Difference between revisions of "Douglas Feith"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Background)
(category:Harvard)
 
(63 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Douglas Jay Feith''' served as the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, the third ranking civilian position at the [[Pentagon]], from July 2001 until his resignation effective August 8, 2005. Feith, a hardline Zionist, previously served on the White House National Security staff under [[Richard Allen]] during [[Ronald Reagan]]'s first term in office. He was dismissed when Judge William Clark replaced Allen. Allegations of improperly handling classified materials were made but Feith was not prosecuted. During Reagan's second term in office, Feith was part of [[Richard N. Perle]]'s Pentagon team.
+
[[Douglas Feith|Douglas Jay Feith]] served as the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, the third ranking civilian position at the Pentagon, from July 2001 until his resignation effective August 8, 2005. Feith, a hardline Zionist, previously served on the White House National Security staff under [[Richard Allen]] during [[Ronald Reagan]]'s first term in office. He was dismissed when Judge William Clark replaced Allen. Allegations of improperly handling classified materials were made but Feith was not prosecuted. During Reagan's second term in office, Feith was part of [[Richard N. Perle]]'s Pentagon team.  
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
−
Feith served from 1984 to 1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy and was Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard N. Perle from 1982 to 1984. He is a graduate of Harvard College and Georgetown University Law Center.[http://www.results.gov/leadership/bio_145.html]
+
Feith began his career in government shortly after his graduation from Harvard as an intern to a subcommittee chaired by Senator [[Henry (Scoop) Jackson]].<ref name="jg">Jeffrey Goldberg, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/09/050509fa_fact?currentPage=all A Little Learning], ''New Yorker'', 9 May 2005</ref> Feith served from 1984 to 1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy and was Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard N. Perle from 1982 to 1984. He is a graduate of Harvard College and Georgetown University Law Center.<ref>[http://www.results.gov/leadership/bio_145.html]</ref> Feith has supported lobbying efforts aimed at persuading the United States to drop out of treaties and [[arms control]] agreements. Wrote one journalist in ''The Nation'', “Largely ignored or derided at the time, a 1995 [[Center for Security Policy]] (CSP)] memo co-written by Douglas Feith holding that the United States should withdraw from the ABM [antiballistic missile] treaty has essentially become policy, as have other CSP reports opposing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention and the International Criminal Court.”<ref>[http://www.security-policy.org/papers/1998/98-D139.html Source: Center for Security Policy 98-D139] </ref>
  
−
Feith has supported lobbying efforts aimed at persuading the United States to drop out of treaties and [[arms control]] agreements. Wrote one journalist in ''The Nation'', “Largely ignored or derided at the time, a 1995 [[Center for Security Policy]] (CSP)] memo co-written by Douglas Feith holding that the United States should withdraw from the ABM [antiballistic missile] treaty has essentially become policy, as have other CSP reports opposing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention and the International Criminal Court.”
+
Feith’s private business dealings have also raised eyebrows in Washington. In 1999, his firm Feith & Zell formed an alliance with the Israel-based Zell, Goldberg & Co., which resulted in the creation of the [[Fandz International Law Group]]. According to Fandz’s web site, the law group “has recently established a task force dealing with issues and opportunities relating to the recently ended war with Iraq. ... and is assisting regional construction and logistics firms to collaborate with contractors from the United States and other coalition countries in implementing infrastructure and other reconstruction projects in Iraq.” Remarked Washington Post columnist Al Kamen, “Interested parties can reach [Fandz] through its Web site, at www.fandz.com. Fandz.com? Hmmm. Rings a bell. Oh, yes, that was the Web site of the Washington law firm of Feith & Zell, P.C., as in Douglas Feith [the] undersecretary of defense for policy and head of -- what else? -- reconstruction matters in Iraq. It would be impossible indeed to overestimate how perfect ZGC would be in ‘assisting American companies in their relations with the United States government in connection with Iraqi reconstruction projects.’”
 +
 
 +
==Zionism and Foreign Policy==
 +
Feith has been active in Zionist causes since his youth. He has also spoken about the formative influence of the Holocaust on his thinking. He told [[Jeffrey Goldberg]],
 +
:“I had done a lot of reading, relative for a kid, about World War Two, and I thought about Chamberlain a lot,” he told me. “Chamberlain wasn’t popular in my house.” Feith’s father lost his parents, three brothers, and four sisters in German death camps...When I took all these nice-sounding [antiwar] ideas and compared it to my own little personal ‘Cogito, ergo sum,’ which was my understanding that my family got wiped out by Hitler, and that all this stuff about working things out—well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare that ‘war is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust?” He continued, “The surprising thing is not that there are so many Jews who are neocons but that there are so many who are not.”<ref name="jg"/>
 +
 
 +
Feith maintains close relations with the Likud Party in Israel. He was a co-author of the infamour 'A Clean Break' document that prominent neoconservatives wrote for the incoming Likud government of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996. In a New Yorker profile Jeffrey Goldberg sums up his views on foreign policy thus:
 +
:In the late nineteen-seventies, he wrote about America’s energy supply, arguing, against conventional wisdom, that oil embargoes could be more damaging to the economies of Arab oil exporters than to the United States. In the nineteen-eighties, as a deputy to Perle, Feith focussed his attention—and skepticism—on arms control and détente. In the early nineteen-nineties, he predicted that the Oslo peace process between Israel and the Palestinians would fail.<ref name="jg"/>
  
−
[http://www.security-policy.org/papers/1998/98-D139.html Source: Center for Security Policy 98-D139]
+
However, following the disaster in Iraq, Feith has grown touchy about his Zionism. Goldberg reports:
 +
:Feith’s library includes a large selection of books on Zionism, but he did not linger there. “I’m not looking to aggravate a distortion about me,” Feith said. The distortion, he said, is that his religion, or at least his longtime support for right-wing Israeli leaders, has affected his policy recommendations to Rumsfeld.<ref name="jg"/>
  
