Difference between revisions of "BBC: Institute of Economic Affairs"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Relevant Publications)
m (→‎David Graham and Thatcher's Policy Unit)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
----
 
----
 
[[Image:IEA - Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC.jpg|right|thumb|250px|[[Alan Peacock|Alan Peacock’s]] 2004 report for the IEA, ''Broadcasting Without the BBC?'']]  
 
[[Image:IEA - Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC.jpg|right|thumb|250px|[[Alan Peacock|Alan Peacock’s]] 2004 report for the IEA, ''Broadcasting Without the BBC?'']]  
−
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) is a seminal free market think-tank based in London. Through its promotion of free market theorists like [[Milton Friedman]] it provided an intellectual rationale for business friendly political and economic reforms introduced by the Thatcher government in the UK - a political programme which later came to be known as neoliberalism.
+
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) is a seminal free market think-tank based in London. Through its promotion of free market theorists like [[Milton Friedman]] it provided an intellectual rationale for business friendly political and economic reforms introduced by the Thatcher government in the UK - a political programme which came to be known as neoliberalism.
  
 
== IEA and the BBC==
 
== IEA and the BBC==
−
Media academic Tom O'Malley notes that, ‘There had been little sustained academic or national political interest in the technicalities of broadcast economics in the UK until the advent of the [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government’, but that, ‘The IEA had published occasional pieces’. <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92'' (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.88</ref>
+
===Early attacks===
 +
Media academic Tom O'Malley notes that, ‘There had been little sustained academic or national political interest in the technicalities of broadcast economics in the UK until the advent of the [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government’, but that, ‘The IEA had published occasional pieces’. <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92'' (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.88</ref> These included a report authored by the director of the [[London School of Economics]] [[Sydney Caine]]. <ref>Sydney Caine, Paying for TV? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1968)</ref>
  
−
===The Key Players===
+
===The Peacock Committee===
 
Figures writing for and closely associated with the IEA had a key role in the attacks on the BBC and public service broadcasting more generally which began in the 1980s. Not least of these was the economist [[Alan Peacock]], who was a Trustee of the IEA and also served as Vice-Chancellor of the [[University of Buckingham]] – Britain’s only private university which was closely affiliated with the IEA. [[Alan Peacock|Peacock]] was appointed by the [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government to head the [[Committee on Financing the BBC]], better known as the [[Peacock Committee]].  
 
Figures writing for and closely associated with the IEA had a key role in the attacks on the BBC and public service broadcasting more generally which began in the 1980s. Not least of these was the economist [[Alan Peacock]], who was a Trustee of the IEA and also served as Vice-Chancellor of the [[University of Buckingham]] – Britain’s only private university which was closely affiliated with the IEA. [[Alan Peacock|Peacock]] was appointed by the [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government to head the [[Committee on Financing the BBC]], better known as the [[Peacock Committee]].  
  
Line 14: Line 15:
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">[[Samuel Brittan|Brittan]] had developed his theories with [[Peter Jay]], the former economics editor of ''[[The Times]]'' and presenter of LWT’s ''Weekend World''. Jay was not on the committee, but had strong thought of his own on the future of television. He and [[Samuel Brittan|Brittan]] were to spend long sessions together at Jay’s Ealing home, effectively forming their own private committee, and wildly exceeding Peacock’s original brief. <ref>Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke, ''Fuzzy Monsters – Fear and Loathing at the BBC'' (London: William Heinemann, 1994) p.37</ref></blockquote>
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">[[Samuel Brittan|Brittan]] had developed his theories with [[Peter Jay]], the former economics editor of ''[[The Times]]'' and presenter of LWT’s ''Weekend World''. Jay was not on the committee, but had strong thought of his own on the future of television. He and [[Samuel Brittan|Brittan]] were to spend long sessions together at Jay’s Ealing home, effectively forming their own private committee, and wildly exceeding Peacock’s original brief. <ref>Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke, ''Fuzzy Monsters – Fear and Loathing at the BBC'' (London: William Heinemann, 1994) p.37</ref></blockquote>
  
