Terrorism Act 2000

This article is part of the Counter-Terrorism Portal project of Spinwatch.

The Terrorism Act 2000 (c.11) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

It supersedes and repeals the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 and the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1996. These were temporary pieces of legislation, but the Terrorism Act 2000 is permanent.

Up to early 2004 around 500 people are believed to have been arrested under the Act; seven people had been charged. By October 2005 these figures had risen to 750 arrested with 22 convictions; the then current Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, said "the statistics illustrate the difficulty of getting evidence to bring prosecution.

Figures released by the Home Office on 5 March 2007 show that 1,126 people were arrested under the Terrorsim Act 2000 between 11 September 2001 and 31 December 2006. Of this, 221 were charged with terrorism offences and only 40 convicted.

Definition of Terrorism

Terrorism is defined, in the first section of the Act, as follows:

Section 1. -

(1) In this Act "terrorism" means the use or threat of action where-

(a) the action falls within subsection (2),

(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the government [or an international governmental organisation] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and

(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious,[racial] or ideological cause.

(2) Action falls within this subsection if it-

(a) involves serious violence against a person,

(b) involves serious damage to property,

(c) endangers a person's life, other than that of the person committing the action,

(d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or

(e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.

(3) The use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied.

Sections (2)(b) and (e) could be criticised as falling well outside the scope of what is generally understood to be the definition of terrorism.

Prior to this, terrorism was defined in a footnote of the Reinsurance Act 1993 as:

acts of terrorism mean acts of persons acting on behalf of, or in connection with, any organisation which carries out activities directed towards the overthrowing or influencing, by force or violence, of Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom or any other government de jure or de facto.

In the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989, terrorism was defined as:

In this Act terrorism means the use of violence for political ends, and includes any use of violence for the purpose of putting the public or any section of the public in fear.

Proscribed groups

The Home Secretary has the power (as was the case in previous anti-terror legislations) to proscribe organisations that are believed to be involved in terrorist activities. Under the Terrorism Act 2006, groups that are beleived to be invovled in Glorification of Terrorism or Encouragment of Terrorism can also be proscribed, as is the case with the now defunct Al Ghurabaa and Saved Sect or Saviour Sect.

At present, there are

• 45 International organisations that are proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, of which 2 have been proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2006 for glorification and/or dissemination of terrorist publications, and
• 14 Organisations in Northern Ireland.

International groups

This is a list of the organisations which are proscribed as international terrorist organisations undert the Terrorism Act 2000:

• 17 November Revolutionary Organisation (17N)
• Abu Nidal Organisation (ANO)
• Abu Sayyaf (ASG)
• Al-Gama'at al-Islamiya (GI)
• Al Gurabaa
• Al Ittihad Al Islamia (AIAI)
• Al Qaida
• Ansar Al Islam (AI)
• Ansar Al Sunna (AS):
• Armed Islamic Group (Groupe Islamique Armée) (GIA)
• Asbat Al-Ansar ('League of Parisans' or 'Band of Helpers')
• Babbar Khalsa (BK)
• Baluchistan Liberation Army (BLA)
• Euskadi ta Askatasuna) ETA
• Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ)
• Groupe Islamique Combattant Marocain (GICM)
• Hamas Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades
• Harakat-Ul-Jihad-Ul-Islami (HUJI)
• Harakat-Ul-Jihad-Ul-Islami (Bangladesh) (HUJI-B):
• Harakat-Ul-Mujahideen/Alami (HuM/A) and Jundallah
• Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HM)
• Hezb-E Islami Gulbuddin (HIG)
• Hizballah External Security Organisation
• International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF)
• Islamic Army of Aden (IAA)
• Islamic Jihad Union (IJU)
• Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
• Jaish e Mohammed (JeM)
• Jammat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB)
• Jeemah Islamiyah (JI)
• Khuddam Ul-Islam (Kul) and splinter group Jamaat Ul-Furquan (JuF)
• Kurdistan Workers Party (Partiya Karkeren Kurdistan or Kongra-Gel) (PKK)
• Lashkar e Tayyaba (LT)
• Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
• Palestinian Islamic Jihad - Shaqaqi (PIJ)
• Revolutionary Peoples' Liberation Party - Front (Devrimci Halk Kurtulus Partisi - Cephesi) (DHKP-C)
• Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (Groupe Salafiste pour la Predication et le Combat) (GSPC)
• Sipah-E Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) (renamed Millat-E Islami Pakistan (MIP) in April 2003) and splinter group Lashkar-E Jhangvi (LeJ)
• Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)
• Saved Sect or Saviour Sect
• Tehrik Nefaz-e Shari'at Muhammadi (TNSM)
• Teyre Azadiye Kurdistan (TAK)

Mujaheddin e Khalq (MeK) was removed from the list of proscribed organisations in June 2008, as a result of judgements of the Proscribed Organisations Appeals Commission and the Court of Appeal.