−
Feith’s private business dealings have also raised eyebrows in Washington. In 1999, his firm Feith & Zell formed an alliance with the Israel-based Zell, Goldberg & Co., which resulted in the creation of the [[Fandz International Law Group]]. According to Fandz’s web site, the law group “has recently established a task force dealing with issues and opportunities relating to the recently ended war with Iraq. ... and is assisting regional construction and logistics firms to collaborate with contractors from the United States and other coalition countries in implementing infrastructure and other reconstruction projects in Iraq.” Remarked Washington Post columnist Al Kamen, “Interested parties can reach [Fandz] through its Web site, at www.fandz.com. Fandz.com? Hmmm. Rings a bell. Oh, yes, that was the Web site of the Washington law firm of Feith & Zell, P.C., as in Douglas Feith [the] undersecretary of defense for policy and head of -- what else? -- reconstruction matters in Iraq. It would be impossible indeed to overestimate how perfect ZGC would be in ‘assisting American companies in their relations with the United States government in connection with Iraqi reconstruction projects.’”
+
==Controversial Tenure as Undersecretary of Defense==
  
−
==Controversial Tenure as Undersecretary of Defense ==
 
 
===Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group===
 
===Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group===
−
Shortly after the events of [[September 11, 2001]], Feith created the [[Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group]] (CPEG), which was disbanded in February 2004. In April 2004, the "Group" was under investigation by the [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] as to whether it "exaggerated the threat posed by Iraq to justify the [[war in Iraq|war]]." [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/politics/28INTE.html?position=&hp=&pagewanted=print&position=][http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=complete_timeline_of_the_2003_invasion_of_iraq_481]
 
  
−
===Attempts to Link Iraq with Al Queda===
+
Shortly after the events of 11 September 2001, Feith created the [[Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group]] (PCEG), which was disbanded in February 2004. In April 2004, the "Group" was under investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence as to whether it "exaggerated the threat posed by Iraq to justify the [[Iraq War 2003|war]]." <ref>James Risen, [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/politics/28INTE.html How Pair's Finding on Terror Led to Clash on Shaping Intelligence], ''New York Times'', 28 April 2004</ref><ref>[http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=complete_timeline_of_the_2003_invasion_of_iraq_481 Context of 'August 2002: Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group In Pentagon Disbanded'], ''History Commons'', accessed 3 September 2010</ref>
  
−
In August 2002, Feith and DIA analyst [[Chris Carney]] discussed [[Iraq]]'s alleged ties to [[al-Qaeda]] to the [[CIA]]. CIA analysts immediately recognized that Feith's allegations came from discredited sources. The information will nevertheless be included in speeches by [[George W. Bush]] and in CIA director [[George J. Tenet]]'s [[Congress]]ional testimony. Feith distributed a classified memo to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence based on this information, and the memo was later leaked to the ''[[Weekly Standard]]'', a [[neoconservative]] magazine.
+
===Attempts to Link Iraq with Al Qaeda===
 +
 
 +
In August 2002, Feith and DIA analyst [[Chris Carney]] discussed Iraq's alleged ties to al-Qaeda to the CIA. CIA analysts immediately recognized that Feith's allegations came from discredited sources. The information will nevertheless be included in speeches by George W. Bush and in CIA director [[George Tenet]]'s Congressional testimony. Feith distributed a classified memo to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence based on this information, and the memo was later leaked to the ''[[Weekly Standard]]'', a [[neoconservative]] magazine.
  
 
===Called for Regime Change in Iraq Five Years Before 9/11 Attack===
 
===Called for Regime Change in Iraq Five Years Before 9/11 Attack===
  
−
Douglas Feith, along with Richard Perle and other noted neo-cons, called for the removal of [[Saddam Hussein]] in a 1996 round table report ''A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm''. [http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm]
+
Douglas Feith, along with Richard Perle and other noted neo-cons, called for the removal of Saddam Hussein in a 1996 round table report ''A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm''.<ref>[http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm]</ref> The removal was considered a means for foiling Syria's regional ambitions. This report was prepared more that five years before the attack on the World Trade Center. The report describes regime change in Iraq as an important Israeli strategic objective.
−
The removal was considered a means for foiling [[Syria]]'s regional ambitions.
 
  
−
This report was prepared more that five years before the attack on the [[World Trade Center]]. The report describes [[regime change]] in Iraq as an important [[Israel]]i strategic objective.
+
===Allegations of Leaking Classified Material===
  
−
For more information, see [[Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000]].
+
"'He was very arrogant,' Karen Kwiatkowski, Feith's former deputy, says, describing what it was like to work with him. 'He doesn't utilize a wide variety of inputs. He seeks information that confirms what he already thinks. And he may go to jail for leaking classified information to ''The Weekly Standard''.'<ref>Laura Rozen, [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=7760 "Ye of Little Feith. Why one of Doug Feith's underlings thinks he might go to jail"],  ''The American Prospect'', May 18, 2004</ref> (As she explains, an article appeared in ''The Weekly Standard'' that included a [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp leaked memo] written by Feith alleging ties between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.) :"It seems unlikely that Feith will face time for the leaked memo. But he may well be forced to look for a new job soon. As he knows all too well, regime change isn't pretty."
  
