Difference between revisions of "British Computer Society"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Lobbying for computing (and more computers) in schools)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 52: Line 52:
  
 
Despite an acknowledgement that Britain’s gaming industry was primarily losing business to international competition because of higher costs, fewer public subsidies and a lack of investment in universities, schools reform was considered vital. The report played up the benefits of video games to teach, while ignoring the mixed results from the few trials conducted. ''Next Gen.'' appears, therefore, as a lobbying tool for technology firms with a clear, vested interest in digitising learning, as well as enthusing a new generation of coders. As if to underline its role in kick-starting an ed-tech revolution in schools, [[Nesta]], supported by the same coalition of technology interests, followed up with a series of reports, all of which called for more technology to teach and strongly advocated the need to redesign education on digital lines.
 
Despite an acknowledgement that Britain’s gaming industry was primarily losing business to international competition because of higher costs, fewer public subsidies and a lack of investment in universities, schools reform was considered vital. The report played up the benefits of video games to teach, while ignoring the mixed results from the few trials conducted. ''Next Gen.'' appears, therefore, as a lobbying tool for technology firms with a clear, vested interest in digitising learning, as well as enthusing a new generation of coders. As if to underline its role in kick-starting an ed-tech revolution in schools, [[Nesta]], supported by the same coalition of technology interests, followed up with a series of reports, all of which called for more technology to teach and strongly advocated the need to redesign education on digital lines.
−
 
−
*[[Next Gen Skills]]: BCS, along with major global corporations such as [[Facebook]] and [[Google]], joined what was called the ''Next Gen Skills'' campaign. The main objective of the campaign was to achieve the introduction of Computer Science onto the National Curriculum.
 
−
 
−
*[[Engineering for Education]] (E4E): this represents the collective views on education and training policy of the [[Royal Academy of Engineering]], Professional Engineering Institutions, the [[Engineering Council]], and [[EngineeringUK]].E4E adopted a supportive position on the national strategic importance of Computing in school.
 
  
 
==People==
 
==People==
Line 100: Line 96:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[Category:Science Media Centre]][[Category:Education Industry]]
+
[[Category:Science Media Centre]][[Category:Education Industry]][[Category:Education reform lobby group]]

Latest revision as of 13:57, 25 July 2016

The British Computer Society, rebranded as BCS - The Chartered Institute for IT since 2009, is a learned society that represent those working in the field of information technology. Established in 1957, BCS is governed by a Royal Charter. BCS is licensed by the Engineering Council to award Chartered Engineer status (CEng) and Incorporated Engineer status (IEng). The Institute also has a licence from the Science Council to award Chartered Scientist status (CSci).

Education reform

Lobbying for computing (and more computers) in schools

In 2011, BCS was a leading organisation in a coalition, which included Microsoft, Google and Computing At School (CAS), that successfully lobbied for the introduction of computing on the curriculum in England. Computing at School is described as a 'grassroots style’ organisation, but which is funded by BCS, Microsoft, Google, BT, IBM, HP, Toshiba, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, GE, RBS and many others.[1]

BCS, Google, Microsoft and Computing at School met with ministers and officials, talked to Lords and MPs on Parliament’s Education Committee and enlisted third parties to back their case, including ‘captains of industry’; every head teacher was urged to support the cause; Microsoft and Google were among those who chipped in for a study by the Royal Society, the oldest and most prestigious of the science academies, to support the campaign to get computing onto the curriculum.

It was a concerted, well-organised effort, which was fully documented by BCS and reproduced below:[2]

Lobbying of the Department for Education:

'Since January 2011 BCS Academy and CAS have had a series of over nine meetings with Department for Education officials, leading up to a meeting in December 2012 with Dominic Cummings, a special advisor to Michael Gove. That meeting included Ian Livingstone co-author of the Livingstone Hope review, as well as representatives from Microsoft, Google, Raspberry Pi and Coding for Kids. The following month Michael Gove gave his ground breaking speech at BETT in support of Computer Science. These meetings have significantly contributed to the fact that DfE accept Computing is a rigorous academic subject distinct from ICT that good schools should teach. BCS Academy with CAS and Microsoft also met with Nick Gibb (Minister responsible for the National Curriculum) in August to discuss the possibility of Computing within the National Curriculum Review.'

Lobbying of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills:

'BCS with Council of Professors and Heads of Computing, UK Computing Research Committee and Microsoft Research met with David Willetts (Science Minister at the Department for Business Innovation and Science) in February [2011] to discuss Computing education in school and university. At our meeting he recognised the importance of Computing education in benefitting the economy and encouraged engagement with the DfE to discuss how Computing would fit into the school curriculum. David Willetts recently announced a new pilot scheme to introduce computer programming into schools through employer led projects, which is known as the Behind the Screen project. The project is being run by e-Skills UK and was established by Lord Lucas.

