Climate Portal

Welcome to the Climate Portal on Powerbase

The Climate Portal is dedicated to exposing and reporting on the spin and lobbying efforts concerning climate change, global warming and other climate-related topics. The Climate Portal is part of Powerbase—your guide to networks of power, lobbying and deceptive PR. You can explore pages on climate sceptics, greenwash, government bodies, corporate climate change lobbies and much more, using the categories in the right-hand column below. Click here for an index of all articles related to the Climate Portal Powerbase has a policy of strict referencing and is overseen by a managing editor and a Sysop and several associate portal editors. Climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time. The global collaboration and individual and institutional action needed to address its causes and avert the worst of its catastrophic effects are unprecedented. As the consensus of climate scientists demands tougher targets and emissions cuts, political failure to meet these challenges grows ever more acute. Meanwhile, polluting high carbon industries have adapted to heightened environmental awareness by portraying themselves as part of the solution, not the problem. Although some environmental gains have been made, 'greenwash' (unjustified green claims or spin) has become an industry in itself. The complexities of climate science, climate policy and climate change solutions, coupled with confusion over which green claims to believe, have led to misguided programs and policies, and public disillusionment. The Climate Portal aims to provide academics, analysts, campaigners, researchers and other interested parties with up-to-date and rigorous information on some of the main debates, technologies, industries, lobby groups, public bodies and policies in the area of climate change in the UK. We will investigate and demystify corporate or political 'greenwash' and examine the activities and connections of key players in the climate change debate. We particularly focus on Change Sceptics , corporate greenwash, the Energy Industry] and Industry Lobby Groups, and the connections between government and industry. The Climate Portal is related to the Nuclear Spin and Mining and Metals portals. This article is part of the Climate project of Spinwatch.

Some facts and figures Despite the claims of Climate Change Sceptics to the contrary, 98% of scientists agree that climate change is anthropogenic and caused largely by emissions of carbon dioxide and other potent greenhouse gases. The fourth report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) gave warnings that unless action is taken to keep warming below 2°C, positive feedbacks (tipping points) that we cannot control are likely to be activated, leading to unstoppable/runaway climate change that will have devastating impacts on the planet and its people. The graph below shows the path of current Kyoto strategy which takes us over the red tipping point (using IPCC's most recent reports) and into 'runaway' or unstoppable climate change (caused by a number of natural knock on effects or 'positive feedbacks' which kick in once a certain carbon concentration is reached). The action needed to address this devastating threat is rapid carbon descent, translating into deep cuts in the activities of carbon heavy industries and energy production, and a matching decrease in consumption. The Copenhagen Diagnosis, a scientific document prepared for the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 concluded 'that several important aspects of climate change are already occurring at the high end, or even beyond, the expectations of just a few years ago'. It asserted that: "by 2020 industrial nations must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by around 40% below 1990 levels to secure a decent chance of avoiding dangerous human interference with the climate system." The report also found that global ice sheets are melting at an increased rate; Arctic sea ice is thinning and melting much faster than recently projected, and future sea-level rise is now expected to be much higher than previously forecast. Without significant mitigation, the report concluded that global mean warming could reach as high as 7 degrees Celsius by 2100. Despite these predictions, the 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change, or COP15, in Copenhagen 2009, failed to agree to any binding emissions reduction targets to take the place of the Kyoto protocol. The Kyoto protocol itself has been criticised as unambitious and ineffective, and has certainly failed to achieve any meaningful cuts worldwide. Lumumba Di-Aping, chief negotiator for the G77 group of 130 developing countries, called the conference outcome 'nothing short of climate change scepticism in action', adding 'It locks countries into a cycle of poverty for ever'. The UK has been congratulated for having the most ambitious emissions reduction targets in the world, aiming for 80% cuts from 1990 levels by 2050 (which will give us a 50:50 chance of avoiding the worst predications ). However, over the last 10 years British emissions have actually increased, and there is little sign that the drastic changes needed to meet this target are being made, leading to accusations that the targets are 'all politics' and no substance. International agreements, and Britain's policies, rely on market based solutions to reduce emissions. Central to this is the notion of Carbon Trading, which allows polluting industries to continue emitting, as long as they pay for someone else to curb emissions elsewhere. This method has been encouraged by many industries who see this as the cheapest and easiest option, especially as many have received exemptions from payment. Market based solutions such as the 'cap and trade' scheme have been heavily criticised by a range of commentators (see recommended reading), and have so far failed to deliver any reductions. Meanwhile public denial and disillusionment about climate change in Britain is on the increase, a manifestation of hopelessness and apathy about finding solutions to the issue, perpetuated by ineffective government strategies, which have historically targeted individual behaviour over polluting industry. Only 41% of those surveyed by a recent Times newspaper poll believed climate change was anthropogenic (man made) despite established science to the contrary.

Categories There are a list of categories associated with this page: Climate Climate Change Climate Change Sceptics Climate: Energy Climate: Energy Industry Climate: Industry Lobby Groups Climate: Industry People Climate: NGOs and Consumer Groups Climate: Lobbyists and PR Consultants Climate: Front Groups Climate: Government and International Agencies Climate Policy Groups Climate Scientists Climate Science Carbon Trading Government People Government Policy News and articles David JC MacKay 'Sustainable Energy- Without the Hot Air' - an up to date scientific analysis of the potential of various types of alternative energy. Larry Lohmann 'Carbon Trading: A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatisation and Power', Dag Hammarskjold Foundation, 2009. The Copenhagen Diagnosis- Latest summary of climate science and predictions from the IPCC reports. Resources The Story of Cap and Trade- A short film explaining the limitations of the 'Cap and Trade' carbon trading scheme.

Getting Started Looking for somewhere to start? To learn how you can edit any article right now, visit Powerbase:About, Welcome, newcomers, our Help page, Frequently Asked Questions, A quick guide to editing or experiment in the sandbox. Or contribute a new article: go to Quick Guide to Getting Started. Research and Writing Tips How to research front groups | Resources for studying propaganda | Research using the web Can you help? Powerbase can be made more effective if more people join the project. If you have research or writing skills or just spare time, you can help. If you are unsure where to start, you could expand some of the recently created but currently very brief articles. (If you look at the recent changes page you will see some noted as being 'stubs' - articles that may just be a line or two and needing to be fleshed out). So if you would like to add to some of those you would be most welcome. There is an automatically updated page which includes the pages which have been signalled by Powerbase users as most wanted. In addition there is a page which includes a list of Things you can do to help. Or if you would like some other suggestions closer to your interests you could drop Powerbase editor, David Miller an email. His address is editor AT powerbase.info Start Here View The Latest Articles View Articles By Category View The Most Popular Articles Create An Account Or Log In Change Your Preferences Write a new Article

Powerbase history Powerbase is a collaborative venture initiated by Spinwatch in collaboration with Lobbywatch, GM Watch Red Star Research and Corporate Watch, but put into effect by a wide variety of volunteers and independent researchers. Contributors are now working on 19,413 articles. Disclaimer: Powerbase is an encyclopedia of people, issues and groups shaping the public agenda. It is a project of the Powerbase—email editor AT powerbase.info. Antispam note: To avoid attracting spam email robots, email addresses on Powerbase are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address. We regret the inconvenience this entails. Campaign for more effective antispam regulations. Read the full disclaimer References