−
===Allegations of Leaking Classified Material===
+
===WMDs as the principal rationale for the war in Iraq===
  
−
The title of Laura Rozen's May 18, 2004, ''The American Prospect Online'' article states the case clearly in [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=7760 "Ye of Little Feith. Why one of Doug Feith's underlings thinks he might go to jail."]
+
Feith and [[Paul Wolfowitz]] "are blamed for persuading President Bush that an invasion would be relatively easy.<ref>Julian Borger, [http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/052204F.shtml], ''Guardian Unlimited'', May 20, 2004.</ref>
  
−
:"'He was very arrogant,' [[Karen Kwiatkowski]], Feith's former deputy, says, describing what it was like to work with him. 'He doesn't utilize a wide variety of inputs. He seeks information that confirms what he already thinks. And he may go to jail for leaking classified information to ''The Weekly Standard''.' (As she explains, an article appeared in ''The Weekly Standard'' that included a [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp leaked memo] written by Feith alleging ties between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.)
+
===Creation of Office of Special Plans===
  
−
:"It seems unlikely that Feith will face time for the leaked memo. But he may well be forced to look for a new job soon. As he knows all too well, regime change isn't pretty."
+
A supplementary annex of the committee's review of the intelligence leading to [[war in Iraq]] says about Feith: A Senior Pentagon policy maker created an unofficial "Iraqi intelligence cell" in the summer of 2002 to circumvent the CIA and secretly brief the White House on links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qa'eda.<ref> [http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/071304B.shtml]</ref>
  
−
===[[WMD]]s as the principal rationale for the war in Iraq===
+
According to Feith said, the non-descript name was chosen to obscure its mission.<ref name="jg"/>
−
Feith and [[Paul Wolfowitz]] "are blamed for persuading President Bush that an invasion would be relatively easy."&mdash;Julian Borger, [http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/052204F.shtml ''Guardian Unlimited'' (UK)], May 20, 2004.
 
  
−
===Creation of [[Office of Special Plans]]===
+
===Office of Strategic Influence===
−
 
+
Another unit reporting to Feith was the [[Office of Strategic Influence]], a covert propaganda unit created at the Pentagon in the wake of 9/11.<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C06EFD71F3FF93AA25751C0A9649C8B63&scp=1&sq=%22office+of+strategic+influence%22&st=nyt  A NATION CHALLENGED: HEARTS AND MINDS; PENTAGON READIES EFFORTS TO SWAY SENTIMENT ABROAD], by James Dao and Eric Schmitt, New York Times, 19 February 2002.</ref>
−
A supplementary annex of the committee's review of the intelligence leading to [[war in Iraq]] says about Feith: A Senior Pentagon policy maker created an unofficial "Iraqi intelligence cell" in the summer of 2002 to circumvent the CIA and secretly brief the White House on links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qa'eda. [http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/071304B.shtml]
 
  
 
===Circumventing the Geneva Convention===
 
===Circumventing the Geneva Convention===
−
Feith was instrumental in the president's decision that the Geneva Convention should not apply to detainees:
 
  
 +
Feith was instrumental in the president's decision that the Geneva Convention should not apply to detainees:
 
::How had the administration gone from a commitment to Geneva, as suggested by the meeting with Rumsfeld, to the president’s declaration that none of the detainees had any rights under Geneva? It all turns on what you mean by “promoting respect” for Geneva, Feith explained. Geneva didn’t apply at all to al-Qaeda fighters, because they weren’t part of a state and therefore couldn’t claim rights under a treaty that was binding only on states. Geneva did apply to the Taliban, but by Geneva’s own terms Taliban fighters weren’t entitled to P.O.W. status, because they hadn’t worn uniforms or insignia. That would still leave the safety net provided by the rules reflected in Common Article 3— but detainees could not rely on this either, on the theory that its provisions applied only to “armed conflict not of an international character,” which the administration interpreted to mean civil war. This was new. In reaching this conclusion, the Bush administration simply abandoned all legal and customary precedent that regards Common Article 3 as a minimal bill of rights for everyone.<ref>[http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/guantanamo200805?printable=true&currentPage=all The Green Light], [[Phillippe Sands]], [[Vanity Fair]], May 2008.</ref>
 
::How had the administration gone from a commitment to Geneva, as suggested by the meeting with Rumsfeld, to the president’s declaration that none of the detainees had any rights under Geneva? It all turns on what you mean by “promoting respect” for Geneva, Feith explained. Geneva didn’t apply at all to al-Qaeda fighters, because they weren’t part of a state and therefore couldn’t claim rights under a treaty that was binding only on states. Geneva did apply to the Taliban, but by Geneva’s own terms Taliban fighters weren’t entitled to P.O.W. status, because they hadn’t worn uniforms or insignia. That would still leave the safety net provided by the rules reflected in Common Article 3— but detainees could not rely on this either, on the theory that its provisions applied only to “armed conflict not of an international character,” which the administration interpreted to mean civil war. This was new. In reaching this conclusion, the Bush administration simply abandoned all legal and customary precedent that regards Common Article 3 as a minimal bill of rights for everyone.<ref>[http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/guantanamo200805?printable=true&currentPage=all The Green Light], [[Phillippe Sands]], [[Vanity Fair]], May 2008.</ref>
  
−
==A History of Lobbying ==
+
==Post War Denials==
−
===[[Turkey]]===
+
The man who oversaw the manufacturing of false intelligence in the lead up to war told Jeffrey Goldberg two years after the war:
−
In 1989, Feith registered [[International Advisors, Inc.]] (IAI) as a foreign agent representing the government of Turkey. The brainchild of Richard N. Perle, IAI's stated purpose was to "promote the objective of U.S.-Turkey defense industrial cooperation."  
+
 
 +
:“The main rationale was not based on intelligence,” Feith said. “It was known to anyone who read newspapers and knew history. Saddam had used nerve gas, he had invaded his neighbors more than once, he had attacked other neighbors, he was hostile to us, he supported numerous terrorist groups. It’s true that he didn’t have a link that we know of to 9/11. . . . But he did give safe haven to terrorists...Given the ease, as everybody knows, with which one can reconstitute stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons if you have the capabilities which he had, I don’t think the rationale for the war hinged on the existence of stockpiles.”<ref name="jg"/>
  
−
Douglas Feith was not only the CEO of IAI but also its only stockholder. Feith earned $60,000 per year and his law firm, Feith and Zell, was the recipient from IAI of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
+
Tellingly, he only speaks about chemical and biological weapons (not strictly 'weapons of mass destruction') and leaves out any mention of Iraq's alleged nuclear program. He also sidesteps the fact that his Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group was dedicated solely to establishing the Iraq-al-Qaeda link.
 +
===Feith and the Arab Mind===
 +
When asked why US troops were not greeted with flowers as the neoconservatives had promised, Feith told the interviewer: '“But they had flowers in their minds.”<ref name="jg"/>
  
