Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:International Policy Network"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Criticisms)
(→‎Criticisms)
Line 82: Line 82:
 
They have sought to insert neoliberal ideology into environmental policy. They  advocate the use of the market to allocate scarce environmental resources such as wilderness and clean air and promote the replacement of legislation with voluntary industry agreements, reinforced or newly created property rights and economic instruments".
 
They have sought to insert neoliberal ideology into environmental policy. They  advocate the use of the market to allocate scarce environmental resources such as wilderness and clean air and promote the replacement of legislation with voluntary industry agreements, reinforced or newly created property rights and economic instruments".
 
<ref>Beder.S, (2001) “Neoliberal Think Tanks and Free Market Environmentalism”, Environmental Politics, 10(2), Summer, 128-133. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=artspapers</ref> However Corporate Europe Observatory state that “Over the last few years, the EU capital Brussels has experienced a huge growth in the number of new think tanks seeking to influence the EU's political debate. A large number of these new players advocate radical "free market" ideology. This includes the London-based International Policy Network and the Paris-based Institut Montaigne. These groups who would once have been regarded as loony fringe organisations, are expanding fast and working their way into mainstream EU political debate. While their funding sources remain a well-protected secret, research by CEO has revealed that it is large corporations that foot the bill for the expansion of these radical rightwing think tanks.”<ref>No author given, “[http://archive.corporateeurope.org/stockholmnetwork.html Covert industry funding fuels the expansion of radical rightwing EU think tanks]”, Corporate Europe Observatory, July 2005, accessed 17.11.10</ref>
 
<ref>Beder.S, (2001) “Neoliberal Think Tanks and Free Market Environmentalism”, Environmental Politics, 10(2), Summer, 128-133. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=artspapers</ref> However Corporate Europe Observatory state that “Over the last few years, the EU capital Brussels has experienced a huge growth in the number of new think tanks seeking to influence the EU's political debate. A large number of these new players advocate radical "free market" ideology. This includes the London-based International Policy Network and the Paris-based Institut Montaigne. These groups who would once have been regarded as loony fringe organisations, are expanding fast and working their way into mainstream EU political debate. While their funding sources remain a well-protected secret, research by CEO has revealed that it is large corporations that foot the bill for the expansion of these radical rightwing think tanks.”<ref>No author given, “[http://archive.corporateeurope.org/stockholmnetwork.html Covert industry funding fuels the expansion of radical rightwing EU think tanks]”, Corporate Europe Observatory, July 2005, accessed 17.11.10</ref>
−
IPN has been described by right-wing blogger Paul Staines as a “change denying propaganda machine funded by industry interests” who peddle “policy recommendations and propaganda on behalf of its sponsors so transparently that almost everyone ignores it”.<ref> Paul Staines, “[http://order-order.com/2006/10/12/who-will-win-wonk-whores-journalism/ Who will win wonk whores journalism prize?]”, Guido Fawkes’ Blog, 12th October 2006, accessed 9.11.10</ref>  In regards to statements that the IPN receive funding from large companies to dismiss the effects of climate change, such as ExxonMobil, Julian Morris replied in a letter written to the Times in 2005, that “IPN has a programme on environment and sustainable development issues to which the ExxonMobil Foundation has contributed over a number of years”.<ref>Julian Morris, “[http://web.archive.org/web/20070425015539/http://www.policynetwork.net/main/article.php?article_id=719 IPN responds to defamatory claims made in The Times]”, IPN Main, 21st December 2005, accessed 9.11.10</ref>  
+
IPN has been described by right-wing blogger Paul Staines as a “change denying propaganda machine funded by industry interests” who peddle “policy recommendations and propaganda on behalf of its sponsors so transparently that almost everyone ignores it”.<ref> Paul Staines, “[http://order-order.com/2006/10/12/who-will-win-wonk-whores-journalism/ Who will win wonk whores journalism prize?]”, Guido Fawkes’ Blog, 12th October 2006, accessed 9.11.10</ref>  In regards to statements that the IPN receive funding from large companies to dismiss the effects of climate change, such as ExxonMobil, Julian Morris replied in a letter written to the Times in 2005, that “IPN has a programme on environment and sustainable development issues to which the ExxonMobil Foundation has contributed over a number of years”.<ref>Julian Morris, “[http://web.archive.org/web/20070425015539/http://www.policynetwork.net/main/article.php?article_id=719 IPN responds to defamatory claims made in The Times]”, IPN Main, 21st December 2005, accessed 9.11.10</ref>  
 