−
[[Alan Peacock|Peacock]], [[Samuel Brittan| Brittan]] and the other members of the committee were advised by [[Cento Veljanovski]], a member of the IEA who later became its Research Editorial Director. <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92'' (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.18</ref>  
+
[[Alan Peacock|Peacock]], [[Samuel Brittan| Brittan]] and the other members of the committee were advised by [[Cento Veljanovski]], a member of the IEA who later became its Research Editorial Director. <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92'' (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.18</ref> In 1989 [[Cento Veljanovski|Veljanovski]] edited the IEA book ''Freedom in Broadcasting'' (which also happened to be the title of [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s notorious MacTaggart Lecture that same year). The book included contributions from [[Samuel Brittan]] and [[Alan Peacock]]. <ref>[[Alan Peacock]] contributed two chapters: 'Competition in broadcasting' and 'The Peacock Report: some unanswered questions'. [[Samuel Brittan|Samuel Brittan's]] chapter was called 'The future of public service broadcasting'.</ref>
  
−
The [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government was advised on broadcasting by the IEA member and former ''Panorama'' producer [[David Graham]], who had written articles on broadcasting for the IEA. According to the authors of ''The Battle for the BBC'', [[Brian Griffiths]], the head of [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher’s]] Policy Unit, invited [[David Graham|Graham]] to Downing Street ‘on several occasions to discuss broadcasting. [[Brian Griffiths|Griffiths]] was interested in the economic questions: how the industry was structured; who did what; how people were paid for what they did.’<ref>Steven Barnett & Andrew Curry, ''The Battle for the BBC: A British Broadcasting Conspiracy?'' (London: Aurum Press, 1994) p.61</ref>
+
===David Graham and Thatcher's Policy Unit===
 +
The [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government was advised on broadcasting by the IEA member and former ''Panorama'' producer [[David Graham]], who had written articles on broadcasting for the IEA. According to the authors of ''The Battle for the BBC'', [[Brian Griffiths]], the head of [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher’s]] Policy Unit, invited [[David Graham|Graham]] to Downing Street ‘on several occasions to discuss broadcasting. [[Brian Griffiths|Griffiths]] was interested in the economic questions: how the industry was structured; who did what; how people were paid for what they did.’<ref>Steven Barnett & Andrew Curry, ''The Battle for the BBC: A British Broadcasting Conspiracy?'' (London: Aurum Press, 1994) p.61</ref> According to the authors of ''Fuzzy Monsters: Fear and Loathing at the BBC'', [[Brian Griffiths|Griffiths]] viewed the licence fee as a denial of freedom of choice and therefore a crime against God. <ref>Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke, ''Fuzzy Monsters – Fear and Loathing at the BBC'' (London: William Heinemann, 1994) p.31</ref> [[David Graham]] went on to found the television research company [[David Graham & Associates]] in 1990 which was renamed [[Attentional]] in 2007. <ref>Attentional Ltd, [http://www.attentional.com/people_view.php?id=1 David Graham - CEO] [Accessed 2 November 2009]</ref> He contributed a chapter 'The importance of competition' to the 2005 [[Institute of Economic Affairs]] publication ''Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC?'' edited by [[Alan Peacock]].
 +
 
