Difference between revisions of "Nuclear Industry Association"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Closer Co-operation with the Unions)
m (added lobbyists)
 
(108 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Template:NuclearSpin}}
 +
{{NuclearNavbar}}
  
−
==People==
+
The [[Nuclear Industry Association]] (NIA) is the trade association and "representative voice" of the UK’s civil nuclear industry. It represents almost 60,000 UK nuclear workers across more than 260 member companies.<ref>[http://www.niauk.org Home page], Nuclear Industry Association, undated, accessed 29 October 2012</ref>
  
−
* [[Philip Dewhurst]]- Chair
+
*For an overview of NIA lobbying up until 2007 see [[Lobbying by the NIA in the mid-noughties]].
  
−
* [[Keith Parker]] - Chief Executive
+
==Spinning Fukushima==
 +
In June 2011, the NIA was involved in a public relations strategy to play down the Fukushima nuclear accident before the full extent of the radiation leak was known.
  
−
* [[Norman Buckley]] Business Development Manager
+
''The Guardian'' revealed that an official at the [[ Department for Business, Innovation and Skills]] emailed the NIA and nuclear companies on 13 March 2011, two days after the disaster. The official argued it was not as bad as the "dramatic" TV pictures made it seem – even though two explosions at reactors on the site were yet to happen. The official said that if companies sent in their comments, they could be incorporated into briefs to ministers and government statements.
  
−
* [[Sandra Evenden]] Accounts Administrator
+
On 7 April 2011, the [[Department for Energy and Climate Change]]'s [[Office for Nuclear Development]] invited companies to attend a meeting at the NIA's headquarters in London. The aim was "to discuss a joint communications and engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain confidence among the British public on the safety of nuclear power stations and nuclear new-build policy in light of recent events at the Fukushima nuclear power plant".<ref>Rob Edwards, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/30/british-government-plan-play-down-fukushima?INTCMP=SRCH Revealed: British government's plan to play down Fukushima], ''The Guardian'', 30 June 2011</ref>
  
−
* [[Simon James]] Communications Manager
+
==Access to Government intelligence==
 +
In December 2011, ''The Guardian'' revealed how the [[Office for Nuclear Development]] was "quietly exchanging intelligence on key policies" with nuclear companies and the NIA "in an effort to protect and promote their plans for new nuclear power stations".
  
−
* [[Miranda Kirschel]] -Corporate Affairs Manager
+
It sent the body details of its court battle against [[Greenpeace]], which was trying to block the Government's nuclear plans.<ref>Rob Edwards, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/05/uk-government-intelligence-nuclear-industry?INTCMP=SRCH UK government shared intelligence with nuclear industry, documents show], ''The Guardian'', 5 December 2011</ref> (Its action was dropped in October 2013).
  
−
==In Bed With the Sceptics==
+
== Friends in high places==
  
−
The NIA has had close involvement with the known climate sceptic and pro-GM organisation the [[Scientific Alliance]] in their joint quest to push nuclear power.
+
In May 2010, the NIA reacted positively to the formation of the Coalition government. Although worried by the appointment of the then Energy Secretary [[Chris Huhne]], the NIA was “particularly pleased to see the appointment of [[Charles Hendry]] to the Energy job.”
  
−
In NIA's October/November 2003 newsletter, Mia Nybrant from the Scientific Alliance wrote that "The goal of truly sustainable and emissions friendly energy has to include the nuclear industry."
+
At the NIA's Summer Party at the [[Royal Society]], Hendry applauded the efforts of the industry in readying itself for "a nuclear renaissance". “I am always impressed by the nuclear industry. I have enjoyed working with many of you in my former role in opposition – and now that I am part of this new government I look forward to working with you to deliver a secure energy future for the UK,” he said.<ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_29.pdf What a Party that Was!], IndustryLink, Issue No.29, Autumn 2010</ref>
  
−
Nybant addded that "The Scientific Alliance has been playing a key role in challenging government energy policy. The highlight of the campaign so far was the The conference "2020 Vision – Powering the UK’s Future" in May this year, which examined the scientific underpinnings of the major energy sources as set out in the Energy White Paper, and facilitated dialogue between the DTI and stakeholders. Adrian Ham, former Chief Executive of the NIA, put forward the case for nuclear power to retain a role in UK energy supply, warning of the perils of increased reliance on gas and the loss of nuclear expertise."
+
The NIA was quick to spin its low-carbon message to other members of the new Coalition government. [[Keith Parker]], the head of the NIA said: “We will continue to get our key message, that nuclear should be at the heart of the UK’s low-carbon agenda, across to the most influential audiences.” The NIA’s Public Affairs and Communications teams were said to be “busy making contact to continue representing the industry to key policymakers and politicians of influence”. <ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_28.pdf New friends in high places as government beds in], Industry Link, Issue No.28, Summer 2010, p5 </ref>
  
