Difference between revisions of "Center for Security Policy"
(→History) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In 1987, Frank Gaffney broke with the Reagan administration over its decision to pursue treaties that aimed for nuclear arms reduction in cooperation with the Soviet Union. Gaffney argued against this policy and continued to push for a hard-line, anti-Soviet rhetoric and the continued buildup of nuclear weapons. The following year he founded the Center for Security Policy, basing it loosely on the Committee for Present Danger, which had taken up the same aggressive opposition to nuclear arms reduction. Gaffney and his colleagues were quick to criticise the Republican President for moving towards liberal governance and preferred to push claims about the level of threat posed to the United States by the Red Menace and the need to possess a much larger nuclear arsenal than that of their rival. | In 1987, Frank Gaffney broke with the Reagan administration over its decision to pursue treaties that aimed for nuclear arms reduction in cooperation with the Soviet Union. Gaffney argued against this policy and continued to push for a hard-line, anti-Soviet rhetoric and the continued buildup of nuclear weapons. The following year he founded the Center for Security Policy, basing it loosely on the Committee for Present Danger, which had taken up the same aggressive opposition to nuclear arms reduction. Gaffney and his colleagues were quick to criticise the Republican President for moving towards liberal governance and preferred to push claims about the level of threat posed to the United States by the Red Menace and the need to possess a much larger nuclear arsenal than that of their rival. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===1992 - 2000=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | During the Carter and Clinton administrations, the group who formed the basis for the Center for Security Policy, the neoconservatives, found themselves in opposition to a Democratic administration with different foreign policy aims and methodologies. Along with the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the CSP became the main bedrock of shadow defence policy during the 1990s,<ref>Jason Vest, [http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020902/vest The Men From JINSA and CSP], The Nation, 15 August 2002, accessed 4th March 2008</ref> a time when the group helped to bring the militarisation of space from the realm of science fiction to almost reality. One of their elaborate claims throughout the 1990s resulted in support for the newly created Project for a New American Century, in which a letter was signed by several prominent CSP members, among others, and sent to President Clinton to urge him to attack Iraq due to the “scourge of Saddam and the weapons of mass destruction that he refuses to relinquish.” <ref> Right Web [http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1456.html Center for Security Policy] accessed 4th March 2008</ref> Gaffney was also proud of his group’s involvement in both the Rumsfeld Missile Commission and the Rumsfeld Space Commission which both suggested that the United States was under far more of a threat than previously suggested and, of course, that is realistically was. Gaffney has been known to describe his baby, the CSP, as the “Dominos Pizza of the policy business” <ref> Media Transparency [http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientgrants.php?recipientID=489 Recipent Grants: The Center for Security Policy] accessed 4th March 2008</ref> due to it’s speed at being responding to any situation with a demand and suggestion for policy, usually of a hard-line, neoconservative nature. | ||
| + | |||
==Center for Security Policy Board of Directors== | ==Center for Security Policy Board of Directors== | ||
Revision as of 08:39, 11 August 2009
Center for Security Policy is a Washington-based organization set up by the hardline neocon Frank Gaffney, who worked in the defence department during the Ronald Reagan era. According to Jim Lobe, it is a "a small think tank funded mainly by U.S. defence contractors, far-right foundations, and right-wing Zionists".[1] It operates with the tagline 'promoting peace through strength', by which they appear to mean that global US dominance is the route to peace.
The Center states its mission as follows:
- To identify challenges and opportunities likely to affect American security, broadly defined, and to act promptly and creatively to ensure that they are the subject of focused national examination and effective action.[2]
The Center has run campaigns and research on the subjects of nuclear deterrents, the war of ideas, weapons in space, Islamism and terror, among others.[3] Indeed Frank J. Gaffney Jnr describes his Center for Security Policy as "the special forces in the war of ideas"[4], stating that it has the advantage over a think tank of not being "slow and unwieldy" and being "able to turn around a product in a matter of hours".[5]
Contents
History
1976-1988
Important in itself, the Committee on the Present Danger’s (CPD) second incarnation in the 1970s and early 1980s was an extremely important predecessor to the Center for Security Policy. Set up as an independent and not-for-profit organisation, it was to assess the Soviet Union’s capabilities and threat to the United States in a non-partisan way. The group was originally called ‘Team B’ in opposition to the ‘Team A’ which currently did this job for the CIA, and had a political base through the Coalition for a Democratic Majority which was founded to try and fight back against any concessions made by the Democrats to the Soviet Union with regards to Foreign Policy. In 1976, this group helped set up the Committee for Present Danger to put pressure on Democrat President Jimmy Carter. The parallels with groups such as the Center for Security Policy can be shown by looking at who have been members of both – Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and even Ronald Reagan in 1979.
