Difference between revisions of "Legal Project"
Hilary Aked (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The Legal Project is an off-shoot from [[Daniel Pipes]]' organisation [[Middle East Forum]]. | + | [[Image:The_Legal_Project_.png ||300px|thumb|right|The Legal Project, Source: [http://www.legal-project.org/ Legal Project.org, screengrab] ]] |
| + | '''The Legal Project''' is an off-shoot from [[Daniel Pipes]]' organisation [[Middle East Forum]]. | ||
| − | According to right-wing news site [[Breitbart]], it was reportedly established to 'protect the right in the West to freely discuss Islam, radical Islam, terrorism, and terrorist funding' | + | ==History== |
| + | According to right-wing news site [[Breitbart]], it was reportedly established to 'protect the right in the West to freely discuss Islam, radical Islam, terrorism, and terrorist funding'.<ref name="Lane">Oliver Lane, [http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/12/22/court-of-appeal-overturns-conviction-of-woman-prosecuted-for-insulting-islam/ COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS CONVICTION OF WOMAN PROSECUTED FOR INSULTING ISLAM], Breitbart News, 22 December 2014, accessed 3 February 2015</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Legal Project's website claims 'the Islamist movement has two wings, one violent and one lawful' and quotes [[Steve Emerson]] as saying: 'Legal action has become a mainstay of radical Islamist organizations seeking to intimidate and silence their critics.'<ref name="About">[http://www.legal-project.org/about/ About], Legal Project, accessed 4 February 2015</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Activities== | ||
| + | |||
| + | According to its own website, The Legal Project works in four ways to 'counter the Islamist threat' as it sees it: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :1) Fundraising for an Escrow account to supplement the court costs and litigation fees for victims of Islamist lawfare - all funds raised go directly to lawfare victims, | ||
| + | :2) Arranging for pro bono and reduced rate counsel for victims of Islamist lawfare, | ||
| + | :3) Maintaining an international network of attorneys dedicated to working pro bono in the defense of free speech and, | ||
| + | :4) Raising awareness about the issue. Efforts include briefings by legal experts on how to avoid libelous statements, and consultations with libel lawyers before publishing on certain topics.<ref name="About"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Support for Geert Wilders and others=== | ||
| + | The Legal Project supported Dutch [[Party for Freedom]] leader [[Geert Wilders]] to appeal hate speech charges in 2010 and 11, as well as French anti-Muslim activist [[Christine Tasin]] with legal costs for a similar appeal.<ref name="Lane"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Daniel Pipes declined to reveal how much funding the Legal Project gave to Wilders (paid directly to his lawyer).<ref name="Lane"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wilders expressed his appreciation in 2011, | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Last June, I was acquitted of all charges by an Amsterdam court. The Middle East Forum's Legal Project ... was always there to help, advise and assist ... The importance of the MEF's Legal Project in reclaiming free expression and political discourse ... cannot be overestimated." | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::— ''Geert Wilders, September 29, 2011'' <Ref> [http://www.legal-project.org/1751/geert-wilders-statement-mef-legal-project Geert Wilders Statement on MEF's Legal Project], Middle East Forum, accessed 6 May 2015 </ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another U.S.-based financial supporter of Wilders is [[David Horowitz]].<ref name="ReutersWilders">Anthony Deutsch and Mark Hosenball, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/10/us-dutch-wilders-us-idUSBRE8890A720120910 Exclusive: U.S. groups helped fund Dutch anti-Islam politician Wilders], Reuters, 10 September 2012</ref> Reuters reported that while former officials from Wilders' [[Freedom Party]] - which is not publically funded and therefore is able to operate less transparently than other Dutch parties - have said it relies almost entirely on foreign donations, both Horowitz and Pipes deny funding political activities in the Netherlands. The non-profit, tax exempt organizations they run are, under U.S. tax laws, forbidden from giving direct financial backing to any political candidate or party but may sponsor policy debates.<ref name="ReutersWilders"/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Support for Fjordman over Breivik case=== | ||
==Affiliations== | ==Affiliations== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 39: | ||
[[Category: Counterjihad]] | [[Category: Counterjihad]] | ||
[[Category: Islam Critics]] | [[Category: Islam Critics]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Neocons]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Counterjihad Funders]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Hate Speech Cases] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:13, 11 October 2016
The Legal Project is an off-shoot from Daniel Pipes' organisation Middle East Forum.
Contents
History
According to right-wing news site Breitbart, it was reportedly established to 'protect the right in the West to freely discuss Islam, radical Islam, terrorism, and terrorist funding'.[1]
The Legal Project's website claims 'the Islamist movement has two wings, one violent and one lawful' and quotes Steve Emerson as saying: 'Legal action has become a mainstay of radical Islamist organizations seeking to intimidate and silence their critics.'[2]
Activities
According to its own website, The Legal Project works in four ways to 'counter the Islamist threat' as it sees it:
- 1) Fundraising for an Escrow account to supplement the court costs and litigation fees for victims of Islamist lawfare - all funds raised go directly to lawfare victims,
- 2) Arranging for pro bono and reduced rate counsel for victims of Islamist lawfare,
- 3) Maintaining an international network of attorneys dedicated to working pro bono in the defense of free speech and,
- 4) Raising awareness about the issue. Efforts include briefings by legal experts on how to avoid libelous statements, and consultations with libel lawyers before publishing on certain topics.[2]
Support for Geert Wilders and others
The Legal Project supported Dutch Party for Freedom leader Geert Wilders to appeal hate speech charges in 2010 and 11, as well as French anti-Muslim activist Christine Tasin with legal costs for a similar appeal.[1]
Daniel Pipes declined to reveal how much funding the Legal Project gave to Wilders (paid directly to his lawyer).[1]
Wilders expressed his appreciation in 2011,
- Last June, I was acquitted of all charges by an Amsterdam court. The Middle East Forum's Legal Project ... was always there to help, advise and assist ... The importance of the MEF's Legal Project in reclaiming free expression and political discourse ... cannot be overestimated."
- — Geert Wilders, September 29, 2011 [3]
Another U.S.-based financial supporter of Wilders is David Horowitz.[4] Reuters reported that while former officials from Wilders' Freedom Party - which is not publically funded and therefore is able to operate less transparently than other Dutch parties - have said it relies almost entirely on foreign donations, both Horowitz and Pipes deny funding political activities in the Netherlands. The non-profit, tax exempt organizations they run are, under U.S. tax laws, forbidden from giving direct financial backing to any political candidate or party but may sponsor policy debates.[4]
Support for Fjordman over Breivik case
Affiliations
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Oliver Lane, COURT OF APPEAL OVERTURNS CONVICTION OF WOMAN PROSECUTED FOR INSULTING ISLAM, Breitbart News, 22 December 2014, accessed 3 February 2015
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 About, Legal Project, accessed 4 February 2015
- ↑ Geert Wilders Statement on MEF's Legal Project, Middle East Forum, accessed 6 May 2015
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Anthony Deutsch and Mark Hosenball, Exclusive: U.S. groups helped fund Dutch anti-Islam politician Wilders, Reuters, 10 September 2012
[[Category: Hate Speech Cases]
