Difference between revisions of "David Hume Institute"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Peacock's proposal)
(Peacock's proposal)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
'In 1984, Professor Alan Peacock returned to Edinburgh with the vision of creating a new independent research institute', according to the account of [[John Shaw]] a trustee of the DHI.<ref>John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> It would be 'distinctive' in having a Scottish base, 'an agenda linking economics and the law and would be vigorously independent of government'.<ref>John Shaw 'The First Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> By 1985 'a Chairman and Board of Trustees had been identified, a President appointed and funding secured.'<ref>Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 2</ref>  Peacock was the first Executive director and Elliot the first president.
 
'In 1984, Professor Alan Peacock returned to Edinburgh with the vision of creating a new independent research institute', according to the account of [[John Shaw]] a trustee of the DHI.<ref>John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> It would be 'distinctive' in having a Scottish base, 'an agenda linking economics and the law and would be vigorously independent of government'.<ref>John Shaw 'The First Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> By 1985 'a Chairman and Board of Trustees had been identified, a President appointed and funding secured.'<ref>Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 2</ref>  Peacock was the first Executive director and Elliot the first president.
 
===Peacock's proposal===
 
===Peacock's proposal===
'On 30 December 1983', Peacock, who was then Vice chancellor and Professor of Economics at the [[University of Buckingham]], 'wrote a paper proposing the foundation of an institute of economics and law' which was the blueprint for the DHI.<ref>John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> Peacock's paper noted 'three good reasons' for starting a new think tank or 'research institute' as he called it..  These were firstly dependence on 'direct government funding' leading to problems of publishing research 'without the permission of the relevant government department'; secondly, concentration in London leading sometimes to a 'metropolitan perspective'; and thirdly a lack of concentration on 'micro-economics and its application to policy problems'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3</ref> This was the most obviously ideological of the reasons and  referred to the 'strong emotional resistance' to the application of micro-economics to 'non-profit institutions' - or government and the public sector to be more accurate. this was because, argued Peacock, 'the policy implications frequently point towards the futility of government policies directed at controlling of influencing particular markets'.  Such conclusions he went on 'threaten the job opportunities of a large proportion of the working population as well as those economists who play a role in devising interventionist instruments'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3-4</ref> In other words the aim of the institute was to break with those approaches and to advocate attacks on the state, the public sector and the jobs of a 'large proportion' of the working population. Peacock goes on to note that it is to the 'great credit' of the [[Institute for Economic Affairs]] and its supporters that 'policy makers have become much more mindful of the importance of market forces'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 4</ref>
+
'On 30 December 1983', Peacock, who was then Vice chancellor and Professor of Economics at the [[University of Buckingham]], 'wrote a paper proposing the foundation of an institute of economics and law' which was the blueprint for the DHI.<ref>John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1</ref> Peacock's paper noted 'three good reasons' for starting a new think tank or 'research institute' as he called it..  These were firstly dependence on 'direct government funding' leading to problems of publishing research 'without the permission of the relevant government department'; secondly, concentration in London leading sometimes to a 'metropolitan perspective'; and thirdly a lack of concentration on 'micro-economics and its application to policy problems'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3</ref> This was the most obviously ideological of the reasons and  referred to the 'strong emotional resistance' to the application of micro-economics to 'non-profit institutions' - or government and the public sector to be more accurate. this was because, argued Peacock, 'the policy implications frequently point towards the futility of government policies directed at controlling of influencing particular markets'.  Such conclusions he went on 'threaten the job opportunities of a large proportion of the working population as well as those economists who play a role in devising interventionist instruments'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3-4</ref> In other words the aim of the institute was to break with those approaches and to advocate attacks on the state, the public sector and the jobs of a 'large proportion' of the working population. Peacock goes on to note that it is to the 'great credit' of the [[Institute of Economic Affairs]] and its supporters that 'policy makers have become much more mindful of the importance of market forces'.<ref>Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) ''The David Hume Institute. The First Decade.'' Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 4</ref>
  
 
===Early days===
 
===Early days===

Revision as of 07:23, 10 June 2010

The David Hume Institute (DHI) was founded in Edinburgh in 1985 by Professor Sir Alan Peacock, who also became its first Executive Director, and the industrialist Gerald Elliot, then Chairman of Christian Control Salvesen, an international logistics business. The DHI was, according to Elliot, 'modelled' on the London based Institute of Economic Affairs.[1]

