Difference between revisions of "Centre for the New Europe"
(→Academic Advisory Board) |
(→Tobacco connections?) |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[File:Centre for the New Europe.png|200px|right|thumb|Centre for the New Europe offices, Brussels]] | |
| + | The '''Centre for the New Europe''' was a [[think tank]] based in Brussels between 1993 and 2008. It hosted events for policymakers, parliamentarians and journalists, and publishes reports and books on a range of libertarian topics. It promotes "pro-market" and "European liberal" policies for the European Union. | ||
| − | + | Founded in 1993 by a Belgian lawyer and a Belgian journalist after a meeting in the Hilton Hotel on the Toison d'Or in Brussels, it is very strongly pro-free-market, with a particular focus on the privatisation of healthcare. It is a member of the [[International Policy Network]] and regularly collaborates with other members of the [[Atlas Economic Research Foundation]] network. It is also a member of the [[Stockholm Network]] of European free-market think tanks. | |
| − | + | [[CNE-USA]] was established to allow for tax-deductible American donations to the Centre, although the organization itself does not operate in the US. | |
| − | + | The funding of the CNE is non-transparent. It failed to answer a think tank survey by the Corporate Europe Observatory in 2005. However, the annual reports of [[Exxon Mobil]] reveal that CNE in 2003 and 2004 received $40,000 and $80,000 respectively for its "Global Climate Change Education Efforts". | |
| + | |||
| + | CNE stated: | ||
| − | + | :''We find that support for liberal ideas--[[free trade]], social tolerance, economic liberty--extends far beyond Europe's Liberal parties. Therefore, we back no party or programme. We find that liberalism has friends and enemies in every party. We hope to unite its friends and persuade its enemies.''"<ref>http://www.cne.org/about2.htm</ref> | |
| − | + | ==Key quotes== | |
| − | == | ||
| − | "The Kyoto Protocol is failing because it is ineffective, costly, and unfair. It is also 'scientifically flawed' and not needed. It is likely to be replaced by other treaties and regulations to limit the use of energy and restrict economic growth. Such developments must be attacked with a strategy that uses both science and economic analysis." | + | "The Kyoto Protocol is failing because it is ineffective, costly, and unfair. It is also 'scientifically flawed' and not needed. It is likely to be replaced by other treaties and regulations to limit the use of energy and restrict economic growth. Such developments must be attacked with a strategy that uses both science and economic analysis."<ref>Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04</ref> |
| − | Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | ||
==Key deeds== | ==Key deeds== | ||
6 September, 2000 | 6 September, 2000 | ||
| − | Released the transcript of a talk given by [[S. Fred Singer]], entitled "Climate Policy - From Rio to Kyoto: A Political Issue for 2000 and Beyond". Singer promoted his ideas that the climate is not warming, and therefore there is no justification for the Kyoto Protocol. | + | Released the transcript of a talk given by [[S. Fred Singer]], entitled "Climate Policy - From Rio to Kyoto: A Political Issue for 2000 and Beyond". Singer promoted his ideas that the climate is not warming, and therefore there is no justification for the Kyoto Protocol.<ref>Source: Singer talk at CNE: "Climate Policy from Rio to Kyoto" 9/6/00</ref> |
| − | Source: Singer talk at CNE: "Climate Policy from Rio to Kyoto" 9/6/00 | ||
27 May, 2004 | 27 May, 2004 | ||
| − | S. Fred Singer is scheduled to speak at a CNE event in Brussels entitled "The Kyoto Protocol is Dead; Good Riddance". In addition to his criticisms of the Kyoto Protocol, Singer is scheduled to address the film "The Day After Tomorrow" | + | S. Fred Singer is scheduled to speak at a CNE event in Brussels entitled "The Kyoto Protocol is Dead; Good Riddance". In addition to his criticisms of the Kyoto Protocol, Singer is scheduled to address the film "The Day After Tomorrow"<ref>Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04</ref> |
| − | Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | ||
==Funding== | ==Funding== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
===2004=== | ===2004=== | ||
| − | $80,000 ExxonMobil Foundation | + | $80,000 [[ExxonMobil Foundation]] |
Center for New Europe - USA | Center for New Europe - USA | ||
Source: Exxon Giving Report 2004 | Source: Exxon Giving Report 2004 | ||
| Line 41: | Line 40: | ||
Other funding sources are not disclosed. However, according to Corporate Watch: | Other funding sources are not disclosed. However, according to Corporate Watch: | ||
