Difference between revisions of "The Hijacking of British Islam"
(info pasted from neocon europe) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''The Hijacking of British Islam''' was a report published in October 2007 by the right-wing think-tank [[Policy Exchange]]. It was revealed by [[BBC]] ''[[Newsnight]]'' as being based in part on fabricated evidence. | |
| − | |||
| − | The report' | + | The full title of the report was ''The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK''. It was written by [[Denis MacEoin]] and overseen by [[Policy Exchange|Policy Exchange's]] [[Dean Godson]]. <ref>The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK, by [[Denis MacEoin]], [[Policy Exchange]], 29 October 2007.</ref> According to the report, which claimed to be 'the most comprehensive academic survey of such literature ever produced in this country', [[Policy Exchange]] sent four Muslim research teams to almost 100 mosques across Britain, and found radical material at 25 per cent of the institutions surveyed. <ref>[http://www.scribd.com/doc/30586814/Hijacking-of-British-Islam The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK], by [[Denis MacEoin]], [[Policy Exchange]], 29 October 2007, p.5.</ref>The Report's recommendations included calls for the British authorities to reconsider their relationship to the [[Muslim Council of Britain]], the [[Islamic Foundation]] and the [[Muslim Safety Forum]].<ref>[http://www.scribd.com/doc/30586814/Hijacking-of-British-Islam The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK], by [[Denis MacEoin]], [[Policy Exchange]], 29 October 2007, p7.</ref> |
| − | + | The report's findings were widely covered in the British media with articles appearing in, for example, The ''[[Daily Mail]]'' <ref>[http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/Press.aspx?id=432 Excerpts from articles featuring Policy Exchange - October 30 2007]: Daily Mail: Agenda of hate in British mosques is linked to Saudis, Policy Exchange (accessed 9 March 2008)</ref>, the ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''<ref>[[Toby Helm]], [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/30/nmosques130.xml 'Hate literature easily found at UK mosques']', ''Daily Telegraph'', 31 October 2007.</ref> and ''[[The Times]]''.<ref>[[Sean O'Neill]], [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2767252.ece Lessons in hate found at leading mosques], ''The Times'', 30 October 2007.</ref> According to ''[[Newsnight]]'' editor [[Peter Barron]], the [[BBC]] had originally been due to run an exclusive report on the findings: | |
| − | On closer examination, the BBC identified particular concerns about five of the receipts in particular: | + | <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">On the planned day of broadcast our reporter [[Richard Watson]] came to me and said he had a problem. He had put the claim and shown a receipt to one of the mosques mentioned in the report - The [[Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre]] in London. They had immediately denied selling the book and said the receipt was not theirs.<p>On closer examination, the BBC identified particular concerns about five of the receipts in particular: |
# In all five cases the mosques involved said the receipts did not belong to them. | # In all five cases the mosques involved said the receipts did not belong to them. | ||
# The expert analysis showed that all five had been printed on an inkjet printer - suggesting they were created on a PC. | # The expert analysis showed that all five had been printed on an inkjet printer - suggesting they were created on a PC. | ||
#The analysis found "strong evidence" that two of the receipts were written by the same person. | #The analysis found "strong evidence" that two of the receipts were written by the same person. | ||
| − | #The analysis found that one of the receipts had been written out while resting on another receipt said to be from a mosque 40 miles away.<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/12/disastrous__misjudgement.html 'Disastrous misjudgement?'], by [[Peter Barron]], BBC News - The Editors, 13 December 2007.</ref> | + | #The analysis found that one of the receipts had been written out while resting on another receipt said to be from a mosque 40 miles away. <ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/12/disastrous__misjudgement.html 'Disastrous misjudgement?'], by [[Peter Barron]], BBC News - The Editors, 13 December 2007.</ref></p></blockquote> |
| + | [[Image:DeanGodson.jpg|right|thumb|Dean Godson, ''[[Newsnight]]'', 12 December 2007.]] | ||
| + | On 12 December 2007, ''[[Newsnight]]'' ran a report on these concerns, followed by a studio discussion between [[Jeremy Paxman]] and [[Dean Godson]], during which Godson accused Barron of 'disastrous editorial misjudgement' and of 'appalling stewardship of ''Newsnight'''. <ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/12/newsnight_response_to_policy_exchange_statement.html BBC News - Talk About Newsnight - Newsnight Response to Policy Exchange Statement], 14 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.</ref> | ||
| − | + | An initial statement on 12 December, 'the executive of [[Policy Exchange]] will meet on Thursday 13th to discuss legal action against the BBC'. <ref>[http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/Press.aspx?id=475 Policy Exchange and BBC Newsnight], Policy Exchange, 12 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.</ref>A second response the next day stated that '[[Policy Exchange]] is in legal consultations about action in this matter.'<ref>[http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/Press.aspx?id=476 Policy Exchange and Newsnight (2)],[[Policy Exchange]], 13 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.</ref>The BBC responded: 'Policy Exchange's statement is misleading in many ways and doesn't answer the simple question raised by Newsnight's film. Given that the Policy Exchange report was based on the testimony of the researchers who gathered the receipts, do they believe all the receipts are genuine?'<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/12/newsnight_response_to_policy_exchange_statement.html BBC News - Talk About Newsnight - Newsnight Response to Policy Exchange Statement], 14 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008. </ref> | |