Oxfam has criticised the IPN for producing “irresponsible” criticism towards International Aid, which in turn, can put millions of lives at risk. The article, published by Oxfam, states that, while they realise that vast quantities of Aid is misspent and ends up in the hands of corrupt officials, the Aid which is accounted for helps to dramatically improve the lives of those who receive it. <ref> Jon Slater, “[http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/2010/05/20/oxfam-aid-not-perfect-but-%E2%80%98irresponsible%E2%80%99-criticism-hurts-millions/ Oxfam: Aid not perfect but “irresponsible” criticism hurts millions]”, Oxfam Website, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10</ref> The IPN respond to this article by stating that “challenging a system that so evidently doesn’t work is not irresponsible- it is prudent and rational” <ref> Timothy Cox, “[http://www.policynetwork.net/blogs/article/ipn%E2%80%99s-criticism-foreign-aid-spending-not-%E2%80%9Cirresponsible%E2%80%9D IPN’s criticism of foreign aid spending is not “irresponsible”]”, IPN Blogs, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10</ref>
 
Oxfam has criticised the IPN for producing “irresponsible” criticism towards International Aid, which in turn, can put millions of lives at risk. The article, published by Oxfam, states that, while they realise that vast quantities of Aid is misspent and ends up in the hands of corrupt officials, the Aid which is accounted for helps to dramatically improve the lives of those who receive it. <ref> Jon Slater, “[http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/pressoffice/2010/05/20/oxfam-aid-not-perfect-but-%E2%80%98irresponsible%E2%80%99-criticism-hurts-millions/ Oxfam: Aid not perfect but “irresponsible” criticism hurts millions]”, Oxfam Website, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10</ref> The IPN respond to this article by stating that “challenging a system that so evidently doesn’t work is not irresponsible- it is prudent and rational” <ref> Timothy Cox, “[http://www.policynetwork.net/blogs/article/ipn%E2%80%99s-criticism-foreign-aid-spending-not-%E2%80%9Cirresponsible%E2%80%9D IPN’s criticism of foreign aid spending is not “irresponsible”]”, IPN Blogs, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10</ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 17:25, 17 November 2010

Dave Forbes Gavin Lindsay Fergus Jones Alexandra Hibbert

Ipn.jpg

IPN seeks to bring down barriers to enterprise and trade, in order to achieve a world of opportunity, peace and prosperity. [1] The organisation describes itself as a think-tank or independent charity, although critics have accused it of being more like a lobbying group [2]

Globalisation:International Policy Network: Ideology and aims

Globalisation:International Policy Network: Funding and connections

Globalisation:International Policy Network: Views on development

Globalisation:International Policy Network: Views on climate change

History

IPN’s UK Charity (No. CC 262982) was founded by Globalisation: Antony Fisher in 1971. The mission of this body is to “Promote the advancement of learning by research into economic and political science and the publication of such research.” The charity’s original name was the International Institute for Economic Research, and it now operates under the name International Policy Network. IPN’s sister organization, International Policy Network US Inc., is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization incorporated in 2001. The two organizations are separate legal and financial entities with independent boards, working together with a common vision.[3]

Origins

People

Directors

Board Members[4]

Staff[5]


Ideology and aims

Mission

IPN's mission is to 'share ideas that free people'. It believes in de-regulation but that 'where regulations are necessary... they should be based on sound science. IPN educates opinion formers around the world about market solutions to public policy problems, especially those of a global nature. IPN aims to empower individuals and promote respect for people and property in order to eliminate poverty, improve human health and protect the environment they promote public awareness of the importance of this vision for all people, both rich and poor. IPN seeks to achieve its vision by promoting the role of market institutions in certain key international policy debates: sustainable development, health, and globalisation and trade. IPN works with academics, think tanks, journalists and policymakers on every continent. '[6]

Aims

The IPN lists its areas of interest as:Health, Free Trade and Globalisation, Sustainable Development & the Environment, Technology, Economics