| − | :A source in Brussels told Corporate Watch that the CNE receives 50% or more of its funding from Pfizer. The sums involved are very large. The Netherlands-based [[Edmund Burke Foundation]] took over $400,000 from Pfizer in 2001-5 and imploded when Pfizer stopped funding them. | + | :A source in Brussels told Corporate Watch that the CNE receives 50% or more of its funding from [[Pfizer]]. The sums involved are very large. The Netherlands-based [[Edmund Burke Foundation]] took over $400,000 from Pfizer in 2001-5 and imploded when Pfizer stopped funding them.<ref>Corporate Watch [http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2187 PFTHINK TANK PFONIES] Newsletter, No. 27</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ===Tobacco connections?=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Documents in the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents archive suggest that the Centre was set up by the [[Hudson Institute]]. A May 1992 internal Philip Morris Monthly report noted the tobacco firm was 'Evaluating with PMI the prospects for support of Hudson Institute's newly formed Center for the New Europe, to be based in Brussels'.<ref>PM, PHILIP MORRIS,FULLER,CL. [https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=phfx0177 000400 MONTHLY REPORT]. 1992 May 06. Philip Morris. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/phfx0177.</ref> Another Philip Morris document on European think tanks notes that the CNE is 'heavily supported by [[Pfizer]]'.<ref>Unknown. EUROPE. 1994 August. Philip Morris. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/xqkm0128</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | According to a briefing paper by two lobbyists from [[Jedco Conseil]] based just outside Geneva, the [[Centre for the New Europe]] ran a series of [[Liberty Lunch]]es which were comparable to those run by the [[Friedrich Naumann Stiftung]] in Berlin (called the [[Berliner Mittagsdebatte]]) in Paris by the [[Institut Français des Relations Internationales]] and the [[Lanesborough Luncheons]], held in an exclusive London hotel.<ref name="Lobby">Edouard Peter and Michael McKay [https://web.archive.org/web/20080907093219/http://www.advisio-intl.com/thought/doc/CorporatepositioningPA.pdf Proactive Positioning – a Public Affairs approach] A White Paper Jedco Conseil, posted 15 August 2005. Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 7 September 2008 on 24 January 2015. | ||
| + | </ref> It is known that the London luncheons were funded by [[Japan Tobacco International]], the Geneva based firm. It also appears that the four series of events were connected in the sense that the lobbyists concerned appeared to be suggesting that they were events which they had organised. At the end of the briefing paper they give examples of 'host personailities and speakers' and note that 'complete personality lists and clipping books available on request'. In addition, [[Adam Bryan-Brown]] a Geneva based Japan Tobacco executive and lobbyist has referred to the '[[Freedoms Program]]' run by [[Japan Tobacco International]] which involved the [[Lanesborough Luncheons]] 'and conferences in Brussels, Berlin and Paris'.<ref name="JTI">Adam Bryan-Brown '[http://www.ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_793.pdf Letter to Clive Bates, Action on Smopking and Heatlh].' 7 March 2002. Published in ''[[Risk of Freedom Briefing]]'', No. 11, April 2002.</ref> Ths suggests that tobacco money has gone to think tanks in Brussels, Berlin and Paris. None of the three think tanks listed above has admitted receiving funding from Japan Tobacco, despite the claim by JTI that it was the 'acknowledged sponsor' of these events.<ref name="JTI"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The lobbyists [[Edouard Peter]] and [[Michael McKay]] of [[Jedco Conseil]] (part of the [[Advisio International]] group) referred to these events as examples of a 'platform and follow-through series' which can help in 'conditioning public debate'.<ref name="Lobby"/> The strategy recommended is | ||
| + | |||