Domestic groups

The following domestic groups (in relation to Northern Ireland) are proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000:

• Continuity Army Council (CAC)
• Cumann na mBan
• Fianna na hÉireann, a name claimed by multiple groups
• Irish National Liberation Army (INLA)
• Irish People's Liberation Organisation (IPLO)
• Irish Republican Army (IRA)
• Loyalist Volunteer Force (LVF)
• Orange Volunteers
• Red Hand Commando
• Red Hand Defenders
• Saor Éire
• Ulster Defence Association (UDA)
• Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF)
• Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF)

Section 41 (detention without charge)

Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 authorises the police to arrest and detain any person without charge for up to 48 hours if they were or are suspected of being involved in the "commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism". This period of 48 hours of pre-charge detention can be extended to seven days if the police and a judge feel this extended time period is necessary for further questioning or collating or examining of collated evidence.

Under regular criminal law, an individual can only be kept for a maximum period of 96 hours (4 days), however, under the Terrorism Act 2000, the police are authorised (in accordance with a magistrates decision) to hold a suspect in pre-charge detention for a period of, initially 7 days and then (under the Criminal Justice Act 2003) 14 days and then subsequently (under the Terrorism Act 2006) 28 days.

Section 44 powers (Stop and Search)

Through sction 44 stop & searches, thousands of ordinary members of public have come into contact with the Terrorism Act 2000. Under this section, the police can stop and search any vehicle or person (within an area defined by the Home Secretary) if they are suspected of being invovled in terrorism, along with seizing "articles of a kind which could be used in connection with terrorism".

Between July and December 2007, the BBC reported that more than 14,000 people and vehicles had been stopped and searched by British Transport Police in Scotland.

Vernon Coaker, the Minister of State stated on 20 April 2009 that, "counter-terrorism measures should only be used for counter-terrorism purposes".

Section 58 - Collection of information

This section creates the offence, liable to a prison term of up to ten years, to collect or possesses "information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism".

People who have been charged or convicted of this offence include Abu Bakr Mansha in December 2005, eight suspects involved in the 2004 Financial buildings plot.

Sections 57-58: Possession offences: Section 57 is dealing with possessing articles for the purpose of terrorist acts. Section 58 is dealing with collecting or holding information that is of a kind likely to be useful to those involved in acts of terrorism. Section 57 includes a specific intention, section 58 does not.

Overall impact

In his comprehensive commentary on this Act and other anti-terrorism legislation, Professor Clive Walker of the University of Leeds comments:

"The Terrorism Act 2000 represents a worthwhile attempt to fulfil the role of a modern code against terrorism, though it fails to meet the desired standards in all respects. There are aspects where rights are probably breached, and its mechanisms to ensure democratic accountability and constitutionalism are even more deficient, as discussed in the section on ‘Scrutiny’ earlier in this chapter. It is also a sobering thought, proffered by the Home Affairs Committee, that the result is that ‘This country has more anti-terrorist legislation on its statute books than almost any other developed democracy.’ (Report on the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill 2001 (2001-02 HC 351) para.1). But at least that result initially flowed from a solemnly studied and carefully constructed legislative exercise."

Alleged abuses

The laws have been criticised for allowing excessive police powers leaving scope for abuse. There have been various cases in which the laws have been used in scenarios criticised for being unrelated to fighting terrorism. Critics allege there is systematic abuse of the act against protesters. Most of these pertain to people being stopped under section 44.

• In October 2005 Sally Cameron was held for four hours after being arrested under the act for walking on a cycle path in a controlled port area. {{quote|I’ve been walking to work every morning for months and months to keep fit. One day, I was told by a guard on the gate that I couldn’t use the route any more because it was solely a cycle path and he said, if I was caught doing it again, I’d be arrested...The next thing I knew, the harbour master had driven up behind me with a megaphone, saying, ‘You’re trespassing, please turn back’. It was totally ridiculous. I started laughing and kept on walking. Cyclists going past were also laughing...But then two police cars roared up beside me and cut me off, like a scene from Starsky and Hutch, and officers told me I was being arrested under the Terrorism Act. The harbour master was waffling on and (saying that), because of September 11, I would be arrested and charged.

Section 44

• In September 2003 two people - Kevin Gillan and Pennie Quinton - intending to protest against the Defence Systems Equipment International (DSEI) show in London's Docklands, were stopped and searched under the Act. There followed an outcry. that this was a misuse of power. The pressure group Liberty took the case to High Court where the Judge ruled in favour of the police. Appeals to the Court of Appeal, and, in March 2006, to the House of Lords, failed.
• Walter Wolfgang was removed from the 2005 Labour Party conference for heckling Jack Straw. He was later stopped by police under the Terrorism Act on attempting to re-enter the conference.
• Journalists have frequently complained that they are stopped under section 44 whilst on their way to cover protests
• MP Andrew Pelling was questioned after photographing roadworks near a railway station
• In April 2009 a man in Enfield was questioned under section 44 for photographing a police car that he considered was inappropriately parked.
• Over 1000 anti-war protesters, were stopped, required and required to empty their pockets, on their way to RAF Fairford (used by American B-52 bombers during the Iraq conflict).
• During the G8 protests in 2005, a cricketer on his way to a match was stopped at King's Cross station in London under Section 44 powers and questioned over his possession of a bat.