Difference between revisions of "Amir Taheri"
(→Views on terrorism) |
(→Views on Islam) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
In an article published just after the San Bernardino attack in 2015, Taheri set out to pose the question: 'what is going on' with Islam? | In an article published just after the San Bernardino attack in 2015, Taheri set out to pose the question: 'what is going on' with Islam? | ||
− | After praising the United States | + | After praising the United States for acting in a benevolent and appeasing way towards 'Muslim nations' (in the form of financial aid, of granting refuge on their soil, of 'liberating' Muslims from dictatorial regimes, and so on), from the 18th century to the present, he claimed that 'no other nation has been a victim of vilification, demonization, and violence on the part of the Islamists as has the U.S.'. |
He brushes aside the justifications for hatred that 'leftists' have given, such as oil ("the U.S. was the only major power to have no state-owned oil company and thus never used its military clout to obtain a share of the Middle East's energy resources") or military occupations ("the U.S. was the only major power prepared to pack up and leave as soon as its hosts showed it the door"). | He brushes aside the justifications for hatred that 'leftists' have given, such as oil ("the U.S. was the only major power to have no state-owned oil company and thus never used its military clout to obtain a share of the Middle East's energy resources") or military occupations ("the U.S. was the only major power prepared to pack up and leave as soon as its hosts showed it the door"). | ||
− | Moreover, he | + | Moreover, he blamed the 'politically correct crowd' (Western intellectuals and leaders) for making it impossible to criticise Islam, and for practicing 'Islamophilia', which to "treat Muslims as children whose feathers should not be ruffled" and to "sacrifice part of their own freedom in atonement of largely imaginary sins against Muslims in the colonial and imperialist era". On the contrary, he believes that Islam and Muslims badly need to be criticised, as their theology is centered around "death". Moreover, he argues that "many Muslims resent that kind of flattery, which takes them for idiots". <ref> Amir Taheri, [https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7092/united-states-islam The United States and Islam: What Is Going On?], ''Gatestone Institute'', December 22, 2015. Accessed 23 September 2016. </ref> |
==Praise for Trump== | ==Praise for Trump== |
Revision as of 08:03, 23 September 2016
Amir Taheri is an Iranian-American journalist who was educated in Tehran, London and Paris.[1] A 'prominent Iranian journalist under the Shah', Taheri, according to a 2006 article in the Financial Times, 'now advocates regime change' in Iran.[2]
Taheri has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat, 'a London-based publication linked to the Saudi royal family' [3], since 1987 [4], a regular contributor to the New York Post [5] and a member of the neoconservative PR agency Benador Associates until it reoriented its work towards financial advisory and real estate promotion in 2007. [6] He was also a contributor to the German weekly Focus from 1993 to 2007. [7] [8]
He was also a contributor to the German weekly Focus from 1993 to 2007. [9] [10]
Taheri is also chairman of the European board of governors of the controversial Gatestone Institute. The think tank has been described as one of America's hubs of Islamophobia.
Contents
Background
According to his biography on Asharqu Al-Awsat, Taheri
- was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. Mr. Taheri has won several prizes for his journalism, and in 2012 was named 'international journalist of the year by the British Society of Editors and the Foreign Press Association in the annual British Media Awards.
False allegations
Nest of Spies sources
In 1989 he published Nest of Spies, a book about the fall of the Shah's regime and the Iranian Revolution. A professor of history and researcher at George Mason University, Shaul Bakhash, accused him in an investigative expose published in The New Republic of citing nonexistent sources and, when they did exist, of distorting them. [11]
Comments on Iran's UN ambassador
In a 2005 New York Post column, Taheri identified Iran's UN ambassador, Javad Zarif, as one of the students involved in the illegal 1979 seizure of hostages at the US Embassy in Tehran. Dwight Simpson, a San Francisco State University professor, corrected him by writing "[t]his allegation is false," and "[o]n November 4, 1979 [the day of the seizure], Javad Zarif was in San Francisco. He was then a graduate student in the Department of International Relations of San Francisco State University. He was my student, and he served also as my teaching assistant". However, the Post never published its correction. [11]
'Jews to be forced to wear coloured badges in Iran' claim
In a 2006 article, the FT identified Amir Taheri as the source of stories that 'the Iranian parliament had passed a law that would require Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear coloured badges to identify them as non-Muslims'.[12] The article was also published in the National Post of Canada, founded by neoconservative media mogul Conrad Black and now owned by the Asper family, who retracted it and apologised a few days later, when the story was proven false. [11]
The reports angered Iranian lawmakers, who said 'creativity was behind what they rejected as false and invented reports'.[12] Contacted by the FT, 'Mr Taheri told the FT he stood by his claim':
- He said his sources were three opponents of the bill - which has not yet been approved by Iran's higher authorities. He cited them as saying a commission of experts was being appointed to work out implementation of the "Islamic identity" law, which could require provisions for identifying non-Muslims.[12]
Exposed as false
The story about Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians being forced to wear badges in Iran was subsequently exposed as false, according to a report by IPS. The IPS report, by Jim Lobe, tells the story:
- A story authored by a prominent U.S. neo-conservative regarding new legislation in Iran allegedly requiring Jews and other religious minorities to wear distinctive colour badges circulated around the world this weekend before it was exposed as false.
- The article by a frequent contributor to the Wall Street Journal, Iranian-American Amir Taheri, was initially published in Friday's edition of Canada's National Post, which ran alongside the story a 1935 photograph of a Jewish businessman in Berlin with a yellow, six-pointed star sewn on his overcoat, as required by Nazi legislation at the time. The Post subsequently issued a retraction.