| − | + | In the ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' on 15 December, [[Policy Exchange]] Chairman [[Charles Moore]] accused [[Peter Barron]] of questioning the receipts in order to justify his original decision not to run the report. | |
| − | + | <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">Given that the report was being published that night, the obvious thing for Newsnight to do was to broadcast Policy Exchange's findings at once, allowing the mosques to have their say about the receipts.<p>There was no need for Newsnight to claim "ownership" of the report. Instead, the editor, Peter Barron, decided to run nothing. His decision meant the Policy Exchange report was not touched by the BBC at all.<ref>[[Charles Moore]], '[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/12/15/do1501.xml Newsnight told a small story over a big one]', ''Daily Telegraph'', 15 December 2007</ref></p></blockquote> | |
| − | + | On 17 December, ''[[The Times]]'' issued an apology to Dr [[Muhammad Abdul Bari]] of the [[East London Mosque]] in connection with its coverage of the report.<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3059836.ece Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari], [[The Times]], 17 December 2007.</ref> | |
| − | + | In February 2008, ''Private Eye'' reported that 'furious Conservatives say they've no option but to sue or take a dossier on [[Peter Barron]], ''[[Newsnight|Newsnight's]]'' editor, to the BBC's senior management.'<ref>Media News: Newsnight and the Mosques, by '[[Ratbiter]]', [[Private Eye]] No. 1203, 8 February-21 February 2008, p.8.</ref>In a letter in the following issue, Barron responded 'Policy Exchange promised to investigate these discrepancies, but two months later they have still not said if they believe these receipts are genuine.'<ref>Receipt deceit? by [[Peter Barron]], Private Eye No.1204, 22 February-6 March 2008, p.15</ref> | |
| − | + | In March 2009, the report appeared to have been removed from the [[Policy Exchange]] website, where the following statement appeared: | |
| − | In | + | <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">The Hijacking of British Islam:<p>Al-Manaar Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre</p><p>In this report we state that Al-Manaar Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre is one of the Centres where extremist literature was found. [[Policy Exchange]] accepts the Centre’s assurances that none of the literature cited in the Report has ever been sold or distributed at the Centre with the knowledge or consent of the Centre’s trustees or staff, who condemn the extremist and intolerant views set out in such literature. We are happy to set the record straight. <ref>Sunny Hundal, [http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2009/03/30/exclusive-policy-exchange-forced-to-apologise-takes-report-off-website/ Exclusive: Policy Exchange forced to apologise; takes report off website], Liberal Conspiracy, 30 March 2009.</ref><ref>[http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/ Policy Exchange], accessed 2 April 2009.</ref></p></blockquote> |
| − | In September 2008, the North London Central Mosque issued a writ in the High Court over the report's allegations.<ref>[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b0adc306-8906-11dd-a179-0000779fd18c.html London mosque sues think-tank], by Megan Murphy, FT.com, 23 September 2008; ''North London Central Mosque v. The Policy Exchange and Denis McEoin'', claim number HQ08X03441, filed 4 September 2008</ref> | + | In September 2008, the North London Central Mosque issued a writ in the High Court over the report's allegations. <ref>[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b0adc306-8906-11dd-a179-0000779fd18c.html London mosque sues think-tank], by Megan Murphy, FT.com, 23 September 2008; ''North London Central Mosque v. The Policy Exchange and Denis McEoin'', claim number HQ08X03441, filed 4 September 2008</ref> The case came to the High Court in December 2009 but was struck out by the Judge on the basis that the Trust could not sue in defamation as it was not a corporate entity or legal person. <ref>'[http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=44814 Eady: Mosque charitable trust can't sue for libel]', ''Press Gazette'', 22 December 2009.</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | [[Category:Terrorism Spin]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:46, 7 May 2010
The Hijacking of British Islam was a report published in October 2007 by the right-wing think-tank Policy Exchange. It was revealed by BBC Newsnight as being based in part on fabricated evidence.
The full title of the report was The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK. It was written by Denis MacEoin and overseen by Policy Exchange's Dean Godson. [1] According to the report, which claimed to be 'the most comprehensive academic survey of such literature ever produced in this country', Policy Exchange sent four Muslim research teams to almost 100 mosques across Britain, and found radical material at 25 per cent of the institutions surveyed. [2]The Report's recommendations included calls for the British authorities to reconsider their relationship to the Muslim Council of Britain, the Islamic Foundation and the Muslim Safety Forum.[3]
The report's findings were widely covered in the British media with articles appearing in, for example, The Daily Mail [4], the Daily Telegraph[5] and The Times.[6] According to Newsnight editor Peter Barron, the BBC had originally been due to run an exclusive report on the findings:
On the planned day of broadcast our reporter Richard Watson came to me and said he had a problem. He had put the claim and shown a receipt to one of the mosques mentioned in the report - The Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre in London. They had immediately denied selling the book and said the receipt was not theirs.
