Difference between revisions of "N officers 2"
Peter Salmon (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Police officers cited in the [[Undercover Policing Inquiry]] (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry [[Operation Herne]] which investigated the activities of the [[Special Demonstration Squad]] undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by [[Mark Ellison]] for his [[Ellison Review|Review]] and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The practice was also taken up by [[Operation Elter]], investigating the [[National Public Order Intelligence Unit]]. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, [[John Mitting]], began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-press-notice-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).</ref> | Police officers cited in the [[Undercover Policing Inquiry]] (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry [[Operation Herne]] which investigated the activities of the [[Special Demonstration Squad]] undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by [[Mark Ellison]] for his [[Ellison Review|Review]] and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The practice was also taken up by [[Operation Elter]], investigating the [[National Public Order Intelligence Unit]]. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, [[John Mitting]], began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-press-notice-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad], Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).</ref> | ||
− | The N number system appears to be applied across the board for police officers regardless of force, position or involvement with undercover policing. A few have since been identified, but many remain anonymous and as such few details of them are | + | The N number system appears to be applied across the board for police officers regardless of force, position or involvement with undercover policing. A few have since been identified, but many remain anonymous and as such few details of them are known. Except where profiled elsewhere, this page collates what is known of them and links to relevant documents, including relevant procedural issues within the Undercover Policing Inquiry. |
− | Due to the number of offices and associated details, they list has been split | + | Due to the number of offices and associated details, they list has been split into several pages. This is page 2, and covers N officers with cypher number of 100 or higher. |
+ | |||
+ | For other officers, with cypher number up to 99, see [[N_officers_1|N officers 1]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For a general introduction into the cypher system, see [[N_officers| N Officers (main page)]]. | ||
* ''Updated 19 November 2017'' | * ''Updated 19 November 2017'' | ||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| | | | ||
− | | SDS. Contemporary of Peter Francis, who had ' | + | | SDS. Contemporary of Peter Francis, who had 'an involvement in Stephen Lawrence campaign issues' according to Lambert (Ellison, p. 214).<ref name="ellison.1"/> |
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
| HN104 | | HN104 | ||
| ''[[Carlo Neri (alias)]]'' | | ''[[Carlo Neri (alias)]]'' | ||
| UCPI minded to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | | UCPI minded to restrict real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights is not justified." Can give evidence from behind a screen.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Applications from MPS & N104's lawyer to restrict publication of real name only; also received are personal statements from his family and expert medical report; final risk assessment from MPS awaited but no scope for restriction of cover name. Open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> |
In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.<ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171004-NPNSCPs-submissions-re-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.<ref>Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171004-NPNSCPs-submissions-re-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications], 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | ||
Line 55: | Line 59: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to: restrict both cover name and real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | | Minded-to: restrict both cover name and real name.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed into number of left-wing groups 1993-1998. Retired from MPS on health grounds & later diagnosed | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed into a number of left-wing groups 1993-1998. Retired from MPS on health grounds & later diagnosed with a mental health condition in part derived from his deployment - in slow but incomplete recovery. "HN123 and HN123’s partner are concerned about the possibility that HN123’s identity will be revealed during the Inquiry, both for reasons of safety and because of the potential impact on HN123’s health. I have read personal statements by both of them, which are and will remain closed, in which these concerns are expressed. I accept that they are genuine and not irrational. Overriding them would interfere with their right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention and would require to be justified under Article 8(2). Fulfilment of the terms of reference of the Inquiry does not require that the real or cover name of HN123 be published. The evidence of HN123 can be given under a cypher. HN123 was involved indirectly in deployments affecting the Lawrence family and can give evidence about that under the cypher. To the extent that it is contentious, it can be challenged just as effectively, as if given in the real or cover name. In those circumstances, the interference would not be justified. It is desirable, and may be essential, that HN123 gives evidence in public. In that event, protective measures are likely to be required."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Application from MPS & HN123's lawyer to restrict both cover and real names, along with personal statements & medical material - open versions published, some material previously being released in March 2016.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> |
March 2016 application documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Open-Application.pdf open application], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Draft-Order.pdf draft order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Personal-Statement-gisted.pdf personal statement (gisted)] & [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N15-N16-N26-N58-N81-N123-Gisted-Risk-Asessments-1.pdf risk assessment (gisted)]. | March 2016 application documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Open-Application.pdf open application], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Draft-Order.pdf draft order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N123-Personal-Statement-gisted.pdf personal statement (gisted)] & [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/N15-N16-N26-N58-N81-N123-Gisted-Risk-Asessments-1.pdf risk assessment (gisted)]. | ||
Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
According to Bob Lambert (Ellison, p.214), N123 started his undercover work after Lambert had become head of the SDS and stated: I am sure from day one the Stephen Lawrence case would have been on N123’s agenda, and… they must have attended, started to attend meetings with the Stephen Lawrence campaign, almost goes as read that they would have been there… they would want to be inside the meeting, to have a speaker on the platform and so N123 is following close behind ‘Pete Francis’… they became quite close friends and times would have been at the same events… May well have been events specifically in support of the Stephen Lawrence campaign… | According to Bob Lambert (Ellison, p.214), N123 started his undercover work after Lambert had become head of the SDS and stated: I am sure from day one the Stephen Lawrence case would have been on N123’s agenda, and… they must have attended, started to attend meetings with the Stephen Lawrence campaign, almost goes as read that they would have been there… they would want to be inside the meeting, to have a speaker on the platform and so N123 is following close behind ‘Pete Francis’… they became quite close friends and times would have been at the same events… May well have been events specifically in support of the Stephen Lawrence campaign… | ||
− | Mentioned in Herne II | + | Mentioned in Herne II as being undercover with the potential to report on the Lawrence family (Herne II, 12.2).<ref name="herne.2"/> |
<br>Represented by Slater & Gordon. | <br>Represented by Slater & Gordon. | ||
Line 79: | Line 83: | ||
| N129 | | N129 | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
− | | Extension sought to be | + | | Extension sought to be dealt with in a future tranche.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17">[https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/20171114-updated-explanatory-note.pdf Counsel to the Inquiry's Explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded-To' Note (2) in respect for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 14 November 2017 (accessed 15 November 2017).</ref> |
