Difference between revisions of "Red Tape Initiative"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Brexit lobbying: typos code fix)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Activity==
 
==Activity==
Beginning in April 2017, the initiative plans to launch around 10 sector-based inquiries. These inquiries will 'seek views on what EU constraints could be jettisoned in the interests of boosting productivity'.<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>
+
Beginning in April 2017, the initiative says it plans to launch around 10 sector-based inquiries. These inquiries will 'seek views on what EU constraints could be jettisoned in the interests of boosting productivity'.<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>
  
The first sectors to be looked at are, or are likely to be:<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>
+
The plan is that senior figures from a sector are brought together, with the help of business lobby groups like the [[CBI]], [[British Chambers of Commerce]], [[Institute of Directors]] and others like the [[TUC]]. These sector experts will then draw up a 'wish list of regulatory and legislative changes after Brexit'. These are then sent to the Initiative's legal team (working pro bono), before making their way to a cross-party political advisory panel where hopefully a consensus can be reached on the merits of the proposals.<ref>[https://www.politico.eu/article/the-other-uk-brexit-department/ The other UK Brexit department], Politico, July 12, 2016</ref>
 +
 
 +
The first sectors to be looked at are:<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>
 
*housebuilding, beginning in June 2017 with an 'industry-sector panel with input from various groups including the [[TUC]], [[CBI]] and the [[Home Builders Federation]]. It is expected to conclude early in 2018.
 
*housebuilding, beginning in June 2017 with an 'industry-sector panel with input from various groups including the [[TUC]], [[CBI]] and the [[Home Builders Federation]]. It is expected to conclude early in 2018.
 
*infrastructure construction
 
*infrastructure construction
 
*training and apprenticeships.
 
*training and apprenticeships.
  
==Relationship with Brexit==
+
==Brexit lobbying==
Letwin says the project will play role between the Great Repeal Bill (that will “repatriate” EU law to this country), and the negotiations required to create new trading terms with the remaining 27 member states. According to Letwin, it is interested in identifying “quick win” burden removals that affect the UK, but are unlikely to be affected by trade negotiations.
+
{{Template:Brexit badge}}Letwin says the project will play a role between the Great Repeal Bill (that will “repatriate” EU law to this country), and the negotiations required to create new trading terms with the remaining 27 member states.  
 +
 
 +
According to Letwin, RTI is interested in identifying “quick win” burden removals that affect the UK, but are unlikely to be affected by trade negotiations. RTI's director [[Nick Tyrone]] added that the Initiative would recommend “things that are too small and technical to be taken into account by the wider Brexit negotiation,” he said, but which “could save millions of pounds to the public purse. Sometimes it could just be a case of taking out three words.<ref>[https://www.politico.eu/article/the-other-uk-brexit-department/ The other UK Brexit department], Politico, July 12, 2016</ref>
  
 
“The aim is to get things prepared, perhaps in time for the commencement of the Brexit negotiations, and the introduction of the Great Reform Bill,” Letwin said. “This will be about things that could be changed quite quickly after that."<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>  
 
“The aim is to get things prepared, perhaps in time for the commencement of the Brexit negotiations, and the introduction of the Great Reform Bill,” Letwin said. “This will be about things that could be changed quite quickly after that."<ref>[https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/letwin-reveals-details-brexit-focused-initiative-cut-red-tape Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape], Civil Service World, 24 April 2017</ref>  
  
 
Business secretary [[Greg Clark]] had written to the initiative, offering the cooperation of staff at the [[Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy]].
 
Business secretary [[Greg Clark]] had written to the initiative, offering the cooperation of staff at the [[Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy]].
 +
 +
==Funding==
 +
According to Politico and Greenpeace's investigative website Unearthed, RTI is funded by a 'small group of donors', including:
 +
*[[Jonathan Marland]], [[David Cameron]]’s former trade envoy, who sits on RTI's management board, gave the group £50,000 in March, before its official launch.
 +
*[[Geoffrey Guy]], chairman at [[GW Pharmaceuticals]], gave RTI £50,000
 +
*[[Public Interest Foundation]], a not-for-profit that backs right-wing think-tanks [[Civitas]] and [[Policy Exchange]], gave £12,000.
 +
*[[Ana Leaf Foundation]], a health charity based in Jersey, gave £50,000. As Unearthed notes: one of the trustees of the [[Ana Leaf Foundation]] is [[Hayley de Putron]], wife of [[Peter de Putron]], a hedge fund boss who has given the [[Conservative Party]] more than £800,000 since sister-in-law [[Andrea Leadsom]] won a seat in Parliament.<ref>[https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2017/07/14/red-tape-initiative-funding/ Who’s funding the Red Tape Initiative?], Unearthed, 14 July 2017</ref>
  
 
==Lobbying connections==
 
==Lobbying connections==
*[[Policy Exchange]]; as George Monbiot pointed out in the Guardian in July 2017, the Red Tape Initiative has numerous links with the [[Policy Exchange]] think tank, or 'neoliberal lobby group funded by dark money' as Monbiot puts it.  
+
 
 +
'''[[Policy Exchange]]'''
 +
<br>As George Monbiot pointed out in the Guardian in July 2017, the Red Tape Initiative has numerous links with the [[Policy Exchange]] think tank, or 'neoliberal lobby group funded by dark money' as Monbiot puts it.  
 
