Difference between revisions of "Aspen Institute"
(→Travel) |
(→Don't mention Israel) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Don't mention Israel== | ==Don't mention Israel== | ||
[[Anatol Lieven]] relates about the Aspen Institute: | [[Anatol Lieven]] relates about the Aspen Institute: | ||
| − | :The writer Anatol Lieven says he reluctantly took on the issue after 9/11 as a matter of "duty"--when the Carnegie Endowment, where he was a senior associate, asked him to. "I knew bloody well it would bring horrible unpopularity.... All my personal loyalties are the other way. I've literally dozens of Jewish friends; I have no Palestinian friends." Lieven says he was a regular at the Aspen Institute till he brought up the issue. "I got kicked out of Aspen.... In early 2002 they held a conference on relations with the Muslim world. For two days nobody mentioned Israel. Finally, I said, 'Look, this is a Soviet-style debate. Whatever you think about this issue, the entire Muslim world is shouting about it.' I have never been asked back."<ref>[http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20060515&s=weiss], The Nation </ref> | + | :The writer Anatol Lieven says he reluctantly took on the issue after 9/11 as a matter of "duty"--when the Carnegie Endowment, where he was a senior associate, asked him to. "I knew bloody well it would bring horrible unpopularity.... All my personal loyalties are the other way. I've literally dozens of Jewish friends; I have no Palestinian friends." Lieven says he was a regular at the Aspen Institute till he brought up the issue. "I got kicked out of Aspen.... In early 2002 they held a conference on relations with the Muslim world. For two days nobody mentioned Israel. Finally, I said, 'Look, this is a Soviet-style debate. Whatever you think about this issue, the entire Muslim world is shouting about it.' I have never been asked back."<ref>[http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20060515&s=weiss Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'] by PHILIP WEISS, from the May 15, 2006 issue, The Nation </ref> |
| − | |||
==People== | ==People== | ||
Revision as of 09:24, 10 September 2007
The Aspen Institute is a neoconservative think tank. One of its activities is to foster young zionists who are then mentored and placed in policy positions. It also funds zionist activities around the US.
Contents
Activities
The Aspen Institute organizes lectures on the preferred topics currently in vogue among neocon circles: relationship between Islam and terror, Iran and nuclear weapons, ...
Travel
The Aspen Institute also has funded travel by US policy makers to conferences, events, where neocons propound their policy wishes. Several US Congressmen have been sponsored to attend conferences on "terror" and related topics.[1]
Don't mention Israel
Anatol Lieven relates about the Aspen Institute:
- The writer Anatol Lieven says he reluctantly took on the issue after 9/11 as a matter of "duty"--when the Carnegie Endowment, where he was a senior associate, asked him to. "I knew bloody well it would bring horrible unpopularity.... All my personal loyalties are the other way. I've literally dozens of Jewish friends; I have no Palestinian friends." Lieven says he was a regular at the Aspen Institute till he brought up the issue. "I got kicked out of Aspen.... In early 2002 they held a conference on relations with the Muslim world. For two days nobody mentioned Israel. Finally, I said, 'Look, this is a Soviet-style debate. Whatever you think about this issue, the entire Muslim world is shouting about it.' I have never been asked back."[2]
People
Related organisations
Contact, Resources, REferences
Contact
- Website: www.aspeninstitute.org
Resources
- RightWeb Profile, last updated October 2005.
- Nine Trustees Elected to Aspen Institute Board, U.S. Newswire, 7 April 2003.
Notes
- ↑ Kimberly Geiger, Chronicle Washington Bureau Steep drop in travel spending after congressional scandals, $1.34 million this year, down from $3.9 million in 2003, Sunday, October 15, 2006 San Francisco Chronicle
- ↑ Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby' by PHILIP WEISS, from the May 15, 2006 issue, The Nation