| SDS Detective Sergeant. received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting; commented on character and skill of Peter Francis, but also that they did not recognise the allegations regarding seeking information to smear the Lawrence family. His statement to Op. Herne is quoted in Ellison (p.212): "[Mr Francis] was targeted towards the campaign in the same way as today… to perform a dual role of protecting the family from malicious extremist influences and providing information about potential public order issues. The anti-police sentiment on the streets was palpable, and Territorial Policing was very interested in any potential or planned disorder…" N129 believes that he was directly tasked to get involved with the campaign, although not necessarily with the family. His role was not about ‘smearing’ at all.<ref name="ellison.1"/> | | SDS Detective Sergeant. received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting; commented on character and skill of Peter Francis, but also that they did not recognise the allegations regarding seeking information to smear the Lawrence family. His statement to Op. Herne is quoted in Ellison (p.212): "[Mr Francis] was targeted towards the campaign in the same way as today… to perform a dual role of protecting the family from malicious extremist influences and providing information about potential public order issues. The anti-police sentiment on the streets was palpable, and Territorial Policing was very interested in any potential or planned disorder…" N129 believes that he was directly tasked to get involved with the campaign, although not necessarily with the family. His role was not about ‘smearing’ at all.<ref name="ellison.1"/> | ||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
Line 105: | Line 109: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): application for restriction order in respect of real name to be refused.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): application for restriction order in respect of real name to be refused.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS management. Responsible for day-to-day running of the unit in 1990s. | + | | SDS management. Responsible for day-to-day running of the unit in the 1990s. |
Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
Line 115: | Line 119: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Cover name and real name to be published as no restriction order application made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/> | | Cover name and real name to be published as no restriction order application made.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | Herne II, para. 25.1.2 states: The MPS Director of Intelligence in 1999 has been interviewed by Operation Herne and stated, 'I have been asked if I recall 'any Special Branch plans to mislead the Macpherson Inquiry' into the death of Stephen Lawrence. For part of this time I was head of Special Branch operations and have no recollection of any such plans.’ Peter Francis alleged that N218 came out to see him in respect of withholding information from the Macpherson Inquiry. In interview N218 stated that this meeting or request never happened.<ref name="herne.2"/> It is not clear if N218 is the MPS Director of Intelligence referred to or if it refers to someone else entirely. If N218 is the Director of Intelligence then it is probably [[Alan Fry]] as opposed to his successor Roger Pearce (who appears as N85).<ref name="herne.2"/> | + | | Herne II, para. 25.1.2 states: The MPS Director of Intelligence in 1999 has been interviewed by Operation Herne and stated, 'I have been asked if I recall 'any Special Branch plans to mislead the Macpherson Inquiry' into the death of Stephen Lawrence. For part of this time, I was head of Special Branch operations and have no recollection of any such plans.’ Peter Francis alleged that N218 came out to see him in respect of withholding information from the Macpherson Inquiry. In interview, N218 stated that this meeting or request never happened.<ref name="herne.2"/> It is not clear if N218 is the MPS Director of Intelligence referred to or if it refers to someone else entirely. If N218 is the Director of Intelligence then it is probably [[Alan Fry]] as opposed to his successor Roger Pearce (who appears as N85).<ref name="herne.2"/> |
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
| HN241 | | HN241 | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): neither cover or real name can be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): neither cover or real name can be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. In 70s, deployed against one group in early 1970s. No allegation of misconduct. | + | | SDS UCO. In his 70s, deployed against one group in the early 1970s. No allegation of misconduct. |
Mitting stated (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | Mitting stated (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | :: Although the risk to physical safety, if real name were to be published, is low, it cannot be dismissed as fanciful. There is a real, but unquantifiable, risk that if the cover name were to be published, the real name could be identified. From what has so far been disclosed to the Inquiry about the deployment, it seems very unlikely that the publication of either real or cover name would prompt any evidence from a non—state source which would assist the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. In those circumstances, the right to respect for an aspect of private life – physical integrity – is not outweighed by any factor which would justify interference with it. Closed reasons accompany this note | + | :: Although the risk to physical safety, if the real name were to be published, is low, it cannot be dismissed as fanciful. There is a real, but unquantifiable, risk that if the cover name were to be published, the real name could be identified. From what has so far been disclosed to the Inquiry about the deployment, it seems very unlikely that the publication of either real or cover name would prompt any evidence from a non—state source which would assist the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. In those circumstances, the right to respect for an aspect of private life – physical integrity – is not outweighed by any factor which would justify interference with it. Closed reasons accompany this note |
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
| HN244 | | HN244 | ||
Line 138: | Line 142: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17">John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-Minded-to.pdf In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref> | | Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17">John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-Minded-to.pdf In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref> | ||
− | | SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974. Has elderly widow & other family members. "There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2)."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Application from MPS for restricting real name, along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> | + | | SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974. Has elderly widow & other family members. "There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances, interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2)."<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Application from MPS for restricting real name, along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> |
August 2017 documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf Open application for restriction order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf open risk assessment (Brian Lockie)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-1-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-2-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (2)] | August 2017 documents: [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf Open application for restriction order], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf open risk assessment (Brian Lockie)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-1-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (1)], [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN294-Open-personal-statement-2-from-the-MPS.pdf open personal statement (2)] | ||
Line 149: | Line 153: | ||
| HN298 | | HN298 | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
− | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real | + | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> |
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups in 1970s, one of which was involved in anti-apartheid campaigning:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups in the 1970s, one of which was involved in anti-apartheid campaigning:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> |
− | :: In the course of his deployment he was arrested at a demonstration against the British Lions rugby tour to South Africa on 12 May 1972 for obstruction of the highway and of a police officer. He was prosecuted in summary proceedings in his cover name. He was convicted of both | + | :: In the course of his deployment, he was arrested at a demonstration against the British Lions rugby tour to South Africa on 12 May 1972 for obstruction of the highway and of a police officer. He was prosecuted in summary proceedings in his cover name. He was convicted of both offenses and fined and made the subject of a conditional discharge. His actions were approved by his line management. Not long after his deployment, he left the police service, since when he has had nothing to do with the police. |
No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
Line 190: | Line 194: | ||
