Partnership Agreement: Scottish Executive and the Alcohol Industry

The Scottish Executive is working in partnership with the alcohol industry in order to develop further ways of tackling the perceived culture of alcohol misuse in Scotland. The agreement, announced on the 22nd of February 2007, includes partnership working between the Scottish Executive, alcohol producers, and retailers in both the off and on licensed trade. The members work with the The Drinkaware Trust who produce educational resources and spearhead campaigns to encourage responsible drinking. Mark Baird of Diageo is the Programme Director, and in this capacity works for the Scottish Executive in Public Health and Substance Misuse: Alcohol .

Public health campaigners have criticised the involvement of the alcohol industry in strategies designed to curb alcohol related harm. Professor Griffith Edwards, founder of the National Addiction Centre, voiced his concern “The drinks trade wanting to enter into partnership on health issues is a bit like saying the International Federation of Wolves should be allowed into partnership with grandmothers. We shall have to control the alcohol supply.”

Drinks giant Diageo’s government affairs manager Rachael Robertson responded to criticisms of her firm by saying they “had nothing to be ashamed of” and argued that drinks companies’ marketing experience ­ and data ­ could be used to good effect in public health moves. The Portman Group also contributed to the debate by claiming the industry has been proactive in relation to irresponsible marketing and products .

This exclusive platform provides alcohol industry access to elected officials and civil servants where they can contribute to the development and implementation of the Scottish alcohol harm reduction strategy. The aim for this forum is to work with industry to develop practical solutions and actions. Initially a select few representatives of the alcohol industry weare involved in discussions with senior civil servants, later the membership broadened out to include a range of industry organisations at the recommendation of the original industry partners . Civil servants prepared a draft paper, which included suggested areas for action, which were presented to the industry representatives. Access to email documents (released under FoI) between the civil servants involved and their industry partners show that the final partnership plan, which was presented to the Health Minister, contained fifteen possible actions. Thirteen of these were had been suggested, worded or rephrased by two prominent alcohol industry partners, Rob Bruce from InBev and Douglas Meikle of the Scotch Whisky Association. The civil servants have used many of suggestions for actions and for rephrasing the wording of actions verbatim from industry inputs, this is evident in email correspondence accessed under freedom of information . When the subject of how these actions would be funded arises, the executive madekes it clear that industry was expected to contribute. The response from industry was to direct the civil servants to The Drinkaware Trust, the former charitable wing of the Portman Group which industry already funds. This trust is involved in implementing the English strategy and if funds from industry are sought in Scotland, the industry wants their contributions to Drinkaware to be used in the Scottish action. Initially the only role for Drinkaware in the Scottish plan wais as a funding mechanism. However, after Kevin Bryne the head of Drinkaware meets with the civil servant in charge of the partnership’s progress a wider role is envisaged for Drinkaware. In fact, the suggestions made by Byrne are cut and pasted by the civil servants from an email from Byrne and included in the plan, increasing Drinkaware’s role in Scotland and undermining the view that Drinkaware should simply provide funds.

Once the meeting with the Health Minister took place, the action plan for industry was endorsed. More industry representatives were then are sought for inclusion in the policy process including the off trade and retailers who sell alcohol. A seconded position within the Scottish government’s Public Health and Substance Abuse wais created for a programme director of the partnership this role wais filled by Mark Baird who works for Diageo Scotland . His role with the Scottish government is within the NHS addictions and substance misuse team. Baird did not wish to be interviewed for my study, but did offer to consider answering some questions if they were sent to him in advance. It took some weeks before the answers to six straightforward questions about his role within the executive and Diageo’s position on alcohol related harm were returned. The reason for the delay was allegedly a result of the internal structure of Diageo., Bbefore Baird could reply his responses had to be screened by the Diageo’s corporate strategy team in London; once they had checked Baird’s response (and compiled part of the response), the Diageo legal team checked over the answers given before they were returned. This inability of a senior member of Diageo’s Scottish team, seconded to the government in Scotland to work in public health, to independently respond to an interview of this nature does support a widely held observation regarding the alcohol industry. That is, the alcohol industry is phenomenally well organised and disciplined as an economic sector (Baggott 2004). Even senior industry figures in Scotland cannot, or will not, speak on these issues independently

Signatories to the Scottish Executive/Alcohol Industry Partnership Agreement

• Scottish Retail Consortium
• Scotch Whisky Association
• InBev formerly (and still sometimes known in Scotland as Tennents)
• Diageo
• Scottish & Newcastle
• Scottish Licensed Trade Association
• BII Scotland
• Scottish Beer and Pub Association
• Scottish Grocers' Federation
• Wine & Spirits Trade Association
• Gin & Vodka Association
• National Association of Cider Makers