Difference between revisions of "Genetic Alliance UK"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (updated membership number/added ref)
(→‎Affiliations)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Genetic Alliance UK''' was formed in 2010 as a result of a name change by the [[Genetic Interest Group]] (GIG).<ref>[http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_62090.asp 'Genetic Interest Group' changes name to 'Genetic Alliance UK'], BioNews website, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> It is a [http://www.gig.org.uk London-based] national alliance of organisations with a membership of over 130 charities which support families and individuals affected by genetic disorders.<ref> Genetic Alliance UK [http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/members.htm Members], accessed 4 May 2011 <ref> Its stated role is to promote awareness and understanding of such disorders. It is funded by, among others, [[GlaxoSmithKline]], [[Merck]], [[Novartis]], [[Pfizer]], [[Schering Plough]], [[AstraZeneca]], [[Genzyme Therapeutics]], and [[GE Healthcare]].<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/geneticallianceuk.htm Our sponsors], GIG website, acc 1 June 2010</ref>
+
{{Powerbase:LM network: Resources}}
 +
'''Genetic Alliance UK''' was formed in 2010 as a result of a name change by the [[Genetic Interest Group]] (GIG).<ref>[http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_62090.asp 'Genetic Interest Group' changes name to 'Genetic Alliance UK'], BioNews website, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> It is a [http://www.gig.org.uk London-based] national alliance of organisations with a membership of over 130 charities which support families and individuals affected by genetic disorders.<ref> Genetic Alliance UK [http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/members.htm Members], accessed 4 May 2011 </ref> Its stated role is to promote awareness and understanding of such disorders. It is funded by, among others, [[GlaxoSmithKline]], [[Merck]], [[Novartis]], [[Pfizer]], [[Schering Plough]], [[AstraZeneca]], [[Genzyme Therapeutics]], [[ABPI]] and [[GE Healthcare]].<ref>[http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/ Sponsors], GIG website, acc 1 June 2010 and May 2011</ref>
  
−
GIG's Director is [[Alistair Kent]].<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/geneticallianceuk.htm Who's who at GIG], GIG website, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> Kent has also been a member of the [[Progress Educational Trust]] Advisory Committee. GIG's Policy Officer was for several years [[John Gillott]], who was also on the staff of the online clinical genetics resource  [[Genepool]] along with [[Juliet Tizzard]] of [[Progress Educational Trust]].  
+
GIG's Director is [[Alastair Kent]].<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/geneticallianceuk.htm Who's who at GIG], GIG website, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> Kent has also been a member of the [[Progress Educational Trust]] Advisory Committee. GIG's Policy Officer was for several years [[John Gillott]], who was also on the staff of the online clinical genetics resource  [[Genepool]] along with [[Juliet Tizzard]] of [[Progress Educational Trust]].  
  
 
GIG's Advisors have included Professor [[Peter Lachmann]] and he is listed as an advisory board member in the GIG Annual Review 2006-07.<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/docs/annualreport0607_website.pdf Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007], acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
 
GIG's Advisors have included Professor [[Peter Lachmann]] and he is listed as an advisory board member in the GIG Annual Review 2006-07.<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/docs/annualreport0607_website.pdf Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007], acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
  
−
According to social scientists [[Sue Weldon]] and [[Brian Wynne]], 'A significant number of patient groups have formed pro-genetics alliances (in many cases sponsored by pharmaceutical companies) to set their own agenda and to debate with the health professionals on their own terms. The Genetics Interest Group (GIG) is a powerful lobby that writes in apocalyptic terms of how genetic disorders have "blighted the lives of countless families". New knowledge is portrayed as "a light at the end of a long dark tunnel for the millions of people with chronic ill health, severe disability [etc.] as a result of their genetic makeup".' (pdf file:[http://www.inra.fr/Internet/Directions/SED/science-gouvernance/pub/ADAPTA/uk-report.pdf Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment] (ADAPTA) January 2001)
+
According to social scientists [[Sue Weldon]] and [[Brian Wynne]], 'A significant number of patient groups have formed pro-genetics alliances (in many cases sponsored by pharmaceutical companies) to set their own agenda and to debate with the health professionals on their own terms. The Genetics Interest Group (GIG) is a powerful lobby that writes in apocalyptic terms of how genetic disorders have "blighted the lives of countless families". New knowledge is portrayed as "a light at the end of a long dark tunnel for the millions of people with chronic ill health, severe disability [etc.] as a result of their genetic makeup".'<ref> (pdf file:[http://www.inra.fr/Internet/Directions/SED/science-gouvernance/pub/ADAPTA/uk-report.pdf Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment] (ADAPTA) January 2001) </ref>
  
 
GIG's perspective contrasts markedly with that of the disability movement which argues that the social and ethical aspects of the introduction and use of new genetic technologies is not being properly debated and monitored at an early enough stage by people whose lives could be affected by them.
 