In their personal witness statement, HN321 says:<ref>'NH321', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-personal-statement-from-the-DL-team.pdf Open personal witness statement of N321 (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | In their personal witness statement, HN321 says:<ref>'NH321', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-personal-statement-from-the-DL-team.pdf Open personal witness statement of N321 (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | ||
− | :: The Special Branch was a covert entity and while the public knew it existed, its activities were secret. My understanding when I joined the Special Branch was that I was not to discuss its activities outside of the service and my expectation of the Branch was that my | + | :: The Special Branch was a covert entity and while the public knew it existed, its activities were secret. My understanding when I joined the Special Branch was that I was not to discuss its activities outside of the service and my expectation of the Branch was that my identity would also be kept secret. I recall that at the Induction presentation into the Branch that we were warned that we would have access to secret information that we were not to reveal to anyone outside of the Police or to even acknowledge that we were members of the Special Branch. This seemed entirely reasonable to me and for nearly fifty years I have kept faith with that understanding. |
According to his risk assessment:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN321 Open Risk Assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2015 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | According to his risk assessment:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN321 Open Risk Assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2015 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | ||
− | ::* 3.3 N321 received no training and no | + | ::* 3.3 N321 received no training and no psychometric testing. N321 was told that N321 needed to gather intelligence, but the senior officers left it to the squad members to work out their own approach. There was no particular methodology advocated by officers and N321 simply used whatever techniques looked the most promising. To a certain extent the approach had to be tailored to the group that were to be penetrated. |
::* They did not use the identity of a dead child. | ::* They did not use the identity of a dead child. | ||
Line 201: | Line 205: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Now in 70s; had 30 year police career, retiring in mid-1990s. With Special Operations Squad for two months in 1968; in his recollection he was intended to be deployed against a group (which | + | | SDS UCO. Now in 70s; had 30-year police career, retiring in mid-1990s. With Special Operations Squad for two months in 1968; in his recollection, he was intended to be deployed against a group (which no longer exists) but was re-allocated to other duties before being deployed. Had no cover name.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> |
Mitting noted (Nov 2017): | Mitting noted (Nov 2017): | ||
Line 229: | Line 233: | ||
According to his risk assessment:<ref>Kevin Shanahan, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf Open risk assessment for HN326], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> | According to his risk assessment:<ref>Kevin Shanahan, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN326-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf Open risk assessment for HN326], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> | ||
:: He was recruited by Special Branch management into the Special Operations Squad, whose function was to monitor protest groups who were a major concern of the Government. He had no formal induction or form of training (3.3). | :: He was recruited by Special Branch management into the Special Operations Squad, whose function was to monitor protest groups who were a major concern of the Government. He had no formal induction or form of training (3.3). | ||
− | :: "3.4 At the time of his recruitment was informed by his senior management (Detective Chief Inspector & Detective Inspector) that the Unit he was seconded to was highly secret and was to be deployed as a result of ongoing large scale public disorder being a major concern of the Government at that time (late 1968)." | + | :: "3.4 At the time of his recruitment was informed by his senior management (Detective Chief Inspector & Detective Inspector) that the Unit he was seconded to was highly secret and was to be deployed as a result of ongoing large-scale public disorder being a major concern of the Government at that time (late 1968)." |
− | :: NOt offered or provided with support during his deployment; it was ad hoc and | + | :: NOt offered or provided with support during his deployment; it was ad hoc and uncoordinated (4.19). |
− | :: After deployment he resumed duties in Special Branch (4.16) | + | :: After deployment, he resumed duties in Special Branch (4.16) |
See under profile for more detailed analysis of his time undercover. | See under profile for more detailed analysis of his time undercover. | ||
Line 260: | Line 264: | ||
In an email to the risk assessors he stated:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | In an email to the risk assessors he stated:<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | ||
− | :: I am puzzled by your reference to my “cover name”. I did have rather a large number of them… I would, however, emphasise that between those dates I did not join any political party, group or organisation. I was present at hundreds of political meeting, joined many public demonstrations and protests | + | :: I am puzzled by your reference to my “cover name”. I did have rather a large number of them… I would, however, emphasise that between those dates I did not join any political party, group or organisation. I was present at hundreds of political meeting, joined many public demonstrations and protests throughout the [Metropolitan Police District] and knocked on hundreds of doors. In all cases and for obvious reasons my true identity remained unknown and when avoidable I gave a false name and occupation...” |
In October 2017, it was noted:<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017">Sir John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171023-supplementary-Minded-to.pdf Supplementary 'Minded-To'], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | In October 2017, it was noted:<ref name="mitting.supp.minded-to.23Oct2017">Sir John Mitting, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/20171023-supplementary-Minded-to.pdf Supplementary 'Minded-To'], ''Undercover Policing Inquiry'', 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).</ref> | ||
When the ‘Minded to’ dated 3 August 2017 was published, the Inquiry did not know HN330’s cover name and HN330 could not remember it. | When the ‘Minded to’ dated 3 August 2017 was published, the Inquiry did not know HN330’s cover name and HN330 could not remember it. | ||
− | The Inquiry has since received information from another officer which permits HN330’s cover name to be published. Legal representatives | + | The Inquiry has since received information from another officer which permits HN330’s cover name to be published. Legal representatives of this officer and the Metropolitan Police Service have been notified and, provided that no application for a restriction order in respect |
of it is received, it will be [released]. | of it is received, it will be [released]. | ||
The MPS have [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf applied to restrict his real name only] along with [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-HN330-HN333-HN343-supplementary-submissions-from-DL.pdf open submissions], a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-personal-statement.pdf personal statement] and [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (David Reid)] - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17">David Barr & Kate Wilkinson, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-counsels-explanatory-note-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref> | The MPS have [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-application-from-the-MPS.pdf applied to restrict his real name only] along with [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN321-HN330-HN333-HN343-supplementary-submissions-from-DL.pdf open submissions], a [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-personal-statement.pdf personal statement] and [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf risk assessment (David Reid)] - open versions published.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17">David Barr & Kate Wilkinson, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170803-counsels-explanatory-note-SDS-Minded-to.pdf Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad], ''Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk)'', 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).</ref> | ||
− | In his personal statement, he has described the risk assessment process as a ' | + | In his personal statement, he has described the risk assessment process as a 'pantomime' and based on 'hearsay obtained from a former colleague'.<ref name="hn329.ps.Apr17"/> |
He is not a core participant, and has expressed to risk assessors (whom he has declined to meet) "he has the ‘most monumental indifference’ to whether the Inquiry wishes him to give evidence."<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> | He is not a core participant, and has expressed to risk assessors (whom he has declined to meet) "he has the ‘most monumental indifference’ to whether the Inquiry wishes him to give evidence."<ref>David Reid, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN330-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN330 open risk assessment (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> | ||
