Difference between revisions of "Cross Party Group on the Civil Nuclear Industry"
m (→Members) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Lobbying controversy== | ==Lobbying controversy== | ||
| − | The Scottish | + | The Scottish equivalent of the [[All-Party Parliamentary Group on Nuclear Energy]] was set up by MSPs to promote 'consideration and discussion of aspects of the civil nuclear industry which come within the responsibility of the Scottish Parliament, including environmental, economic and planning issues relating to the commissioning, operation and decommissioning of nuclear plant, and liaison with interested groups, including management and employees in the industry and other stakeholders."<ref>[http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/crossPartyGroups/groups/cpg-cni.htm Scottish Parliament website]</ref> It is supposed to be neutral on nuclear power. |
| − | It is supposed to be neutral on nuclear power. | ||
On the eve of the launch of the [[Energy Review (UK 2006)|2006 energy review]], the Scottish ''Sunday Herald'' revealed that the CPG had "failed to declare the administrative support it receives from nuclear power firm [[British Energy]] that runs eight power stations in the UK. Services include drafting agendas and taking minutes of meetings, none of which is made available to the public." The newspaper also reported that the CPG was given presentations by the [[Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA)]] and the nuclear waste agency, [[Nirex]], and had gone on a trip to a nuclear power station with its UK counterpart, the [[Nuclear Energy APPG]]. <ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/53711 ''The Sunday Herald'']</ref> | On the eve of the launch of the [[Energy Review (UK 2006)|2006 energy review]], the Scottish ''Sunday Herald'' revealed that the CPG had "failed to declare the administrative support it receives from nuclear power firm [[British Energy]] that runs eight power stations in the UK. Services include drafting agendas and taking minutes of meetings, none of which is made available to the public." The newspaper also reported that the CPG was given presentations by the [[Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA)]] and the nuclear waste agency, [[Nirex]], and had gone on a trip to a nuclear power station with its UK counterpart, the [[Nuclear Energy APPG]]. <ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/53711 ''The Sunday Herald'']</ref> | ||
| − | According to the ''Sunday Herald'', the Scottish Parliament has been asked to investigate whether the Cross Party Group "flouted anti-sleaze rules" as it has "has failed to register a number of trips and dinners financed by organisations that support the controversial energy source." <ref> | + | According to the ''Sunday Herald'', the Scottish Parliament has been asked to investigate whether the Cross Party Group "flouted anti-sleaze rules" as it has "has failed to register a number of trips and dinners financed by organisations that support the controversial energy source." <ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/53711 ''The Sunday Herald'']</ref> |
"The group's register also leaves the 'financial benefits' section blank, despite Holyrood rules requiring CPGs to register 'financial or other benefits' exceeding £250 received from any source. "But last August, nuclear plant operator British Nuclear Fuels Limited funded 'accommodation' costs for MSPs to visit the reprocessing plant at Sellafield". | "The group's register also leaves the 'financial benefits' section blank, despite Holyrood rules requiring CPGs to register 'financial or other benefits' exceeding £250 received from any source. "But last August, nuclear plant operator British Nuclear Fuels Limited funded 'accommodation' costs for MSPs to visit the reprocessing plant at Sellafield". | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
"Weeks later, the CPG and its Westminster equivalent, the all-party group on nuclear energy, attended a dinner paid for them by the nuclear industry. This was preceded months earlier by a trip to Torness, home to one of Scotland's nuclear plants, part of which was funded by British Energy". | "Weeks later, the CPG and its Westminster equivalent, the all-party group on nuclear energy, attended a dinner paid for them by the nuclear industry. This was preceded months earlier by a trip to Torness, home to one of Scotland's nuclear plants, part of which was funded by British Energy". | ||
| − | According to the paper | + | According to the paper, |
