Difference between revisions of "Teaching About Terrorism: University of Buckingham"
(→Terrorism expertise in the media) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:'In his speech on Tuesday, President Bush said that America was targeted because it was a beacon of freedom. Actually, that was not completely true. America was targeted because two ancient peoples are fighting an irreconcilable war over a single piece of territory, and America is backing one side. And America will win because it is free'. | :'In his speech on Tuesday, President Bush said that America was targeted because it was a beacon of freedom. Actually, that was not completely true. America was targeted because two ancient peoples are fighting an irreconcilable war over a single piece of territory, and America is backing one side. And America will win because it is free'. | ||
− | :'However horrible the scenes from America were, [[Francis Fukuyama]] explains why ultimately democracy will triumph. And we can see how the evolution of Christianity foreshadows how Islam, in its turn, may evolve. Muslim terrorism in America will not destroy Western democracy today, nor need it destroy Islamic democracy in the future. Fundamentally, humanity is on course'<ref>Terence Kealey, Zealotry has never been limited to Islam two cultures, ''The Daily Telegraph'', 13-September-2001</ref>. | + | :'However horrible the scenes from America were, [[Francis Fukuyama]] explains why ultimately democracy will triumph. And we can see how the evolution of Christianity foreshadows how Islam, in its turn, may evolve. Muslim terrorism in America will not destroy Western democracy today, nor need it destroy Islamic democracy in the future. Fundamentally, humanity is on course'<ref>Terence Kealey, Zealotry has never been limited to Islam two cultures, ''The Daily Telegraph'', 13-September-2001</ref>. |
+ | ===Kazakstan=== | ||
+ | In 2007 Proffessor [[Dennis O'Keeffe]] of the [[University of Buckingham]] praised Kazakhstan because 'The country has committed itself to the struggle against international terrorism.' According to the Hindustan Times 'This, he said, might relate to the fact Kazakhstan had avoided parasitic status by taking the initiative in forging its own development model'<ref>Asian News International, Yeleukenov says Kazakhstan would play active role in international, regional peace and security, ''Hindustan Times'', 27-October-2007</ref>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Radicalisation in University=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In January 2009 [[Anthony Glees]], the Director of the [[Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies]] at the [[University of Buckingham]] argued, in a letter to ''The Guardian'', that 'universities should not be sites of 'truly free debate' where that debate would lead people to want to undermine or overthrow our democratic society or attack, harm or terrorise individuals'<ref>Anthony Glees, Free Speech, ''The Guardian'', 27-January-2009</ref>. | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 15:19, 7 September 2010
Contents
Terrorism expertise in the media
Scholars from the University of Buckingham appear reguarly in the UK media offering expertise in terrorism related matters.
ID Cards
In 1993 Dick Kemm from the University of Buckingham argued, in a letter to The Times that due to the IRA's mainland bombing campaign the UK governemnt should introduce ID cards. He argued that 'the state should assume responsibility for issuing a card, made to a high standard, incorporating a photo, signature and identification capable of computer recognition'[1]
9/11 Response
In response to the 9/11 attack in New York, University of Buckingham vice chancellor Terence Kealey cited Samuel Huntingdon's 1993 book, The Clash of Civilisations. He argued that:
- 'Huntingdon predicted that militant Islam and Western democracy will clash, as indeed they now are. But the clash must be, in technical language, asymmetrical and therefore heavily biased in favour of the West, for the Muslims are reduced to terrorism simply because they are poor'.
- 'In his speech on Tuesday, President Bush said that America was targeted because it was a beacon of freedom. Actually, that was not completely true. America was targeted because two ancient peoples are fighting an irreconcilable war over a single piece of territory, and America is backing one side. And America will win because it is free'.
- 'However horrible the scenes from America were, Francis Fukuyama explains why ultimately democracy will triumph. And we can see how the evolution of Christianity foreshadows how Islam, in its turn, may evolve. Muslim terrorism in America will not destroy Western democracy today, nor need it destroy Islamic democracy in the future. Fundamentally, humanity is on course'[2].
Kazakstan
In 2007 Proffessor Dennis O'Keeffe of the University of Buckingham praised Kazakhstan because 'The country has committed itself to the struggle against international terrorism.' According to the Hindustan Times 'This, he said, might relate to the fact Kazakhstan had avoided parasitic status by taking the initiative in forging its own development model'[3].
Radicalisation in University
In January 2009 Anthony Glees, the Director of the Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies at the University of Buckingham argued, in a letter to The Guardian, that 'universities should not be sites of 'truly free debate' where that debate would lead people to want to undermine or overthrow our democratic society or attack, harm or terrorise individuals'[4].
Notes
- ↑ Dick Kemm, Anti-terrorist measures, The Times, 5-May-1993
- ↑ Terence Kealey, Zealotry has never been limited to Islam two cultures, The Daily Telegraph, 13-September-2001
- ↑ Asian News International, Yeleukenov says Kazakhstan would play active role in international, regional peace and security, Hindustan Times, 27-October-2007
- ↑ Anthony Glees, Free Speech, The Guardian, 27-January-2009