Line 276: | Line 280: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to (Nov 2017): restrict real name<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to (Nov 2017): restrict real name<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed against one group (now defunct) in 1968 & 1969. Cover name is unknown. Killed in road traffic accident in 1970s leaving a widow and son. | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed against one group (now defunct) in 1968 & 1969. Cover name is unknown. Killed in road traffic accident in the 1970s leaving a widow and son. |
According to Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | According to Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
Line 284: | Line 288: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to: restrict real name.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to: restrict real name.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS managerial role in 1970s. | + | | SDS managerial role in the 1970s. |
Mitting stated (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | Mitting stated (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
Line 292: | Line 296: | ||
| HN333 | | HN333 | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
− | | Cover name known.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real and cover names | + | | Cover name known.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: real and cover names cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> |
− | | SDS UCO. Now in 70s and retired. Deployed for 9 months in 1968-1969 against a left wing group (no longer exists). No known allegation of misconduct against him and he neither committed any crimes or took the identity of a dead child as part of his cover. Described his training as 'rudimentary'. Hei infiltrated his target group by answering an advert for people who were following the philosophy of [redacted]. Subsequently attended meetings of this small group. He characterised the group as extremist.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017">'HN333', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-personal-statement-from-DL.pdf Open personal statement (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 25 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> <ref name="hn333.ra.May2017">Graham Walker, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN333 Open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 2 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> | + | | SDS UCO. Now in his 70s and retired. Deployed for 9 months in 1968-1969 against a left-wing group (no longer exists). No known allegation of misconduct against him and he neither committed any crimes or took the identity of a dead child as part of his cover. Described his training as 'rudimentary'. Hei infiltrated his target group by answering an advert for people who were following the philosophy of [redacted]. Subsequently attended meetings of this small group. He characterised the group as extremist.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017">'HN333', [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-personal-statement-from-DL.pdf Open personal statement (redacted)], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 25 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> <ref name="hn333.ra.May2017">Graham Walker, [https://www.ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HN333-Open-risk-assessment-from-the-MPS.pdf HN333 Open risk assessment], ''Metropolitan Police Service'', 2 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)</ref> |
"N333 received no specific assurance or guarantee of anonymity by senior officer(s). N333 states that there was only 'implied implication' of future anonymity'.<ref name="hn333.ra.May2017"/> He subsequently went on to have a 'long and distinguished career' in the police.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017"/> | "N333 received no specific assurance or guarantee of anonymity by senior officer(s). N333 states that there was only 'implied implication' of future anonymity'.<ref name="hn333.ra.May2017"/> He subsequently went on to have a 'long and distinguished career' in the police.<ref name="hn333.ps.May2017"/> | ||
Line 347: | Line 351: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| Minded-to: restrict both cover and real names.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | | Minded-to: restrict both cover and real names.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed in 1970s against two groups. | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed in the 1970s against two groups. |
Mitting (Nov 2017): | Mitting (Nov 2017): | ||
Line 362: | Line 366: | ||
| ''unknown'' | | ''unknown'' | ||
| UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: "The real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Cover name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/> | | UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/> Minded-To: "The real name cannot be published.<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> Cover name to be published.<ref name="explan.note.cti.14Nov17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. In 70s. Deployed into various groups in early 1970s; past kept secret from everyone his family & social circles. | + | | SDS UCO. In 70s. Deployed into various groups in the early 1970s; past kept secret from everyone his family & social circles. |
The inquiry has noted:<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | The inquiry has noted:<ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | ||
− | :: HN343 is still economically active and has a legitimate concern, the cause of which cannot be stated in this document, that if oral evidence were to be given without steps being taken to conceal identity, HN343 would be the subject of media interest which would impair personal and economic life. If HN343 is required to give oral evidence, it is likely that protective measures will have to be taken. Pending receipt of further information, no decision can yet be made about publication of the cover name. | + | :: HN343 is still economically active and has a legitimate concern, the cause of which cannot be stated in this document, that if oral evidence were to be given without steps being taken to conceal identity, HN343 would be the subject of media interest which would impair personal and economic life. If HN343 is required to give oral evidence, it is likely that protective measures will have to be taken. Pending receipt of further information, no decision can yet be made about the publication of the cover name. |
Application from MPS to restrict real name only. Open versions of documents not yet published pending final application.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> | Application from MPS to restrict real name only. Open versions of documents not yet published pending final application.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> | ||
Line 378: | Line 382: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Previously thought to be deceased but since discovered to be alive.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> UCPI granted extension until 1 September 2017 to submit anonymity application.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | Previously thought to be deceased but since discovered to be alive.<ref name="counsel.note.3Aug17"/> UCPI granted extension until 1 September 2017 to submit anonymity application.<ref name="ucpi.pr.3Aug17"/><ref name="ucpi.mitting.mindedto.3Aug17"/> | ||
− | | SDS UCO. Deployed for six months in 1971, though not against | + | | SDS UCO. Deployed for six months in 1971, though not against anyone specific groups - reported on several including those opposed to apartheid. Deployment ceased when his probationary period in Special Branch was terminated. "There is a difference between his recollection of the reason for termination and that recorded in his personnel file. He left the Metropolitan Police Service soon after." No known allegation of misconduct.<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> |
Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> | Mitting (Nov 2017):<ref name="mitting.mindedto2.14Nov17"/> |
Revision as of 10:27, 4 December 2017
This article is part of the Undercover Research Portal at Powerbase: investigating corporate and police spying on activists.
Police officers cited in the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI) are generally designated by a cypher / nominal starting with N or HN followed by a number. The practice of assigning these cyphers was begun in by the Metropolitan Police inquiry Operation Herne which investigated the activities of the Special Demonstration Squad undercovers. It was subsequently adopted by Mark Ellison for his Review and the UCPI, both of which draw heavily on the material assembled by Operation Herne. The practice was also taken up by Operation Elter, investigating the National Public Order Intelligence Unit. The system appears to have changed in 2017, when the 3 August 2017 rulings and direction of the new Inquiry Chair, John Mitting, began using the 'HN' label, though the associated numbers appear to be unchanged.[1]
The N number system appears to be applied across the board for police officers regardless of force, position or involvement with undercover policing. A few have since been identified, but many remain anonymous and as such few details of them are known. Except where profiled elsewhere, this page collates what is known of them and links to relevant documents, including relevant procedural issues within the Undercover Policing Inquiry.