| − | + | :Critics say the group has broken the MSPs' code of conduct and compromised the forum's impartiality by accepting financial benefits from outfits that back new reactors. They want parliament to examine the role of commercial lobbyists in arranging meetings between their pro-nuclear clients and politicians. | |
| − | + | ==Secret spinners== | |
| − | In addition, the website listing for Nirex's representative on the CPG was altered: [[Rachel Robertson]] (daughter of former NATO Secretary General [[George Robertson]]) from [[Fleishman-Hillard]] was on the Group, although she was listed as being from [[Nirex]] and not the PR company itself. <ref>Standards Committee Meeting Agenda [http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/standards/papers-05/stp05-02.pdf Scottish | + | According to the newspaper, after it "...started making enquiries about the group last week, the name of a well-known lobbyist mentioned on the website was erased." The lobbyist in question is [[Thomas Docherty]], as illustrated by [[:Image:Scottish-civil-nuclear-cpg-in-yahoo-cache-26jan06.jpg|this screenshot of the old version of the CPG's website]], which was still in the Yahoo cache a few days after ''The Herald'' report was published.<ref>Civil Nuclear Industry Scottish CPG Website, [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Image:Scottish-civil-nuclear-cpg-in-yahoo-cache-26jan06.jpg].</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | In addition, the website listing for Nirex's representative on the CPG was altered: [[Rachel Robertson]] (daughter of former NATO Secretary General [[George Robertson]]) from [[Fleishman-Hillard]] was on the Group, although she was listed as being from [[Nirex]] and not the PR company itself. <ref>Standards Committee Meeting Agenda, [http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/standards/papers-05/stp05-02.pdf Scottish Paliament website], 22 February, 2005.</ref> | ||
She was replaced by [[Ian Price]]. Unless there are two Ian Prices working for Nirex in Edinburgh, this is the same person who is a member of staff of [[Fleishman-Hillard]], based in the PR firm's Edinburgh office, <ref>[http://www.appc.org.uk/registers/APPC_register_June05-Nov05.pdf APPC website]</ref> and is seconded to Nirex. <ref>[http://www.nirex.co.uk/foi/nxconsult/oldsitelistworkshop_2005.pdf Nirex website]</ref> If so, the fact that he is a public relations professional is not disclosed on the CPG's website. <ref>[http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/crossPartyGroups/groups/cpg-cni.htm Scottish Parliament website]</ref> | She was replaced by [[Ian Price]]. Unless there are two Ian Prices working for Nirex in Edinburgh, this is the same person who is a member of staff of [[Fleishman-Hillard]], based in the PR firm's Edinburgh office, <ref>[http://www.appc.org.uk/registers/APPC_register_June05-Nov05.pdf APPC website]</ref> and is seconded to Nirex. <ref>[http://www.nirex.co.uk/foi/nxconsult/oldsitelistworkshop_2005.pdf Nirex website]</ref> If so, the fact that he is a public relations professional is not disclosed on the CPG's website. <ref>[http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/crossPartyGroups/groups/cpg-cni.htm Scottish Parliament website]</ref> | ||
==Members== | ==Members== | ||
| − | + | Information as of 25 January, 2005 <ref>[http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/crossPartyGroups/groups/cpg-cni.htm Scottish Parliament website]</ref> | |
| − | Information | ||
| − | |||
===MSPs=== | ===MSPs=== | ||
| − | |||
*[[Shiona Baird]] | *[[Shiona Baird]] | ||
*[[Richard Baker]] | *[[Richard Baker]] | ||
| Line 48: | Line 46: | ||
===Non-MSPs=== | ===Non-MSPs=== | ||
| − | |||
*[[Neil Cardwell]] - researcher for Richard Baker MSP | *[[Neil Cardwell]] - researcher for Richard Baker MSP | ||
*[[Tony King]] - MSP researcher | *[[Tony King]] - MSP researcher | ||
| Line 54: | Line 51: | ||
*[[Linda Smith]] - [[British Energy]] | *[[Linda Smith]] - [[British Energy]] | ||
*[[Simon Tiernan]] - researcher for John Home Robertson MSP | *[[Simon Tiernan]] - researcher for John Home Robertson MSP | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Latest revision as of 08:28, 2 September 2012
|
This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch. |
Contents
Lobbying controversy
The Scottish equivalent of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Nuclear Energy was set up by MSPs to promote 'consideration and discussion of aspects of the civil nuclear industry which come within the responsibility of the Scottish Parliament, including environmental, economic and planning issues relating to the commissioning, operation and decommissioning of nuclear plant, and liaison with interested groups, including management and employees in the industry and other stakeholders."[1] It is supposed to be neutral on nuclear power.
