Difference between revisions of "The Times"
Tom Griffin (talk | contribs) m (→Editors since 1900) |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Rupert Murdoch]] moved production of the newspaper away from its traditional home in Fleet Street to new premises in Wapping East London in 1986. The move was designed to modernise production practices, reduce costs and perhaps more importantly remove the influence of the powerful Fleet Street print unions. The move away from Fleet Street and the trade unions led to the Sacking by [[The Observer]] of all sub-editors who also worked on [[The Times]]. The paper was banned from conferences by [[The Labour Party]] and boycotted by the BBC for 5 years. | [[Rupert Murdoch]] moved production of the newspaper away from its traditional home in Fleet Street to new premises in Wapping East London in 1986. The move was designed to modernise production practices, reduce costs and perhaps more importantly remove the influence of the powerful Fleet Street print unions. The move away from Fleet Street and the trade unions led to the Sacking by [[The Observer]] of all sub-editors who also worked on [[The Times]]. The paper was banned from conferences by [[The Labour Party]] and boycotted by the BBC for 5 years. | ||
| − | In the early 1990s Rupert Murdoch imposed a 10% cut in staff costs, a 50% price rise and a ban on promotion. <ref> Simon Jenkins, [http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article784725.ece Journalism:The History of The Times by Graham Stewart] 08-January-2006, Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>.[[Image:PR_Content_resized.JPG|right|thumb|PR Content]] | + | In the early 1990s Rupert Murdoch imposed a 10% cut in staff costs, a 50% price rise and a ban on promotion. <ref> Simon Jenkins, [http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article784725.ece Journalism:The History of The Times by Graham Stewart] 08-January-2006, Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>. The move to Wapping had, according to journalist Nick Davies, "Released a chain reaction of internal changeswhich have had a devastating effect on truth-telling journalism". <ref> Nick Davies, Flat Earth News (2008), London: Chatto & Windus </ref> |
| + | [[Image:PR_Content_resized.JPG|right|thumb|PR Content]] | ||
==Reliance on PR Material and News Agencies== | ==Reliance on PR Material and News Agencies== | ||
| − | + | According to research conducted by Professor Justin Lewis at Cardiff University up to 70% of news stories published by the times are wholly derived from PR activity, News Agencies or replacated from other media sources. Lewis' research found that that "The Times and the Daily Telegraph appear to replicate a significantly higher percentage of agency/PR material than the Guardian, which, according to these data, is the most independent of the newspapers. While just over half the stories in the Guardian come wholly or mainly from pre-packaged sources, this compares with around two-thirds of the stories on other newspapers. By the same measure, the Guardian is also more likely to use a mix of information or to get information from other sources". Lewis' study concludes, "What is clear from this study is that the quality and independence of the British news media has been significantly affected by its increasing reliance on public relations and news agency material; and for the worse!" <ref> Justin Lewis, [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713393939~db=all A Compromised Fourth Estate? UK news journalism, public relations and news sources], Journalism Studies, Volume 9, Issue 1 February 2008 </ref>. | |
| − | |||
| − | According to research conducted by Professor Justin Lewis at Cardiff University up to 70% of news stories published by the times are wholly derived from PR activity, News Agencies or replacated from other media sources. Lewis' research found that that "The Times and the Daily Telegraph appear to replicate a significantly higher percentage of agency/PR material than the Guardian, which, according to these data, is the most independent of the newspapers. While just over half the stories in the Guardian come wholly or mainly from pre-packaged sources, this compares with around two-thirds of the stories on other newspapers. By the same measure, the Guardian is also more likely to use a mix of information or to get information from other sources." <ref> Justin Lewis, [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713393939~db=all A Compromised Fourth Estate? UK news journalism, public relations and news sources], Journalism Studies, Volume 9, Issue 1 February 2008 </ref>. | ||
| − | |||
==Controversies== | ==Controversies== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
At the time of the take over [[Rupert Murdoch]] was threatened by MP's who wanted to refer the sale to the [[Monopolies and Mergers Commision]]. Murdoch claimed he would not go through with the sale if this was to happen <ref> BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/22/newsid_4312000/4312698.stm 1981: Murdoch bids to take over The Times], Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>. Murdoch managed to avoid the sale being referred to the commision by agreeing to increased powers for the Independent National Directors of the newspaper. The role of these directors would be to adjudicate in disputes between the editor and the company, make decisions on the appointment and dismissal of editorial staff and to be involved in decisions about the sale or transfer of the newspapers. The Independent National Directors were also given veto powers <Ref> House of Lords Select Comittee, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12208.htm Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation], Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref> | At the time of the take over [[Rupert Murdoch]] was threatened by MP's who wanted to refer the sale to the [[Monopolies and Mergers Commision]]. Murdoch claimed he would not go through with the sale if this was to happen <ref> BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/22/newsid_4312000/4312698.stm 1981: Murdoch bids to take over The Times], Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>. Murdoch managed to avoid the sale being referred to the commision by agreeing to increased powers for the Independent National Directors of the newspaper. The role of these directors would be to adjudicate in disputes between the editor and the company, make decisions on the appointment and dismissal of editorial staff and to be involved in decisions about the sale or transfer of the newspapers. The Independent National Directors were also given veto powers <Ref> House of Lords Select Comittee, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12208.htm Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation], Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref> | ||