Due to the number of offices and associated details, they list has been split into several pages. This is page 2, and covers N officers with cypher number of 100 or higher.
For other officers, with cypher number up to 99, see N officers 1.
For a general introduction into the cypher system, see N Officers (main page).
- Updated 19 November 2017
N series officers part 2 (>100)
Cypher | Name | Status | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
HN101 | unknown | SDS. Contemporary of Peter Francis, who had 'an involvement in Stephen Lawrence campaign issues' according to Lambert (Ellison, p. 214).[2] | |
HN104 | Carlo Neri (alias) | UCPI minded to restrict real name.[1][3] | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups March 2000 to Summer 2006. Both he and partners concerned about violence being used by (ex)members of the groups he targeted and of media intrusion, and the efforts of those with IT skills to ascertain his real name and whereabouts. "These concerns are not irrational and have some basis in fact". According to Prof Fox, (report of 8 March 2017), HN104 suffers from significant mental health conditions. Mitting opposing publishing of real name as interference under Article 8(2), and not necessary for those who claim sexual relationships with him in order to give evidence in acts committed by his cover name. "On the basis of what is known, interference in Article 8(2) rights is not justified." Can give evidence from behind a screen.[3] Applications from MPS & N104's lawyer to restrict publication of real name only; also received are personal statements from his family and expert medical report; final risk assessment from MPS awaited but no scope for restriction of cover name. Open versions published.[4]
In the responding submissions made by the Non-Police/State Core Participants, it was noted that Carlo's real name was known to those he had spied upon.[5] August 2017 documents: open application for restriction order (MPS), open application for restriction order (S&G), Open supplementary application for restriction order (S&G), open medical assessment, open personal statement (1), open personal statement (2), open statement by HN104's partner, open statement by HN104's relative |
HN108 | unknown | real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] | SDS back office / manager |
HN109 | unknown | Extension sought to move to future tranche (Nov 2017).[6] | SDS Detective Inspector in 1995. Interview by Operation Herne quoted in Ellison Review: "There was never any reference made to ‘smearing’ in relation to the Lawrence family. Deployments into the support campaigns surrounding Stephen Lawrence were specifically to build a picture of the public order background… Any meeting I was involved in was never about any family member. It was done to protect the family" (Ellison, p.211).[2] |
N118 | Simon Wellings (alias) | Confirmed.[7] | SDS UCO |
HN120 | unknown | real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] | SDS back office / manager |
HN123 | unknown | Minded-to: restrict both cover name and real name.[1][3] | SDS UCO. Deployed into a number of left-wing groups 1993-1998. Retired from MPS on health grounds & later diagnosed with a mental health condition in part derived from his deployment - in slow but incomplete recovery. "HN123 and HN123’s partner are concerned about the possibility that HN123’s identity will be revealed during the Inquiry, both for reasons of safety and because of the potential impact on HN123’s health. I have read personal statements by both of them, which are and will remain closed, in which these concerns are expressed. I accept that they are genuine and not irrational. Overriding them would interfere with their right to respect for private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention and would require to be justified under Article 8(2). Fulfilment of the terms of reference of the Inquiry does not require that the real or cover name of HN123 be published. The evidence of HN123 can be given under a cypher. HN123 was involved indirectly in deployments affecting the Lawrence family and can give evidence about that under the cypher. To the extent that it is contentious, it can be challenged just as effectively, as if given in the real or cover name. In those circumstances, the interference would not be justified. It is desirable, and may be essential, that HN123 gives evidence in public. In that event, protective measures are likely to be required."[3] Application from MPS & HN123's lawyer to restrict both cover and real names, along with personal statements & medical material - open versions published, some material previously being released in March 2016.[4]
March 2016 application documents: open application, draft order, personal statement (gisted) & risk assessment (gisted). August 2017 documents: open application for restriction order (MPS), open application for restriction order (S&G) The Ellison review stated (p.211): N123... spoke on the telephone to Operation Herne in November 2013: "Francis was lying about the smearing of Lawrence…" N123 had taken over from Mr Francis when in the back office. Mr Francis had told him that it was their role to provide "gossip for the field…" N123 had spent nine months in the back office and amongst management and had gone to field meetings. Not once did N123 see or hear any instruction to 'smear' the Lawrences. He did not see any paperwork to reflect this either. According to Bob Lambert (Ellison, p.214), N123 started his undercover work after Lambert had become head of the SDS and stated: I am sure from day one the Stephen Lawrence case would have been on N123’s agenda, and… they must have attended, started to attend meetings with the Stephen Lawrence campaign, almost goes as read that they would have been there… they would want to be inside the meeting, to have a speaker on the platform and so N123 is following close behind ‘Pete Francis’… they became quite close friends and times would have been at the same events… May well have been events specifically in support of the Stephen Lawrence campaign… Mentioned in Herne II as being undercover with the potential to report on the Lawrence family (Herne II, 12.2).[8]
|
N127 | unknown | Minded To (Nov 2017): refuse application for restriction of real name.[9] | Sergeant with SDS 1997-2001. Provides statement where he states he does not recognise Peter Francis's statements regarding spying on the Lawrence family; also received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting (Ellison, p.229). N81 told Ellison: …I was informed, at the height of the Macpherson inquiry, that my reporting was going straight to Sir Paul Condon’s desk each morning via N24, and N127 (SDS Sgt) passed on to me from N24 congratulations from the Commissioner for your excellent reporting…' (Ellison 212, 229 & 232).[2]
Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
N129 | unknown | Extension sought to be dealt with in a future tranche.[6] | SDS Detective Sergeant. received Lambert's memo on the N81 / Walton meeting; commented on character and skill of Peter Francis, but also that they did not recognise the allegations regarding seeking information to smear the Lawrence family. His statement to Op. Herne is quoted in Ellison (p.212): "[Mr Francis] was targeted towards the campaign in the same way as today… to perform a dual role of protecting the family from malicious extremist influences and providing information about potential public order issues. The anti-police sentiment on the streets was palpable, and Territorial Policing was very interested in any potential or planned disorder…" N129 believes that he was directly tasked to get involved with the campaign, although not necessarily with the family. His role was not about ‘smearing’ at all.[2] |
HN146 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] | SDS back office / manager |
N183 | Richard Walton | Special Branch background. Later head of Counter Terrorism Command. | |
N190 | unknown | SDS Detective Inspector; commented on retention / destruction of documents within the SDS during a 2004 document rationalisation process (Ellison, 201).[2] | |
HN204 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[1] No application made.[3] | SDS back office / manager |
N216 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): application for restriction order in respect of real name to be refused.[9] | SDS management. Responsible for day-to-day running of the unit in the 1990s.
