Difference between revisions of "Weekly Standard"
(test) |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
===Contributing Editors=== | ===Contributing Editors=== | ||
| + | {|width=100% | ||
| + | |-valign=top | ||
| + | |width=50%| | ||
*[[Gerard Baker]] | *[[Gerard Baker]] | ||
*[[Max Boot]] | *[[Max Boot]] | ||
| Line 60: | Line 63: | ||
*[[David Frum]] | *[[David Frum]] | ||
*[[David Gelernter]] | *[[David Gelernter]] | ||
| + | |width=50%| | ||
*[[Reuel Marc Gerecht]] | *[[Reuel Marc Gerecht]] | ||
*[[Brit Hume]] | *[[Brit Hume]] | ||
| Line 67: | Line 71: | ||
*[[P.J. O'Rourke]] | *[[P.J. O'Rourke]] | ||
*[[John Podhoretz]] | *[[John Podhoretz]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*[[Irwin M. Stelzer]] | *[[Irwin M. Stelzer]] | ||
| − | + | |} | |
==Contact Details== | ==Contact Details== | ||
1150 17th Street, NW <br> | 1150 17th Street, NW <br> | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
*Steven Harras, "[http://www.poppolitics.com/articles/2000/07/14/The-Weekly-Thats-Anything-But-Standard The Weekly That's Anything But Standard]", ''PopPolitics.com'', July 14, 2000. | *Steven Harras, "[http://www.poppolitics.com/articles/2000/07/14/The-Weekly-Thats-Anything-But-Standard The Weekly That's Anything But Standard]", ''PopPolitics.com'', July 14, 2000. | ||
*"[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5037/is_200509/ai_n18255143 The neocon bible; The Weekly Standard.(Ten years of conservatism)]", ''The Economist (US)'', September 17, 2005. (This links only to a part of the article; the rest is subscriber access only). | *"[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5037/is_200509/ai_n18255143 The neocon bible; The Weekly Standard.(Ten years of conservatism)]", ''The Economist (US)'', September 17, 2005. (This links only to a part of the article; the rest is subscriber access only). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Target Iran]][[Category:Neocons]][[category:Iraq War 2003]][[category:Target Iran]] | [[Category:Target Iran]][[Category:Neocons]][[category:Iraq War 2003]][[category:Target Iran]] | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 24 August 2007
The Weekly Standard magazine is the mouthpiece for neoconservatives, and one of the most influential publications in Washington under the Bush Administration. [1]. The magazine is edited by William Kristol, chairman of the controversial Project for the New American Century and son of leading neoconservative Irving Kristol.
Contents
Political Influence
Founded in 1995 by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, the Weekly Standard states on its website that "more than 65,000 politically active Americans nationwide receive the magazine each week". [2] Dwarfed by its primary competitor, the conservative National Review (circulation 155,000), the Weekly Standard nonetheless influences conservatives and neoconservatives alike through a massive Internet presence. [3] On its website, the Weekly Standard states that "before breakfast on Mondays, 4,000 requested copies of The Standard are delivered – also by hand - to every Member of Congress, to Congressional committees, and to federal agencies throughout the city." [4]
In 2003 William Kristol explained that "we have a funny relationship with the top tier of the administration. They very much keep us at arm's length, but Dick Cheney does send over someone to pick up 30 copies of the magazine every Monday." [5]
Eric Alterman, writing in The Nation magazine, described this presence as
- "Reader for reader, it may be the most influential publication in America. Their circulation may be small but they are not interested in speaking to the great unwashed. The magazine speaks directly to and for power. Anybody who wants to know what this administration is thinking and what they plan to do has to read this magazine." [6]
Influence Over Bush Regime
Like National Review in the administration of Ronald Reagan, it is very popular among George W. Bush's administration. According to Vanity Fair (July 2003; as quoted by Ben Bagdikian in The Media Monopoly|The New Media Monopoly), the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney alone receives a special delivery of thirty copies. The magazine's sway over the Bush administration is evident from the fact that Donalf Rumsfeld was ejected shortly after William Kristol called for his resignation multiple times in the pages of the magazine.