Before setting up the DHI, Peacock was Professor of Economics at York University and Vice Chancellor of the independent (ie private) University of Buckingham. He also sat on a number of committees: for example, he was chairman of the Home Office Committee on Financing the BBC between 1985 and 1986, where he proposed making subscription to the BBC voluntary and to bring more market mechanisms into the broadcasting sector. When, in 2004, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), where Peacock was a Fellow, gave an address on the same topic, it boasted that Peacock's ideas were now being "discussed by several commentators, including experts from the BBC and Ofcom".[2] Peacock was member of various other UK Government and international Commissions and served as Chief Economic Adviser in the UK Department of Trade and Industry between 1973-76.

Origins and history

'In 1984, Professor Alan Peacock returned to Edinburgh with the vision of creating a new independent research institute', according to the account of John Shaw a trustee of the DHI.[3] It would be 'distinctive' in having a Scottish base, 'an agenda linking economics and the law and would be vigorously independent of government'.[4] By 1985 'a Chairman and Board of Trustees had been identified, a President appointed and funding secured.'[5] Peacock was the first Executive director and Elliot the first president.

Peacock's proposal

'On 30 December 1983', Peacock, who was then Vice chancellor and Professor of Economics at the University of Buckingham, 'wrote a paper proposing the foundation of an institute of economics and law' which was the blueprint for the DHI.[6] Peacock's paper noted 'three good reasons' for starting a new think tank or 'research institute' as he called it.. These were firstly dependence on 'direct government funding' leading to problems of publishing research 'without the permission of the relevant government department'; secondly, concentration in London leading sometimes to a 'metropolitan perspective'; and thirdly a lack of concentration on 'micro-economics and its application to policy problems'.[7] This was the most obviously ideological of the reasons and referred to the 'strong emotional resistance' to the application of micro-economics to 'non-profit institutions' - or government and the public sector to be more accurate. this was because, argued Peacock, 'the policy implications frequently point towards the futility of government policies directed at controlling of influencing particular markets'. Such conclusions he went on 'threaten the job opportunities of a large proportion of the working population as well as those economists who play a role in devising interventionist instruments'.[8] In other words the aim of the institute was to break with those approaches and to advocate attacks on the state, the public sector and the jobs of a 'large proportion' of the working population. Peacock goes on to note that it is to the 'great credit' of the Institute of Economic Affairs and its supporters that 'policy makers have become much more mindful of the importance of market forces'.[9]

Early days

According to the account of Jock Snaith:

In its earliest days the institute was a creature of no fixed abode. we met in the University Staff club, chez Peacock or chez blight. The official address was my house in Penicuik and the administration was carried out from a corner of my room there. My wife was rightly suspicious of this intrusion, for she had memories of the early days of the University of Dar es Salaam which started in the dining room of our house there and soon spread to the bedrooms. The institute's letters and papers were typed either on my ancient portable or by a lady who lived on the other side of Penicuik. As she predicted my wife soon became an unpaid courier/receptionist and proof-reader.[10]

According to Snaith the registration of the Institute at Companies House in Edinburgh caused some concern as 'the word Institute is one of the most sensitive words that the Secretary of State considers'. Clearly under some suspicion that the DHI would abuse the word by registering as a company, the prospective founders procured references from Ralph Harris and Lord Grimond.[11]

Northern neoliberal outpost

In 1995 Professor Brian Main, who in 2002 was official advisor of the Scottish Parliament Justice Committees One and Two, joined the Institute. He was its director from 1999 until he was replaced by Jeremy Peat in June 2005. Peat served as Group Chief Economist at the Royal Bank of Scotland and was economist at the HM Treasury and the Scottish Office. He is also on the Board of Governors of BBC Scotland.

It is an interesting move to fill the position formerly held by an academic with a professional economist who has 'extensive connections with business and areas of government in Scotland and further afield'. Peat's appointment probably will push the DHI into a more business-oriented direction and will open new sources of sponsorship.