| + | :First, elevate the issue as high up the scale of logic, objectivity and social relevance as possible: It is not about this or that product, it is the boundaries to freedom of commerce... For example, practically all products may have negative health consequences, yet there is the broader issue of personal choice that needs to be balanced with an inclination to regulate. The freedom for adults to make their good or bad choices attracts influential audiences who otherwise may have no particular interest in the particular products. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Second, have a prestigious and credible third party assume the public debate on your behalf. The corporation doesn’t hide, yet its spokespersons never take the front of the stage in the public debate. Wherever possible, the third party is an independent institution, a recognized platform for objective debate among experts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Bringing these two conditions together requires enormous tact, long-standing networks of relations at the highest levels and the ability to behave in a neutral fashion as a bridge between academic, political, media and commercial thought processes. The latter often disqualifies large, well-known consultancies. That is why this approach is not applied more often. Or if it is, can’t attract attention to itself and risk self-defeat.<ref name="Lobby"/> | ||
| − | ==Board== | + | ==People== |
| + | ===Board=== | ||
*[[Digby Anderson]] London | *[[Digby Anderson]] London | ||
*[[Mattias Bengtsson]] Stockholm | *[[Mattias Bengtsson]] Stockholm | ||
| Line 51: | Line 66: | ||
*[[Daniel Oliver]] Washington | *[[Daniel Oliver]] Washington | ||
*[[Wilfried Prewo]] Hanover | *[[Wilfried Prewo]] Hanover | ||
| − | *[[Catherine Windels]] (Director of International Affairs, [[Pfizer]]), New York | + | *[[Catherine Windels]] (Director of International Affairs, [[Pfizer]]), New York |
| − | ==Staff== | + | ===Staff=== |
*[[Tim Evans]], President | *[[Tim Evans]], President | ||
*[[Janie Kong]], Vice President Public Relations and Development | *[[Janie Kong]], Vice President Public Relations and Development | ||
| Line 65: | Line 80: | ||
*[[Gabriel Calzada]] Visiting Fellow, Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | *[[Gabriel Calzada]] Visiting Fellow, Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | ||
| − | ==Academic Advisory Board== | + | ===Academic Advisory Board=== |
*[[Hardy Bouillon]], Chairman, Academic Advisory Boar Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | *[[Hardy Bouillon]], Chairman, Academic Advisory Boar Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04 | ||
*Prof. [[Louis de Alessi]], USA | *Prof. [[Louis de Alessi]], USA | ||
| Line 95: | Line 110: | ||
==Contact information== | ==Contact information== | ||
Centre for the New Europe <br> | Centre for the New Europe <br> | ||
| − | Rue du Luxembourg 23<br> | + | :Rue du Luxembourg 23<br> |
| − | B-1000 BRUSSELS, Belgium<br> | + | :B-1000 BRUSSELS, Belgium<br> |
| − | Phone: +32 2 506 40 00<br> | + | :Phone: +32 2 506 40 00<br> |
| − | Fax: +32 2 506 40 09<br> | + | :Fax: +32 2 506 40 09<br> |
| − | + | :Internet Archive holdings : [https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cne.org/ cne.org] | |
| − | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
| Line 108: | Line 122: | ||
*Exxon Giving Report 2004 | *Exxon Giving Report 2004 | ||
*Exxon's published [http://www.exxonmobil.com/corporate/files/corporate/giving04_publicpolicy.pdf report] on annual giving | *Exxon's published [http://www.exxonmobil.com/corporate/files/corporate/giving04_publicpolicy.pdf report] on annual giving | ||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*Corporate Europe Observatory, [http://www.corporateeurope.org/thinktanksurvey.html Transparency unthinkable? Financial secrecy common among EU think tanks], July 2005 | *Corporate Europe Observatory, [http://www.corporateeurope.org/thinktanksurvey.html Transparency unthinkable? Financial secrecy common among EU think tanks], July 2005 | ||
| + | ==Notes== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Think Tanks]][[Category:Stockholm Network]][[Category:Belgium]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 21 February 2016
The Centre for the New Europe was a think tank based in Brussels between 1993 and 2008. It hosted events for policymakers, parliamentarians and journalists, and publishes reports and books on a range of libertarian topics. It promotes "pro-market" and "European liberal" policies for the European Union.
Founded in 1993 by a Belgian lawyer and a Belgian journalist after a meeting in the Hilton Hotel on the Toison d'Or in Brussels, it is very strongly pro-free-market, with a particular focus on the privatisation of healthcare. It is a member of the International Policy Network and regularly collaborates with other members of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation network. It is also a member of the Stockholm Network of European free-market think tanks.
CNE-USA was established to allow for tax-deductible American donations to the Centre, although the organization itself does not operate in the US.
