Difference between revisions of "Roger Scruton"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Tobacco money)
(→‎Tobacco money)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Scruton was caught taking payments from the tobacco industry in exchange for writing pro-smoking articles in the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''.  
 
Scruton was caught taking payments from the tobacco industry in exchange for writing pro-smoking articles in the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''.  
  
−
After ''The Guardian'''s disclosure in 2002 that Scruton had 'asked Japan Tobacco for a £1,000 a month rise to an annual £66,000 to help place articles defending the right to smoke in newspapers, including the WSJ, the ''Financial Times'', ''The Times'', the ''Daily Telegraph'', and the ''Independent'',' he was dropped by both the ''Financial Times'' and ''Wall Street Journal''. <ref>Rebecca Allison, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/smoking/Story/0,2763,645168,00.html Wall Street Journal drops Scruton over tobacco cash], ''The Guardian'', 5 February 2002</ref> According to Scruton the ''[[Risk of Freedom Briefing]]'' that he edited  was funded by [[Japan Tobacco International]].<ref name="Scruton">Roger Scruton [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jan/28/smoking.guardianletters A puff for the Scrutons] ''The Guardian'', Monday 28 January 2002 01.33 GMT</ref>  
+
After ''The Guardian'''s disclosure in 2002 that Scruton had 'asked Japan Tobacco for a £1,000 a month rise to an annual £66,000 to help place articles defending the right to smoke in newspapers, including the WSJ, the ''Financial Times'', ''The Times'', the ''Daily Telegraph'', and the ''Independent'',' he was dropped by both the ''Financial Times'' and ''Wall Street Journal''. <ref>Rebecca Allison, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/smoking/Story/0,2763,645168,00.html Wall Street Journal drops Scruton over tobacco cash], ''The Guardian'', 5 February 2002</ref> According to Scruton the ''[[Risk of Freedom Briefing]]'' that he edited  was funded by [[Japan Tobacco International]]: <ref name="Scruton">Roger Scruton [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jan/28/smoking.guardianletters A puff for the Scrutons] ''The Guardian'', Monday 28 January 2002 01.33 GMT</ref>  
  
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">My wife and I have a company devoted to public affairs, the aim of which is to help clients to find the language appropriate to their concerns and to promote debate of those concerns in the media. [[Japan Tobacco International]] has been our client for the last three years. We have advised JTI on language and arguments and arranged debates, seminars and conferences on risk and freedom, with their declared sponsorship.<p>We have also published ''[[Risk of Freedom Briefing]]'', circulated to journalists (including some on the ''[[Guardian]]'') the purpose of which is to stimulate debate. This carries my name as editor and JTI's name as sponsor. We have never concealed the relationship, but have tried to make clear we are related to our client not as advocates but as advisers. <ref name="Scruton"/></p></blockquote>
 
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">My wife and I have a company devoted to public affairs, the aim of which is to help clients to find the language appropriate to their concerns and to promote debate of those concerns in the media. [[Japan Tobacco International]] has been our client for the last three years. We have advised JTI on language and arguments and arranged debates, seminars and conferences on risk and freedom, with their declared sponsorship.<p>We have also published ''[[Risk of Freedom Briefing]]'', circulated to journalists (including some on the ''[[Guardian]]'') the purpose of which is to stimulate debate. This carries my name as editor and JTI's name as sponsor. We have never concealed the relationship, but have tried to make clear we are related to our client not as advocates but as advisers. <ref name="Scruton"/></p></blockquote>

Revision as of 16:30, 24 March 2011

Roger Vernon Scruton (born 27 February 1944) is an influential conservative philosopher. He was a Resident Fellow at Peterhouse, Cambridge from 1969-71 and is considered to have been a member of the so called Peterhouse Right. He co-founded the Conservative Philosophy Group with John Casey and was editor of the Salisbury Review from 1982 to 2000. [1]

In 2002 he was caught taking payments from the tobacco industry in exchange for writing pro-smoking articles in the Wall Street Journal.

Views

According to a profile in the Times Higher Education, Scruton 'came from a Labour-voting family, [but] his experiences of Paris in May 1968 shifted him sharply to the Right.' [2] In 2000 Scruton told the Guardian:

What I saw was an unruly mob of self-indulgent middle-class hooligans. When I asked my friends what they wanted, what were they trying to achieve, all I got back was this ludicrous Marxist gobbledegook. I was disgusted by it, and thought there must be a way back to the defence of western civilisation against these things. That's when I became a conservative. I knew I wanted to conserve things rather than pull them down. [3]

Scruton has complained that philosophy is not taken seriously by the Conservative Party and that ideas are simply used as tools for class struggle. In his memoirs he writes that: 'Ideas, in the Tory vision, are fleeting by-products of the social and political process, which are no sooner produced than forgotten. In this and other respects the Tory Party behaves as though Marx were its principal mentor: it treats philosophy as ‘ideology’, and economics as the motor of social life.' [4]

Tobacco money

Scruton was caught taking payments from the tobacco industry in exchange for writing pro-smoking articles in the Wall Street Journal.

After The Guardian's disclosure in 2002 that Scruton had 'asked Japan Tobacco for a £1,000 a month rise to an annual £66,000 to help place articles defending the right to smoke in newspapers, including the WSJ, the Financial Times, The Times, the Daily Telegraph, and the Independent,' he was dropped by both the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal. [5] According to Scruton the Risk of Freedom Briefing that he edited was funded by Japan Tobacco International: [6]

My wife and I have a company devoted to public affairs, the aim of which is to help clients to find the language appropriate to their concerns and to promote debate of those concerns in the media. Japan Tobacco International has been our client for the last three years. We have advised JTI on language and arguments and arranged debates, seminars and conferences on risk and freedom, with their declared sponsorship.

We have also published Risk of Freedom Briefing, circulated to journalists (including some on the Guardian) the purpose of which is to stimulate debate. This carries my name as editor and JTI's name as sponsor. We have never concealed the relationship, but have tried to make clear we are related to our client not as advocates but as advisers. [6]

Affiliation

Notes

  1. ↑ ‘SCRUTON, Prof. Roger Vernon’, Who's Who 2011, A & C Black, 2011; online edn, Oxford University Press, Dec 2010 ; online edn, Oct 2010 [Accessed 14 March 2011]
  2. ↑ Matthew Reisz, 'Right-thinking aesthetic', Times Higher Education, 25 June 2009.
  3. ↑ Nicholas Wroe, 'Thinking for England', Guardian, 28 October 2000
  4. ↑ Roger Scruton, Gentle regrets: thoughts from a life (Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006) p.51
  5. ↑ Rebecca Allison, Wall Street Journal drops Scruton over tobacco cash, The Guardian, 5 February 2002
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Roger Scruton A puff for the Scrutons The Guardian, Monday 28 January 2002 01.33 GMT
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Roger_Scruton&oldid=152276"