−
In 1992, Feith joined with [[Richard N. Perle|Perle]] and other [[Neo-conservatives/list|neo-cons]] opposing President [[George H.W. Bush]]'s stern policy on Israel in forming the [[Committee on U.S. Interests in the Middle East]].
+
==A History of Lobbying ==
  
−
===[[Bosnia]]===
+
In 1989, Feith registered [[International Advisors, Inc.]] (IAI) as a foreign agent representing the government of Turkey. The brainchild of Richard N. Perle, IAI's stated purpose was to "promote the objective of U.S.-Turkey defense industrial cooperation." Douglas Feith was not only the CEO of IAI but also its only stockholder. Feith earned $60,000 per year and his law firm, Feith and Zell, was the recipient from IAI of hundreds of thousands of dollars. In 1992, Feith joined with [[Richard Perle|Perle]] and other [[neo-conservatives|neo-cons]] opposing President [[George H.W. Bush]]'s stern policy on Israel in forming the [[Committee on US Interests in the Middle East]].  
−
Feith and [[Richard N. Perle|Perle]] reportedly teamed up once again as consultants for Bosnia. They both worked for and advised the Bosnians during the Dayton peace talks. They were not, however, registered then as foreign agents with the [[U.S. Department of Justice]].
 
  
−
Above paragraphs from the [[Arab American Institute]]'s [http://www.aaiusa.org/wwatch/051301.htm ''Washington Watch''].
+
Feith and [[Richard Perle|Perle]] reportedly teamed up once again as consultants for Bosnia. They both worked for and advised the Bosnians during the Dayton peace talks. They were not, however, registered then as foreign agents with the U.S. Department of Justice. Above paragraphs from the [[Arab American Institute]]'s [http://www.aaiusa.org/wwatch/051301.htm ''Washington Watch''].
  
 
==Affiliations==
 
==Affiliations==
Line 64: Line 71:
 
*[[Energy Infrastructure Planning Group]]
 
*[[Energy Infrastructure Planning Group]]
 
*[[Office of Special Plans]]
 
*[[Office of Special Plans]]
 +
*[[Office of Strategic Influence]]
 +
*[[One Jerusalem]]
 +
*[[JINSA]]
 
*[[Project for the New American Century]]
 
*[[Project for the New American Century]]
 
*[[Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000]] Member
 
*[[Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000]] Member
 
*[[United States Committee for a Free Lebanon]]
 
*[[United States Committee for a Free Lebanon]]
−
*[[United States Institute of Peace]] - Former Director(2002)
+
*[[United States Institute of Peace]] - Former Director (2002)<ref>Mearsheimer, J. & Walt, S. [http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html The Israel Lobby] <i>London Review of Books</i>, 16 March 2006</ref>
  
−
Feith is described as having 'long-term ties to [[Likud]]'<ref>Mearsheimer, J. & Walt, S. (2006) [http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html The Israel Lobby] <i>London Review of Books</i>. Accessed 8th July 2008</ref>
+
==Contact Information==
  
−
==Contact Information==
+
*Website: http://www.dougfeith.com/<br>  
−
*Website: http://www.dougfeith.com/<br>
 
  
 
== Resources and articles==
 
== Resources and articles==
 +
 
===Profiles===
 
===Profiles===
 +
 
*[http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/feith/feith_body.html Profile: Douglas Feith], ''RightWeb''.
 
*[http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/feith/feith_body.html Profile: Douglas Feith], ''RightWeb''.
 
*[http://www.nndb.com/people/100/000047956/ Profile: Douglas Feith], NNBD.com.
 
*[http://www.nndb.com/people/100/000047956/ Profile: Douglas Feith], NNBD.com.
 
*[http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=douglas_feith Profile: Douglas Feith], ''Cooperative Research''.
 
*[http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=douglas_feith Profile: Douglas Feith], ''Cooperative Research''.
 
*[http://www.israelipalestinianprocon.org/Biosind/douglasfeith.html Profile: Douglas J. Feith], ''Israeli-Palestinian ProCon.org''.
 
*[http://www.israelipalestinianprocon.org/Biosind/douglasfeith.html Profile: Douglas J. Feith], ''Israeli-Palestinian ProCon.org''.
−
*[http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/celebritytalentbios/Douglas-Feith Printable Biography of Douglas Feith], All American Speakers Bureau.
+
*[http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/celebritytalentbios/Douglas-Feith Printable Biography of Douglas Feith], All American Speakers Bureau.*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_J._Feith Douglas J. Feith] in the ''Wikipedia''.
−
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_J._Feith Douglas J. Feith] in the ''Wikipedia''.
 
−
* [http://www.dougfeith.com/ DougFeith.com], a website associated with Feith, responding to the February 2007 Pentagon Inspector General's report about pre-war Iraq intelligence.
 
  
 
===Articles by Douglas J. Feith===
 
===Articles by Douglas J. Feith===
 +
 
*[http://www.meforum.org/article/284 "The Inner Logic of Israel's Negotations: Withdrawal Process, Not Peace Process,"] [[Middle East Forum]] / [[Middle East Quarterly]], March 1996.
 
*[http://www.meforum.org/article/284 "The Inner Logic of Israel's Negotations: Withdrawal Process, Not Peace Process,"] [[Middle East Forum]] / [[Middle East Quarterly]], March 1996.
 
*[http://www.cfr.org/publication/6526/global_war_on_terrorism.html Transcript: "The Global War on Terrorism,"] with Robert L. Galluci, Presider, at [[Council on Foreign Relations]], November 13, 2003.
 
*[http://www.cfr.org/publication/6526/global_war_on_terrorism.html Transcript: "The Global War on Terrorism,"] with Robert L. Galluci, Presider, at [[Council on Foreign Relations]], November 13, 2003.
Line 90: Line 100:
 
*[http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/2001041__undersecretary_defense_douglas_feith_conventional_warfare Op-Ed: "Conventional Warfare,"] ''Wall Street Journal'' (''AllAmericanPatriots.com''), April 24, 2004.
 