| − | [[Harold Evans]], who was the editor of [[The Sunday Times]] when Murodoch bought it and later the editor of [[The Times]] argued that the concessions made by Murdoch were worthless. Evans had fought for the increased powers of the Independent National Directors but in practice, he found they provided him with no effective protection. In his autobiography he wrote that none of the guarantees that Rupert Murdoch gave to safeguard editorial independence "are worth the paper they are written on—unless the proprietor shares the spirit of them. If he does, they are merely ornamental; if he does not, they are unworkable. Internal freedom cannot be acquired by external rules" <ref> Harold Evans | + | [[Harold Evans]], who was the editor of [[The Sunday Times]] when Murodoch bought it and later the editor of [[The Times]] argued that the concessions made by Murdoch were worthless. Evans had fought for the increased powers of the Independent National Directors but in practice, he found they provided him with no effective protection. In his autobiography he wrote that none of the guarantees that Rupert Murdoch gave to safeguard editorial independence "are worth the paper they are written on—unless the proprietor shares the spirit of them. If he does, they are merely ornamental; if he does not, they are unworkable. Internal freedom cannot be acquired by external rules" <ref> Harold Evans, Good Times, Bad Times, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983, pgs. 461-462] </ref>. [[Andrew Neil]] who was the editor of [[The Times]] from 1983 to 1994 agreed "It was a conceit invented ... to allow Mr Murdoch to take over these papers in the first place, and it was put in place for that reason. It was not really put in place to protect the independence of the editors". <Ref> House of Lords Select Comittee, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcomuni/122/12208.htm Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation], Accessed 19-January-2009 </ref>. |
==Media Monopoly== | ==Media Monopoly== | ||
| Line 56: | Line 54: | ||
==Journalists== | ==Journalists== | ||
| + | ===Editors since 1900=== | ||
| + | *[[George Earle Buckle]] 1884 | ||
| + | *[[Geoffrey Dawson]] 1912 | ||
| + | *[[Henry Wickham Steed]] 1919 | ||
| + | *[[Geoffrey Dawson]] 1922 | ||
| + | *[[Robert McGowan Barrington-Ward]] 1941 | ||
| + | *[[William Francis Casey]] 1948 | ||
| + | *Sir [[William Haley]] 1952 | ||
| + | *[[William Rees-Mogg]] 1967 | ||
| + | *[[Harold Evans]] 1981 | ||
| + | *[[C. Douglas-Home]] 1983 | ||
| + | *[[C. Wilson]] 1985 | ||
| + | *[[Simon Jenkins]] 1990 | ||
| + | *[[Peter Stothard]] 1992<ref name="BPF530">David Butler and Gareth Butler, ''Twentieth Century British Political Facts 1900-2000'', Macmillan, 2000, p.530.</ref> | ||
| + | *[[Robert Thomson]] 2002 | ||
| + | *[[James Harding]] 2005<ref>Chris Tryhorn, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/dec/07/thetimes.newsinternational Harding confirmed as Times editor], ''The Guardian'', 21 November 2005.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==A-L== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Michael Atherton]] | [[Guillem Balague]] | [[Simon Barnes]] | [[Peter Brookes]], leader-page cartoonist | [[David Brown]] |[[Anthony Browne]] | [[Rachel Campbell-Johnston]] | [[Sam Coates]] | [[Giles Coren]] | [[Robert Crampton]] | [[Ginny Dougary]] |[[Stephen Farrell]] | [[Daniel Finkelstein]], comment editor | [[Richard Ford]] | [[Adam Fresco]] | [[Frances Gibb]] |[[Brian Glanville]] | [[Ruth Gledhill]] | [[Michael Gove]] | [[Tim Hames]] | [[Nigel Hawkes]] | [[Anthony Howard]]| [[Philip Howard]] | [[Ben Hoyle]] | [[Mick Hume]] | [[Anatole Kaletsky]] | [[Magnus Linklater]] | [[Richard Lloyd Parry]] | [[Anthony Loyd]], war correspondent on retainer | ||
| − | + | ==M-Z== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | [[Ben Macintyre]] | [[Bronwen Maddox]] | [[Stephanie Marsh]] | [[Hugh McIlvanney]] | [[Alice Miles]] | [[Caitlin Moran]] | [[Richard Morrison]] | [[Kate Muir]] | [[Matthew Parris]] | [[Grayson Perry]] | [[Libby Purves]] | [[Gordon Ramsay]] | [[Lord Rees-Mogg]] | [[Peter Riddell]] | [[Hugo Rifkind]] | [[Aki Riihilahti]] | [[Nick Robinson]] | [[Dan Sabbagh]] | [[Paul Sheehan]] | [[Mary Ann Sieghart]] | [[David Sinclair]] | [[Graham Stewart]] | [[Andrew Sullivan]] | [[Stewart Tendler]] | [[Ann Treneman]] | [[Janice Turner]] | [[Philip Webster]] | [[Alexander Williams]], cartoonist | ||
==ABC and Readership Figures== | ==ABC and Readership Figures== | ||
| Line 126: | Line 91: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[Category:journalism]][[Category:Media]][[category:journalists]] | + | [[Category:journalism]][[Category:Media]][[category:journalists]][[Category:Media Industry]][[Category:Newspapers]] |
Latest revision as of 19:56, 4 November 2012
Contents
The Times
The Times is a UK based national newspaper published by News International. The Newspaper has a cover price of 90 pence since an increase in January 2009, and has traditionally been classified as a broadsheet. To boost sales after a successful trial the paper moved to tabloid format in 2004 [1]. The current editor is James Harding and it has a sister paper published on Sundays The Sunday Times.