Note from Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
Expressed outrage at Peter Francis allegations (Herne II, 21.1.14) and stated in respect of the targeting of Duwayne Brooks (Herne 24.1.13): 'SDS activity targeting individuals in a public order context may have brought certain officers into contact with, or in the close proximity of Duwayne Brooks, but, if that did happen, this would not have been in response to the murder investigation, or any connection with the family'.[8] |
N218 | unknown | Cover name and real name to be published as no restriction order application made.[6] | Herne II, para. 25.1.2 states: The MPS Director of Intelligence in 1999 has been interviewed by Operation Herne and stated, 'I have been asked if I recall 'any Special Branch plans to mislead the Macpherson Inquiry' into the death of Stephen Lawrence. For part of this time, I was head of Special Branch operations and have no recollection of any such plans.’ Peter Francis alleged that N218 came out to see him in respect of withholding information from the Macpherson Inquiry. In interview, N218 stated that this meeting or request never happened.[8] It is not clear if N218 is the MPS Director of Intelligence referred to or if it refers to someone else entirely. If N218 is the Director of Intelligence then it is probably Alan Fry as opposed to his successor Roger Pearce (who appears as N85).[8] |
HN241 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): neither cover or real name can be published.[9] | SDS UCO. In his 70s, deployed against one group in the early 1970s. No allegation of misconduct.
Mitting stated (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN244 | unknown | Full extent of restriction order being sought unknown; extension sought for MPS to supply this application (Nov 2017).[6] | |
N275 | unknown | Det. Ch. Insp.; probably SDS but not definitive. Critical of record retention and note-taking in the SDS (Ellison, pages 198 & 201).[2] | |
HN294 | unknown | Cover name not ascertained by UCPI.[1] Minded-To: real name cannot be published.[3] | SDS UCO & managerial. Now deceased. Deployed in 1968-1969 against one group which no longer exists, and reported on others, which also no longer exist. Managerial position in SDS 1969-1974. Has elderly widow & other family members. "There is no risk to their safety and minimal risk of intrusive interest in them even if his real name were to be published. They wish to avoid that risk. Although the risk is minimal, nothing would be gained by running it. Unless HN294’s cover name were to become known, publication of his real name could not prompt evidence from one or more members of the affected groups. Evidence about his managerial role, if it is available, can be given by others who knew him, by reference to his cypher. In those circumstances, interference with the right of his widow and family to respect for their private life under Article 8 of the European Convention would not be justifiable under Article 8(2)."[3] Application from MPS for restricting real name, along with evidence from family and a risk assessment - open versions published.[4]
August 2017 documents: Open application for restriction order, open risk assessment (Brian Lockie), open personal statement (1), open personal statement (2) |
HN297 | Rick Gibson (alias) | Cover name released[1] Minded-To: real name cannot be published.[3] | SDS UCO. Deceased. Deployed 1974-1976. "As in the case of the living officers cited above it is unlikely that the publication of his real name would prompt the giving or production of evidence necessary to permit the Inquiry to fulfil its terms of reference. It would be likely to interfere with the right of his widow."[3] The MPS have submitted an application to restrict his real name, along with a risk assessment (Graham Walker) and additional threat assessments - open versions published along with cover name.[4] |
HN298 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name cannot be published.[9] | SDS UCO. Deployed against two groups in the 1970s, one of which was involved in anti-apartheid campaigning:[9]
No application made for his cover name to be restricted. Regarding his application to have his real name restricted, Mitting noted:[9]
|
HN301 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published;[9] cover name to be published.[6] | SDS UCO. Deployed 1971-76 into the International Socialists (which became subsumed into another [Socialist Workers Party]), and reported on others. No allegations of misconduct against him.[9]
Mitting noted (Nov 2017):[9]
|
N315 | unknown | Witness Protection Unit officer assigned by John Grieve to Lawrence family following wrongful publication of witness details in a Macpherson Report appendix; said they were 'never approached by any member of the MPS or asked for personal information or rumour surrounding the Stephen Lawrence family' (Herne II, 21.2.4-5).[8] | |
N318 | unknown | Real name to be published.[6] | SDS managerial / back office. Deceased. No restriction order applications made.[6] |
HN321 | Bill Lewis | Minded-To: real name cannot be published.[3][9] | Now in 70s. Deployed against two groups which no longer exist, for one year Sept 1968-Sept 1969; no known allegation of misconduct against him.