−
Nybrant talked about the clear need to change government policy: "Given the current state of the debate, there are clear challenges for the nuclear industry; however, they are not insurmountable as long as there is a focused programme to change the current government policy." [http://www.niauk.org/industrylink/article_46.shtml]
+
“Starting at the TUC in September and finishing with the Conservatives in Birmingham, in early October, the NIA will be exhibiting, debating, networking, defending and messaging on behalf of UK nuclear,” wrote the NIA’s then Head of Media and Public Relations at the NIA. <ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_29.pdf Editor’s Eye], IndustryLink, Issue No.29 Autumn 2010, p3</ref>
  
−
Just under a year later, in September 2004, the two organisations held two joint seminars on "Nuclear Solutions - The Finnish Experience". The first was at Portcullis House, in Westminster.
+
A year later, the NIA was also extremely active at the Party Conference season. Its newsletter described how the “NIA descended on Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester for 3 weeks of engagement with politicians, grassroots party members and other organisations.” The NIA’s favourite minister, Energy Minister Charles Hendry MP spoke to a packed out room at Conservative Party Conference. His conference speech recognised nuclear energy to be “the cheapest low-carbon source of electricity, so it can keep bills down and the lights on."<ref> IndustryLink, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_34.pdf Political Conference Season 2011], Issue No.34 Winter 2011, p10-11</ref>
−
[http://www.scientific-alliance.org/events_items/future_events/nuclearsolutions_seminar.htm] The second was in Brighton to coincide with the Labour Party Conference. The chair of the second event was Bill Olner MP, from the [[All Party Parliamentary Group on Nuclear Energy]].
 
−
[http://www.scientific-alliance.org/events_items/future_events/nuclearsolutions29sept04.htm]
 
−
The full costs of the visit of the Finnish nuclear experts for the seminas was paid for by [[BNFL]]. [K. Parker (2004) Email to S. Tustin, 28 July]
 
  
−
In June 2005, the NIA held a a futher debate with the Alliance called "The Challenge for Nuclear: The Policy, the Science and the Need for Public Engagement."[http://www.scientific-alliance.org/pdf/The%20Challenge%20for%20Nuclear%20-%20Proceedings.pdf]
+
== Working with the Government on the carbon floor price ==
  
 +
Keith Parker was quick to let slip that the NIA was seeking to lobby the government on the carbon floor price, a key mechanism by which the government might surreptitiously subsidise nuclear. “We look forward to working with [[Chris Huhne]] and his team and we note the encouraging words on setting a carbon price, something the industry is supporting, to send a clear signal to investors that low carbon technologies including renewables and nuclear play the key role in delivering the UK’s energy future.” <ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_28.pdf New friends in high places as government beds in], IndustryLink, Issue No.28, Summer 2010, p5 </ref>
  
−
==Closer Co-operation with the Unions==
+
=='We must learn lessons” of Fukushima' ==  
  
−
Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show that the NIA are trying to forge closer ties to the unions in the new nuclear push. In October 2005, Keith Parker wrote a letter to Robbie Huston from BNFL:
+
After the Fukushima disaster, Keith Parker, the head of the NIA wrote that the “UK has made huge progress in recent years in turning around what was generally regarded as a sunset industry, enduring a slow and not very graceful decline, into one with bright and optimistic prospects that is destined now to be a cornerstone of the nation’s energy needs well into the future".
  
−
"Dear Robbie
+
Despite this, he praised the government’s “sensible and measured approach” in response to the catastrophic accident at Fukushima, arguing that “we have to be prepared to learn and apply the lessons of Japan just as we did the lessons of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.” <ref> Keith Parker, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_31.pdf From the Top], IndustryLink, Issue No.31 Spring 2011, p8 </ref>
  
−
A couple of weeks ago [[Tony Cooper]] and I  met Philip [Dewhurst] and Ipek to go through NIA's forward communications and public affairs plans. One of the items we discussed was improved co-operation between NIA and the industry's trade union organisations, and closer co-ordination and understanding of messages and activities. We are fairly close to TUSNE and are talking to them about forging stronger links with NIA. However Tony and I would like the opportunity to talk to officials of Nuclear 21 [[nUKclear21]] - who we know less well - to explain what NIA's strategy is, and explore whether there could be closer communication between us so that the industry and its advocates are giving consistent messages. Philip agreed this was a good idea and suggested we contact you to arrange a meeting up at Sellafield." [K.  Parker (2005) Email Re: ''Meeting BNFL Trade Unions'', 28 October]
+
=='Support for nuclear new build now the highest it has ever been' ==
  
−
==Nuclear Media Training==
+
In spring 2012, the [[Nuclear Industry Association]] (NIA) argued that “After the unprecedented tsunami in Japan last March and the damage inflicted upon the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, it was hardly surprising that a poll conducted in June 2011 saw a drop in public support for nuclear, with the results showing that people with favourable opinions about nuclear fell from 40% to 28% and unfavourable opinions increased from 17% to 24%.”
  
−
Several key members of NIA - [[Simon James]], [[Miranda Kirschel]], [[Ruth Stanway]] and [[Keith Parker]], were the recipients of an email from Belinda Yates, from [[BNFL]]'s Corporate Affairs Department, along with, amongst others, [[Professor Phil Thomas]] from City Univerty, [[Lisa Woolhouse]] and [[Philip Dewhurst]], [[Sue Ion]], [[Richard Mayson]], and [[Adrian Bull]] from [[BNFL]], entitled: "Media Training  Workshop 2"
+
It continued: “However, a recent survey conducted in December 2011 by Ipsos MORI has indicated that the dip in support for nuclear energy has been short-lived, with figures all but returning to those marked in polls conducted before Fukushima - favourability towards the industry recovered to 40% and unfavourable opinions reduced to 19%.”
  