*[http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/2001041__undersecretary_defense_douglas_feith_conventional_warfare Op-Ed: "Conventional Warfare,"] ''Wall Street Journal'' (''AllAmericanPatriots.com''), April 24, 2004.
 
*[http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1715 Transcript: Speech] to the Council on Foreign Relations, February 17, 2005. (on asymmetrical sovereignty)
 
*[http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1715 Transcript: Speech] to the Council on Foreign Relations, February 17, 2005. (on asymmetrical sovereignty)
−
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/10/AR2006111001388.html "The Donald Rumsfeld I Know,"] ''Washington Post'', November 12, 2006.
+
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/10/AR2006111001388.html "The Donald Rumsfeld I Know,"] ''Washington Post'', November 12, 2006.*[http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=27010 "A Word for Chris Wallace,"] [[FrontPageMag.com]], February 21, 2007.
−
*[http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=27010 "A Word for Chris Wallace,"] [[FrontPageMag.com]], February 21, 2007.
+
*[http://www.meforum.org/1934/my-pentagon-years "My Pentagon Years"], [[Middle East Forum]], 8 May 2008
  
 
===External articles===
 
===External articles===
 +
 
====1996====
 
====1996====
−
*[http://www.freeman.org/m_online/jan97/center.htm "Israeli Settlements: Legitimate, Democratically Mandated, Vital to Israel's Security and, Therefore, in U.S. Interest,"] [[Center for Security Policy]], December 17, 1996.
+
 
 +
*[http://www.freeman.org/m_online/jan97/center.htm "Israeli Settlements: Legitimate, Democratically Mandated, Vital to Israel's Security and, Therefore, in U.S. Interest,"] [[Center for Security Policy]], December 17, 1996.  
  
 
====2001====
 
====2001====
−
*[[James J. Zogby]], [http://middleeastinfo.org/article701.html "A Dangerous Appointment: Profile of Douglas Feith, Undersecretary of Defense under Bush,"] ''Middle East Info'', April 18, 2001.
+
 
 +
*James Zogby, [http://web.archive.org/web/20020617033044/http://www.middleeastinfo.org/article701.html "A Dangerous Appointment: Profile of Douglas Feith, Undersecretary of Defense under Bush,"] ''Middle East Info'', April 18, 2001.
  
 
====2003====
 
====2003====
 +
 
*[http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/20030310_american_dreamers/int_feith.htm "Interview with Douglas Feith. Jonathan Holmes interviews Douglas Feith, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy,"] ''Four Corners''/ABC News (Australia), February 21, 2003.
 
*[http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/20030310_american_dreamers/int_feith.htm "Interview with Douglas Feith. Jonathan Holmes interviews Douglas Feith, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy,"] ''Four Corners''/ABC News (Australia), February 21, 2003.
−
*Julian Borger, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html "The spies who pushed for war. ... on the shadow rightwing intelligence network set up in Washington to second-guess the CIA and deliver a justification for toppling Saddam Hussein by force,"] ''The Guardian'' (UK), July 17, 2003.
+
*Julian Borger, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html "The spies who pushed for war,"] ''The Guardian'', July 17, 2003.
 
*Jim Lobe, [http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2003/0311feith.html "The Crisis of Feith,"] ''Foreign Policy in Focus'', November 7, 2003.
 
*Jim Lobe, [http://www.fpif.org/commentary/2003/0311feith.html "The Crisis of Feith,"] ''Foreign Policy in Focus'', November 7, 2003.
 
*Jim Lobe, [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EK07Ak03.html "Loss of Feith in Douglas,"] ''Asia Times'', November 7, 2003.
 
*Jim Lobe, [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EK07Ak03.html "Loss of Feith in Douglas,"] ''Asia Times'', November 7, 2003.
Line 111: Line 125:
  
 
====2004====
 
====2004====
 +
 
*Dana Priest, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54569-2004Mar12.html "Pentagon Shadow Loses Some Mystique. Feith's Shops Did Not Usurp Intelligence Agencies on Iraq, Hill Probers Find,"] ''Washington Post'', March 13, 2004. See [http://www.juancole.com/2004_03_01_juancole_archive.html#107916178862710617 comments] by Juan Cole.
 
*Dana Priest, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54569-2004Mar12.html "Pentagon Shadow Loses Some Mystique. Feith's Shops Did Not Usurp Intelligence Agencies on Iraq, Hill Probers Find,"] ''Washington Post'', March 13, 2004. See [http://www.juancole.com/2004_03_01_juancole_archive.html#107916178862710617 comments] by Juan Cole.
 
*James Risen, [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/politics/28INTE.html?pagewanted=print&position= "How Pair's Finding on Terror Led To Clash on Shaping Intelligence" (Abstract)], ''New York Times'', April 28, 2004.
 
*James Risen, [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/28/politics/28INTE.html?pagewanted=print&position= "How Pair's Finding on Terror Led To Clash on Shaping Intelligence" (Abstract)], ''New York Times'', April 28, 2004.
Line 121: Line 136:
 
*Tom Barry, [http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2004/0409feith.php "Douglas Feith: Portrait of a Neoconservative,"] ''RightWeb'', September 3, 2004; [http://www.antiwar.com/barry/?articleid=3545 ''Antiwar.com'',] September 15, 2004.
 
*Tom Barry, [http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2004/0409feith.php "Douglas Feith: Portrait of a Neoconservative,"] ''RightWeb'', September 3, 2004; [http://www.antiwar.com/barry/?articleid=3545 ''Antiwar.com'',] September 15, 2004.
 
*Julian Coman, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/11/wsept11.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/11/ixnewstop.html "Fury over Pentagon cell that briefed White House on Iraq's 'imaginary' al-Qaeda links,"] ''The Telegraph'' (UK), October 7, 2004.
 
