Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tommy"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
--[[User:David|David]] 16:06, 15 Nov 2006 (GMT)
 
--[[User:David|David]] 16:06, 15 Nov 2006 (GMT)
  
Just noticed that the WIC used to retain porter novelli scotland.  Might be worth an foi and a straight request to ask how much they were paid?
+
Tommy,
  
Also, is it greenhaus that they retain as pr? anything you can enter on this on spinproflesI think a briefing on the WIC is needed urgently now... :)
+
good stuff on [[Nurses for Reform]].  Can you remove the hyperboleno need for words like 'blatant', 'seriously' 'no doubt'.  Let the evidence speak for itself...
--[[User:David|David]] 09:03, 7 Dec 2006 (GMT)
 
  
Two tips:
+
--[[User:David|David]] 09:36, 5 October 2007 (BST)
1. no square brackets round 'Sir' and the like
 
2. put the URL in a note as a link to the title as in Note 3 in Frontier page.
 
OK?--[[User:David|David]] 15:35, 11 Jan 2007 (GMT)
 

Revision as of 08:36, 5 October 2007

Have a look at the pages on Scottish and Universal Investments and those linked to them. I think a wee bit of adding to the complex of Fraser related businesses would be useful.

What do you think?

--David 14:11, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT)

Can you explain the 'all over theworld' ref and who awarded him the resources or prize to do it and where he did it...? --David 16:06, 15 Nov 2006 (GMT)

Tommy,

good stuff on Nurses for Reform. Can you remove the hyperbole? no need for words like 'blatant', 'seriously' 'no doubt'. Let the evidence speak for itself...

--David 09:36, 5 October 2007 (BST)