−
The email, dated 2 June 05 stated:
+
Keith Parker argued that, "The poll clearly shows that public opinion has not only recovered from last summer’s dip but it has also resumed its gradual year-on year improvement. The 50% support figure for new build is the highest it has ever been." <ref> NIA, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_35.pdf Nuclear: What do the public think?], ''IndustryLink'', Issue No.35 Spring 2012 </ref>
  
−
"Dear All
+
However, Professor [[Nick Pidgeon]], Director of the Understanding Risk Programme, Cardiff University, giving evidence to the House of Commons [[Science and Technology Select Committee]] argues that “a large proportion of recent support” for nuclear power “remain[s] conditional - a 'reluctant acceptance' at best" and added that "while many more in Britain have indeed come to support nuclear power over the past decade they do so while viewing it only as a 'devil's bargain', a choice of last resort in the face of the threat of climate change”. <ref> Science and Technology Select Committee, [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/428/42805.htm Devil's bargain? Energy risks and the public], 9 July 2012</ref>
  
−
You have been nominated to attend an upcoming one day media training session with [[Weber Shandwick]] ... This media training will following [sic] on from the last training session held in March this year. However there will only be the 10 of you participating in this workshop and therefore it will be
+
==Nuclear revolving door ==
−
a more 'hands on', intensive day with each of you partaking in television and radio interviews."
 
  
−
The date proposed for the Media Training was 31st August.
+
In mid-June 2011, the former Secretary of State for Energy, [[John Hutton]], became the Chair of the NIA.
  
−
[[Keith Parker]] responded by saying:
+
The NIA’s chief executive Keith Parker said, “We are at a key point for the development of the UK’s nuclear industry and we are delighted to welcome John Hutton as our chairman. In the wake of the events in Japan we must continue to move forward with confidence and credibility - and help the UK meet it’s security of supply and climate change goals. John Hutton is recognised internationally and he is the ideal person to lead the industry forward.” <ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_32.pdf John Hutton announced as NIA chairman], IndustryLink, Issue No.32 Summer 2011 </ref>
  
−
"Is it not possible to do it earlier? If, as we expect, the energy review is announced before Parilamentary recess in July we need to be well prepared to hit the airwaves confidently then, rather than in September. Best regards, Keith." [K. Parker (2005) ''RE: Media Training Workshop 2'', Email to Sue Ion and Belinda Yates, 3 June]
+
== Labour government commends NIA for low carbon message ==
  
−
==Behind the Scenes Briefing of the BBC==
+
At the 2010 Energy Choices conference, the then Energy Minister [[Lord Hunt]] said: “I must commend the work of the NIA in helping to get the positive message across that nuclear is an essential part of a low carbon future for the UK.” <ref> John McNamara, [http://www.niauk.org/images/industry_link/industrylink_27.pdf NIA’s Energy Choices strikes a chord], IndustryLink 27, Jan/Feb/March 2010 </ref>
  
−
In March 2005 the BBC ran a series of programmes called "If" looking at future scenarios on different issues. One of the programmes was on energy. The BBC trailed the programme by asking: "Could Britain be facing a widespread, catastrophic power cut in the future? The short answer is yes." [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/if/3487048.stm]. The programme was widely perceived as raising the issue of an energy shortage in the UK.
+
==People==
−
 
+
*[[John Hutton|Lord Hutton of Furness]], Chairman from June 2011
−
In the programme, the BBC interviewed pro-nuclear government advisor Professor [[Ian Fells]] who was quoted as saying: "Unless we make decisions now our electricity will start to run out within five years." The programme also quoted [[Tony Cooper]], the Chair of the NIA.
+
* [[Keith Parker]], Chief Executive from Sept 2003. Joined the NIA in 1995 from the UK [[Department of Trade and Industry]] and two years later became head of corporate communications.
−
 
+
* [[Kirsty Alexander]], Head of Communications
−
In an email to colleagues including people from BNFL and British Energy, [[Keith Parker]] said that "I and colleagues in NIA were involved in briefing the programme makers ... the programme is a powerful caution against relying on imported gas for Britain's electricity, and losing indigenous capacity."
+
* [[Alastair Evans]], Communications Officer
−
[K. Parker (2005) ''Re: If'', Email, 5 March]
+
* [[Sandra Evenden]], Accounts Administrator
−
 
+
* [[Hannah Grimsley]], Public Affairs Officer
−
The programme had helped put nuclear back on the political agenda.
+
* [[Peter Haslam]], Public Policy Advisor
−
 
+
* [[Veronica Lekavicius]], Head of Administration
−
 
+
* [[Rupert Lewis]], Communications Executive
−
==Funded by BNFL, Funding SONE==
+
* [[Stephanie McKenna]], Members Relations Manager
 +
* [[Dan Powney]], Website and Marketing Officer
 +
* [[Nikki Powney]], Member Relations and PA to the Chief Executive
 +
* [[Stephen Tustin]], Accountant
  