A press release of 5 October 2017 stated:
Mitting's 'Minded-To' of August 2017 noted:
Application made by the MPS to restrict real and cover names, including an supplementary submission, along with a personal statement and a risk assessment (David Reid) - open versions published in August 2017.[4] Following the publishing of Mitting's Minded-To note of 3 August 2017, the Metropolitan Police withdrew their application to restrict HN321's cover name, leading it to being published on 5 October 2017, though the application to restrict his real name remained in place.[10] In their personal witness statement, HN321 says:[11]
According to his risk assessment:[12]
N321 is not a core participant. |
HN322 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): Real name name cannot be published.[9] | SDS UCO. Now in 70s; had 30-year police career, retiring in mid-1990s. With Special Operations Squad for two months in 1968; in his recollection, he was intended to be deployed against a group (which no longer exists) but was re-allocated to other duties before being deployed. Had no cover name.[9]
Mitting noted (Nov 2017):
|
HN323 | unknown | Real name to be used in due course.[1][3] | SDS UCO. Now deceased and no records of cover name have been found. No restriction order application made.[6][3] |
HN325 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[1]. No application made.[3] | SDS back office / manager |
HN326 | Douglas Edwards (alias) | Cover name name released[1]. No application made.[3] | SDS UCO. Currently in 70s and retired; deployed against 3 groups, two of which no longer exist, for 2 1/2 years between 1968-1971. "He has been careful to preserve his anonymity and is worried about disclosure of his real name. He is concerned that it may be discovered by organisations such as undercoverresearch.net and fears media intrusion. He suffers from conditions which may be exacerbated by worry. His cover name will be published."[3]
Application from MPS to restrict real name only, personal statement, risk assessment (Kevin Shanahan) and additional threat assessments - open versions published bar on additional threat assessments.[4] In his personal statement, he wrote:[13]
According to his risk assessment:[14]
See under profile for more detailed analysis of his time undercover. He did not use the identity of a dead child. |
HN327 | unknown | Real names to be used in due course.[1] | SDS UCO. Deceased. No record of cover name and no application made in respect of the real name.[3][1] |
HN328 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[1] | SDS back office / manager. No restriction order application made.[3] |
HN329 | John Graham (alias) | Cover name released.[1] Minded-To: real name cannot be published.[3] | SDS UCO. Now in 70s. Deployed against two groups that no longer exist for one year in 1968-1969. As with HN321, only less concerned about media intrusion.[3] MPS have applied to restrict real name only, and issued a open personal / impact statement from him alongside a open risk assessment (David Reid).[4]
For details and analysis of his time undercover see his profile. He has subsequently made appearances on television under his real identity.[15] |
HN330 | unknown | Minded-to (Aug & Sept 2017): cover name to be published subject of receipt of any application to restrict it. Real name to be restricted (Aug & Nov 2017).[6][3] Previously cover name had not been ascertained, but there was still intention to restrict real name.[1] | SDS UCO. Now in 80s; deployed against one group, no longer active, for several weeks in 1968. "He would like to be left in peace". Does not remember the cover names he used, similar considerations apply as HN321.[3] He targeted the Havering, Essex branch of the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, attending some of their meetings, both public and private. He created a false name and occupation. He ceased his undercover deployment with the Special Operations Squad on 27th October 1968, following the large VSC march which the unit had focused on.[16]
In an email to the risk assessors he stated:[17]
In October 2017, it was noted:[18] When the ‘Minded to’ dated 3 August 2017 was published, the Inquiry did not know HN330’s cover name and HN330 could not remember it. The Inquiry has since received information from another officer which permits HN330’s cover name to be published. Legal representatives of this officer and the Metropolitan Police Service have been notified and, provided that no application for a restriction order in respect of it is received, it will be [released]. The MPS have applied to restrict his real name only along with open submissions, a personal statement and risk assessment (David Reid) - open versions published.[4] In his personal statement, he has described the risk assessment process as a 'pantomime' and based on 'hearsay obtained from a former colleague'.[16] He is not a core participant, and has expressed to risk assessors (whom he has declined to meet) "he has the ‘most monumental indifference’ to whether the Inquiry wishes him to give evidence."[19] |
HN331 | unknown | Minded-to (Nov 2017): restrict real name[9] | SDS UCO. Deployed against one group (now defunct) in 1968 & 1969. Cover name is unknown. Killed in road traffic accident in the 1970s leaving a widow and son.
According to Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN332 | unknown | Minded-to: restrict real name.[9] | SDS managerial role in the 1970s.
Mitting stated (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN333 | unknown | Cover name known.[1] Minded-To: real and cover names cannot be published.[3] | SDS UCO. Now in his 70s and retired. Deployed for 9 months in 1968-1969 against a left-wing group (no longer exists). No known allegation of misconduct against him and he neither committed any crimes or took the identity of a dead child as part of his cover. Described his training as 'rudimentary'. Hei infiltrated his target group by answering an advert for people who were following the philosophy of [redacted]. Subsequently attended meetings of this small group. He characterised the group as extremist.[20][3] [21]
"N333 received no specific assurance or guarantee of anonymity by senior officer(s). N333 states that there was only 'implied implication' of future anonymity'.[21] He subsequently went on to have a 'long and distinguished career' in the police.[20] Mitting stated in his Minded-To:[3]
The MPS has applied to restrict real name only, while N333's designated laywer has applied to restrict the cover name. Other August 2017 application documents: open submissions, personal statement and risk assessment (Graham Walker).[4] HN333 is not a core participant in the Inquiry. |
HN334 | unknown | Real name cannot be published.[9] | SDS UCO. Currently in 70s. No allegation of misconduct against her. Served with Special Operations Squad 1968-72. 'In 1968 she was deployed for several months against one group - the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign, which no longer exists - as the girlfriend of HN330. Thereafter, according to her own recollection, she performed back office duties only.'[9]
Mitting noted she wished to 'preserve her privacy and that of her family', and it was unlikely that surviving members of the groups she targeted would recall her.[9] |
HN335 | unknown | Real name to be used in due course.[1] | SDS UCO. Deceased. No record of cover name and no application made to restrict real name.[1][3] |
HN336 | unknown | Minded-to: Real name cannot be published; cover name will be published.[9] | SDS UCO. Deployed 1969-1972, targeting the International Marxist Group and British Communist Party, but also providing intelligence on other groups. No allegation of misconduct known. Appeared on 'True Spies' programme under the pseudonym 'Dan' with the approval of senior officers.[9]
Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN337 | unknown | Minded-to: Neither real or cover names can be published.[9] | SDS UCO & manager. In his 70s. Deployed against four groups in the 1970s. Later a manager in the SDS in the 1990s where he was responsible for the recruitment and deployment of N81, though played no role in the targeting of the Lawrences.[9]
According to Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN338 | unknown | Minded-to: real name cannot be published. [9] | SDS UCO. Cover name and target groups unknown; deployed for a period in 1970 or 1971. Deceased. Mitting is minded-to (Nov 2017) restrict publication of real name to avoid distress to HN338's widow.[9] |
HN339 | unknown | Extension sought to deal with in a future tranche.[6] | |
HN341 | unknown | Minded-to: restrict both cover and real names.[9] | SDS UCO. Deployed in the 1970s against two groups.