On the eve of the launch of the 2006 energy review, the Scottish Sunday Herald revealed that the CPG had "failed to declare the administrative support it receives from nuclear power firm British Energy that runs eight power stations in the UK. Services include drafting agendas and taking minutes of meetings, none of which is made available to the public." The newspaper also reported that the CPG was given presentations by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and the nuclear waste agency, Nirex, and had gone on a trip to a nuclear power station with its UK counterpart, the Nuclear Energy APPG. [2]
According to the Sunday Herald, the Scottish Parliament has been asked to investigate whether the Cross Party Group "flouted anti-sleaze rules" as it has "has failed to register a number of trips and dinners financed by organisations that support the controversial energy source." [3]
"The group's register also leaves the 'financial benefits' section blank, despite Holyrood rules requiring CPGs to register 'financial or other benefits' exceeding £250 received from any source. "But last August, nuclear plant operator British Nuclear Fuels Limited funded 'accommodation' costs for MSPs to visit the reprocessing plant at Sellafield".
"Weeks later, the CPG and its Westminster equivalent, the all-party group on nuclear energy, attended a dinner paid for them by the nuclear industry. This was preceded months earlier by a trip to Torness, home to one of Scotland's nuclear plants, part of which was funded by British Energy".
According to the paper,
- Critics say the group has broken the MSPs' code of conduct and compromised the forum's impartiality by accepting financial benefits from outfits that back new reactors. They want parliament to examine the role of commercial lobbyists in arranging meetings between their pro-nuclear clients and politicians.
Secret spinners
According to the newspaper, after it "...started making enquiries about the group last week, the name of a well-known lobbyist mentioned on the website was erased." The lobbyist in question is Thomas Docherty, as illustrated by this screenshot of the old version of the CPG's website, which was still in the Yahoo cache a few days after The Herald report was published.[4]
In addition, the website listing for Nirex's representative on the CPG was altered: Rachel Robertson (daughter of former NATO Secretary General George Robertson) from Fleishman-Hillard was on the Group, although she was listed as being from Nirex and not the PR company itself. [5] She was replaced by Ian Price. Unless there are two Ian Prices working for Nirex in Edinburgh, this is the same person who is a member of staff of Fleishman-Hillard, based in the PR firm's Edinburgh office, [6] and is seconded to Nirex. [7] If so, the fact that he is a public relations professional is not disclosed on the CPG's website. [8]
Members
Information as of 25 January, 2005 [9]
MSPs
- Shiona Baird
- Richard Baker
- Chris Ballance
- Murdo Fraser
- Phil Gallie
- Karen Gillon
- John Home Robertson
- Alex Johnstone
- Michael McMahon
- Duncan McNeil
- Christine May
- Alasdair Morrison
- Dr Elaine Murray
- Mary Scanlon
- John Scott
- Stewart Stevenson
- Jamie Stone
- John Swinburne
Non-MSPs
- Neil Cardwell - researcher for Richard Baker MSP
- Tony King - MSP researcher
- Ian Price - The Nuclear Industry Radioactive Waste Executive (Nirex)
- Linda Smith - British Energy
- Simon Tiernan - researcher for John Home Robertson MSP
External links
- Homepage of the Civil Nuclear Industry CPG
- Old site list publication stakeholder workshop (PDF), Nirex, May 26, 2005. Mentions Ian Price.
- APCO UK register, June-Nov 2005 (PDF). Mentions Ian Price.
- MP ENERGY REPORT "DOES NOT BACK NEW NUCLEAR PLANTS" Friends of the Earth Scotland
Articles
- Paul Hutcheon, "Sleaze probe into nuclear lobbying at Holyrood", Sunday Herald, 22 January, 2006.
- Rob Edwards, "Leading scientists attack Blair over nuclear power", Sunday Herald, 9 April, 2006.
- Magnus Linklater, "Linklater's Scotland", The Scotsman, 14 May, 2006.
- Douglas Fraser, "Nuclear plant decisions on hold for poll", The Herald, 16 May, 2006.
- Andrew Grice, "Brown endorses Blair's plans for more nuclear power stations", The Independent, 17 May, 2006.
- "MP generates atomic power alert for Blair", Glasgow Evening Herald, 24 May, 2006.
Notes
- ↑ Scottish Parliament website
- ↑ The Sunday Herald
- ↑ The Sunday Herald
- ↑ Civil Nuclear Industry Scottish CPG Website, [1].
- ↑ Standards Committee Meeting Agenda, Scottish Paliament website, 22 February, 2005.
- ↑ APPC website
- ↑ Nirex website
- ↑ Scottish Parliament website
- ↑ Scottish Parliament website
![[1]](http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Image:Scottish-civil-nuclear-cpg-in-yahoo-cache-26jan06.jpg){kind=link}