The DHI's board of trustees unites the who's who of the Scottish policy community: senior journalists, members of the Scottish Parliament's Corporate Body Audit and Advisory Board, the CEO of TSB Scotland and a high official of the Rowntree Foundation. The DHI commissions external researchers as it does not employ full time research staff.

Activities

The DHI hardly pursues any local, national or international cooperation with other think-tanks or research institutions. The only ongoing cooperation is to be found with the Europa Institute of the University of Edinburgh. Though Diane Stone describes the DHI as an advocacy institute which is part of a wider epistemic community of privatisation and as the Adam Smith Institute's Scottish counterpart, today it has neither the interest nor the ability in a wider cooperation with other like-minded institutions'[12]

In 2004, the DHI's director stated that it was struggling to get press attention, because of the media's commercial structure: the 'press generally want you to say something quite sensational, political, and we... are generally not talking in those terms'. Such media relations were left to institutes which 'are more politically oriented. [..] to be pejorative, some of them are for people who actually want to be MPs or politicians'.[13]

People

Board of Trustees at 1996

Catherine Blight | Gerald Elliot | Nick Kuenssberg | Lady Mackenzie-Stuart | Prof. Hector MacQueen | Prof. John Murray | Prof. Sir Alan Peacock | Prof. Sir John Shaw | Prof. John Ward[14]

Board of Trustees 2004

Trustees at February 2006

Trustees at February 2009

Mr. Robert Bertram WS | Ms Kyla Brand | Mr Jo Elliot | Lord Hodge | Professor Gavin Kennedy | Dr Ken Lyall | Sir Ian Byatt (Chairman) | Professor Hector MacQueen FRSE | Professor Donald MacRae FRSE | Mr Ian Ritchie | Mr Karl Snowden | Professor Joan Stringer CBE FRSE | Mr Donald Workman[20]

Staff

Honorary President (2005 - )

Lord Sutherland of Houndwood

Past Honorary Presidents

Honorary Vice Presidents

Honorary Trustees

Funding

Between 2000 and 2004, the DHI received financial sponsorship from blue chip corporations including the Royal Bank of Scotland, the Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB Scotland and Standard Life. The academic background of the DHI is reflected in the sponsorship by the ESRC and Edinburgh University's Europa Institute. Some individuals, including a member of the board of the SCDI and a Scotsman journalist, were also among the financial contributors.[21]

Financial sponsorship from 2000 to 2006

Economic & Social Research Council: 23 November 2006 - "Policy making in a devolved environment" ; 10 October 2006 - "Does size matter? - An investigation of the link between post-devolution growth in public spending and Scottish economic performance" ; 2 November 2005 - 'Gordon Brown and the public finances: sticking to the rules?' ; 5 October 2005 - 'The Sociology of Finance. When genius failed - revisited.' ; 20 June 2005 - 'Does Public Sector Wage Setting Constrain Devolution?'; 24 February 2005 - 'The Risk Management of everything. Rethinking the politics of uncertainty'; 11 November 2004 - "Making Executive Pay Work: remuneration committees and their effectiveness"; 27 October 2004 - "Improving Public Services: targets, performance and other regulatory arrangements"; Seminar 23 June 2004 - 'The Simultaneous Fall and Rise of Mutuality'; Spring Seminar Series 2003 "Diseminating the Results of ESRC Research"

The Stewart Ivory Foundation: 23 May 2006 - "Is Britain well served by it's financial press" ; 28 April 2005 - 'Global Markets, Investment, Management and the Role of Financial Reporting' ; Seminar 9 September 2004 - "Restoring Trust - Investment in the twenty-first century"; Spring Seminar Series 2004; 12 February 2004 - "The Private Finance Initiative. From the foundations up" 18 March 2004 - "The Equitable Life Report"; Spring Seminar Series 2002 "Fund Management - Twenty-First Century Challenges"

Scottish Water Commission: 19 April 2006 - "Balancing regulation and competition in the water business in Scotland"

Joint Event with the Securities & Investment Institute: 14 March 2006 - "Trust and Integrity: Principles and Practice"

Royal Bank of Scotland: 1 March 2006 (Annual Lecture) - 'The European Union and the Idea of a Perfect Commonwealth'; Hume Lecture 7 October 2004 (Lecture and Publication) "Regulation and Politics: The need for a new dialogue"; Presidential Address 8 March 2001(Lecture and Publication) "Are Lawyers Parasites?"