History
(1981-Present)
The Times along with its Sunday version The Sunday Times was purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s organisation News International in 1981. The move was controversial because press baron Murdoch already owned tabloid newspapers The Sun and its sister paper The News of The World.
Rupert Murdoch moved production of the newspaper away from its traditional home in Fleet Street to new premises in Wapping East London in 1986. The move was designed to modernise production practices, reduce costs and perhaps more importantly remove the influence of the powerful Fleet Street print unions. The move away from Fleet Street and the trade unions led to the Sacking by The Observer of all sub-editors who also worked on The Times. The paper was banned from conferences by The Labour Party and boycotted by the BBC for 5 years.
In the early 1990s Rupert Murdoch imposed a 10% cut in staff costs, a 50% price rise and a ban on promotion. [2]. The move to Wapping had, according to journalist Nick Davies, "Released a chain reaction of internal changeswhich have had a devastating effect on truth-telling journalism". [3]
Reliance on PR Material and News Agencies
According to research conducted by Professor Justin Lewis at Cardiff University up to 70% of news stories published by the times are wholly derived from PR activity, News Agencies or replacated from other media sources. Lewis' research found that that "The Times and the Daily Telegraph appear to replicate a significantly higher percentage of agency/PR material than the Guardian, which, according to these data, is the most independent of the newspapers. While just over half the stories in the Guardian come wholly or mainly from pre-packaged sources, this compares with around two-thirds of the stories on other newspapers. By the same measure, the Guardian is also more likely to use a mix of information or to get information from other sources". Lewis' study concludes, "What is clear from this study is that the quality and independence of the British news media has been significantly affected by its increasing reliance on public relations and news agency material; and for the worse!" [4].
Controversies
At the time of the take over Rupert Murdoch was threatened by MP's who wanted to refer the sale to the Monopolies and Mergers Commision. Murdoch claimed he would not go through with the sale if this was to happen [5]. Murdoch managed to avoid the sale being referred to the commision by agreeing to increased powers for the Independent National Directors of the newspaper. The role of these directors would be to adjudicate in disputes between the editor and the company, make decisions on the appointment and dismissal of editorial staff and to be involved in decisions about the sale or transfer of the newspapers. The Independent National Directors were also given veto powers [6]
Harold Evans, who was the editor of The Sunday Times when Murodoch bought it and later the editor of The Times argued that the concessions made by Murdoch were worthless. Evans had fought for the increased powers of the Independent National Directors but in practice, he found they provided him with no effective protection. In his autobiography he wrote that none of the guarantees that Rupert Murdoch gave to safeguard editorial independence "are worth the paper they are written on—unless the proprietor shares the spirit of them. If he does, they are merely ornamental; if he does not, they are unworkable. Internal freedom cannot be acquired by external rules" [7]. Andrew Neil who was the editor of The Times from 1983 to 1994 agreed "It was a conceit invented ... to allow Mr Murdoch to take over these papers in the first place, and it was put in place for that reason. It was not really put in place to protect the independence of the editors". [8].
Media Monopoly
MP's protesting against Murdoch's acquisition of The Times were concerned with the effect a media monopoly could have on democracy in the United Kingdom. This is according to a report by the Labour Government in 2001 because "A healthy democracy depends on a culture of dissent and argument, which would inevitably be diminished if there were only a limited number of providers of news" [9].