*Julian Coman, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/11/wsept11.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/11/ixnewstop.html "Fury over Pentagon cell that briefed White House on Iraq's 'imaginary' al-Qaeda links,"] ''The Telegraph'' (UK), October 7, 2004.
−
*[http://www.levin.senate.gov/newsroom/supporting/2004/102104inquiryreport.pdf Report of an Inquiry into the Alternative Analysis of the Issue of an Iraq-al Qaeda Relationship] by Senator [[Carl Levin]] (D-MI) Ranking Member, [[Senate Armed Services Committee]], October 21, 2004.
+
*[http://www.levin.senate.gov/newsroom/supporting/2004/102104inquiryreport.pdf Report of an Inquiry into the Alternative Analysis of the Issue of an Iraq-al Qaeda Relationship] by Senator [[Carl Levin]] (D-MI) Ranking Member, [[Senate Armed Services Committee]], October 21, 2004.:
−
:*Sen. Levin, a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] releases a report on the role of the office of the Pentagon's number three official Douglas Feith in alleged extracurricular intelligence analysis and advocacy.
+
*Sen. Levin, a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] releases a report on the role of the office of the Pentagon's number three official Douglas Feith in alleged extracurricular intelligence analysis and advocacy.
−
*[http://www.tompaine.com/articles/the_iraq_intel_scandal_unfolds.php "The Iraq Intel Scandal Unfolds,"] ''War and Piece'' (''TomPaine.com''), October 22, 2004.
+
*[http://www.tompaine.com/articles/the_iraq_intel_scandal_unfolds.php "The Iraq Intel Scandal Unfolds,"] ''War and Piece'' (''TomPaine.com''), October 22, 2004.*Brian Bender, [http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1022-02.htm "Senator Says Pentagon Unit Hyped Terror Tie,"] ''Boston Globe'' (''Common Dreams''), October 22, 2004.  
−
*Brian Bender, [http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1022-02.htm "Senator Says Pentagon Unit Hyped Terror Tie,"] ''Boston Globe'' (''Common Dreams''), October 22, 2004.
 
  
 
====2005====
 
====2005====
 +
 
*[http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=8160 News Release: "DoD Announces Departure of Undersecretary Douglas Feith,"] U.S. Department of Defense, January 26, 2005.
 
*[http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=8160 News Release: "DoD Announces Departure of Undersecretary Douglas Feith,"] U.S. Department of Defense, January 26, 2005.
 
*Demetri Sevastopulo, [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/879673b0-6ff0-11d9-850d-00000e2511c8.html "Neo-con Feith to quit defence policy post,"] ''Financial Times'', January 26, 2005.
 
*Demetri Sevastopulo, [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/879673b0-6ff0-11d9-850d-00000e2511c8.html "Neo-con Feith to quit defence policy post,"] ''Financial Times'', January 26, 2005.
Line 142: Line 157:
 
*Harkavy, [http://villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/archive/2005/08/morning_report_149.php "Dual Disloyalty: Feith and the Occupations of Gaza and Iraq,"] ''The Bush Beat'' Blog/''The Village Voice'', August 9, 2005.
 
*Harkavy, [http://villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/archive/2005/08/morning_report_149.php "Dual Disloyalty: Feith and the Occupations of Gaza and Iraq,"] ''The Bush Beat'' Blog/''The Village Voice'', August 9, 2005.
 
*Evelyn J. Pringle, [http://www.counterpunch.org/pringle09092005.html "War Pays. Douglas Feith's Platinum Parachute,"] ''CounterPunch'', September 9/11, 2005.
 
*Evelyn J. Pringle, [http://www.counterpunch.org/pringle09092005.html "War Pays. Douglas Feith's Platinum Parachute,"] ''CounterPunch'', September 9/11, 2005.
−
*[[Karen Kwiatkowski]], [http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski123.html "Thoughts on the Retirement of Douglas Feith,"] ''LewRockwell.com'', September 21, 2005.
+
*Karen Kwiatkowski, [http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski123.html "Thoughts on the Retirement of Douglas Feith,"] ''LewRockwell.com'', September 21, 2005.
 
*[[Arnaud de Borchgrave]], [http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20051024-090713-3995r Commentary: "Dumb, But Smart Feith,"] UPI, October 24, 2005.
 
*[[Arnaud de Borchgrave]], [http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20051024-090713-3995r Commentary: "Dumb, But Smart Feith,"] UPI, October 24, 2005.
  
 
====2006====
 
====2006====
 +
 
*[[Larisa Alexandrovna]], [http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Pentagon_investigation_stalls_Phase_II_of_0130.html "Pentagon investigation of Iraq war hawk stalling Senate inquiry into pre-war Iraq intelligence,"] ''The Raw Story'', January 30, 2006.
 
*[[Larisa Alexandrovna]], [http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Pentagon_investigation_stalls_Phase_II_of_0130.html "Pentagon investigation of Iraq war hawk stalling Senate inquiry into pre-war Iraq intelligence,"] ''The Raw Story'', January 30, 2006.
 
*Stephen Santulli, [http://www.thehoya.com/news/050206/news3.cfm "Douglas Feith Hired as Visiting SFS Professor. Correction Appended,"] ''The Hoya'', May 2, 2006.
 
*Stephen Santulli, [http://www.thehoya.com/news/050206/news3.cfm "Douglas Feith Hired as Visiting SFS Professor. Correction Appended,"] ''The Hoya'', May 2, 2006.
Line 156: Line 172:
  
 
====2007====
 
====2007====
 +
 
*David S. Cloud and Mark Mazzetti, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/09/washington/09feith.html?ex=1328677200&en=29181d121fce0c29&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss "Prewar Intelligence Unit at Pentagon Is Criticized,"] ''New York Times'', February 9, 2007.
 
*David S. Cloud and Mark Mazzetti, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/09/washington/09feith.html?ex=1328677200&en=29181d121fce0c29&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss "Prewar Intelligence Unit at Pentagon Is Criticized,"] ''New York Times'', February 9, 2007.
 
