Difference between revisions of "Brian Brivati"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gaitskell biography)
(Arnold Goodman biography)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
::This is not an isolated omission. In the context of his times - highly organised, well-resourced 'anti-communism' by the British and American states - we should expect something substantial on the network of which Gaitskell was the leading British public figure and the activities of the circle around the [[CIA]]-funded [[Congress for Cultural Freedom]] (CCF) in which he was a prominent participant. On the former, on which there is now a good deal of published material, we find scarcely anything in Brivati.<ref>Hugh Gaitskell, reviewed by Tom Easton, Lobster issue 32, December 1996.</ref>
 
::This is not an isolated omission. In the context of his times - highly organised, well-resourced 'anti-communism' by the British and American states - we should expect something substantial on the network of which Gaitskell was the leading British public figure and the activities of the circle around the [[CIA]]-funded [[Congress for Cultural Freedom]] (CCF) in which he was a prominent participant. On the former, on which there is now a good deal of published material, we find scarcely anything in Brivati.<ref>Hugh Gaitskell, reviewed by Tom Easton, Lobster issue 32, December 1996.</ref>
 +
 +
==Arnold Goodman biography==
 +
Brivati wrote a biography of Lord Goodman, a prominent solicitor who had been accused of embezzling funds from one of his clients, Lord Goodman. Reviewers were divided about the way Brivati dealt with this.
 +
 +
The former Cabinet Secretary [[Robin Butler]] wrote:
 +
::In January 1999, when the newspapers were carrying stories that Lord Goodman and his solicitors' firm had misappropriated Portman Trust money, [[Brian Brivati]] wrote an article for  The THES suggesting that there might be some fire behind the smoke. Many of Goodman's friends who believed that he would not have been reckless enough to mishandle a client's money, even if he had been disposed to do so, feared that Brivati's book, then in the final stages of preparation, would be a hatchet job...
 +
::...Overall, Brivati gives the impression of a man who started with a conclusion and found, inconveniently, that the evidence did not support it.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=157056&sectioncode=5 Private Acts in a Public Theatre], Robin Butler, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 18 August 2000.</ref>
 +
 +
[[Harold Wilson]]'s former press secretary [[Joe Haines]] wrote:
 +
::Goodman could be a kind and generous man, so lax in his billing that he often didn't charge at all. The Friends of Arnold, especially in the arts world, are still numerous and cherish his memory. However, they don't include the Portman family, who accused him of stealing millions from a trust fund. Brivati persuasively clears Goodman of that charge, but [[Paul Foot]], who originally made it, is a meticulous researcher, and I still cannot grasp why, if the accusation was totally unfounded, Goodman's old firm, [[Goodman Derrick]], should have paid Lord Portman half a million pounds not to pursue his writ.<ref>Lord Fixit, by  Joe Haines, New Statesman, 18 October 1999.</ref>
 +
 +
The Evening Standard claimed that Brivati was leant on to remove revelations from the book:
 +
::"There is a lot of opposition from various establishment figures who knew Lord Goodman," Brivati tells me nervously. "They wanted a Victorian biography. But Goodman wanted public life without public accountability, and that's my central criticism. There are things I have left out of the book because they push the boundaries of privacy. I can only discuss what will appear in the book. Goodbye."<ref>Goodman Secrets kept under wraps, p12, The Evening Standard, 20 August 1999.</ref>
 +
 +
This may have been related to Goodman's relationships with a number of powerful women:
 +
:: A controversial new biography was supposed to reveal intimate details of [[Arnold Goodman]]'s relationships with [[Jenny Lee]], [[Aneurin Bevan|Nye Bevan]]'s widow, [[Ann Fleming]], wife of the creator of James Bond, and Lady Avon, widow of Sir Anthony Eden, the Tory prime minister.
 +
 +
::However, pressure from "friends of Arnold", who was one of Britain's most influential men from the 1960s into the 1980s, has meant [[Brian Brivati]], the author, has had to cut out certain references to Goodman's sexual interests.<ref>Mother fixations of Lord Goodman, by Richard Brooks, Sunday Times, 22 August 1999.</ref>
  
 
==Affiliations==
 
==Affiliations==

Revision as of 01:38, 12 May 2008

From the Battle of Ideas biography:[1]

Professor Brian Brivati is Professor of Contemporary History at Kingston University and runs the Human Rights degrees at BA and MA level. He has published extensive work on contemporary British politics, with an emphasis on the political history of the British Labour party. His research and teaching has recently extended to comparative work on genocide and human rights. He speaks regularly for the Holocaust Education Trust and is a member of the Board of the Wiener Library. His articles have appeared in The Times, Financial Times, Independent on Sunday, Observer, New Statesman, Progress, Fabian Review, Contemporary Record, History Today and Parliamentary Brief, and he maintains a blog in the Guardian. He is a regular broadcaster on politics for radio and television. In 2007 he was a member of the Foreign Policy Centre/Channel 4 Iraq Commission.