 +
===Maggie's Militant Tendency===
 +
IEA's chairman [[Ralph Harris]] raised around £100,000 for the right-wing Conservative MP [[Neil Hamilton]] to bring a libel action against the BBC over the ''Panorama'' programme ''[[Maggie's Militant Tendency]]''. The programme, which was based on an official investigation by the Conservative Party, detailed infiltration of the Tory party by rightwing extremists. It was broadcast on 30 January 1984 <ref>BFI Film & TV Database, [http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/330111 ''Maggie's Militant Tendency'']</ref> and provoked a furious reaction from the Tory right-wing. [[Lord Harris]] has said: 'I remember at the time [[Neil Hamilton|Neil]] came to me and raised the question of financing the libel action. I managed to raise around £100,000, enabling Neil at the time to go after the BBC.' <ref>quoted in Kim Sengupta, '[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-hamilton-affair-the-cost--rightwing-donors-united-by-their-loathing-of-fayed-1134008.html The Hamilton Affair: The cost - Right-wing donors united by their loathing of Fayed]', ''Independent'', 22 December 1999</ref> A major donor to the fund was the right-wing financier [[James Goldsmith|Sir James Goldsmith]]. <ref>Patricia Wynn Davies, '[The Cash-for-Questions Affair: The miners' grandson who found a niche in the right]', Independent, 21 October 1994; p.3</ref> The case came to the High Court in October 1986 and the BBC subsequently settled, <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?'' (Pluto Press, 1994), p.61</ref> according to the BBC Director-General [[Alasdair Milne]] because he was instructed to by the Governors. It cost the BBC £50,000 in damages and £250,000 in costs after "the governors instructed me to pull out". <ref>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/knives-are-out-for-the-bbc-bosses-522177.html Knives are out for the BBC bosses], ''Independent'', 9 January 2006</ref> This was followed by a Commons motion signed by 100 Tory MPs calling on the DG to resign. <ref>Tom O'Malley, ''Closedown?'' (Pluto Press, 1994), p.61</ref>
  
 
===Relevant Publications===
 
===Relevant Publications===
Line 29: Line 34:
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
−
[[Category:BBC]]
+
[[Category:BBC|Institute of Economic Affairs]]

Latest revision as of 07:04, 4 June 2010

N.B. This page relates to the IEA’s attacks on the BBC. A separate page deals with the IEA in general.

Alan Peacock’s 2004 report for the IEA, Broadcasting Without the BBC?

The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) is a seminal free market think-tank based in London. Through its promotion of free market theorists like Milton Friedman it provided an intellectual rationale for business friendly political and economic reforms introduced by the Thatcher government in the UK - a political programme which came to be known as neoliberalism.

IEA and the BBC

Early attacks

Media academic Tom O'Malley notes that, ‘There had been little sustained academic or national political interest in the technicalities of broadcast economics in the UK until the advent of the Thatcher government’, but that, ‘The IEA had published occasional pieces’. [1] These included a report authored by the director of the London School of Economics Sydney Caine. [2]

The Peacock Committee

Figures writing for and closely associated with the IEA had a key role in the attacks on the BBC and public service broadcasting more generally which began in the 1980s. Not least of these was the economist Alan Peacock, who was a Trustee of the IEA and also served as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Buckingham – Britain’s only private university which was closely affiliated with the IEA. Peacock was appointed by the Thatcher government to head the Committee on Financing the BBC, better known as the Peacock Committee.

Another IEA affiliated member of the Peacock Committee was Samuel Brittan, who was appointed to the Committee by his brother, the Home Secretary Leon Brittan. He was ‘closely affiliated with the IEA and had published under the IEA’s imprint.’ [3] Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke note that whilst the committee was conducting its inquiry, Samuel Brittan was close contact with the fellow financial journalist and neoliberal ideologue Peter Jay:

Brittan had developed his theories with Peter Jay, the former economics editor of The Times and presenter of LWT’s Weekend World. Jay was not on the committee, but had strong thought of his own on the future of television. He and Brittan were to spend long sessions together at Jay’s Ealing home, effectively forming their own private committee, and wildly exceeding Peacock’s original brief. [4]

Peacock, Brittan and the other members of the committee were advised by Cento Veljanovski, a member of the IEA who later became its Research Editorial Director. [5] In 1989 Veljanovski edited the IEA book Freedom in Broadcasting (which also happened to be the title of Rupert Murdoch's notorious MacTaggart Lecture that same year). The book included contributions from Samuel Brittan and Alan Peacock. [6]

David Graham and Thatcher's Policy Unit

The Thatcher government was advised on broadcasting by the IEA member and former Panorama producer David Graham, who had written articles on broadcasting for the IEA. According to the authors of The Battle for the BBC, Brian Griffiths, the head of Thatcher’s Policy Unit, invited Graham to Downing Street ‘on several occasions to discuss broadcasting. Griffiths was interested in the economic questions: how the industry was structured; who did what; how people were paid for what they did.’[7] According to the authors of Fuzzy Monsters: Fear and Loathing at the BBC, Griffiths viewed the licence fee as a denial of freedom of choice and therefore a crime against God. [8] David Graham went on to found the television research company David Graham & Associates in 1990 which was renamed Attentional in 2007. [9] He contributed a chapter 'The importance of competition' to the 2005 Institute of Economic Affairs publication Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC? edited by Alan Peacock.