*[[Walter Pincus]] and R. Jeffrey Smith, [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/09/MNGLQO1HUD1.DTL "Report cites 'dubious' pre-war findings. Political views, not intelligence consensus, imbued White House case, watchdog says,"] ''Washington Post'' (''San Francisco Chronicle''), February 9, 2007.
 
*[[Walter Pincus]] and R. Jeffrey Smith, [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/09/MNGLQO1HUD1.DTL "Report cites 'dubious' pre-war findings. Political views, not intelligence consensus, imbued White House case, watchdog says,"] ''Washington Post'' (''San Francisco Chronicle''), February 9, 2007.
Line 187: Line 204:
 
*[http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/ "The Architects of War: Where Are They Now?"] ''Think Progress'', July 2007.
 
*[http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/ "The Architects of War: Where Are They Now?"] ''Think Progress'', July 2007.
  
−
[[Category:Israel Lobby]][[Category:Iraq War 2003]]
+
==Notes==
−
[[Category:Neocons|Feith, Douglas]]
+
 
 +
<references/>
 +
[Category:Harvard alumni|Feith, Douglas]][[Category:Israel Lobby|Feith, Douglas]][[Category:Iraq War 2003|Feith, Douglas]][[Category:Neocons|Feith, Douglas]]

Latest revision as of 17:11, 23 April 2012

Douglas Jay Feith served as the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, the third ranking civilian position at the Pentagon, from July 2001 until his resignation effective August 8, 2005. Feith, a hardline Zionist, previously served on the White House National Security staff under Richard Allen during Ronald Reagan's first term in office. He was dismissed when Judge William Clark replaced Allen. Allegations of improperly handling classified materials were made but Feith was not prosecuted. During Reagan's second term in office, Feith was part of Richard N. Perle's Pentagon team.

Background

Feith began his career in government shortly after his graduation from Harvard as an intern to a subcommittee chaired by Senator Henry (Scoop) Jackson.[1] Feith served from 1984 to 1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy and was Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard N. Perle from 1982 to 1984. He is a graduate of Harvard College and Georgetown University Law Center.[2] Feith has supported lobbying efforts aimed at persuading the United States to drop out of treaties and arms control agreements. Wrote one journalist in The Nation, “Largely ignored or derided at the time, a 1995 Center for Security Policy (CSP)] memo co-written by Douglas Feith holding that the United States should withdraw from the ABM [antiballistic missile] treaty has essentially become policy, as have other CSP reports opposing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention and the International Criminal Court.”[3]

Feith’s private business dealings have also raised eyebrows in Washington. In 1999, his firm Feith & Zell formed an alliance with the Israel-based Zell, Goldberg & Co., which resulted in the creation of the Fandz International Law Group. According to Fandz’s web site, the law group “has recently established a task force dealing with issues and opportunities relating to the recently ended war with Iraq. ... and is assisting regional construction and logistics firms to collaborate with contractors from the United States and other coalition countries in implementing infrastructure and other reconstruction projects in Iraq.” Remarked Washington Post columnist Al Kamen, “Interested parties can reach [Fandz] through its Web site, at www.fandz.com. Fandz.com? Hmmm. Rings a bell. Oh, yes, that was the Web site of the Washington law firm of Feith & Zell, P.C., as in Douglas Feith [the] undersecretary of defense for policy and head of -- what else? -- reconstruction matters in Iraq. It would be impossible indeed to overestimate how perfect ZGC would be in ‘assisting American companies in their relations with the United States government in connection with Iraqi reconstruction projects.’”

Zionism and Foreign Policy

Feith has been active in Zionist causes since his youth. He has also spoken about the formative influence of the Holocaust on his thinking. He told Jeffrey Goldberg,

“I had done a lot of reading, relative for a kid, about World War Two, and I thought about Chamberlain a lot,” he told me. “Chamberlain wasn’t popular in my house.” Feith’s father lost his parents, three brothers, and four sisters in German death camps...When I took all these nice-sounding [antiwar] ideas and compared it to my own little personal ‘Cogito, ergo sum,’ which was my understanding that my family got wiped out by Hitler, and that all this stuff about working things out—well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare that ‘war is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust?” He continued, “The surprising thing is not that there are so many Jews who are neocons but that there are so many who are not.”[1]

Feith maintains close relations with the Likud Party in Israel. He was a co-author of the infamour 'A Clean Break' document that prominent neoconservatives wrote for the incoming Likud government of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996. In a New Yorker profile Jeffrey Goldberg sums up his views on foreign policy thus:

In the late nineteen-seventies, he wrote about America’s energy supply, arguing, against conventional wisdom, that oil embargoes could be more damaging to the economies of Arab oil exporters than to the United States. In the nineteen-eighties, as a deputy to Perle, Feith focussed his attention—and skepticism—on arms control and détente. In the early nineteen-nineties, he predicted that the Oslo peace process between Israel and the Palestinians would fail.[1]

However, following the disaster in Iraq, Feith has grown touchy about his Zionism. Goldberg reports:

Feith’s library includes a large selection of books on Zionism, but he did not linger there. “I’m not looking to aggravate a distortion about me,” Feith said. The distortion, he said, is that his religion, or at least his longtime support for right-wing Israeli leaders, has affected his policy recommendations to Rumsfeld.[1]

Controversial Tenure as Undersecretary of Defense

Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group

Shortly after the events of 11 September 2001, Feith created the Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group (PCEG), which was disbanded in February 2004. In April 2004, the "Group" was under investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence as to whether it "exaggerated the threat posed by Iraq to justify the war." [4][5]

Attempts to Link Iraq with Al Qaeda

In August 2002, Feith and DIA analyst Chris Carney discussed Iraq's alleged ties to al-Qaeda to the CIA. CIA analysts immediately recognized that Feith's allegations came from discredited sources. The information will nevertheless be included in speeches by George W. Bush and in CIA director George Tenet's Congressional testimony. Feith distributed a classified memo to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence based on this information, and the memo was later leaked to the Weekly Standard, a neoconservative magazine.