−
Documents released under Freedom of Information, show that on the 7 June 2004, Dorothy Seed from BNFL emailed Keith Parker.
+
===Former personnel===
 +
* [[Martin O'Neill]] (Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan) was chairman for three years until June 2011
 +
* [[Philip Dewhurst]], Former chairman
 +
* [[Simon James]], Communications Manager
 +
* [[John McNamara]] <ref> Gavin Stamp, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11096716 Lib Dems face extra lobbying push], BBC News, in Liverpool, 20 September 2010, accessed 8 May 2010 </ref> - now head of corporate communications at [[NuGen]] <ref> [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-mcnamara/24/4a8/b74 John McNamara], LinkedIn profile, undated, acc 4 October 2013 </ref>
  
−
"Keith
+
==Lobbyists==
 +
*[[Bell Pottinger Public Affairs]] handles public affairs for the NIA in 2014-2015
  
−
We spoke about the process for arranging paytment relating to SONE. Could you email me with the following words, so I can start off the process internally". The words were:
+
==NIA Members==
 +
[[ABB]] Limited | [[AECL]] | [[AK Engineering Services]] | [[Alpha Engineering]] | [[ALSTEC]] | [[AMEC]] Group | [[AMEC NNC]] | [[AN Technology]] | [[Arup]] | [[Ashurst]] | [[Atentis]] Limited | [[AT Group]] Ltd | [[Atkins Nuclear]] | [[AWE]] Plc | [[Bechtel Management Company]] Ltd |  [[Birse Nuclear]] | [[BNFL]] | [[Boulting Group]] Plc | [[Bradtec Decon Technologies]] Ltd | [[British Energy]] Plc | [[British Shielding Windows]] Ltd | [[Brown and Mason]] Ltd | [[Canberra Harwell]] Ltd | [[Capula]] Ltd | [[Carillion]] Plc | [[Cee Vee Engineering]] Ltd | [[Centronic]] Ltd | [[CH2M Hill]] | [[CMS Cameron McKenna]] | [[Corbis Consulting]] Ltd | [[Corus Northern Engineering Services]] | [[Corus Process Engineering]] | [[Costain Oil, Gas and Process]] Ltd | [[Data Systems & Solution]] Ltd | [[Day & Zimmerman]] Ltd | [[DentonWildeSapte]] | [[Different by Design]] | [[DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary]] | [[E C Harris]] | [[Edmund Nuttall]] Ltd | [[Electrowatt-Ekono]] (UK) Ltd [[Energy Institute]] | [[Entec UK]] Ltd | [[Fathoms]] Ltd | [[FCx Thompson Valves]] | [[Fluor]] Government Group | [[Foster Wheeler Energy]] Ltd |  [[Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer]] | [[GENII Engineering & Technology Training]] Ltd | [[Gleeds]] | [[Golder Associates]] (UK) Ltd | [[Gravatom Engineering Systems]] Ltd | [[H Smith (Engineers)]] Ltd | [[Halcrow Group]] Ltd | [[Hammonds]] | [[Herbert Smith]] | [[Hertel Services]] Ltd |  [[Hochtief (UK) Construction]] Ltd | [[Hogan & Hartson]] | [[IJS Consultants]] | [[Imaging & Sensing Technology]] Ltd | [[IMI Components]] | [[Imperial College]] London | [[INBIS Group]] Plc | [[Jacobs Babtie]] Ltd | [[Jacobs]] Ltd | [[Jordan Engineering UK]] Ltd | [[KDC Group]] | [[Kier Construction]] | [[Laboratory Impex Systems]]  | [[Lumis]] LLP | [[Marubeni Europe]] Plc | [[McGrigors]] | [[Mitsui Babcock Energy]] Ltd | MHF Logistical Solutions | [[Montgomery Watson Harza]] | [[Mott MacDonald]] | [[Mowlem Nuclear Services]] Ltd | [[Nirex]] | [[NIS Group]] | [[Northwest Development Agency]] | [[Norton Rose]] | [[Norwest Holst Construction]] Ltd | [[Nuclear Engineering Services]] Ltd | [[Nuclear Risk Insurers]] Ltd | [[Nuclear Technologies]] Plc | [[Nu-Tech Associates]] | [[One North East | [[Parsons Brinckerhoff]] Limited | [[Pinsent Masons Solicitors]] | [[Praxis High Intergrity Systems]] Ltd | Radwise Limited | Redcliffe Ltd | [[RM Consultants]] Ltd | [[RTS Innovation]] Ltd | [[RWE NUKEM]] Ltd | [[Scottish Enterprise Energy Team]] | [[SEC-UK Nuclear]] Ltd | [[Semple Fraser]] | [[Speechly Bircham]] | [[SERCO]] Assurance | [[Simmons & Simmons]] | [[Sinclair Knight Merz]] | [[Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd]] | [[SMT Consulting]] | [[Southern Scientific]] Ltd | [[Speechly Bircham]] | [[Studsvik UK]] Ltd | [[Syngensis]] Ltd | [[Taylor Woodrow Construction]] | The [[Engineering Business]] Ltd | [[Thermo Electron Corporation]] | [[Tokyo Electric Power Company]] Inc | [[Trinity May]] Ltd | [[UKAEA]] | [[Urenco]] Ltd | [[URS Corporation]] Ltd | [[VECTRA Group]] Limited | [[Washington E&C]] Ltd | [[Weir Strachan & Henshaw]] Ltd | [[Weir Valves & Controls UK]] Ltd. | [[WSP Environmental]] <ref>The Nuclear Industry Association website is [http://www.niauk.org/ here], although the list was removed from the website in early 2006. This list was current up until January, 2006.</ref>
  
