David Hume Institute

From Powerbase
Revision as of 16:49, 14 March 2006 by Hartwig (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

The David Hume Institute (DHI) was founded in Edinburgh in 1985 by Professor Sir Alan Peacock, who also became its first Executive Director, and the industrialist Gerald Elliot, then Chairman of Christian Control Salvesen, an international logis-tics business. Prior to his committement to the DHI Peacock was Professor of Economics at York University and Vice Chancellor of the independent University of Buckingham. He also sat on a number of committees: for example, he was chairman of the Home Office Committee on Financing the BBC between 1985 and 1986, where he proposed making subscription to the BBC voluntary and to bring more more market mechanisms into the broadcasting sector. When, in 2004, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), where Peacock was a Fellow, gave an address on the same topic, it boasted that Peacock’s ideas were now being ‘discussed by several commentators, including experts from the BBC and Ofcom’ [1](accessd 3 February 2005). Peacock was member of various other UK Government and international Commissions and served as Chief Eco-nomic Adviser in the UK Department of Trade and Industry between 1973-76. According to Peacock, his motivation to set up the DHI was to establish an institute independent of government funding in order to avoid constraints on research and publication and to counter the ‘metropolitan perspective of economic events’ coming from the overwhelming number of research institutes based in London (Peacock 1995). The DHI, in the 1980s, can be considered an outpost of neo-liberal thought and Thatcherite ideology in Scotland. In 1995 Professor Brian Main, who in 2002 was official advisor of the Scottish Parliament Justice Committees One and Two, joined the institute and had been its director since 1999 until he was replaced by Jeremy Peat in June 2005. Peat served as Group Chief Economist at the Royal Bank of Scotland and was economist at the HM Treasury and the Scottish Office. He is also on the Board of Governors of the BBC for Scotland. It is an interesting move to fill the position formerly held by an academic with a professional economist who has ‘extensive connections with business and areas of government in Scotland and further afield’. Peat’s appointment probably will push the DHI into a more business-oriented direction and will open new sources of sponsorship. The DHI’s board of trustees unites the who’s who of the Scottish policy com-munity: senior journalists, members of the Scottish Parliament’s Corporate Body Audit and Advisory Board, the CEO of TSB Scotland and a high official of the Rowntree Foundation. The DHI commissions external re-searchers as it does not employ full time research staff.


Board of Trustees

Among them are:

2004).

  • Professor Duncan MacLennan worked for the Rowntree Foundation and has provided advice to the World Bank, the European Commission and the European Parliament ([6] Accessed 17 November 2004).

Trustees at February 2006

Funding

Between 2000 and 2004, the DHI received financial sponsorship from blue chip corporations including the Royal Bank of Scotland, the Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB Scotland and Standard Life. The academic background of the DHI is reflected in the sponsorship by the ESRC and Edinburgh University’s Europa Institute. Some individuals, including a member of the board of the SCDI and a Scotsman journalist, were also among the financial contributors (Source:[7] )

Activities

'The DHI hardly pursues any local, national or international cooperation with other think-tanks or research institutions. The only ongoing cooperation is to be found with the Europa Institute of the University of Edinburgh. Though Stone describes the DHI as an advocacy institute which is part of a wider epistemic community of privatisation and as the Adam Smith Institute’s Scottish counterpart, today it has neither the interest nor the ability in a wider cooperation with other like-minded institutions.' [8]

The DHI claims it is struggling to get press attention, because of the media’s commercial structure: the ‘press generally want you to say something quite sensational, political, and we […] are generally not talking in those terms’. Such media relations are left to institutes which ‘are more politically oriented. [..] to be pejorative, some of them are for people who actually want to be MPs or politicians’(Interview with Tom Miers, cited in Pautz.

References

^ Stone, Diane. Think-tanks and the Privatisation Band-Wagon in: Lovenduski,J. and Stanyer, J. (eds). Contemporary Political Studies Belfast: Political Studies Association, Vol. 1, 1995, p 22; Stone, Diane 2003 op.cit., p. 335.

 Peacock, Alan. in: Kuenssberg, Nick and Lomas, Gillian. () The David Hume Institute. The First Decade. Norwich : Page Bros Ltd., 1995