GIG's perspective contrasts markedly with that of the disability movement which argues that the social and ethical aspects of the introduction and use of new genetic technologies is not being properly debated and monitored at an early enough stage by people whose lives could be affected by them.
Line 15: Line 16:
 
But in March 1997, the name of GIG's Director appeared on a pamphlet called Patents for Life which instructed MEPs to vote to pass the gene patenting directive into law or else explain to families "how it was that you had the opportunity to create significant progress in the search for cures, but you chose not to take that step."<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
 
But in March 1997, the name of GIG's Director appeared on a pamphlet called Patents for Life which instructed MEPs to vote to pass the gene patenting directive into law or else explain to families "how it was that you had the opportunity to create significant progress in the search for cures, but you chose not to take that step."<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
  
−
In July 1997 MEPs arriving to vote on the directive were confronted at the steps of the parliament by wheelchair-bound protesters organised by [[Alistair Kent]] who claimed they were about to be denied the chance of a cure if MEPs did not vote for the Life Patent Directive. The lobbying to which the proposed directive was subjected is widely regarded as having been decisive in the MEPs' approval of a directive which all surveys showed was opposed by a clear majority of Europeans and which two years earlier MEPs had vetoed.<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
+
In July 1997 MEPs arriving to vote on the directive were confronted at the steps of the parliament by wheelchair-bound protesters organised by [[Alastair Kent]] who claimed they were about to be denied the chance of a cure if MEPs did not vote for the Life Patent Directive. The lobbying to which the proposed directive was subjected is widely regarded as having been decisive in the MEPs' approval of a directive which all surveys showed was opposed by a clear majority of Europeans and which two years earlier MEPs had vetoed.<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
  
 
After complaints from some patient interest groups about what had occurred, the Chair of GIG issued a letter restating the views of the group, which were clearly against gene patenting. So how did the director of an organisation with such a policy come to behave in such a contrary way?  
 
After complaints from some patient interest groups about what had occurred, the Chair of GIG issued a letter restating the views of the group, which were clearly against gene patenting. So how did the director of an organisation with such a policy come to behave in such a contrary way?  
  
−
The fact that for the previous two years GIG had been receiving expenses and 'gifts in kind' from SmithKline Beecham, who were lobbying aggressively for the directive, offers one possible explanation. [[SmithKline Beecham]]'s support for Kent's lobbying included not only his Strasbourg expenses<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> but the hiring of the lobby firm [[GPC Market Access]] (the firm's MD, [[Michael Craven]], later started [[Lexington Communications]]). Market Access has been [http://www.corporateeurope.org/observer1/patents.html accused] of a 'massive disinformation campaign', to which GIG's Alistair Kent was party, to promote biotech as saving lives, ending hunger.  
+
The fact that for the previous two years GIG had been receiving expenses and 'gifts in kind' from SmithKline Beecham, who were lobbying aggressively for the directive, offers one possible explanation. [[SmithKline Beecham]]'s support for Kent's lobbying included not only his Strasbourg expenses<ref>George Monbiot, [http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998/05/07/emotional-blackmail/ Emotional blackmail], The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010</ref> but the hiring of the lobby firm [[GPC Market Access]] (the firm's MD, [[Michael Craven]], later started [[Lexington Communications]]). Market Access was accused of a 'massive disinformation campaign', to which GIG's Alistair Kent was party, to promote biotech as saving lives, ending hunger. <ref> [http://archive.corporateeurope.org/observer1/patents.html Industry and the EU Life Patent Directive], CEO Quarterly Newsletter, Issue 1, May 1998, accessed 4 May 2011 </ref>
  
 
What has received less attention is the role in GIG and in this affair of [[John Gillott]], GIG's Policy Officer at the time. What, after all, was GIG's Policy Officer doing while GIG's Director was so openly working against GIG's policy?  
 