−
"I can confirm that the NIA will provide services relating to support for nuclear energy, specifically for activities carried out by SONE. The cost of this activity for 2004/5 is £21k, to be paid immediately in one annual instalment. We will provide you with service entry details for this, which you then can quote on your invoices to us". [D. Seed (2004) RE: ''Service Agreement for SONE'', Email to Keith Parker, 7 June]
+
==Evidence to government committees==
 +
*[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/428/428vw10.htm Science & Technology Committee Written evidence submitted by the Nuclear Industry Association (Risk 11)], 14 December 2011
  
−
On the 17th October 2005, [[Keith Parker]] from the NIA wrote to Theresa Dickinson of the Energy Unit at BNFL, regarding the "Proposal for Provision of Service". The letter read:
+
==Affiliations==
 +
*[[Nuclear Industry Association]] was a donor to the [[Science Media Centre]] in 2013 according to the SMC.<ref>Data from Internet Archive holdings of the Science Media Centre website, 2002-2013.
 +
*Aug 2013 Science Media Centre, 'Funding' August 2013 screengrab of http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/about-us/funding/, taken 16 August 2013.
 +
</ref>
  
−
"Dear Theresa
+
==Resources==
  
−
We detail below the activities to keeping the nuclear option open. Would you please arrange to issue Purchase Orders so that payment may be claimed
+
*See Powerbase profile on [[NIA Programme Management Board]]
 +
*Rob Edwards, [http://www.spinwatch.org/-articles-by-category-mainmenu-8/67-nuclear/5487-waiving-the-rules-to-keep-the-nuclear-power-programme-on-course Waiving the rules to keep the nuclear power programme on course], Private Eye, 21 March 2012
 +
*Nuclear Industry Association, [http://www.nuclearsupplychain.com/new-industry-map UK Nuclear Industry Map], SC@nuclear project
  
−
1. Additional support to NIA to assist in information delivery and influencing on nuclear energy issues - fixed payment of £21k"
+
==Contact==
 +
:Carlton House
 +
:22a St James’s Square
 +
:London SW1Y 4JH
 +
:UK
 +
:Tel: +44(0)20 7766 6640
 +
:Fax: +44(0)20 7839 1523
 +
:Email: info@niauk.org
  
−
2. Blanked out under BNFL
+
===Notes===
  
−
3. Blanked out by BNFL
+
<references/>
−
 
 
−
4. Blanked out by BNFL
 
−
 
 
−
5. "Funding to support KNOO awareness meeetings and payment of speakers on the industry's behalf - limit of liability £10K
 
−
 
 
−
6. Funding to support MORI research on public attitudes towards energy / nuclear energy - limit of liability £12K
 
−
 
 
−
Total Value: £102.2k"
 
−
 
 
−
[K. Parker (2005) ''Proposal for Provision of Services'', Letter to T. Dickinson, 17 October]
 
−
 
 
−
== A Front For BNFL? ==
 
−
 
 
−
In July 2005, BNFL was asked to contribute to a special edition of ''Parliamentary Monitor'' on "future energy". Adrian Bull from BNFL wrote to colleagues that "I believe that any input should be via NIA based on our newly created briefing material ... Although we would of course be happy to work on it behind the scenes." [A. Bull (2005) Email to Belinda Yates, Richard Mayson and Brian Hoffmann, 20 July]
 
−
 
−
On 5th October 2005, The ''Financial Times'' ran an article by its political correspondent, Chris Adams, entitled "Blair risks revolt over new power stations", which stated: "Tony Blair risks a backbench rebellion if he decides to build a new generation of nuclear power stations, with survey evidence showing nearly half of Labour MPs opposed to the idea."
 
  
−
[C. Adams (2005) Blair Risks Revolt Over New Power Stations, ''The Financial Times'', p2]
+
===Documents===
 
   
 
   
−
At just over 8.AM that morning, Dorothy Seed from BNFL emailed Ruth Stanway at the NIA:
+
* S. Evenden [http://www.powerbase.info/images/1/1c/Nuc66.pdf Email Re: ''Labour party conference fringe event on trade 28/9/05'' (pdf)], 6 October, 2005.
−
 
 
−
"Ruth
 
−
 
 
−
I would propose a letter from Keith as follows:
 
−
 
 
−
Dorothy
 
−
 
 
−
A recent survey by MORI on behalf of the nuclear industry shows that the percentage of MPs who would support building new nuclear power stations to replace existing capacity slightly exceeds those who would oppose it..." [D. Seed (2005) Email to Ruth Stanway, 5 October, ]
 
−
 
 
−
Why was NIA writing to the FT on behalf of BFNL?
 