Links to other organisations

The IPN has been linked to several other organisations and think-tanks including; Atlas Economic Research Foundation, Institute of Economic Affairs, Stockholm Network and Competitive Enterprise Institute. Anthony Fisher, who founded the IPN, went on to found the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in 1981 creating several ties between the organisations. Julian Morris, the current executive director of IPN was previously the director of the Institute of Economic Affairs’ Environment and Technology Programme. Morris is on the Policy Advisory Board for the International Climate Science Coalition and a regular speaker at the Heartland Institute. “Bate and Morris work for the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a right-wing think tank based in London. Bate is also a fellow at the Washington-based Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a leading anti-environmental think tank, where Kendra Okonski also used to work”.[7] IPN is also partnered with over 75 think-tanks worldwide, incuding;

Criticisms

Sharon Beder, in an article, states that "Conservative think tanks are generally set up as private, tax-exempt, research and advocacy institutes, and are largely funded by foundations and corporations. They have sought to insert neoliberal ideology into environmental policy. They advocate the use of the market to allocate scarce environmental resources such as wilderness and clean air and promote the replacement of legislation with voluntary industry agreements, reinforced or newly created property rights and economic instruments". [8] However Corporate Europe Observatory state that “Over the last few years, the EU capital Brussels has experienced a huge growth in the number of new think tanks seeking to influence the EU's political debate. A large number of these new players advocate radical "free market" ideology. This includes the London-based International Policy Network and the Paris-based Institut Montaigne. These groups who would once have been regarded as loony fringe organisations, are expanding fast and working their way into mainstream EU political debate. While their funding sources remain a well-protected secret, research by CEO has revealed that it is large corporations that foot the bill for the expansion of these radical rightwing think tanks.”[9] 

IPN has been described by right-wing blogger Paul Staines as a “change denying propaganda machine funded by industry interests” who peddle “policy recommendations and propaganda on behalf of its sponsors so transparently that almost everyone ignores it”.[10]  In regards to statements that the IPN receive funding from large companies to dismiss the effects of climate change, such as ExxonMobil, Julian Morris replied in a letter written to the Times in 2005, that “IPN has a programme on environment and sustainable development issues to which the ExxonMobil Foundation has contributed over a number of years”.[11]

Oxfam has criticised the IPN for producing “irresponsible” criticism towards International Aid, which in turn, can put millions of lives at risk. The article, published by Oxfam, states that, while they realise that vast quantities of Aid is misspent and ends up in the hands of corrupt officials, the Aid which is accounted for helps to dramatically improve the lives of those who receive it. [12] The IPN respond to this article by stating that “challenging a system that so evidently doesn’t work is not irresponsible- it is prudent and rational” [13]

Notes

  1. ↑ IPN, "Homepage", accessed 05.10.10
  2. ↑ George Monbiot, “How corporations have hijacked the climate change debate”, The Age, 27th September 2006, accessed 2.11.10
  3. ↑ IPN, "History", accessed 12.10.10
  4. ↑ IPN, "Board Members", accessed 12.10.10
  5. ↑ IPN, "Staff", accessed 18.10.10
  6. ↑ IPN, "About IPN", accessed 02 November 2010
  7. ↑ Andy Rowell and Bob Burnton, “Rising Rhetoric on Genetically Modified Crops”, PR Watch, First Quarter 2003, accessed 16.11.10
  8. ↑ Beder.S, (2001) “Neoliberal Think Tanks and Free Market Environmentalism”, Environmental Politics, 10(2), Summer, 128-133. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=artspapers
  9. ↑ No author given, “Covert industry funding fuels the expansion of radical rightwing EU think tanks”, Corporate Europe Observatory, July 2005, accessed 17.11.10
  10. ↑ Paul Staines, “Who will win wonk whores journalism prize?”, Guido Fawkes’ Blog, 12th October 2006, accessed 9.11.10
  11. ↑ Julian Morris, “IPN responds to defamatory claims made in The Times”, IPN Main, 21st December 2005, accessed 9.11.10
  12. ↑ Jon Slater, “Oxfam: Aid not perfect but “irresponsible” criticism hurts millions”, Oxfam Website, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10
  13. ↑ Timothy Cox, “IPN’s criticism of foreign aid spending is not “irresponsible””, IPN Blogs, 20th May 2010, accessed 9.11.10
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Globalisation:International_Policy_Network&oldid=140684"