Difference between revisions of "Centre for Social Cohesion"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Publications)
(conservative movement)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''Centre for Social Cohesion''' (CSC) is a think tank set up by Civitas "following widespread and longstanding concern about the diminishing sense of community in Britain".<ref>[http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/pubs/action.php About Us] (Accessed: 6 September 2007)</ref>  According to a BBC Newsnight programme on 5 September 2007 the CSC was a "right leaning think tank".  Its main focus has to do with discussing and analyzing the best means to integrate or assimilate ethnic minorities and what implications this has for the wider society.  A major focus of CSC are trends in Muslim society in the UK, how they are integrating or not, and the radicalized sections of that society.
 
The '''Centre for Social Cohesion''' (CSC) is a think tank set up by Civitas "following widespread and longstanding concern about the diminishing sense of community in Britain".<ref>[http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/pubs/action.php About Us] (Accessed: 6 September 2007)</ref>  According to a BBC Newsnight programme on 5 September 2007 the CSC was a "right leaning think tank".  Its main focus has to do with discussing and analyzing the best means to integrate or assimilate ethnic minorities and what implications this has for the wider society.  A major focus of CSC are trends in Muslim society in the UK, how they are integrating or not, and the radicalized sections of that society.
 +
 +
CSC and its parent [[Civitas]] have been claimed by [[Tim Montgomerie]] as part of the infrastructure of the [[Movement Conservatism|conservative movement]] in Britain.<ref>Tim Montgomerie, [http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/03/the-growth-of-b.html The growth of Britain's conservative movement], ConservativeHome, 14 March 2009.</ref>
  
 
==Establishment==
 
==Establishment==

Revision as of 01:37, 2 March 2010

The Centre for Social Cohesion (CSC) is a think tank set up by Civitas "following widespread and longstanding concern about the diminishing sense of community in Britain".[1] According to a BBC Newsnight programme on 5 September 2007 the CSC was a "right leaning think tank". Its main focus has to do with discussing and analyzing the best means to integrate or assimilate ethnic minorities and what implications this has for the wider society. A major focus of CSC are trends in Muslim society in the UK, how they are integrating or not, and the radicalized sections of that society.

CSC and its parent Civitas have been claimed by Tim Montgomerie as part of the infrastructure of the conservative movement in Britain.[2]

Establishment

Civitas spent £274,669 on the Centre for Social Cohesion Project Fund in 2006. According to its annual report this fund was ""set up to encourage racial and religious harmony."[3]

Activities

  • It seeks to analyze why certain groups become radicalized, and in the process seeks it advocates banning some books, and not funding certain activities or resources.
  • Analyze the role schools play or should play in integrating minorities or fomenting "patriotism".
  • Analyze the role and effect of religious schools.
  • Analyze and debate what the UK's immigration policy should be and what possible effects extant policy will have.

Campaign against Islamic Shakhsiyah Foundation

CfSC has led a campaign against the Islamic Shakhsiyah Foundation, alleging that it is a front for the Hizb-ut-Tahrir, based on the fact that one of its trustees is married to an HuT member and has in the past been a member herself. The research was used by David Cameron to attack the New Labour government in parliament. However, the Conservatives admitted some of their allegations turned out to be false. Houriya Ahmed, co-author of the CfSC report, appeared on BBC's Newsnight claiming that the state is funding a school allegedly run by HuT[4]

A Degree of Influence

David Shariatmadari of the Guardian has criticized CSC for its 'relentless Islamophobia', which he argues has 'spread poison and whipped up anti-Muslim paranoia at every turn'. Commenting on the CSC publication "A Degree of Influence", Shariatmadari concludes that it 'makes a mockery of these legitimate concerns by presenting trumped-up arguments to push a barely disguised anti-Muslim agenda.' [5]

CSC and the Quilliam Foundation

The Centre for Social Cohesion has a complex relationship with the Quilliam Foundation (QF), another think tank working on Muslim issues.

After joining Quilliam, former CSC researcher James Brandon strongly criticised Douglas Murray's approach to Islam in a January 2009 Comment is Free article:

My time there was a constant struggle to "de-radicalise" Murray and to ensure that the centre's output targeted only Islamists – and not Muslims as a whole. This October, however, I had finally had enough of this constant battle and resigned. To his credit, Murray has privately retracted many of his more noxious comments – but he apparently lacks the courage to do so publicly.[6]

Brandon particularly criticised Murray's claim that: "conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board."[7]

Murray responded to this in a Comment is Free article in October 2009, stating:

Some years ago, in a speech in the Netherlands, I said I wanted the culture of extra rights to stop, and for the rights of Muslims to be brought in line with those of all other people. Long after the fact and purely for positioning reasons, QF has condemned me for this.[8]

He went on to accuse Quilliam of "using public money to advocate increasingly totalitarian attitudes towards the general public and judging Muslims by their own early standards."[9]

Around the time Ed Husain came to public notice, I recruited him to work with me (through Civitas, the organisation that originally hosted the Centre for Social Cohesion). He liked my views and I had great hopes for him to become a source for real reform. This gave him the time and financial freedom to set up QF. But the increasing oddness of his opinions (particularly relating to my own freedom of speech) meant that eventually we parted ways. What is scandalous is that QF – set up to counter extremists such as their former colleagues in Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT) – has done nothing substantial to challenge HT in the UK or radicalisation on UK campuses, the things it was actually set up for.[10]

Ed Husain himself contributed to Comment is Free a week later, with an article which described Murray as an 'acolyte' of journalist Melanie Phillips, and called on them both to "cease attacks on Muslim scripture that were based on bin Laden's understanding of Islam".[11]

Personnel

Advisory Council

Authors

  • Edmund Standing – Author of the Center's 2009 report on BNP's online activities.

Former Staff

Publications

Affiliations

References, Resources and Contact

Contact

Centre For Social Cohesion
77 Great Peter Street
Westminster
London SW1P 2EZ
Tel: +44 (0)20 7799 6677
Fax: +44 (0)20 7799 6688
Web: www.socialcohesion.co.uk

References

  1. About Us (Accessed: 6 September 2007)
  2. Tim Montgomerie, The growth of Britain's conservative movement, ConservativeHome, 14 March 2009.
  3. Civitas Limited: Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 2007 (pdf), Charities Commission, p.13.
  4. Francis Elliot, Tories admit David Cameron Islamic schools claim 'had mistakes', The Times, 26 November 2009
  5. David Shariatmadari, A study in scare-mongering, The Guardian, 2 April 2009, accessed 2 Mar 2010
  6. James Brandon, Reining in the preachers of hate, Comment is Free, 13 January 2009.
  7. James Brandon, Reining in the preachers of hate, Comment is Free, 13 January 2009.
  8. Douglas Murray, Quilliam's toxic take on liberty, Comment is Free, 23 October 2009.
  9. Douglas Murray, Quilliam's toxic take on liberty, Comment is Free, 23 October 2009.
  10. Douglas Murray, Quilliam's toxic take on liberty, Comment is Free, 23 October 2009.
  11. Ed Husain, The personal jihad of Melanie Phillips, Comment is Free, 31 October 2009.
  12. Who We Are, Centre for Social Cohesion, archived at the Internet Archive, 29 August 2007, accessed 17 February 2010.