−
 
 
−
==The "Important" 2005 Conference Season - Cash for Access? ==
 
−
 
 
−
In July 2005, Keith Parker sent an email to numerous colleagues in the nuclear industry concerning the Autumn party conferences. Released under the Freedom of Information Act, most of the names have been blanked out, apart from John Mills and [[Philip Dewhurst]] at BNFL. The email read:
 
−
 
 
−
"Dear Colleagues
 
−
 
 
−
With the announcement of a Government energy review looking increasingly likley towards the end of the year, this autumn's political party confernces are particularly important for the nuclear industry. NIA will be present and active at all three major party conferences and at the TUC conference"
 
−
 
 
−
Further documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show the extent of the lobbying by the NIA, [[TUC]], [[BNFL]], [[British Energy]] and [[Trade Unionists for Safe Nuclear Energy]] (TUSNE) during the 2005 party conference season:
 
−
 
 
−
* Lib Dem Conference, Blackpool  - On Monday, 19 September, the NIA sponsored a Centre for Reform fringe debate with John Thurso who has Dounreay in his constituency. The following evening it held a reception at the Imperial Hotel, followed by a Dinner;
 
−
 
 
−
* Labour Conference, Brighton - On Monday, 26 September [[TUSNE]] held a lunch at the same time as [[BNLF]] / New Statesman held an event together. That evening [[BNFL]] held a dinner. The following day, the NIA held a fringe meeting on the Economics of the New Build, with [[Lisa Woolhouse]] amongst others. In the evening there was the "British Nuclear Group" disco, called "rock around the clock". On the Wednesday the NIA sponsored a Fabian Society debate on energy policy and in the evening the NIA/[[British Energy]] sponsored a TUSNE dinner.
 
−
 
 
−
* Conservative Conference, Blackpool - On Wednesday 5th October, the NIA held a reception and Dinner at the Imperial Hotel with [[Bernard Jenkin]] the Shadow Energy Minister for the Conservatives and [[Evan Harris]] for the Liberal Democrats.
 
−
[Ref: Conferences 2005 - Timetable for TUSNE, BNFL, British Energy and NIA at TUC and Party Conferences]
 
−
 
 
−
Parker's July email went on to note that:
 
−
 
 
−
"All of these activities clearly have cost and resource implications and I am writing to you to ask for your company's support at this crucial time. If each company represented on the Board were able to pledge £2000 towards NIA's conference costs it would ensure a strong and effective presence, and enable us to commission high quality information materials for distribution to delegates. In return we can offer your company the chance to display your logo and literature on the stand, invitations to the fringes and receptions and dinners (places are limited for the dinners), and Subject to adequate notice (by 31 August)passes for the conference centres which will allow you or another named representative to enter the secure zone and to meet MPs and delegates. NIA can try to arrange meetings, again given adequate notice." [K. Parker (2005) Email Regarding: ''Party Conferences'', 26 July.]
 
  
−
BNFL donated £8225 to NIA for the "Party Conferences 2005" [NIA (2005) Invoice to BNFL - Contribution Towards Party Conferences 2005, 29 September]
+
* K. Parker [http://www.spinprofiles.org/images/5/52/Nuc59.pdf Email Re: ''Service agreement for SONE'' (pdf)], 8 June, 2004.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Nuclear Spin]]
 +
[[Category:Nuclear: UK]]
 +
[[Category:Pro-nuclear organisations]]
 +
[[Category:Nuclear revolving door]]
 +
[[Category:Science Media Centre]]

Latest revision as of 01:24, 10 March 2015

Nuclear spin.png This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch.


The Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) is the trade association and "representative voice" of the UK’s civil nuclear industry. It represents almost 60,000 UK nuclear workers across more than 260 member companies.[1]

Spinning Fukushima

In June 2011, the NIA was involved in a public relations strategy to play down the Fukushima nuclear accident before the full extent of the radiation leak was known.

The Guardian revealed that an official at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills emailed the NIA and nuclear companies on 13 March 2011, two days after the disaster. The official argued it was not as bad as the "dramatic" TV pictures made it seem – even though two explosions at reactors on the site were yet to happen. The official said that if companies sent in their comments, they could be incorporated into briefs to ministers and government statements.

On 7 April 2011, the Department for Energy and Climate Change's Office for Nuclear Development invited companies to attend a meeting at the NIA's headquarters in London. The aim was "to discuss a joint communications and engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain confidence among the British public on the safety of nuclear power stations and nuclear new-build policy in light of recent events at the Fukushima nuclear power plant".[2]

Access to Government intelligence

In December 2011, The Guardian revealed how the Office for Nuclear Development was "quietly exchanging intelligence on key policies" with nuclear companies and the NIA "in an effort to protect and promote their plans for new nuclear power stations".

It sent the body details of its court battle against Greenpeace, which was trying to block the Government's nuclear plans.[3] (Its action was dropped in October 2013).