What has received less attention is the role in GIG and in this affair of [[John Gillott]], GIG's Policy Officer at the time. What, after all, was GIG's Policy Officer doing while GIG's Director was so openly working against GIG's policy?  
Line 34: Line 35:
  
 
==Affiliations==
 
==Affiliations==
−
GIG states in its Annual Review 2006-07:
+
*[[Science Media Centre]] - GIG states in its Annual Review 2006-07:
−
:We collaborate closely with the [[Science Media Centre]], based at the [[Royal Institution]] in London, and have provided them with inputs on a wide range of topics including stem cell research, screening programmes, animals in research, hybrid embryos and many other topics.<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/docs/annualreport0607_website.pdf Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007], acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
+
::We collaborate closely with the [[Science Media Centre]], based at the [[Royal Institution]] in London, and have provided them with inputs on a wide range of topics including stem cell research, screening programmes, animals in research, hybrid embryos and many other topics.<ref>[http://www.gig.org.uk/docs/annualreport0607_website.pdf Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007], acc 1 Jun 2010</ref>
 +
*[[STRATUM]] - Genetic Alliance UK works on "public engagement with biobanking" (storage of human tissue samples for research) for STRATUM, "a collaboration between the pharmaceutical industry and academia, led by [[AstraZeneca]]".<ref>Genetic Alliance UK (2012) [http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/projects/stratum.htm Project: Understanding public engagement with biobanking], acc 30 Nov 2012</ref>
  
 
==Funding==
 
==Funding==
Line 69: Line 71:
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
−
[[Category:LM network]][[Category:Biotechnology]][[Category:GM]][[Category:GM Lobby Groups]]
+
[[Category:LM network]][[Category:Biotechnology]][[Category:GM]][[Category:GM Lobby Groups]][[Category:Human Genetics]]

Latest revision as of 14:15, 30 November 2012

LM network resources

Genetic Alliance UK was formed in 2010 as a result of a name change by the Genetic Interest Group (GIG).[1] It is a London-based national alliance of organisations with a membership of over 130 charities which support families and individuals affected by genetic disorders.[2] Its stated role is to promote awareness and understanding of such disorders. It is funded by, among others, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Schering Plough, AstraZeneca, Genzyme Therapeutics, ABPI and GE Healthcare.[3]

GIG's Director is Alastair Kent.[4] Kent has also been a member of the Progress Educational Trust Advisory Committee. GIG's Policy Officer was for several years John Gillott, who was also on the staff of the online clinical genetics resource Genepool along with Juliet Tizzard of Progress Educational Trust.

GIG's Advisors have included Professor Peter Lachmann and he is listed as an advisory board member in the GIG Annual Review 2006-07.[5]

According to social scientists Sue Weldon and Brian Wynne, 'A significant number of patient groups have formed pro-genetics alliances (in many cases sponsored by pharmaceutical companies) to set their own agenda and to debate with the health professionals on their own terms. The Genetics Interest Group (GIG) is a powerful lobby that writes in apocalyptic terms of how genetic disorders have "blighted the lives of countless families". New knowledge is portrayed as "a light at the end of a long dark tunnel for the millions of people with chronic ill health, severe disability [etc.] as a result of their genetic makeup".'[6]

GIG's perspective contrasts markedly with that of the disability movement which argues that the social and ethical aspects of the introduction and use of new genetic technologies is not being properly debated and monitored at an early enough stage by people whose lives could be affected by them.

Patents on life directive

In 1997 GIG became embroiled in controversy over its role in lobbying for the 'Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions', commonly known as the 'Life Patent Directive', which would allow for the patenting of genes, cells, plants, animals, human body parts and genetically modified or cloned human embryos.

GIG had publicly opposed attempts to patent genes and its director had warned that 'there is something fundamentally unacceptable about any institution, corporation, or individual having ownership over part of a human being'. The patenting of genes would, he had argued, reduce collaboration between scientists and increase costs for charities fighting genetic diseases too rare to be commercially interesting.

But in March 1997, the name of GIG's Director appeared on a pamphlet called Patents for Life which instructed MEPs to vote to pass the gene patenting directive into law or else explain to families "how it was that you had the opportunity to create significant progress in the search for cures, but you chose not to take that step."[7]

In July 1997 MEPs arriving to vote on the directive were confronted at the steps of the parliament by wheelchair-bound protesters organised by Alastair Kent who claimed they were about to be denied the chance of a cure if MEPs did not vote for the Life Patent Directive. The lobbying to which the proposed directive was subjected is widely regarded as having been decisive in the MEPs' approval of a directive which all surveys showed was opposed by a clear majority of Europeans and which two years earlier MEPs had vetoed.[8]

After complaints from some patient interest groups about what had occurred, the Chair of GIG issued a letter restating the views of the group, which were clearly against gene patenting. So how did the director of an organisation with such a policy come to behave in such a contrary way?