**[[Charles Moore]], RTI advisory board member; former chair of [[Policy Exchange]]. Moore was also best man at [[Oliver Letwin]]’s wedding.
 
**[[Charles Moore]], RTI advisory board member; former chair of [[Policy Exchange]]. Moore was also best man at [[Oliver Letwin]]’s wedding.
 
**[[Archie Norman]], RTI advisory board member; founder of [[Policy Exchange]]. Norman was once Conservative MP for Tunbridge Wells and was succeeded in that seat by [[Greg Clark]], the minister who now provides government support for the Red Tape Initiative.
 
**[[Archie Norman]], RTI advisory board member; founder of [[Policy Exchange]]. Norman was once Conservative MP for Tunbridge Wells and was succeeded in that seat by [[Greg Clark]], the minister who now provides government support for the Red Tape Initiative.
Line 25: Line 38:
 
**Policy Exchange also supplied two of Letwin’s staff in the Conservative policy unit that he used to run.<ref>George Monbiot, [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/05/grenfell-fire-public-inquiry-stitch-up-red-tape-regulation-policy-exchange The Grenfell inquiry will be a stitch-up. Here’s why], Guardian, 5 July 2017</ref>
 
**Policy Exchange also supplied two of Letwin’s staff in the Conservative policy unit that he used to run.<ref>George Monbiot, [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/05/grenfell-fire-public-inquiry-stitch-up-red-tape-regulation-policy-exchange The Grenfell inquiry will be a stitch-up. Here’s why], Guardian, 5 July 2017</ref>
  
*[[Hanbury Strategy]], lobbying firm set up by ex-Conservative adviser [[Ameet Gill]] and Brexit campaigner and former [[British Bankers' Association]] director, [[Paul Stephenson]].
+
'''[[Hanbury Strategy]]'''
 
+
<br>The lobbying firm set up by ex-Conservative adviser [[Ameet Gill]] and Brexit campaigner and former [[British Bankers' Association]] director, [[Paul Stephenson]] was commissioned by RTI in May 2017 to conduct 'in house research' and create a 'series of reports' that will be 'presented to the RTI in order to better inform its own campaign and supplement their own research efforts'.<ref>[http://www.prweek.com/article/1436432/mays-ex-press-aide-joins-hanbury-strategy-agency-bags-brexit-briefs May's ex-press aide joins Hanbury Strategy as agency bags Brexit briefs], PR Week, 14 June 2017</ref>
In May 2017 RTI commissioned lobbying firm [[Hanbury Strategy]] to conduct 'in house research' and create a 'series of reports' that will be 'presented to the RTI in order to better inform its own campaign and supplement their own research efforts'.<ref>[http://www.prweek.com/article/1436432/mays-ex-press-aide-joins-hanbury-strategy-agency-bags-brexit-briefs May's ex-press aide joins Hanbury Strategy as agency bags Brexit briefs], PR Week, 14 June 2017</ref>
 
  
 
According to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointment, which 'approved' the commission, 'throughout the research project, Hanbury will not be working with other organisations and any work done with other organisations by the RTI, will be independent of Hanbury.
 
According to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointment, which 'approved' the commission, 'throughout the research project, Hanbury will not be working with other organisations and any work done with other organisations by the RTI, will be independent of Hanbury.
  
Two of Hanbury's employees work for the RTI.  
+
Two of Hanbury's employees work for the RTI.
  
 
==People==
 
==People==
Line 66: Line 78:
 
*[[Edward Garnier]]
 
*[[Edward Garnier]]
 
*[[Jonathan Fisher]]
 
*[[Jonathan Fisher]]
*[[James Dallas]]
+
*[[James Dallas]], partner at international law firm [[Dentons]], which in early 2017 created a gloabl network of public affairs firms, called [[Nextlaw Global Public Affairs Network]] to help clients 'navigate complex public policy issues', such as 'post-Brexit Europe'.
*[[Jeremy Cape]]
+
*[[Jeremy Cape]], works for law firm [[Squire Patton Boggs]] and is a member of its Brexit team. Writing on the firm's blog, Cape states that [[Oliver Letwin]] 'has stated that the RTI is keen to hear from chief executives of companies big and small'. He then invites people to contact a member of [[Squire Patton Boggs]]' Brexit team 'if you wish to discuss UK deregulation or any other aspect of Brexit'.<ref>[https://www.brexitlegal.com/2017/04/rolling-back-red-tape-in-the-uk/?utm_content=buffere2f89&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer Rolling Back Red Tape in the UK], SPB website, 27 April 2017</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Contacts==
 +
:Website:https://redtapeinitiative.org.uk
 +
:Address: 76 Vincent Square, London, SW1P 2PD
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[Category:Brexit]]
+
[[Category:Brexit]][[Category:Brexit lobby group - Remain]][[Category:Brexit lobby group - Leave]]

Latest revision as of 00:09, 8 February 2018

The Red Tape Initiative was established in December 2016 by Oliver Letwin to identify and cut EU regulations – 'red tape' – that it sees as 'impeding business' as part of the Brexit process.