Gaitskell biography

Brivati's biography of Hugh Gaitskell was criticised by Tom Easton for under-playing Gaitskell's covert American links.

in a footnote on Gaitskell's efforts to expel Aneurin Bevan from the party in 1955, Williams records Gaitskell's apparent concern that Godson was becoming too deeply involved in the party's internal affairs.
This unsourced observation has intrigued many since it appeared in 1983, but it has failed to stir the curiosity of Gaitskell's latest biographer, Brian Brivati. Not only does the footnote not rate a mention, but the anti-Bevan plotting at the Hotel Russell to which it relates is described without Godson's participation.
This is not an isolated omission. In the context of his times - highly organised, well-resourced 'anti-communism' by the British and American states - we should expect something substantial on the network of which Gaitskell was the leading British public figure and the activities of the circle around the CIA-funded Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) in which he was a prominent participant. On the former, on which there is now a good deal of published material, we find scarcely anything in Brivati.[2]

Arnold Goodman biography

Brivati wrote a biography of Lord Goodman, a prominent solicitor who had been accused of embezzling funds from one of his clients, Lord Goodman. Reviewers were divided about the way Brivati dealt with this.

The former Cabinet Secretary Robin Butler wrote:

In January 1999, when the newspapers were carrying stories that Lord Goodman and his solicitors' firm had misappropriated Portman Trust money, Brian Brivati wrote an article for The THES suggesting that there might be some fire behind the smoke. Many of Goodman's friends who believed that he would not have been reckless enough to mishandle a client's money, even if he had been disposed to do so, feared that Brivati's book, then in the final stages of preparation, would be a hatchet job...
...Overall, Brivati gives the impression of a man who started with a conclusion and found, inconveniently, that the evidence did not support it.[3]

Harold Wilson's former press secretary Joe Haines wrote:

Goodman could be a kind and generous man, so lax in his billing that he often didn't charge at all. The Friends of Arnold, especially in the arts world, are still numerous and cherish his memory. However, they don't include the Portman family, who accused him of stealing millions from a trust fund. Brivati persuasively clears Goodman of that charge, but Paul Foot, who originally made it, is a meticulous researcher, and I still cannot grasp why, if the accusation was totally unfounded, Goodman's old firm, Goodman Derrick, should have paid Lord Portman half a million pounds not to pursue his writ.[4]

The Evening Standard claimed that Brivati was leant on to remove revelations from the book:

"There is a lot of opposition from various establishment figures who knew Lord Goodman," Brivati tells me nervously. "They wanted a Victorian biography. But Goodman wanted public life without public accountability, and that's my central criticism. There are things I have left out of the book because they push the boundaries of privacy. I can only discuss what will appear in the book. Goodbye."[5]

This may have been related to Goodman's relationships with a number of powerful women:

A controversial new biography was supposed to reveal intimate details of Arnold Goodman's relationships with Jenny Lee, Nye Bevan's widow, Ann Fleming, wife of the creator of James Bond, and Lady Avon, widow of Sir Anthony Eden, the Tory prime minister.
However, pressure from "friends of Arnold", who was one of Britain's most influential men from the 1960s into the 1980s, has meant Brian Brivati, the author, has had to cut out certain references to Goodman's sexual interests.[6]

Affiliations

References, Resources and Contact

Contact

Email: B.Brivati@kingston.ac.uk
Website: fass.kingston.ac.uk/staff/cv.php?staffnum=115
Comment is Free listing: commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/brian_brivati

References

  1. ↑ Battle of Ideas 2007 festival biography, (Accessed 3 September 2007)
  2. ↑ Hugh Gaitskell, reviewed by Tom Easton, Lobster issue 32, December 1996.
  3. ↑ Private Acts in a Public Theatre, Robin Butler, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 18 August 2000.
  4. ↑ Lord Fixit, by Joe Haines, New Statesman, 18 October 1999.
  5. ↑ Goodman Secrets kept under wraps, p12, The Evening Standard, 20 August 1999.
  6. ↑ Mother fixations of Lord Goodman, by Richard Brooks, Sunday Times, 22 August 1999.
  7. ↑ signatory
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Brian_Brivati&oldid=59514"