored the ‘Westminster Fringe Debate’ with the motion “Democratisation of science would not be in the public interest”. According to the organisers:
 +
 +
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">“Science is driven by curiosity. Would any attempt to put that under greater public scrutiny deaden scientific inquiry or must scientists now come to terms with the fears and priorities of society at large? And is public accountability a meaningful concept in science? Scientists may not know what they are going to discover when they start experimenting or to what use it may ultimately be put. Are the public qualified to determine the priorities of scientific research? Is that untrammelled freedom for science out of date and dangerous?”<ref>Saunders, P. 4 April 2005. Institute of Science in Society. [http://www.i-sis.org.uk/SciencevsDemocracy.php Science versus Democracy?] Accessed 17 April 2010</ref></blockquote>
 +
 +
[[Lord Dick Taverne]] from [[Sense About Science]] and [[Colin Blakemore]], who was Chief Executive of the UK [[ Medical Research Council]] (MRC) at the time, supported the motion which was carried.<ref>Saunders, P. 4 April 2005. Institute of Science in Society. [http://www.i-sis.org.uk/SciencevsDemocracy.php Science versus Democracy?] Accessed 17 April 2010</ref>
 +
 +
==Links to American Organisations==
 +
 +
The Stockholm Network is listed on the website for the [[Atlas Economic Research Foundation]] <ref> Atlas Economic Research Foundation]. [http://atlasnetwork.org/for-think-tanks/free-market-think-tank-links/ Freemarket Think Tanks] Accessed 17 April 2010.</ref>, an American organisation based near Washington that “serves as a catalyst and connector to link free-market organizations and individuals to the ideas, people and resources they need to promote a free society.”<ref> Atlas Economic Research Foundation. [http://atlasnetwork.org/about/about-atlas-mission-vision/ Mission & Vision] Accessed 17 April 2010.</ref>
  
 
==Contact, References and Resources==
 
==Contact, References and Resources==

Revision as of 13:48, 17 April 2010

The Stockholm Network is a working group of more than 120 market-oriented think tanks from across Europe. It calls itself "a one-stop shop for organisations seeking to work with Europe’s brightest policymakers and thinkers" and claims to have "the capacity to deliver local messages and locally-tailored global messages across the EU and beyond."[1] The network churns out thousands of op-eds in the "high-quality European press", produces hundreds of publications and holds several conferences, seminars and meetings to "influence many millions of Europeans every year." [2]

Writing in The Times in December 2005, Paul Staines wrote that the Stockholm Network, "turns out to be in fact the public face of Market House International, a PR consultancy that tells corporate clients that the network gives it 'local capacity to deliver both local messages and locally tailored global messages in a wide range of countries'." [3]

Aims and Policy Issues

The Network is described as a forum for "sharing, exchanging and developing pan-European research and best practice." In order to promote ideas to stimulate economic growth, the Stockholm Network concentrates on the following policy issues:

  • Reforming European welfare states and creating a more flexible labour market
  • Updating European pension systems to empower individuals
  • Ensuring more consumer-driven healthcare, through reform of European health systems and markets
  • Encouraging an informed debate on intellectual property rights as an incentive to innovate and develop new knowledge in the future, whilst ensuring wide public access to such products in the present
  • Reforming European energy markets to ensure the most beneficial balance between economic growth and environmental quality
  • Emphasising the benefits of globalisation, trade and competition and creating an understanding of free market ideas and institutions[4]

History

The Stockholm Network was founded in September 1997 by Helen Disney, [5] a British journalist and policy specialist, and initially managed by the Swedish think tank, Timbro. It later became part of Civitas, which was formerly known as the Health and Welfare Unit of the Institute for Economic Affairs. It has been independently run since 2004. [6] Early aims (which extend to present day) were:

"to find an efficient method of connecting like-minded policymakers and thinkers; to encourage collaboration on joint research projects in order to share the most successful policy innovations and arguments more widely; and to ensure a wider audience and a more co-ordinated approach to the dissemination of market-oriented ideas within Europe and beyond its borders."[7]

Funding

According to its website, the Stockholm Network receives funding from a variety of individuals, corporations, trade associations and foundations:

’A mixture of for-profit and not-for-profit organisations, some SN supporters are large global enterprises, while others are small or medium in size. Subscriptions from individuals, commercial enterprises, and a range of NGOs make up the bulk of our funding. We also derive a small income from the sale of our publications and research materials to the public, bookshops, government agencies and private companies. Corporate subscribers come from a wide range of sectors that currently include information technology, energy, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, entertainment, public affairs, and insurers.’[8]

Funders, however, ‘do not have a veto over the outcome of Stockholm Network research or any influence over its media output.’ The network maintains that it does not accept payments intended to ‘purchase’ prearranged research outcomes. It also insists it is not a ‘front group’ for other organisations or individuals and that contributors are listed in full on its annual report and website. [9]

The British connection

The network was founded in London and Stockholm, though it is operated out of London and has a large contingent of UK members. These are:

Adam Smith Institute | Centre for European Reform | Centre for Policy Studies | Centre for Research into Post-Communist Economies | CIVITAS | David Hume Institute | E.G. West Centre | Hayek Society | Institute of Economic Affairs | International Policy Network | Libertarian Alliance | Nurses for Reform | Open Europe | Policy Exchange | Policy Institute | Politeia | Project Empowerment | Reform | Social Affairs Unit | Globalization Institute

Some of these organisations are listed as part of the British conservative movement, Movement Conservatism, including the Institute of Economic Affairs, Reform, the Adam Smith Institute, Policy Exchange, Civitas, International Policy Network.[10]

Members

People

The Stockholm Network does not have a board and is owned and run by Helen Disney

Personnel

Health and Welfare Programme

The Stockholm Network's Health and Welfare Programme was set up at the end of 2005. Key aims and objectives include:[11]

  • Providing a comprehensive resource on European think tank initiatives in the field of Health and Welfare
  • Promoting competition and choice in healthcare, through reform of European health systems and markets
  • Promoting more flexible labour markets in Europe
  • Promoting market oriented reform of Europe's failing pensions systems

'The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions'

In 2009, the Stockholm Network published a reported, The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions, calling for the UK Government to fund the pharmaceutical industry. According to the publication written by Ross Carroll and Stuart Carroll, ‘[A] lack of government investment is another factor adversely affecting the UK pharmaceutical industry.’[12] The report, which was a part of the ‘Stockholm Network Experts’ Series’, also called a reduction in the rate of UK corporation tax; tax credits for new product introduction and technological development; and the simplification of ‘taxation rules and reduce the burden of complex legislation and regulation through the utilisation of cutting-edge approaches.’ [13] The publication was allegedly criticised by other free-market think tanks. According to emails seen by the Telegraph, the head of one said: “The whole thing is mad. I cannot imagine any free market think tank now being able to stay in membership [of the Stockholm Network].” Another claimed:

"As far as I can see this is the end of the Stockholm Network as a network for European free market think tanks. It might however be the opening attempt at some sort of consultancy… Whatever, the whole thing is totally —— up: big time."[14]

The Science-Democracy Debate

In 2005, the Stockholm Network co-sponsored the ‘Westminster Fringe Debate’ with the motion “Democratisation of science would not be in the public interest”. According to the organisers:

“Science is driven by curiosity. Would any attempt to put that under greater public scrutiny deaden scientific inquiry or must scientists now come to terms with the fears and priorities of society at large? And is public accountability a meaningful concept in science? Scientists may not know what they are going to discover when they start experimenting or to what use it may ultimately be put. Are the public qualified to determine the priorities of scientific research? Is that untrammelled freedom for science out of date and dangerous?”[15]

Lord Dick Taverne from Sense About Science and Colin Blakemore, who was Chief Executive of the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) at the time, supported the motion which was carried.[16]

Links to American Organisations

The Stockholm Network is listed on the website for the Atlas Economic Research Foundation [17], an American organisation based near Washington that “serves as a catalyst and connector to link free-market organizations and individuals to the ideas, people and resources they need to promote a free society.”[18]

Contact, References and Resources

Contact information

35 Britannia Row
London, N1 8QH
United Kingdom
Email: info@ stockholm-network.org
Phone: +44 (0)20 7354 8888
Fax: +44 (0)20 7359 8888
Web: www.stockholm-network.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stockholm-Network/135765338804

External links

References

  1. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: FAQs Accessed 9 April 2010.
  2. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: About Us Accessed 9 April 2010.
  3. ↑ Paul Staines, You want policy? In cash?', The Times (London), 20 December 2005, Page 19.
  4. ↑ Stockholm Network Stockholm Network: Policy Issues Accessed 9 April 2010.
  5. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: FAQs Accessed 9 April 2010.
  6. ↑ Corporate Europe Observatory. Covert industry funding fuels the expansion of radical rightwing EU think tanks Accessed 9 April 2010.
  7. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: FAQs Accessed 9 April 2010.
  8. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: FAQs Accessed 9 April 2010.
  9. ↑ Stockholm Network. Stockholm Network: FAQs Accessed 9 April 2010.
  10. ↑ Tim Montgomerie, The growth of Britain's conservative movement, ConservativeHome, 14 March 2009.
  11. ↑ Stockholm Networks. Health and Welfare Accessed 8 April 2010.
  12. ↑ Carroll, R. and Carroll, S. (2009). The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions. The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions Accessed 10 April 2010.
  13. ↑ Carroll, R. and Carroll, S. (2009). The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions. The UK Pharmaceutical Industry: Current Challenges and Future Solutions Accessed 10 April 2010.
  14. ↑ Singleton, A. 19 January 2009. Telegraph. Free-market network demands bail-out for pharmaceutical industry Accessed 10 April 2010.
  15. ↑ Saunders, P. 4 April 2005. Institute of Science in Society. Science versus Democracy? Accessed 17 April 2010
  16. ↑ Saunders, P. 4 April 2005. Institute of Science in Society. Science versus Democracy? Accessed 17 April 2010
  17. ↑ Atlas Economic Research Foundation]. Freemarket Think Tanks Accessed 17 April 2010.
  18. ↑ Atlas Economic Research Foundation. Mission & Vision Accessed 17 April 2010.
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Stockholm_Network&oldid=115191"