Mitting (Nov 2017):
|
HN342 | unknown | Extension sought to deal with in a future tranche.[6] | |
HN343 | unknown | UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.[1] Minded-To: "The real name cannot be published.[3] Cover name to be published.[6] | SDS UCO. In 70s. Deployed into various groups in the early 1970s; past kept secret from everyone his family & social circles.
The inquiry has noted:[3]
Application from MPS to restrict real name only. Open versions of documents not yet published pending final application.[4] |
HN344 | unknown | UCPI needs more details before making decision on restricting details.[6] | |
HN345 | unknown | Minded-to: real name to be restricted; cover name to be published.[9]
Previously thought to be deceased but since discovered to be alive.[4] UCPI granted extension until 1 September 2017 to submit anonymity application.[1][3] |
SDS UCO. Deployed for six months in 1971, though not against anyone specific groups - reported on several including those opposed to apartheid. Deployment ceased when his probationary period in Special Branch was terminated. "There is a difference between his recollection of the reason for termination and that recorded in his personnel file. He left the Metropolitan Police Service soon after." No known allegation of misconduct.[9]
Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN346 | unknown | Minded-to: Real name to be published.[6] | SDS. Deceased. No cover name known and no restriction order application has been made.[6] |
HN347 | unknown | Minded-to: Real name cannot be published;[9] cover name to be published[6] | SDS UCO. In his 70s. Deployed against the Irish National Liberation Solidarity Front 1971-1973.[9]
Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN348 | unknown | Minded-to: Real name cannot be published.[9] | SDS UCO. In her 70s. Deployed 1972-1973 against a non-violent group. Cover name not recalled and no official record of it exists - though she recalls one element of the name which will be published.[9]
Mitting (Nov 2017):[9]
|
HN353 | unknown | Extension sought to move to a future tranche; full extent of restriction sought is unknown.[6] | |
N367 | unknown | Further information required before Inquiry can proceed with the application.[6] | SO15 / CTC from 2006, Det. Sgt; point of contact for ex-SDS officers. Was contacted by N81 in this capacity but was accused of having 'an agenda to belittle SDS' (Ellison, 253).[2] |
N406 | Barry McDowell | Special Branch officer who moved to Racial and Violent Crime Task Force (CO24 / under John Grieve) and was appointed as a liaison between the two units 1998/1999 (Herne II, 21.1.6; Ellison, multiple pages).[8][2] | |
N519 | Marco Jacobs (alias) | Cover name confirmed.[22] | NPOIU UCO |
N587 | unknown | Author of the SDS Annual Report in 1985 (Herne II, 18.1).[8] | |
HN593 | unknown | Minded to: real name to be published (no restriction order application made)[6] | SDS management / back-office. Deceased.[6] |
N596 | Rod Richardson (alias) | Cover name Confirmed.[23] | NPOIU UCO |
HN1251 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[1] | SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.[3] |
HN1668 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[6] | SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.[6] |
HN2152 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[6] | SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.[6] |
HN3093 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[6] | SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.[6] |
HN3095 | unknown | Real name to be published in due course.[6] | SDS back office / manager. No application for a restriction order made.[6] |
Notes
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 Press Release: 'Minded to' note, ruling and directions in respect of anonymity applications relating to former officers of the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 3 August 2017).
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Mark Ellison, Possible corruption and the role of undercover policing in the Stephen Lawrence case, Stephen Lawrence Independent Review, Vol. 1, Gov.UK, March 2014
- ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 3.26 3.27 3.28 3.29 3.30 3.31 3.32 John Mitting, In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
- ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 David Barr & Kate Wilkinson, Counsel to the Inquiry's explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded to' note in respect of applications for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 3 August 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
- ↑ Ruth Brander & Philippa Kaufmann QC, Submissions on behalf of the non-police, non-state core participants re the Chairman's 'Minded To' note dated 3 August 2017 concerning restriction order applications, 5 October 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22 6.23 6.24 6.25 6.26 6.27 Counsel to the Inquiry's Explanatory note to accompany the 'Minded-To' Note (2) in respect for restrictions over the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstration Squad, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 14 November 2017 (accessed 15 November 2017).
- ↑ Update on anonymity applications – N118 ("Simon Wellings"), Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 19 January 2017 (accessed 5 August 2017).
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 Mick Creedon, Operation Herne: Report 2 - Allegations of Peter Francis, Metropolitan Police Service, March 2014.
- ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 9.12 9.13 9.14 9.15 9.16 9.17 9.18 9.19 9.20 9.21 9.22 9.23 9.24 9.25 9.26 9.27 9.28 9.29 9.30 9.31 9.32 9.33 9.34 9.35 9.36 9.37 9.38 9.39 9.40 In the matter of section 19 (3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations Squad ‘Minded to’ note 2, Undercover Policing Inquiry, 14 November 2017 (accessed 15 November 2017)
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Undercover Policing Inquiry, Press Notice: No cover name anonymity sought in respect of HN321, UCPI.org.uk, 5 October 2017 (accessed 10 October 2017).
- ↑ 'NH321', Open personal witness statement of N321 (redacted), Metropolitan Police Service, 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ David Reid, HN321 Open Risk Assessment, Metropolitan Police Service, 31 May 2015 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ 'HN326', Open personal statement of HN326, Metropolitan Police Service, 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ Kevin Shanahan, Open risk assessment for HN326, Metropolitan Police Service, 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)
- ↑ 'HN329', Open personal statement, Metropolitan Police Service, 30 March 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 HN329, Open personal statement (redacted), Metropolitan Police Service, April 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ David Reid, HN330 open risk assessment, Metropolitan Police Service, 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ Sir John Mitting, Supplementary 'Minded-To', Undercover Policing Inquiry, 23 October 2017 (accessed 23 October 2017 via UCPI.org.uk).
- ↑ David Reid, HN330 open risk assessment (redacted), Metropolitan Police Service, 31 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 'HN333', Open personal statement (redacted), Metropolitan Police Service, 25 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Graham Walker, HN333 Open risk assessment, Metropolitan Police Service, 2 May 2017 (accessed via UCPI.org.uk)
- ↑ Update on anonymity applications - N519 (“Marco Jacobs”), Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 10 November 2016 (accessed 5 August 2017).
- ↑ No anonymity sought for undercover identity ‘Rod Richardson’, Undercover Policing Public Inquiry (UCPI.org.uk), 15 December 2016 (accessed 5 August 2017).