Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Kampfner"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
===source no longer available===
 
===source no longer available===
 
Note that the New Statesman was a former Hobsbawm Macaulay Communications client <ref>Tom Bower, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/05/06/nrob06.xml 'Houdini' Robinson's great escape], Telegraph, 3 July 2001.</ref>  The NS has described ''Editorial Intelligence'' as a small, self-referential clique comprised of press, TV, public relations, publishing and politics clones.
 
Note that the New Statesman was a former Hobsbawm Macaulay Communications client <ref>Tom Bower, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/05/06/nrob06.xml 'Houdini' Robinson's great escape], Telegraph, 3 July 2001.</ref>  The NS has described ''Editorial Intelligence'' as a small, self-referential clique comprised of press, TV, public relations, publishing and politics clones.
 +
 +
==Removed for just now==
 +
===Kampfner is only mentioned very briefly in the source… might be worth considering if we want to keep this bit. If yes, then this piece could do with a bit of reworking/rewording (including referencing)…===
 +
 +
This came after a bit of a falling out over Lloyd's promotion of the wholesale adoption of neo-conservatism.<ref>Oliver Kamm, [http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2005/12/john_lloyd_on_t.html John Lloyd on "The Case for Freedom"], Blog, 8 December 2005.</ref> Part of the gymnastics of those mysterious commentators who claim to be left-wing but hold no discernible left-wing views are that after their somersaults they must land on the side of whoever holds the reins of power. <ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/200512120039 The case for freedom] For a few on the left, Tony Blair's determination to take a stand against tyranny has been a source of admiration rather than despair. John Lloyd explains why, when it comes to foreign policy, he is no longer ashamed to be called a Neoconservative, ''New Statesman'', Published 12 December 2005</ref>
 +
 +
===Parts of this piece don’t appear to be substantiated by the sources. It could also do with a bit of clarification (ie making clear what it is that this part is trying to convey)===
 +
 +
Although he has written on the news management of the Iraq war <ref>John Kampfner, [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/005iqpvz.asp?pg=2 The Disgrace of the BBC], Weekly Standard, 25 August 2003</ref> by the US and UK, in reviews Kampfner uncritically promotes both the FPC and the ''Centre for European Reform'' (CER) &ndash; both run by [[Mark Leonard]] and both of which are, amongst other things, engaged in "public diplomacy". <ref>[http://markleonard.net/whyeurope/Kampfner/]</ref> The CER's [[Charles Grant]] returns the reviewing favours by praising Kampfner in ''Prospect'' magazine.  Here we read some of the mildest rebukes of Blair and indeed Mr. Bush to be committed to paper:
 +
 +
:George Bush often displays a similarly Manichean worldview, which may be why the two men get on as well as they do. Both Bush and Blair are instinctive politicians who attach great importance to personal relationships. <ref>Charles Grant, [http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/grant_prospect_oct03.html Blair's five wars], Prospect, October 2003. (Accessed: 1 September 2007)</ref>
 +
 +
Kampfner and Leonard trade favours by reviewing each others' books in the NS or the CER respectively. <ref>John Kampfner, [http://www.cer.org.uk/articles/reviews_leonard.html Why Europe will Run the 21st Century], CER reprint, 28 February 2005.</ref>  You can even catch Leonard and Kampfner doing the rounds at Jewish Book Week <ref>[http://www.jewishbookweek.com/2006/programme.php Jewish Book Week: 2006]: List of events and speakers</ref>

Revision as of 17:48, 8 October 2007

The article needs to be rewritten in toto... it is basically a poorly written jab at Kampfner... not all well documented. Even the first few paragraph lack cohesion or logic...

I hope that is OK to do a major reshuffle and axing of silly material.

Paulo

yes, it's ok. but let's all be careful about criticising each others work. This page certainly needed work and you have contributed to that. I think we need to try and adopt an approach which encourages people to contributs and where we are all respectful of each others contributions.

OK?

--David 15:14, 2 September 2007 (BST)

Removed sections

Unable to locate this in the source…

Much of his work for Editorial Intelligence has been to tell us how great other people in Editorial Intelligence are. [1]

source not available

One decorative use of this – was the Foreign Policy Centre (FPC), which has close ties to the intelligence services, is funded by mercenary companies (working in Iraq) and is largely pro-war and pro-government. Kampfner joined with John Lloyd and Stephen Twigg to reinforce the FPC's line at the Fabian Society's "Britishness" Conference. [2]

source no longer available

Note that the New Statesman was a former Hobsbawm Macaulay Communications client [3] The NS has described Editorial Intelligence as a small, self-referential clique comprised of press, TV, public relations, publishing and politics clones.

Removed for just now

Kampfner is only mentioned very briefly in the source… might be worth considering if we want to keep this bit. If yes, then this piece could do with a bit of reworking/rewording (including referencing)…

This came after a bit of a falling out over Lloyd's promotion of the wholesale adoption of neo-conservatism.[4] Part of the gymnastics of those mysterious commentators who claim to be left-wing but hold no discernible left-wing views are that after their somersaults they must land on the side of whoever holds the reins of power. [5]

Parts of this piece don’t appear to be substantiated by the sources. It could also do with a bit of clarification (ie making clear what it is that this part is trying to convey)

Although he has written on the news management of the Iraq war [6] by the US and UK, in reviews Kampfner uncritically promotes both the FPC and the Centre for European Reform (CER) – both run by Mark Leonard and both of which are, amongst other things, engaged in "public diplomacy". [7] The CER's Charles Grant returns the reviewing favours by praising Kampfner in Prospect magazine. Here we read some of the mildest rebukes of Blair and indeed Mr. Bush to be committed to paper:

George Bush often displays a similarly Manichean worldview, which may be why the two men get on as well as they do. Both Bush and Blair are instinctive politicians who attach great importance to personal relationships. [8]

Kampfner and Leonard trade favours by reviewing each others' books in the NS or the CER respectively. [9] You can even catch Leonard and Kampfner doing the rounds at Jewish Book Week [10]

  1. ↑ Roy Greenslade, Would you like your news spun or opinionated?, Telegraph, 22 November 2005.
  2. ↑ Document No longer Accessible, (Accessed 1 Sept 2007)
  3. ↑ Tom Bower, 'Houdini' Robinson's great escape, Telegraph, 3 July 2001.
  4. ↑ Oliver Kamm, John Lloyd on "The Case for Freedom", Blog, 8 December 2005.
  5. ↑ The case for freedom For a few on the left, Tony Blair's determination to take a stand against tyranny has been a source of admiration rather than despair. John Lloyd explains why, when it comes to foreign policy, he is no longer ashamed to be called a Neoconservative, New Statesman, Published 12 December 2005
  6. ↑ John Kampfner, The Disgrace of the BBC, Weekly Standard, 25 August 2003
  7. ↑ [1]
  8. ↑ Charles Grant, Blair's five wars, Prospect, October 2003. (Accessed: 1 September 2007)
  9. ↑ John Kampfner, Why Europe will Run the 21st Century, CER reprint, 28 February 2005.
  10. ↑ Jewish Book Week: 2006: List of events and speakers
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Talk:John_Kampfner&oldid=38542"