Maggie's Militant Tendency

IEA's chairman Ralph Harris raised around £100,000 for the right-wing Conservative MP Neil Hamilton to bring a libel action against the BBC over the Panorama programme Maggie's Militant Tendency. The programme, which was based on an official investigation by the Conservative Party, detailed infiltration of the Tory party by rightwing extremists. It was broadcast on 30 January 1984 [10] and provoked a furious reaction from the Tory right-wing. Lord Harris has said: 'I remember at the time Neil came to me and raised the question of financing the libel action. I managed to raise around £100,000, enabling Neil at the time to go after the BBC.' [11] A major donor to the fund was the right-wing financier Sir James Goldsmith. [12] The case came to the High Court in October 1986 and the BBC subsequently settled, [13] according to the BBC Director-General Alasdair Milne because he was instructed to by the Governors. It cost the BBC £50,000 in damages and £250,000 in costs after "the governors instructed me to pull out". [14] This was followed by a Commons motion signed by 100 Tory MPs calling on the DG to resign. [15]

Relevant Publications

Richard D North, The BBC's Climate Change Meltdown (web publication) (Institute of Economic Affairs, 24 March 2006)
Alan Peacock (ed.), Public Service Broadcasting Without the BBC? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 2006)
Raymond B. Gallagher, Is American television that bad?: fact and fantasy in the free broadcasting market (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1988)
Cento Veljanovski (ed.), Freedom in broadcasting (London : Institute of Economic Affairs, 1989)
Cento Veljanovski and W.D.Bishop, Choice by cable: the economics of a new era in television (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1983)
Sir Sydney Caine, Paying for TV? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1968)
Wilfred Altman, Denis Thomas & David Sawers, TV: from monopoly to competition (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1962)

Notes

  1. ↑ Tom O'Malley, Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92 (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.88
  2. ↑ Sydney Caine, Paying for TV? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1968)
  3. ↑ Tom O'Malley, Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92 (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.18
  4. ↑ Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke, Fuzzy Monsters – Fear and Loathing at the BBC (London: William Heinemann, 1994) p.37
  5. ↑ Tom O'Malley, Closedown?: The BBC and Government Broadcasting Policy 1979-92 (London: Pluto Press, 1994) p.18
  6. ↑ Alan Peacock contributed two chapters: 'Competition in broadcasting' and 'The Peacock Report: some unanswered questions'. Samuel Brittan's chapter was called 'The future of public service broadcasting'.
  7. ↑ Steven Barnett & Andrew Curry, The Battle for the BBC: A British Broadcasting Conspiracy? (London: Aurum Press, 1994) p.61
  8. ↑ Chris Horrie and Steve Clarke, Fuzzy Monsters – Fear and Loathing at the BBC (London: William Heinemann, 1994) p.31
  9. ↑ Attentional Ltd, David Graham - CEO [Accessed 2 November 2009]
  10. ↑ BFI Film & TV Database, Maggie's Militant Tendency
  11. ↑ quoted in Kim Sengupta, 'The Hamilton Affair: The cost - Right-wing donors united by their loathing of Fayed', Independent, 22 December 1999
  12. ↑ Patricia Wynn Davies, '[The Cash-for-Questions Affair: The miners' grandson who found a niche in the right]', Independent, 21 October 1994; p.3
  13. ↑ Tom O'Malley, Closedown? (Pluto Press, 1994), p.61
  14. ↑ Knives are out for the BBC bosses, Independent, 9 January 2006
  15. ↑ Tom O'Malley, Closedown? (Pluto Press, 1994), p.61
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=BBC:_Institute_of_Economic_Affairs&oldid=122257"