Difference between revisions of "Peter Janke"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Edward S. Herman]] and [[Gerry O'Sullivan]] write<ref>The "Terrorism" Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View of Terror by Edward S. Herman and Gerry O'Sullivan, New York: Pantheon, 1989. p. 110</ref> of Janke that: | |
| − | [[Edward S. Herman]] and [[Gerry O'Sullivan]] write<ref></ref> of Janke that: | ||
ISC's [[Peter Janke]], now with [[Control Risks Group|Control Risks Ltd.]], was a good friend and close ally of [[Michael Morris]] of the South African security police and, eventually, head of the South African [[Terrorism Research Centre]]. ISC's Conflict Study no. 52, 'South Africa � The End of Empire', written by Janke, was based in part on information on "terrorism" in Mozambique supplied him by [[P. J. De Wit]], the head of South African intelligence, a source unacknowledged in the report. ISC also passed along to South African officials their report 'Sources of Conflict in British Industry', which would be useful for indicating how South African unions might be attacked as recalcitrant and strikeprone, not on account of any real grievances but only because of "left-wing militants" and outside agitators.<ref>See "Subversion, Inc." </ref> | ISC's [[Peter Janke]], now with [[Control Risks Group|Control Risks Ltd.]], was a good friend and close ally of [[Michael Morris]] of the South African security police and, eventually, head of the South African [[Terrorism Research Centre]]. ISC's Conflict Study no. 52, 'South Africa � The End of Empire', written by Janke, was based in part on information on "terrorism" in Mozambique supplied him by [[P. J. De Wit]], the head of South African intelligence, a source unacknowledged in the report. ISC also passed along to South African officials their report 'Sources of Conflict in British Industry', which would be useful for indicating how South African unions might be attacked as recalcitrant and strikeprone, not on account of any real grievances but only because of "left-wing militants" and outside agitators.<ref>See "Subversion, Inc." </ref> | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 27 January 2009
Edward S. Herman and Gerry O'Sullivan write[1] of Janke that:
ISC's Peter Janke, now with Control Risks Ltd., was a good friend and close ally of Michael Morris of the South African security police and, eventually, head of the South African Terrorism Research Centre. ISC's Conflict Study no. 52, 'South Africa � The End of Empire', written by Janke, was based in part on information on "terrorism" in Mozambique supplied him by P. J. De Wit, the head of South African intelligence, a source unacknowledged in the report. ISC also passed along to South African officials their report 'Sources of Conflict in British Industry', which would be useful for indicating how South African unions might be attacked as recalcitrant and strikeprone, not on account of any real grievances but only because of "left-wing militants" and outside agitators.[2]
ISC also established close working relationships with the British police and military. John Alderson, the director of the Bramshill Police College in 1972, asked Janke to help the college develop a course on terrorism and counter-subversion. The ISC's "Manual on Counter-Insurgency" was developed and used at the Police College and elsewhere. The stress of ISC's instruction was on the need for more extensive surveillance and preemptive action.[3] This training, sponsored ultimately by the CIA and British intelligence, is strongly reminiscent of the U.S. training of Latin American police in the 1960s and 1970s on subversion and the need for preemptive counterinsurgency, which [...] played a significant role in the rise of torture, disappearances, and large-scale state terrorism in that area.