Policy Positions
In 1997, the Weekly Standard became one of the first publications to publicly call for regime change in Iraq. Presently it leads the campaign for regime change in Iran. While the Bush administration has assiduously followed its hardline prescriptions, the publication is not averse to excoriating him wherever it feels the administration has stepped out of line. When Bush failed to intervene in time to the neoconservating "Scooter" Libby, Jim Lobe reporte,
- Kristol excoriated Bush, even questioning his manliness (See Kristol’s teacher on the subject, Harvey Mansfield), for not pardoning Scooter Libby “So much for loyalty, or decency, or courage,” Kristol charged. “For President Bush, loyalty is apparently a one-way street; decency is something he’s for as long as he doesn’t have to take any risks in its behalf; and courage – well, that’s nowhere to be seen. Many of us used to respect President Bush. Can one respect him still?” Less than a month later, the president commuted Libby’s sentence so he didn’t have to spend even a single day in prison.[1]
Funding
Writing in the American Conservative, Scott McConnell, stated that when the Weekly Standard started up in 1995, it did so "thanks to a $3 million annual subsidy from Rupert Murdoch". (McConnell does not indicate what the source of the subsidy estimate is). [7]
In 2003 the New York Times reported that "executives said The Weekly Standard was losing a little more than a million dollars a year". [8]
Staff
(data from website about us page August 2007)
Editorial Staff
- William Kristol; Editor bio
- Fred Barnes; Executive Editor bio
- David Tell; Opinion Editor bio
- Christopher Caldwell; Senior Editor bio
- Andrew Ferguson; Senior Editor
- Richard Starr; Managing Editor bio
- Claudia Anderson; Managing Editor bio
- Philip Terzian; Books & Arts Editor bio
- Matt Labash; Senior Writer bio
- Stephen F. Hayes; Senior Writer bio
- Matthew Continetti; Staff Writer bio
- Duncan Currie; Reporter
- Victorino Matus; Assistant Managing Editor bio
- David Skinner; Assistant Managing Editor bio
- Jonathan V. Last; Online Editor bio
- Daniel McKivergan; Online Foreign Editor
- Sonny Bunch; Assistant Editor
- Michael Goldfarb; Editorial Assistant
- Joe Lindsley; Editorial Assistant
- Whitney Blake, Editorial Assistant
- Lev Nisnevitch; Art Director
- Philip Chalk; Production Director
Contributing Editors
Contact Details
1150 17th Street, NW
Suite 505
Washington, DC 20036
E-mail: editor At weeklystandard.com
Phone: 202-293-4900
Website: http://www.weeklystandard.com/
References
- ↑ David Carr, "White House Listens When Weekly Speaks", New York Times, March 11, 2003.
- ↑ "Readership & Circulation: Delivering Influence", accessed August 2007.
- ↑ Project for Excellence in Journalism, "Magazines", State of the News Media 2006.
- ↑ "Readership & Circulation: Delivering Influence", accessed August 2007.
- ↑ David Carr, "White House Listens When Weekly Speaks", New York Times, March 11, 2003.
- ↑ David Carr, "White House Listens When Weekly Speaks", New York Times, March 11, 2003.
- ↑ Scott McConnell, "Murdoch's mag stands athwart history yelling, "Attack!"," The American Conservative, 21 November 2005.
- ↑ David Carr, "White House Listens When Weekly Speaks", New York Times, March 11, 2003.
External Links
- Tim Bogardus, "A new standard: created to make commentary, not cash, The Weekly Standard strives to be the conservative conscience of the changing political landscape - Interview", Folio: The Magazine for Magazine Management, May 15, 1996.
- Steven Harras, "The Weekly That's Anything But Standard", PopPolitics.com, July 14, 2000.
- "The neocon bible; The Weekly Standard.(Ten years of conservatism)", The Economist (US), September 17, 2005. (This links only to a part of the article; the rest is subscriber access only).