Called for Regime Change in Iraq Five Years Before 9/11 Attack

Douglas Feith, along with Richard Perle and other noted neo-cons, called for the removal of Saddam Hussein in a 1996 round table report A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.[6] The removal was considered a means for foiling Syria's regional ambitions. This report was prepared more that five years before the attack on the World Trade Center. The report describes regime change in Iraq as an important Israeli strategic objective.

Allegations of Leaking Classified Material

"'He was very arrogant,' Karen Kwiatkowski, Feith's former deputy, says, describing what it was like to work with him. 'He doesn't utilize a wide variety of inputs. He seeks information that confirms what he already thinks. And he may go to jail for leaking classified information to The Weekly Standard.'[7] (As she explains, an article appeared in The Weekly Standard that included a leaked memo written by Feith alleging ties between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.) :"It seems unlikely that Feith will face time for the leaked memo. But he may well be forced to look for a new job soon. As he knows all too well, regime change isn't pretty."

WMDs as the principal rationale for the war in Iraq

Feith and Paul Wolfowitz "are blamed for persuading President Bush that an invasion would be relatively easy.[8]

Creation of Office of Special Plans

A supplementary annex of the committee's review of the intelligence leading to war in Iraq says about Feith: A Senior Pentagon policy maker created an unofficial "Iraqi intelligence cell" in the summer of 2002 to circumvent the CIA and secretly brief the White House on links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qa'eda.[9]

According to Feith said, the non-descript name was chosen to obscure its mission.[1]

Office of Strategic Influence

Another unit reporting to Feith was the Office of Strategic Influence, a covert propaganda unit created at the Pentagon in the wake of 9/11.[10]

Circumventing the Geneva Convention

Feith was instrumental in the president's decision that the Geneva Convention should not apply to detainees:

How had the administration gone from a commitment to Geneva, as suggested by the meeting with Rumsfeld, to the president’s declaration that none of the detainees had any rights under Geneva? It all turns on what you mean by “promoting respect” for Geneva, Feith explained. Geneva didn’t apply at all to al-Qaeda fighters, because they weren’t part of a state and therefore couldn’t claim rights under a treaty that was binding only on states. Geneva did apply to the Taliban, but by Geneva’s own terms Taliban fighters weren’t entitled to P.O.W. status, because they hadn’t worn uniforms or insignia. That would still leave the safety net provided by the rules reflected in Common Article 3— but detainees could not rely on this either, on the theory that its provisions applied only to “armed conflict not of an international character,” which the administration interpreted to mean civil war. This was new. In reaching this conclusion, the Bush administration simply abandoned all legal and customary precedent that regards Common Article 3 as a minimal bill of rights for everyone.[11]

Post War Denials

The man who oversaw the manufacturing of false intelligence in the lead up to war told Jeffrey Goldberg two years after the war:

“The main rationale was not based on intelligence,” Feith said. “It was known to anyone who read newspapers and knew history. Saddam had used nerve gas, he had invaded his neighbors more than once, he had attacked other neighbors, he was hostile to us, he supported numerous terrorist groups. It’s true that he didn’t have a link that we know of to 9/11. . . . But he did give safe haven to terrorists...Given the ease, as everybody knows, with which one can reconstitute stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons if you have the capabilities which he had, I don’t think the rationale for the war hinged on the existence of stockpiles.”[1]

Tellingly, he only speaks about chemical and biological weapons (not strictly 'weapons of mass destruction') and leaves out any mention of Iraq's alleged nuclear program. He also sidesteps the fact that his Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group was dedicated solely to establishing the Iraq-al-Qaeda link.

Feith and the Arab Mind

When asked why US troops were not greeted with flowers as the neoconservatives had promised, Feith told the interviewer: '“But they had flowers in their minds.”[1]

A History of Lobbying

In 1989, Feith registered International Advisors, Inc. (IAI) as a foreign agent representing the government of Turkey. The brainchild of Richard N. Perle, IAI's stated purpose was to "promote the objective of U.S.-Turkey defense industrial cooperation." Douglas Feith was not only the CEO of IAI but also its only stockholder. Feith earned $60,000 per year and his law firm, Feith and Zell, was the recipient from IAI of hundreds of thousands of dollars. In 1992, Feith joined with Perle and other neo-cons opposing President George H.W. Bush's stern policy on Israel in forming the Committee on US Interests in the Middle East.

Feith and Perle reportedly teamed up once again as consultants for Bosnia. They both worked for and advised the Bosnians during the Dayton peace talks. They were not, however, registered then as foreign agents with the U.S. Department of Justice. Above paragraphs from the Arab American Institute's Washington Watch.

Affiliations

Contact Information

Resources and articles

Profiles

Articles by Douglas J. Feith

External articles

1996

2001

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Notes

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Jeffrey Goldberg, A Little Learning, New Yorker, 9 May 2005
  2. ↑ [1]
  3. ↑ Source: Center for Security Policy 98-D139
  4. ↑ James Risen, How Pair's Finding on Terror Led to Clash on Shaping Intelligence, New York Times, 28 April 2004
  5. ↑ Context of 'August 2002: Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group In Pentagon Disbanded', History Commons, accessed 3 September 2010
  6. ↑ [2]
  7. ↑ Laura Rozen, "Ye of Little Feith. Why one of Doug Feith's underlings thinks he might go to jail", The American Prospect, May 18, 2004
  8. ↑ Julian Borger, [3], Guardian Unlimited, May 20, 2004.
  9. ↑ [4]
  10. ↑ A NATION CHALLENGED: HEARTS AND MINDS; PENTAGON READIES EFFORTS TO SWAY SENTIMENT ABROAD, by James Dao and Eric Schmitt, New York Times, 19 February 2002.
  11. ↑ The Green Light, Phillippe Sands, Vanity Fair, May 2008.
  12. ↑ Mearsheimer, J. & Walt, S. The Israel Lobby London Review of Books, 16 March 2006

[Category:Harvard alumni|Feith, Douglas]]

Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Douglas_Feith&oldid=167890"