1988-1992
In 1987, Frank Gaffney broke with the Reagan administration over its decision to pursue treaties that aimed for nuclear arms reduction in cooperation with the Soviet Union. Gaffney argued against this policy and continued to push for a hard-line, anti-Soviet rhetoric and the continued buildup of nuclear weapons. The following year he founded the Center for Security Policy, basing it loosely on the Committee for Present Danger, which had taken up the same aggressive opposition to nuclear arms reduction. Gaffney and his colleagues were quick to criticise the Republican President for moving towards liberal governance and preferred to push claims about the level of threat posed to the United States by the Red Menace and the need to possess a much larger nuclear arsenal than that of their rival.
1992 - 2000
During the Carter and Clinton administrations, the group who formed the basis for the Center for Security Policy, the neoconservatives, found themselves in opposition to a Democratic administration with different foreign policy aims and methodologies. Along with the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the CSP became the main bedrock of shadow defence policy during the 1990s,[6] a time when the group helped to bring the militarisation of space from the realm of science fiction to almost reality. One of their elaborate claims throughout the 1990s resulted in support for the newly created Project for a New American Century, in which a letter was signed by several prominent CSP members, among others, and sent to President Clinton to urge him to attack Iraq due to the “scourge of Saddam and the weapons of mass destruction that he refuses to relinquish.” [7] Gaffney was also proud of his group’s involvement in both the Rumsfeld Missile Commission and the Rumsfeld Space Commission which both suggested that the United States was under far more of a threat than previously suggested and, of course, that is realistically was. Gaffney has been known to describe his baby, the CSP, as the “Dominos Pizza of the policy business” [8] due to it’s speed at being responding to any situation with a demand and suggestion for policy, usually of a hard-line, neoconservative nature.
Center for Security Policy Board of Directors
Chairman of the Board
- James T. de Graffenreid Chairman & President, HP Associates
Directors
- M.D.B. Carlisle Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs, and former Chief of Staff to Senator Thad Cochran
- Terry Elkes Principal & Co-Owner, Apollo Partners, LLC
- Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. President, Center for Security Policy
- Lt. Col. Marlin L. Hefti, USMC (Ret.) Vice President, Van Scoyoc Associates
- Charles M. Kupperman
- Dominic J. Monetta President, Resource Alternatives, Inc.
- David P. Steinmann (JINSA)
- Allen M. Taylor Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
National Security Advisory Council
CSP Board of Advisors has been renamed the National Security Advisory Council(NSAC). Most of its memberships overlaps with the Committee on the Present Danger, including one of the same honorary co-chair.
- Jon Kyl - Honorary co-chairman
- James Woolsey - Honorary co-chairman
Contact
Website: http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org
Related Articles
- Jim Lobe, Neo-Cons Driving Iran Divestment Campaign, InterPress Service, 11 May 2007.
Notes
- ↑ Jim Lobe, Neo-Con Superhawk Earns His Wings on Port Flap, IPS News, 24 February 2006.
- ↑ Center for Security Policy "The Center's Role in National Security Policy accessed 26th February 2008
- ↑ Center for Security Policy Center for Security Policy Projects accessed 26th February 2008
- ↑ Common Dreams News Center Neo-Con Superhawk Earns His Wings on Port Flap accessed 26th February 2008
- ↑ The Washington Times Keeper of the flame for foreign-policy hard-liners accessed 26th of February 2008
- ↑ Jason Vest, The Men From JINSA and CSP, The Nation, 15 August 2002, accessed 4th March 2008
- ↑ Right Web Center for Security Policy accessed 4th March 2008
- ↑ Media Transparency Recipent Grants: The Center for Security Policy accessed 4th March 2008