Friends in high places

In May 2010, the NIA reacted positively to the formation of the Coalition government. Although worried by the appointment of the then Energy Secretary Chris Huhne, the NIA was “particularly pleased to see the appointment of Charles Hendry to the Energy job.”

At the NIA's Summer Party at the Royal Society, Hendry applauded the efforts of the industry in readying itself for "a nuclear renaissance". “I am always impressed by the nuclear industry. I have enjoyed working with many of you in my former role in opposition – and now that I am part of this new government I look forward to working with you to deliver a secure energy future for the UK,” he said.[4]

The NIA was quick to spin its low-carbon message to other members of the new Coalition government. Keith Parker, the head of the NIA said: “We will continue to get our key message, that nuclear should be at the heart of the UK’s low-carbon agenda, across to the most influential audiences.” The NIA’s Public Affairs and Communications teams were said to be “busy making contact to continue representing the industry to key policymakers and politicians of influence”. [5]

“Starting at the TUC in September and finishing with the Conservatives in Birmingham, in early October, the NIA will be exhibiting, debating, networking, defending and messaging on behalf of UK nuclear,” wrote the NIA’s then Head of Media and Public Relations at the NIA. [6]

A year later, the NIA was also extremely active at the Party Conference season. Its newsletter described how the “NIA descended on Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester for 3 weeks of engagement with politicians, grassroots party members and other organisations.” The NIA’s favourite minister, Energy Minister Charles Hendry MP spoke to a packed out room at Conservative Party Conference. His conference speech recognised nuclear energy to be “the cheapest low-carbon source of electricity, so it can keep bills down and the lights on."[7]

Working with the Government on the carbon floor price

Keith Parker was quick to let slip that the NIA was seeking to lobby the government on the carbon floor price, a key mechanism by which the government might surreptitiously subsidise nuclear. “We look forward to working with Chris Huhne and his team and we note the encouraging words on setting a carbon price, something the industry is supporting, to send a clear signal to investors that low carbon technologies including renewables and nuclear play the key role in delivering the UK’s energy future.” [8]

'We must learn lessons” of Fukushima'

After the Fukushima disaster, Keith Parker, the head of the NIA wrote that the “UK has made huge progress in recent years in turning around what was generally regarded as a sunset industry, enduring a slow and not very graceful decline, into one with bright and optimistic prospects that is destined now to be a cornerstone of the nation’s energy needs well into the future".

Despite this, he praised the government’s “sensible and measured approach” in response to the catastrophic accident at Fukushima, arguing that “we have to be prepared to learn and apply the lessons of Japan just as we did the lessons of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.” [9]

'Support for nuclear new build now the highest it has ever been'

In spring 2012, the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) argued that “After the unprecedented tsunami in Japan last March and the damage inflicted upon the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, it was hardly surprising that a poll conducted in June 2011 saw a drop in public support for nuclear, with the results showing that people with favourable opinions about nuclear fell from 40% to 28% and unfavourable opinions increased from 17% to 24%.”

It continued: “However, a recent survey conducted in December 2011 by Ipsos MORI has indicated that the dip in support for nuclear energy has been short-lived, with figures all but returning to those marked in polls conducted before Fukushima - favourability towards the industry recovered to 40% and unfavourable opinions reduced to 19%.”

Keith Parker argued that, "The poll clearly shows that public opinion has not only recovered from last summer’s dip but it has also resumed its gradual year-on year improvement. The 50% support figure for new build is the highest it has ever been." [10]

However, Professor Nick Pidgeon, Director of the Understanding Risk Programme, Cardiff University, giving evidence to the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee argues that “a large proportion of recent support” for nuclear power “remain[s] conditional - a 'reluctant acceptance' at best" and added that "while many more in Britain have indeed come to support nuclear power over the past decade they do so while viewing it only as a 'devil's bargain', a choice of last resort in the face of the threat of climate change”. [11]

Nuclear revolving door

In mid-June 2011, the former Secretary of State for Energy, John Hutton, became the Chair of the NIA.

The NIA’s chief executive Keith Parker said, “We are at a key point for the development of the UK’s nuclear industry and we are delighted to welcome John Hutton as our chairman. In the wake of the events in Japan we must continue to move forward with confidence and credibility - and help the UK meet it’s security of supply and climate change goals. John Hutton is recognised internationally and he is the ideal person to lead the industry forward.” [12]

Labour government commends NIA for low carbon message

At the 2010 Energy Choices conference, the then Energy Minister Lord Hunt said: “I must commend the work of the NIA in helping to get the positive message across that nuclear is an essential part of a low carbon future for the UK.” [13]