On closer examination, the BBC identified particular concerns about five of the receipts in particular:
- In all five cases the mosques involved said the receipts did not belong to them.
- The expert analysis showed that all five had been printed on an inkjet printer - suggesting they were created on a PC.
- The analysis found "strong evidence" that two of the receipts were written by the same person.
- The analysis found that one of the receipts had been written out while resting on another receipt said to be from a mosque 40 miles away. [7]
Dean Godson, Newsnight, 12 December 2007.
On 12 December 2007, Newsnight ran a report on these concerns, followed by a studio discussion between Jeremy Paxman and Dean Godson, during which Godson accused Barron of 'disastrous editorial misjudgement' and of 'appalling stewardship of Newsnight'. [8]
An initial statement on 12 December, 'the executive of Policy Exchange will meet on Thursday 13th to discuss legal action against the BBC'. [9]A second response the next day stated that 'Policy Exchange is in legal consultations about action in this matter.'[10]The BBC responded: 'Policy Exchange's statement is misleading in many ways and doesn't answer the simple question raised by Newsnight's film. Given that the Policy Exchange report was based on the testimony of the researchers who gathered the receipts, do they believe all the receipts are genuine?'[11]
In the Daily Telegraph on 15 December, Policy Exchange Chairman Charles Moore accused Peter Barron of questioning the receipts in order to justify his original decision not to run the report.
Given that the report was being published that night, the obvious thing for Newsnight to do was to broadcast Policy Exchange's findings at once, allowing the mosques to have their say about the receipts.
There was no need for Newsnight to claim "ownership" of the report. Instead, the editor, Peter Barron, decided to run nothing. His decision meant the Policy Exchange report was not touched by the BBC at all.[12]
On 17 December, The Times issued an apology to Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari of the East London Mosque in connection with its coverage of the report.[13]
In February 2008, Private Eye reported that 'furious Conservatives say they've no option but to sue or take a dossier on Peter Barron, Newsnight's editor, to the BBC's senior management.'[14]In a letter in the following issue, Barron responded 'Policy Exchange promised to investigate these discrepancies, but two months later they have still not said if they believe these receipts are genuine.'[15]
In March 2009, the report appeared to have been removed from the Policy Exchange website, where the following statement appeared:
The Hijacking of British Islam:
Al-Manaar Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre
In this report we state that Al-Manaar Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre is one of the Centres where extremist literature was found. Policy Exchange accepts the Centre’s assurances that none of the literature cited in the Report has ever been sold or distributed at the Centre with the knowledge or consent of the Centre’s trustees or staff, who condemn the extremist and intolerant views set out in such literature. We are happy to set the record straight. [16][17]
In September 2008, the North London Central Mosque issued a writ in the High Court over the report's allegations. [18] The case came to the High Court in December 2009 but was struck out by the Judge on the basis that the Trust could not sue in defamation as it was not a corporate entity or legal person. [19]
References
- ↑ The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK, by Denis MacEoin, Policy Exchange, 29 October 2007.
- ↑ The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK, by Denis MacEoin, Policy Exchange, 29 October 2007, p.5.
- ↑ The Hijacking of British Islam: How Extremist Literature is Subverting Mosques in the UK, by Denis MacEoin, Policy Exchange, 29 October 2007, p7.
- ↑ Excerpts from articles featuring Policy Exchange - October 30 2007: Daily Mail: Agenda of hate in British mosques is linked to Saudis, Policy Exchange (accessed 9 March 2008)
- ↑ Toby Helm, 'Hate literature easily found at UK mosques'', Daily Telegraph, 31 October 2007.
- ↑ Sean O'Neill, Lessons in hate found at leading mosques, The Times, 30 October 2007.
- ↑ 'Disastrous misjudgement?', by Peter Barron, BBC News - The Editors, 13 December 2007.
- ↑ BBC News - Talk About Newsnight - Newsnight Response to Policy Exchange Statement, 14 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.
- ↑ Policy Exchange and BBC Newsnight, Policy Exchange, 12 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.
- ↑ Policy Exchange and Newsnight (2),Policy Exchange, 13 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.
- ↑ BBC News - Talk About Newsnight - Newsnight Response to Policy Exchange Statement, 14 December 2007, accessed 9 March 2008.
- ↑ Charles Moore, 'Newsnight told a small story over a big one', Daily Telegraph, 15 December 2007
- ↑ Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, The Times, 17 December 2007.
- ↑ Media News: Newsnight and the Mosques, by 'Ratbiter', Private Eye No. 1203, 8 February-21 February 2008, p.8.
- ↑ Receipt deceit? by Peter Barron, Private Eye No.1204, 22 February-6 March 2008, p.15
- ↑ Sunny Hundal, Exclusive: Policy Exchange forced to apologise; takes report off website, Liberal Conspiracy, 30 March 2009.
- ↑ Policy Exchange, accessed 2 April 2009.
- ↑ London mosque sues think-tank, by Megan Murphy, FT.com, 23 September 2008; North London Central Mosque v. The Policy Exchange and Denis McEoin, claim number HQ08X03441, filed 4 September 2008
- ↑ 'Eady: Mosque charitable trust can't sue for libel', Press Gazette, 22 December 2009.