The funding of the CNE is non-transparent. It failed to answer a think tank survey by the Corporate Europe Observatory in 2005. However, the annual reports of Exxon Mobil reveal that CNE in 2003 and 2004 received $40,000 and $80,000 respectively for its "Global Climate Change Education Efforts".
CNE stated:
- We find that support for liberal ideas--free trade, social tolerance, economic liberty--extends far beyond Europe's Liberal parties. Therefore, we back no party or programme. We find that liberalism has friends and enemies in every party. We hope to unite its friends and persuade its enemies."[1]
Contents
Key quotes
"The Kyoto Protocol is failing because it is ineffective, costly, and unfair. It is also 'scientifically flawed' and not needed. It is likely to be replaced by other treaties and regulations to limit the use of energy and restrict economic growth. Such developments must be attacked with a strategy that uses both science and economic analysis."[2]
Key deeds
6 September, 2000 Released the transcript of a talk given by S. Fred Singer, entitled "Climate Policy - From Rio to Kyoto: A Political Issue for 2000 and Beyond". Singer promoted his ideas that the climate is not warming, and therefore there is no justification for the Kyoto Protocol.[3]
27 May, 2004 S. Fred Singer is scheduled to speak at a CNE event in Brussels entitled "The Kyoto Protocol is Dead; Good Riddance". In addition to his criticisms of the Kyoto Protocol, Singer is scheduled to address the film "The Day After Tomorrow"[4]
Funding
Centre for the New Europe has received $120,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
2003
$40,000 ExxonMobil Foundation Global Climate Change Program Source: ExxonMobil 2003 Corporate Giving Report
2004
$80,000 ExxonMobil Foundation Center for New Europe - USA Source: Exxon Giving Report 2004
Other funding sources are not disclosed. However, according to Corporate Watch:
- A source in Brussels told Corporate Watch that the CNE receives 50% or more of its funding from Pfizer. The sums involved are very large. The Netherlands-based Edmund Burke Foundation took over $400,000 from Pfizer in 2001-5 and imploded when Pfizer stopped funding them.[5]
Tobacco connections?
Documents in the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents archive suggest that the Centre was set up by the Hudson Institute. A May 1992 internal Philip Morris Monthly report noted the tobacco firm was 'Evaluating with PMI the prospects for support of Hudson Institute's newly formed Center for the New Europe, to be based in Brussels'.[6] Another Philip Morris document on European think tanks notes that the CNE is 'heavily supported by Pfizer'.[7]
According to a briefing paper by two lobbyists from Jedco Conseil based just outside Geneva, the Centre for the New Europe ran a series of Liberty Lunches which were comparable to those run by the Friedrich Naumann Stiftung in Berlin (called the Berliner Mittagsdebatte) in Paris by the Institut Français des Relations Internationales and the Lanesborough Luncheons, held in an exclusive London hotel.[8] It is known that the London luncheons were funded by Japan Tobacco International, the Geneva based firm. It also appears that the four series of events were connected in the sense that the lobbyists concerned appeared to be suggesting that they were events which they had organised. At the end of the briefing paper they give examples of 'host personailities and speakers' and note that 'complete personality lists and clipping books available on request'. In addition, Adam Bryan-Brown a Geneva based Japan Tobacco executive and lobbyist has referred to the 'Freedoms Program' run by Japan Tobacco International which involved the Lanesborough Luncheons 'and conferences in Brussels, Berlin and Paris'.[9] Ths suggests that tobacco money has gone to think tanks in Brussels, Berlin and Paris. None of the three think tanks listed above has admitted receiving funding from Japan Tobacco, despite the claim by JTI that it was the 'acknowledged sponsor' of these events.[9]
The lobbyists Edouard Peter and Michael McKay of Jedco Conseil (part of the Advisio International group) referred to these events as examples of a 'platform and follow-through series' which can help in 'conditioning public debate'.[8] The strategy recommended is
- First, elevate the issue as high up the scale of logic, objectivity and social relevance as possible: It is not about this or that product, it is the boundaries to freedom of commerce... For example, practically all products may have negative health consequences, yet there is the broader issue of personal choice that needs to be balanced with an inclination to regulate. The freedom for adults to make their good or bad choices attracts influential audiences who otherwise may have no particular interest in the particular products.
