Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lynn Hill"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(note to self)
(note to self)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* add Brand(X) page and link to clients [http://www.brandxcoms.co.uk/clients.htm Brand (X)]. see also [http://www.pmlive.com/communique/consult_profiles/listing.cfm?showCompanyProfile=1&CompanyProfileID=340 PMLive page]
 
* add Brand(X) page and link to clients [http://www.brandxcoms.co.uk/clients.htm Brand (X)]. see also [http://www.pmlive.com/communique/consult_profiles/listing.cfm?showCompanyProfile=1&CompanyProfileID=340 PMLive page]
 
* [[Schering-Plough]] - finish linking people to connected pages
 
* [[Schering-Plough]] - finish linking people to connected pages
 
+
* revolving door info (remember to check refs) http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/politics/revolvingdoor.html
 
* add pharma details from http://www.opensecrets.org http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/index.asp http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/overview.asp?txtindextype=l http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/search.asp
 
* add pharma details from http://www.opensecrets.org http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/index.asp http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/overview.asp?txtindextype=l http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/search.asp
 
* might be worth doing a Spinprofiles search for Pharma firms not started yet and joining the dots so to speak...  
 
* might be worth doing a Spinprofiles search for Pharma firms not started yet and joining the dots so to speak...  

Revision as of 13:47, 4 March 2008

note to self

Businessweek lists board member affiliations... check this out further for others, may prove a useful resource elsewhere. http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/people/relationship.asp?personId=598067&capId=154924&previousCapId=139677&previousTitle=Johnson%20%26%20Johnson

Category list is here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Special:Categories

Lynn, any chance you could drop by the Daniel Finkelstein page when you get a minute? If you could just change the formatting on the refs and also make sure that all the bibliographic details are included in the refs that would be fine. After that I will take a look and see what else needs doing.

Thanks

--David 21:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)