The fact that for the previous two years GIG had been receiving expenses and 'gifts in kind' from SmithKline Beecham, who were lobbying aggressively for the directive, offers one possible explanation. SmithKline Beecham's support for Kent's lobbying included not only his Strasbourg expenses[9] but the hiring of the lobby firm GPC Market Access (the firm's MD, Michael Craven, later started Lexington Communications). Market Access was accused of a 'massive disinformation campaign', to which GIG's Alistair Kent was party, to promote biotech as saving lives, ending hunger. [10]

What has received less attention is the role in GIG and in this affair of John Gillott, GIG's Policy Officer at the time. What, after all, was GIG's Policy Officer doing while GIG's Director was so openly working against GIG's policy?

One thing Gillott was busy doing was vehemently attacking those with whom he and GIG should have been allied in opposition to the Directive. 'The Directive has been vigorously opposed,' Gillott noted in an article at the time, 'by environmental campaigners who say it is an aspect of the 'race to commodify life' which amounts to 'biopiracy' '. Gillott dismisses such views as 'the rubbish peddled by the environmentalists.'[11]

Gillott's article appeared on the website of LM (formerly known as Living Marxism) of which Gillott was the science editor. In 1997 Gillott appeared in the Channel Four TV series Against Nature which presented environmentalists as comparable to the Nazis and as responsible for the deprivation and death of millions in the Third World.

Gillott and Kent have both spoken at events organised by the Institute of Ideas, headed by LM's former co-publisher, and Gillott is also a regular contributor to the Spiked website which was the successor to LM. As a leading member of a political network known to be hostile to more or less all restrictions on business, science and technology, it seems unlikely that Gillott would have welcomed the defeat of a Directive opposed by those who are highly critical of aspects of biotechnology and of the behaviour of big business.

Lobbying

GIG states in its Annual Review 2006-07 that it was "a source of information for articles featured in The Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph, BBC News-online, The Daily Mail, The Mirror and The Scotsman."[12]

Affiliations

We collaborate closely with the Science Media Centre, based at the Royal Institution in London, and have provided them with inputs on a wide range of topics including stem cell research, screening programmes, animals in research, hybrid embryos and many other topics.[13]
  • STRATUM - Genetic Alliance UK works on "public engagement with biobanking" (storage of human tissue samples for research) for STRATUM, "a collaboration between the pharmaceutical industry and academia, led by AstraZeneca".[14]

Funding

  • GlaxoSmithKline stated on their website that: 'We have supported this organisation since 2000. During 2006: We gave an unrestricted grant of £20,000 to help their activities. This commitment allows GIG to develop services and support for its members and to raise awareness of their needs and expectations for innovative and effective therapies and other forms of support. Our support represented 6 per cent of their income overall.'[15]


Notes

  1. ↑ 'Genetic Interest Group' changes name to 'Genetic Alliance UK', BioNews website, acc 1 Jun 2010
  2. ↑ Genetic Alliance UK Members, accessed 4 May 2011
  3. ↑ Sponsors, GIG website, acc 1 June 2010 and May 2011
  4. ↑ Who's who at GIG, GIG website, acc 1 Jun 2010
  5. ↑ Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007, acc 1 Jun 2010
  6. ↑ (pdf file:Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment (ADAPTA) January 2001)
  7. ↑ George Monbiot, Emotional blackmail, The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010
  8. ↑ George Monbiot, Emotional blackmail, The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010
  9. ↑ George Monbiot, Emotional blackmail, The Guardian, 7th May 1998, acc 1 Jun 2010
  10. ↑ Industry and the EU Life Patent Directive, CEO Quarterly Newsletter, Issue 1, May 1998, accessed 4 May 2011
  11. ↑ 12-02-97: 'Gene Patenting: piracy or progress?' - John Gillott, co-author of Science and the Retreat from Reason, looks at the brouhaha surrounding gene patenting.
  12. ↑ Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007, acc 1 Jun 2010
  13. ↑ Beyond Boundaries: Genetic Interest Group Annual Review 2006-2007, acc 1 Jun 2010
  14. ↑ Genetic Alliance UK (2012) Project: Understanding public engagement with biobanking, acc 30 Nov 2012
  15. ↑ Patient organisations: Working with UK and European patient groups, GSK website, Accessed March 2007.
  16. ↑ GIG Sponsors Page Accessed March 2007.
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Genetic_Alliance_UK&oldid=179821"