Difference between revisions of "The Times"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Controversies)
(→‎Media Monopoly)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
==Media Monopoly==
 
==Media Monopoly==
  
−
MP's protesting against Murdoch's acquisition of [[The Times]] were concerned with the effect a media monopoly could have on democracy in the United Kingdom. This is according to a report by the Labour Government in 2001 because "A healthy democracy depends on a culture of dissent and argument, which would inevitably be diminished if there were only a limited number of providers of news" <ref> Department for Culture Media and Sport,[http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/consultations/mediaownership2001.pdf Media Ownership Rules], November-2001, Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>
+
MP's protesting against Murdoch's acquisition of [[The Times]] were concerned with the effect a media monopoly could have on democracy in the United Kingdom. This is according to a report by the Labour Government in 2001 because "A healthy democracy depends on a culture of dissent and argument, which would inevitably be diminished if there were only a limited number of providers of news" <ref> Department for Culture Media and Sport,[http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/consultations/mediaownership2001.pdf Media Ownership Rules], November-2001, Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>.
 +
 
 +
The main concern with [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s media monopoly is that he can use it to manipulate public opinion and therefore put pressure on politicians who oppose his business interests. In October 2003 in the United States a study by the nonpartisan Program on International Policy Attitudes showed that 60% of U.S. citizens believed either that, clear evidence had been found of links between Iraq and Al Qaeda; W.M.D. had been found in Iraq; world public opinion favored the U.S. going to war with Iraq. 80% of the people who believed these falsehoods received their news primarily from [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[Fox News]]. The clear bias of [[Fox News]] has not been displayed in [[The Times]] but Krugman argues that "a number of former Times employees have said that there was pressure to slant coverage — and everyone I’ve seen quoted defending Mr. Murdoch’s management is still on his payroll" <Ref> Paul Krugman, [http://select.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/opinion/29krugman.html?_r=1, The Murdoch Factor], 29-June-2007, Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
The media interests of [[News International]] in the United Kingdom include:
 
The media interests of [[News International]] in the United Kingdom include:

Revision as of 15:19, 19 January 2009

The Times is a UK based national newspaper published by News International. The Newspaper has a cover price of 90 pence since an increase in January 2009, and has traditionally been classified as a broadsheet. To boost sales after a successful trial the paper moved to tabloid format in 2004 [1]. The current editor is James Harding.

History

(1981-Present)

The Times along with its Sunday version The Sunday Times was purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s organisation News International in 1981. The move was controversial because press baron Murdoch already owned tabloid newspapers The Sun and its sister paper The News of The World.

Rupert Murdoch moved production of the newspaper away from its traditional home in Fleet Street to new premises in Wapping East London in 1986. The move was designed to modernise production practices, reduce costs and perhaps more importantly remove the influence of the powerful Fleet Street print unions. The move away from Fleet Street and the trade unions led to the Sacking by The Observer of all sub-editors who also worked on The Times. The paper was banned from conferences by The Labour Party and boycotted by the BBC for 5 years.

In the early 1990s Rupert Murdoch imposed a 10% cut in staff costs, a 50% price rise and a ban on promotion. [2].

Controversies

At the time of the take over Rupert Murdoch was threatened by MP's who wanted to refer the sale to the Monopolies and Mergers Commision. Murdoch claimed he would not go through with the sale if this was to happen [3]. Murdoch managed to avoid the sale being referred to the commision by agreeing to increased powers for the Independent National Directors of the newspaper. The role of these directors would be to adjudicate in disputes between the editor and the company, make decisions on the appointment and dismissal of editorial staff and to be involved in decisions about the sale or transfer of the newspapers. The Independent National Directors were also given veto powers [4]

Harold Evans, who was the editor of The Sunday Times when Murodoch bought it and later the editor of The Times argued that the concessions made by Murdoch were worthless. Evans had fought for the increased powers of the Independent National Directors but in practice, he found they provided him with no effective protection. In his autobiography he wrote that none of the guarantees that Rupert Murdoch gave to safeguard editorial independence "are worth the paper they are written on—unless the proprietor shares the spirit of them. If he does, they are merely ornamental; if he does not, they are unworkable. Internal freedom cannot be acquired by external rules" [5]. Andrew Neil who was the editor of The Times from 1983 to 1994 agreed "It was a conceit invented ... to allow Mr Murdoch to take over these papers in the first place, and it was put in place for that reason. It was not really put in place to protect the independence of the editors". [6].

Media Monopoly

MP's protesting against Murdoch's acquisition of The Times were concerned with the effect a media monopoly could have on democracy in the United Kingdom. This is according to a report by the Labour Government in 2001 because "A healthy democracy depends on a culture of dissent and argument, which would inevitably be diminished if there were only a limited number of providers of news" [7].

The main concern with Rupert Murdoch's media monopoly is that he can use it to manipulate public opinion and therefore put pressure on politicians who oppose his business interests. In October 2003 in the United States a study by the nonpartisan Program on International Policy Attitudes showed that 60% of U.S. citizens believed either that, clear evidence had been found of links between Iraq and Al Qaeda; W.M.D. had been found in Iraq; world public opinion favored the U.S. going to war with Iraq. 80% of the people who believed these falsehoods received their news primarily from Rupert Murdoch's Fox News. The clear bias of Fox News has not been displayed in The Times but Krugman argues that "a number of former Times employees have said that there was pressure to slant coverage — and everyone I’ve seen quoted defending Mr. Murdoch’s management is still on his payroll" [8].



The media interests of News International in the United Kingdom include:

In the United States Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp owns:

[9]

Journalists


ABC and Readership Figures

The Times has an average daily net circulation of 600,962 according to the latest figures from ABC, these figures cover the period from the end of November 2008 to the end of December 2008. [10]

According to The National Readership Survey 88% of Times readers belong to socio-economic group ABC1, with the other 12% belonging to socio-economic group C2DE. 60% of Times readers are over 44 and 40% are aged between 15-44. The male-female divide amongst Times readers is 58% male and 42% female. This data was captured over one year from October 2007 to September 2008. [11]


References

  1. ↑ BBC NEWS, Times in Tabloid Transformation, 29-October-2004, Accessed 19-January-2009
  2. ↑ Simon Jenkins, Journalism:The History of The Times by Graham Stewart 08-January-2006, Accessed 19-January-2009
  3. ↑ BBC News, 1981: Murdoch bids to take over The Times, Accessed 19-January-2009
  4. ↑ House of Lords Select Comittee, Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation, Accessed 19-January-2009
  5. ↑ Harold Evans [Good Times, Bad Times, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983, pgs. 461-462]
  6. ↑ House of Lords Select Comittee, Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation, Accessed 19-January-2009
  7. ↑ Department for Culture Media and Sport,Media Ownership Rules, November-2001, Accessed 19-January-2009
  8. ↑ Paul Krugman, The Murdoch Factor, 29-June-2007, Accessed 19-January-2009
  9. ↑ Richard Wray, Murdoch faces scrutiny over media influence, 25-May-2007, Accessed 19-January-2009
  10. ↑ Audit Bureau of Circulation, ABC Figures for The Times Nov-Dec 2008 Accessed 19-January-2009
  11. ↑ National Readership Survey Figures, NRS Figures October 2008-September 2009, Accessed 19-January-2009
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=The_Times&oldid=74049"