Standard Life: 9 February 2006 - "The appropriate role of Government in the provision of pensions. Some insights drawn from the Second Report of the Pensions Commission"; Publication of Hume Lecture "The European Union and the Nation State"

The Scottish Economic Society & The Royal Society Of Edinburgh: 24 March 2005 - 'The Globalization of Labour Markets and the consequences for Economic Policy'

The Binks Trust: 27 May 2004 - "The Future of the Scottish Fishing Industry"; Spring Seminar Series 2004; 22 April 2004 - "Tilting at Windmills. The economics of wind power"

Mr Andrew Ferguson: Spring Seminar Series 2004, 11 March 2004 - "NHS Scotland versus NHS England. Lesson to be learned"; Autumn Seminar Series 2000 "Economic and Monetary Union"

Cairn Energy: Presidential Address 2003

Europa Institute: Human Rights Legislation Seminar (Nov 2003)

Noble & Co.: PFI Seminar (Mar 2003)

The Esmee Fairbairn Foundation: Autumn Seminar Series 2002 "Has Devolution Delivered?"

Lloyds TSB Scotland: Hume Lecture 7 March 2002 (Lecture and Publication) "Hume, Liberty and the Market - a Twenty-First Century Perspective "

Sir Alan Peacock: Autumn Seminar Series 2001 "Establishing Competitive Economic Advantage in the Scottish Economy."

Shepherd & Wedderburn: 7 November 2006 - "BBC Governance and Accountability - the new regime"; Spring Seminar Series 2001 "Regulation"

Bank of Scotland: Hume Lecture 18 May 2000 "The European Union and the Nation State"

Affiliations

In the Stockholm Network's 2004 publication, Eye on Europe (Issue 1, Summer 2004), the David Hume Institute is listed as a member.[22] However, the David Hume Institute is no longer listed as a member of the Stockholm Network on the Network website of May 2010.[23]

Publications

The Institute has published several series of papers and reports and assorted other material. A full list is available here: David Hume Institute: Publications.

Contact

As of 18 March 2009 the address and contact details for the Institute will be:

26 Forth Street
Edinburgh
EH1 3LH
Tel: (0131) 550 3746
Email: enquiries@davidhumeinstitute.com

Further reading

  • Stone, Diane. (2003) Think-tanks and the Privatisation Band-Wagon in: Lovenduski,J. and Stanyer, J. (eds). Contemporary Political Studies; Belfast: Political Studies Association, Vol. 1, 1995
  • Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1996) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Norwich : Page Bros Ltd.

Notes

  1. Gerald Elliot 'Brief History: 1985-1995' in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 7
  2. Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC?, IEA website, 9 Mar 2005, accessed in web archive 10 May 2010.
  3. John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1
  4. John Shaw 'The First Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1
  5. Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 2
  6. John Shaw 'The first Decade: Foreword', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 1
  7. Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3
  8. Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 3-4
  9. Alan Peacock 'A Vision of the Institute', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 4
  10. Jock Snaith, 'Hume starts to hum', in Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. (eds) (1995) The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute p. 9
  11. Snaith, op cit, p. 10
  12. (Stone 1995, 22)
  13. Interview with Brian Main cited in Hartwig Pautz 'Think-Tanks in Scotland' Paper for 55th Political Studies Association Annual Conference 4-7 April 2005 - University of Leeds
  14. Nick Kuenssberg and Gillian Lomas (Eds) The David Hume Institute: The First Decade, Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute, 1996.
  15. Robert Bertram Accessed 17 November 2004
  16. [1] Accessed 17 November 2004.
  17. [2] Accessed 17 November 2004).
  18. Susan Rice Accessed 17 November 2004
  19. Duncan MacLennan Accessed 17 November 2004)
  20. http://www.davidhumeinstitute.com/, accessed 13 February 2009
  21. Hartwig Pautz 'Think-Tanks in Scotland' Paper for 55th Political Studies Association Annual Conference 4-7 April 2005 - University of Leeds
  22. Member Organisations, Eye on Europe, Stockholm Network, Summer 2004, Issue no 1, acc 10 May 2010
  23. Think tank details, Stockholm Network website, acc 10 May 2010