People

Former personnel

Lobbyists

NIA Members

ABB Limited | AECL | AK Engineering Services | Alpha Engineering | ALSTEC | AMEC Group | AMEC NNC | AN Technology | Arup | Ashurst | Atentis Limited | AT Group Ltd | Atkins Nuclear | AWE Plc | Bechtel Management Company Ltd | Birse Nuclear | BNFL | Boulting Group Plc | Bradtec Decon Technologies Ltd | British Energy Plc | British Shielding Windows Ltd | Brown and Mason Ltd | Canberra Harwell Ltd | Capula Ltd | Carillion Plc | Cee Vee Engineering Ltd | Centronic Ltd | CH2M Hill | CMS Cameron McKenna | Corbis Consulting Ltd | Corus Northern Engineering Services | Corus Process Engineering | Costain Oil, Gas and Process Ltd | Data Systems & Solution Ltd | Day & Zimmerman Ltd | DentonWildeSapte | Different by Design | DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary | E C Harris | Edmund Nuttall Ltd | Electrowatt-Ekono (UK) Ltd Energy Institute | Entec UK Ltd | Fathoms Ltd | FCx Thompson Valves | Fluor Government Group | Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer | GENII Engineering & Technology Training Ltd | Gleeds | Golder Associates (UK) Ltd | Gravatom Engineering Systems Ltd | H Smith (Engineers) Ltd | Halcrow Group Ltd | Hammonds | Herbert Smith | Hertel Services Ltd | Hochtief (UK) Construction Ltd | Hogan & Hartson | IJS Consultants | Imaging & Sensing Technology Ltd | IMI Components | Imperial College London | INBIS Group Plc | Jacobs Babtie Ltd | Jacobs Ltd | Jordan Engineering UK Ltd | KDC Group | Kier Construction | Laboratory Impex Systems | Lumis LLP | Marubeni Europe Plc | McGrigors | Mitsui Babcock Energy Ltd | MHF Logistical Solutions | Montgomery Watson Harza | Mott MacDonald | Mowlem Nuclear Services Ltd | Nirex | NIS Group | Northwest Development Agency | Norton Rose | Norwest Holst Construction Ltd | Nuclear Engineering Services Ltd | Nuclear Risk Insurers Ltd | Nuclear Technologies Plc | Nu-Tech Associates | [[One North East | Parsons Brinckerhoff Limited | Pinsent Masons Solicitors | Praxis High Intergrity Systems Ltd | Radwise Limited | Redcliffe Ltd | RM Consultants Ltd | RTS Innovation Ltd | RWE NUKEM Ltd | Scottish Enterprise Energy Team | SEC-UK Nuclear Ltd | Semple Fraser | Speechly Bircham | SERCO Assurance | Simmons & Simmons | Sinclair Knight Merz | Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd | SMT Consulting | Southern Scientific Ltd | Speechly Bircham | Studsvik UK Ltd | Syngensis Ltd | Taylor Woodrow Construction | The Engineering Business Ltd | Thermo Electron Corporation | Tokyo Electric Power Company Inc | Trinity May Ltd | UKAEA | Urenco Ltd | URS Corporation Ltd | VECTRA Group Limited | Washington E&C Ltd | Weir Strachan & Henshaw Ltd | Weir Valves & Controls UK Ltd. | WSP Environmental [16]

Evidence to government committees

Affiliations

Resources

Contact

Carlton House
22a St James’s Square
London SW1Y 4JH
UK
Tel: +44(0)20 7766 6640
Fax: +44(0)20 7839 1523
Email: info@niauk.org

Notes

  1. ↑ Home page, Nuclear Industry Association, undated, accessed 29 October 2012
  2. ↑ Rob Edwards, Revealed: British government's plan to play down Fukushima, The Guardian, 30 June 2011
  3. ↑ Rob Edwards, UK government shared intelligence with nuclear industry, documents show, The Guardian, 5 December 2011
  4. ↑ John McNamara, What a Party that Was!, IndustryLink, Issue No.29, Autumn 2010
  5. ↑ John McNamara, New friends in high places as government beds in, Industry Link, Issue No.28, Summer 2010, p5
  6. ↑ John McNamara, Editor’s Eye, IndustryLink, Issue No.29 Autumn 2010, p3
  7. ↑ IndustryLink, Political Conference Season 2011, Issue No.34 Winter 2011, p10-11
  8. ↑ John McNamara, New friends in high places as government beds in, IndustryLink, Issue No.28, Summer 2010, p5
  9. ↑ Keith Parker, From the Top, IndustryLink, Issue No.31 Spring 2011, p8
  10. ↑ NIA, Nuclear: What do the public think?, IndustryLink, Issue No.35 Spring 2012
  11. ↑ Science and Technology Select Committee, Devil's bargain? Energy risks and the public, 9 July 2012
  12. ↑ John McNamara, John Hutton announced as NIA chairman, IndustryLink, Issue No.32 Summer 2011
  13. ↑ John McNamara, NIA’s Energy Choices strikes a chord, IndustryLink 27, Jan/Feb/March 2010
  14. ↑ Gavin Stamp, Lib Dems face extra lobbying push, BBC News, in Liverpool, 20 September 2010, accessed 8 May 2010
  15. ↑ John McNamara, LinkedIn profile, undated, acc 4 October 2013
  16. ↑ The Nuclear Industry Association website is here, although the list was removed from the website in early 2006. This list was current up until January, 2006.
  17. ↑ Data from Internet Archive holdings of the Science Media Centre website, 2002-2013.

Documents

Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Nuclear_Industry_Association&oldid=212625"