Lobbying of and by Google Chairman Eric Schmidt over computing in school:

Together with CAS, Nesta, UKIE, the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, the efforts of BCS Academy have helped to raise awareness of the Computing issue at a senior level in Google. We believe these efforts were a contributory factor to Google Chairman Eric Schmidt’s widely reported comment that he was ‘flabbergasted’ we do not teach Computer Science in school.
In June, Matt Brittin, Managing Director UK & Ireland Operations Google, agreed to sign a letter to Michael Gove (Secretary of State for Education), in which he endorsed the BCS position that Computing education is essential for all pupils in secondary schools. This letter was signed by a number of prominent captains of industry and the text of the letter is included below together with a list of the other signatories.
Since then Naomi Gummer and Sarah Hunter of UK Public Policy at Google have been working to actively raise the issue of Computing both within Google and to government. David Harper, Head EMEA University Relations at Google, has also been working with BCS Academy and CAS and was also a member of the Royal Society Advisory group for the Computing in Schools study.

Letter to Michael Gove:
A letter was sent to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education in June 2011, petitioning him to support computing in schools.It is described by BCS as providing the 'catalyst leading to a dialogue' with the government. It was signed by:

Collaboration with other groups
BCS lists key collaborations that helped to promote the value of Computing education in schools:

  • Royal Society: BCS Academy played a key role in ensuring sufficient funds were raised on time for the Royal Society in order for them to begin a study into Computing in school. The study had the support from 24 organisations, including the Royal Academy of Engineering, BCS Academy of Computing, CPHC (The Council of Professors and Heads of Computing), Google, Microsoft Research, IBM and many of the UK’s leading universities. The Chair of the BCS Academy, the BCS Academy Director, the Chairman of CAS and the CAS Coordinator were members of the Advisory Group. The report Computing in Schools: Shut down or restart? was published in January 2012.
  • Nesta: 'BCS Academy and CAS actively promoted the importance of Computing in school with Nesta during the Livingstone-Hope Skills Review of the Video Games and Visual Effects industries. This review was called for by Ed Vaizey, Minister for Culture, Communications and Creative Industries. BCS Academy and CAS directly contributed to the two main school recommendations in the report.'

Background note on the Livingstone-Hope Skills Review and Nesta:
The government commissioned a six-month study the Livingstone-Hope Skills Review on the future skills needed in the gaming industry was funded by the gaming lobby group UKIE, of which Microsoft is a member, with the support of Google, TalkTalk, Facebook, the IT lobby group Intellect, BCS, the Education Foundation and others like the Guardian Media Group. Gaming was used as a poster boy for the skills review because of its status as a ‘high-profile rock’n’roll industry’, said the head of UKIE, Ian Livingstone. In reality the campaign was acting in the interests of this ‘broad coalition’. The review was run under the auspices of the Nesta.

Its ‘landmark’ report, Next Gen., made a number of recommendations. First was that computer science be included on the national schools curriculum. Next was to train a new generation of teachers to teach it. But third on the wish list was that video games be used across science, technology, engineering and maths lessons to draw pupils into these subjects. This was followed by a call for a central repository for teachers of the best video games for use in classrooms – in essence, a marketing tool – and more training for teachers in how to use them.

Despite an acknowledgement that Britain’s gaming industry was primarily losing business to international competition because of higher costs, fewer public subsidies and a lack of investment in universities, schools reform was considered vital. The report played up the benefits of video games to teach, while ignoring the mixed results from the few trials conducted. Next Gen. appears, therefore, as a lobbying tool for technology firms with a clear, vested interest in digitising learning, as well as enthusing a new generation of coders. As if to underline its role in kick-starting an ed-tech revolution in schools, Nesta, supported by the same coalition of technology interests, followed up with a series of reports, all of which called for more technology to teach and strongly advocated the need to redesign education on digital lines.

People

Trustee Board Members

As of 2013:

Council Members

Supported organisations

Contact

BCS First Floor
The Davidson Building
5 Southampton Street
London, WC2E 7HA
Website: http://www.bcs.org/

Notes

  1. ↑ BCS written evidence to the Select Committee on Digital Skills, 2014
  2. ↑ Detailed background on what's been happening, BCS website, c2011-12, accessed July 2016
  3. ↑ SMC, Funding, accessed 23.09.2013.
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=British_Computer_Society&oldid=237651"