It describes itself as a 'non-partisan project, bringing together remainers and leavers in all three major UK-wide political parties to forge a consensus on the regulatory changes that could benefit both businesses and their employees in a post-Brexit Britain.'[1]

Activity

Beginning in April 2017, the initiative says it plans to launch around 10 sector-based inquiries. These inquiries will 'seek views on what EU constraints could be jettisoned in the interests of boosting productivity'.[2]

The plan is that senior figures from a sector are brought together, with the help of business lobby groups like the CBI, British Chambers of Commerce, Institute of Directors and others like the TUC. These sector experts will then draw up a 'wish list of regulatory and legislative changes after Brexit'. These are then sent to the Initiative's legal team (working pro bono), before making their way to a cross-party political advisory panel where hopefully a consensus can be reached on the merits of the proposals.[3]

The first sectors to be looked at are:[4]

  • housebuilding, beginning in June 2017 with an 'industry-sector panel with input from various groups including the TUC, CBI and the Home Builders Federation. It is expected to conclude early in 2018.
  • infrastructure construction
  • training and apprenticeships.

Brexit lobbying

Brexit badge.png Part of the Powerbase Brexit Portal.

Letwin says the project will play a role between the Great Repeal Bill (that will “repatriate” EU law to this country), and the negotiations required to create new trading terms with the remaining 27 member states.

According to Letwin, RTI is interested in identifying “quick win” burden removals that affect the UK, but are unlikely to be affected by trade negotiations. RTI's director Nick Tyrone added that the Initiative would recommend “things that are too small and technical to be taken into account by the wider Brexit negotiation,” he said, but which “could save millions of pounds to the public purse. Sometimes it could just be a case of taking out three words.[5]

“The aim is to get things prepared, perhaps in time for the commencement of the Brexit negotiations, and the introduction of the Great Reform Bill,” Letwin said. “This will be about things that could be changed quite quickly after that."[6]

Business secretary Greg Clark had written to the initiative, offering the cooperation of staff at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

Funding

According to Politico and Greenpeace's investigative website Unearthed, RTI is funded by a 'small group of donors', including:

Lobbying connections

Policy Exchange
As George Monbiot pointed out in the Guardian in July 2017, the Red Tape Initiative has numerous links with the Policy Exchange think tank, or 'neoliberal lobby group funded by dark money' as Monbiot puts it.

    • Charles Moore, RTI advisory board member; former chair of Policy Exchange. Moore was also best man at Oliver Letwin’s wedding.
    • Archie Norman, RTI advisory board member; founder of Policy Exchange. Norman was once Conservative MP for Tunbridge Wells and was succeeded in that seat by Greg Clark, the minister who now provides government support for the Red Tape Initiative.
    • Michael Gove, ex-RTI advisory board member (until he was made Environment Secretary in June 2017); appointed by Archie Norman as the first chairman of Policy Exchange (replaced by Moore).
    • Policy Exchange also supplied two of Letwin’s staff in the Conservative policy unit that he used to run.[8]

Hanbury Strategy
The lobbying firm set up by ex-Conservative adviser Ameet Gill and Brexit campaigner and former British Bankers' Association director, Paul Stephenson was commissioned by RTI in May 2017 to conduct 'in house research' and create a 'series of reports' that will be 'presented to the RTI in order to better inform its own campaign and supplement their own research efforts'.[9]

According to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointment, which 'approved' the commission, 'throughout the research project, Hanbury will not be working with other organisations and any work done with other organisations by the RTI, will be independent of Hanbury.

Two of Hanbury's employees work for the RTI.

People

Women are noticably under-represented in the initiative. None of its staff are women; only one of its four board members is a woman; two of its ten advisory board members are women; and there are no women on its legal panel (8 members).

Board

Staff

Advisory Panel

Legal panel

Contacts

Website:https://redtapeinitiative.org.uk
Address: 76 Vincent Square, London, SW1P 2PD

Notes

  1. About, Red Tape Iniative website, accessed June 2017
  2. Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape, Civil Service World, 24 April 2017
  3. The other UK Brexit department, Politico, July 12, 2016
  4. Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape, Civil Service World, 24 April 2017
  5. The other UK Brexit department, Politico, July 12, 2016
  6. Letwin reveals details of Brexit-focused initiative to cut red tape, Civil Service World, 24 April 2017
  7. Who’s funding the Red Tape Initiative?, Unearthed, 14 July 2017
  8. George Monbiot, The Grenfell inquiry will be a stitch-up. Here’s why, Guardian, 5 July 2017
  9. May's ex-press aide joins Hanbury Strategy as agency bags Brexit briefs, PR Week, 14 June 2017
  10. Nick Tyrone, Linkedin Profile, accessed June 2017
  11. Rolling Back Red Tape in the UK, SPB website, 27 April 2017