- Taheri's story, however, was reprinted by the New York Post, which is owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, and picked up by the Jerusalem Post, which also featured a photo of a yellow star from the Nazi era over a photo of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
- Another neo-conservative publication, the New York Sun, also noted the story Monday, claiming that the specific report that special badges were required by the legislation had been "incorrect". At the same time, however, the Sun quoted two Iranian-American foes of the Islamic Republic as suggesting that dress requirements for religious minorities were still being considered by Iran's ruling circles. It offered no evidence to support that assertion.[13]
Invited to the White House as an Iraq 'expert'
In May 2006, only a month after his news story was revealed as fake, Taheri was part of a group of "Iraq experts" invited to the White House to consult with George W. Bush on the situation there.
Views on terrorism
Taheri wrote an article for the New York Post just after the March 2016 terrorist attack in Brussels that killed 35 and injured 240. In it, he blamed the existence of a breeding-ground for jihadism on Belgian multicultural elites who refused to 'push' immigrants to integrate:
- Liberals fetishize separation, arguing that immigrants don’t need to learn English, don’t need to stop subjugating women with hijabs and arranged marriages, don’t need to become citizens. They encourage otherness rather than integration. [14]
After the 14 July 2016 attacks in Nice, France, he wrote again, stating that '[the French] nation, perhaps the whole democratic portion of the globe, is at war, a war over two mutually exclusive visions of the future', the second being an 'Islamic' world-view, that he implied is lead by Iran. [15]
Views on Islam
In an article published just after the San Bernardino attack in 2015, Taheri set out to pose the question: 'what is going on' with Islam? After praising the United States for acting in a benevolent and appeasing way towards 'Muslim nations' (in the form of financial aid, of granting refuge on their soil, of 'liberating' Muslims from dictatorial regimes, and so on), from the 18th century to the present, he claimed that 'no other nation has been a victim of vilification, demonization, and violence on the part of the Islamists as has the U.S.'. He brushes aside the justifications for hatred that 'leftists' have given, such as oil ("the U.S. was the only major power to have no state-owned oil company and thus never used its military clout to obtain a share of the Middle East's energy resources") or military occupations ("the U.S. was the only major power prepared to pack up and leave as soon as its hosts showed it the door").
Moreover, he blamed the 'politically correct crowd' (Western intellectuals and leaders) for making it impossible to criticise Islam, and for practicing 'Islamophilia', which to "treat Muslims as children whose feathers should not be ruffled" and to "sacrifice part of their own freedom in atonement of largely imaginary sins against Muslims in the colonial and imperialist era". On the contrary, he believes that Islam and Muslims badly need to be criticised, as their theology is centered around "death". Moreover, he argues that "many Muslims resent that kind of flattery, which takes them for idiots". [16]
Praise for Trump
In a 2016 article for the New York Post, Taheri praised Donald Trump's foreign policy plans. In it, he says: "Trump makes it clear that he wishes to de-Obamaize US foreign policy. He says he won’t go around the world apologizing to all and sundry for America’s alleged sins. Nor will he insist on flattering America’s Islamist enemies..". Moreover, he agrees, like Trump, that President Obama had "treated Israel horribly", and wished to see with Trump a change of policy in the opposite direction. He even praised his inexperience, by claiming: "because of his diplomatic inexperience, Trump states his objectives clearly where Obama conjures opacity". [17]
Affiliations
- Gatestone Institute - Chairman Europe Board of Governors
- Center for Security Policy - Contributor to CSP front group Family Security Matters
- Henry Jackson Society, Advisory Council: Policy Council member [18]
- Benador Associates until 2007
Social media
- Facebook: Amir Taheri
Notes
- ↑ Amir Taheri, zimbio website, accessed 16 Jan 2010
- ↑ Guy Dinmore, US hails the Iranian people but not their 'lunatic' leaders, Financial Times, 23 May 2006, accessed 16 Jan 2010
- ↑ Vested interests and inevitable conclusions: Window on Arabic media, ITV News, 04 September 2016. Accessed 22 September 2016.
- ↑ Author; Amir Taheri, Asharq Al-Awsat, accessed 22 September 2016
- ↑ Amir Taheri, New York Post, accessed 22 September 2016
- ↑ Benador Associates, See Powerbase profile.
- ↑ Gatestone biog
- ↑ Amir Taheri, contributions to Focus, Focus, accessed 23 September 2016.
- ↑ testone biog
- ↑ Amir Taheri, Focus, accessed 23 September 2016.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Larry Cohler-Esses, Bunkum From Benador, The Nation, 3 July 2006. Accessed 22 September 2016. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "bunkumfrom" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "bunkumfrom" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Guy Dinmore, US hails the Iranian people but not their 'lunatic' leaders, Financial Times, 23 May 2006, accessed 16 Jan 2010
- ↑ Jim Lobe, POLITICS: Iran Target of Apparent Disinformation Ploy, IPS, 22 May 2006, accessed 16 Jan 2010
- ↑ Amir Taheri, Brussels is what happens when liberals don’t push immigrants to integrate, New York Post, March 27, 2016. Accessed 22 September 2016.
- ↑ Amir Taheri, A cry from France: After Nice, can we finally face the truth about this war?, The New York Post, July 15, 2016, Accessed 22 September 2016.
- ↑ Amir Taheri, The United States and Islam: What Is Going On?, Gatestone Institute, December 22, 2015. Accessed 23 September 2016.
- ↑ Amir Taheri, Enough with the hysteria over Trump’s foreign-policy plans, New York Post, 19 June 2016. Accessed 22 September 2016.
- ↑ Advisory Council:Policy Council members, HJS website, undated, accessed 5 November 2014
]]