The main concern with Rupert Murdoch's media monopoly is that he can use it to manipulate public opinion and therefore put pressure on politicians who oppose his business interests. In October 2003 in the United States a study by the nonpartisan Program on International Policy Attitudes showed that 60% of U.S. citizens believed either that, clear evidence had been found of links between Iraq and Al Qaeda; W.M.D. had been found in Iraq; world public opinion favored the U.S. going to war with Iraq. 80% of the people who believed these falsehoods received their news primarily from Rupert Murdoch's Fox News. The clear bias of Fox News has not been displayed in The Times but Krugman argues that "a number of former Times employees have said that there was pressure to slant coverage — and everyone I’ve seen quoted defending Mr. Murdoch’s management is still on his payroll" [10].
The media interests of News International in the United Kingdom include:
- BSkyB (39% Stake)
- The Times
- The Sunday Times
- The Sun
- The News of The World
- The London Paper
- Harper Collins (Publishing house)
In the United States Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp owns:
Journalists
Editors since 1900
- George Earle Buckle 1884
- Geoffrey Dawson 1912
- Henry Wickham Steed 1919
- Geoffrey Dawson 1922
- Robert McGowan Barrington-Ward 1941
- William Francis Casey 1948
- Sir William Haley 1952
- William Rees-Mogg 1967
- Harold Evans 1981
- C. Douglas-Home 1983
- C. Wilson 1985
- Simon Jenkins 1990
- Peter Stothard 1992[12]
- Robert Thomson 2002
- James Harding 2005[13]
A-L
Michael Atherton | Guillem Balague | Simon Barnes | Peter Brookes, leader-page cartoonist | David Brown |Anthony Browne | Rachel Campbell-Johnston | Sam Coates | Giles Coren | Robert Crampton | Ginny Dougary |Stephen Farrell | Daniel Finkelstein, comment editor | Richard Ford | Adam Fresco | Frances Gibb |Brian Glanville | Ruth Gledhill | Michael Gove | Tim Hames | Nigel Hawkes | Anthony Howard| Philip Howard | Ben Hoyle | Mick Hume | Anatole Kaletsky | Magnus Linklater | Richard Lloyd Parry | Anthony Loyd, war correspondent on retainer
M-Z
Ben Macintyre | Bronwen Maddox | Stephanie Marsh | Hugh McIlvanney | Alice Miles | Caitlin Moran | Richard Morrison | Kate Muir | Matthew Parris | Grayson Perry | Libby Purves | Gordon Ramsay | Lord Rees-Mogg | Peter Riddell | Hugo Rifkind | Aki Riihilahti | Nick Robinson | Dan Sabbagh | Paul Sheehan | Mary Ann Sieghart | David Sinclair | Graham Stewart | Andrew Sullivan | Stewart Tendler | Ann Treneman | Janice Turner | Philip Webster | Alexander Williams, cartoonist
ABC and Readership Figures
The Times has an average daily net circulation of 600,962 according to the latest figures from ABC, these figures cover the period from the end of November 2008 to the end of December 2008. [14]
According to The National Readership Survey 88% of Times readers belong to socio-economic group ABC1, with the other 12% belonging to socio-economic group C2DE. 60% of Times readers are over 44 and 40% are aged between 15-44. The male-female divide amongst Times readers is 58% male and 42% female. This data was captured over one year from October 2007 to September 2008. [15]
References
- ↑ BBC NEWS, Times in Tabloid Transformation, 29-October-2004, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Simon Jenkins, Journalism:The History of The Times by Graham Stewart 08-January-2006, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Nick Davies, Flat Earth News (2008), London: Chatto & Windus
- ↑ Justin Lewis, A Compromised Fourth Estate? UK news journalism, public relations and news sources, Journalism Studies, Volume 9, Issue 1 February 2008
- ↑ BBC News, 1981: Murdoch bids to take over The Times, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ House of Lords Select Comittee, Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Harold Evans, Good Times, Bad Times, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983, pgs. 461-462]
- ↑ House of Lords Select Comittee, Select Comittee on Communications, Chapter 5: The Case for Media Ownership Regulation, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Department for Culture Media and Sport,Media Ownership Rules, November-2001, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Paul Krugman, The Murdoch Factor, 29-June-2007, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ Richard Wray, Murdoch faces scrutiny over media influence, 25-May-2007, Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ David Butler and Gareth Butler, Twentieth Century British Political Facts 1900-2000, Macmillan, 2000, p.530.
- ↑ Chris Tryhorn, Harding confirmed as Times editor, The Guardian, 21 November 2005.
- ↑ Audit Bureau of Circulation, ABC Figures for The Times Nov-Dec 2008 Accessed 19-January-2009
- ↑ National Readership Survey Figures, NRS Figures October 2008-September 2009, Accessed 19-January-2009