- Second, have a prestigious and credible third party assume the public debate on your behalf. The corporation doesn’t hide, yet its spokespersons never take the front of the stage in the public debate. Wherever possible, the third party is an independent institution, a recognized platform for objective debate among experts.
- Bringing these two conditions together requires enormous tact, long-standing networks of relations at the highest levels and the ability to behave in a neutral fashion as a bridge between academic, political, media and commercial thought processes. The latter often disqualifies large, well-known consultancies. That is why this approach is not applied more often. Or if it is, can’t attract attention to itself and risk self-defeat.[8]
People
Board
- Digby Anderson London
- Mattias Bengtsson Stockholm
- John Blundell London
- David Evans Cambridge
- Carol Martino Rome
- Daniel Oliver Washington
- Wilfried Prewo Hanover
- Catherine Windels (Director of International Affairs, Pfizer), New York
Staff
- Tim Evans, President
- Janie Kong, Vice President Public Relations and Development
- James Rogers, Executive Director Marketing and IT
- Luuk van Middalaar, Visiting Fellow
- Alberto Mingardi, Visiting Fellow
- Hardy Bouillon, Chairman, Academic Advisory Board
- Richard Miniter, Senior Fellow
- Stephen Pollard, Senior Fellow
- Carlo Stagnaro Speaker, Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04
- Gabriel Calzada Visiting Fellow, Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04
Academic Advisory Board
- Hardy Bouillon, Chairman, Academic Advisory Boar Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04
- Prof. Louis de Alessi, USA
- Prof. Marcel van Meerhaeghe, Belgium
- Prof. Peter Bernholz, Switzerland
- Dr. Gerrit Meijer, The Netherlands
- Prof. Walter Block, USA
- Prof. Angelo Petroni, Italy
- Prof. Boudewijn Bouckaert, Belgium
- Prof. Gerard Radnitzky, Germany
- Prof. Enrico Colombatto, Italy
- Prof. Pascal Salin, France
- Prof. Victoria Curzon-Price, Switzerland
- Dr. Gerhard Schwarz, Switzerland
- Prof. Frank van Dun, Belgium
- Dr. Jiri Schwarz, Czech Republic
- Prof. Hannes Gissurarson, Iceland
- Dr. Arthur Seldon, UK
- Lord Harris of High Cross, UK
- Prof. Gordon Tullock, USA
- Anthony de Jasay, France
- Prof. Christian Watrin, Germany
- Prof. Wolfgang Kasper, Australia
- Prof. Atilla Yayla, Turkey
- Prof. Václav Klaus, Czech Republic
- Dr. Albert Zlabinger, Austria
- Prof. Antonio Martino, Italy
Contact information
Centre for the New Europe
- Rue du Luxembourg 23
- B-1000 BRUSSELS, Belgium
- Phone: +32 2 506 40 00
- Fax: +32 2 506 40 09
- Internet Archive holdings : cne.org
Sources
- ExxonMobil 2003 Corporate Giving Report
- Singer talk at CNE: "Climate Policy from Rio to Kyoto" 9 June 2000
- Center for the New Europe website 4/04
- Exxon Giving Report 2004
- Exxon's published report on annual giving
External links
- Corporate Europe Observatory, Transparency unthinkable? Financial secrecy common among EU think tanks, July 2005
Notes
- ↑ http://www.cne.org/about2.htm
- ↑ Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04
- ↑ Source: Singer talk at CNE: "Climate Policy from Rio to Kyoto" 9/6/00
- ↑ Source: Center for the New Europe website 4/04
- ↑ Corporate Watch PFTHINK TANK PFONIES Newsletter, No. 27
- ↑ PM, PHILIP MORRIS,FULLER,CL. 000400 MONTHLY REPORT. 1992 May 06. Philip Morris. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/phfx0177.
- ↑ Unknown. EUROPE. 1994 August. Philip Morris. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/xqkm0128
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Edouard Peter and Michael McKay Proactive Positioning – a Public Affairs approach A White Paper Jedco Conseil, posted 15 August 2005. Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 7 September 2008 on 24 January 2015.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Adam Bryan-Brown 'Letter to Clive Bates, Action on Smopking and Heatlh.' 7 March 2002. Published in Risk of Freedom Briefing, No. 11, April 2002.
