Difference between revisions of "Clive Cookson"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Clive Cookson]] is the science editor of the ''[[Financial Times | + | [[Clive Cookson]] is the science editor of the ''[[Financial Times]]''. He has worked in science journalism for the whole of his professional life.<ref name="bio"> Biovision [http://www.biovision.org/biovision2013/speakers/view.html;jsessionid=D6163201F28A0DC1EC181B37F1500697?id=20 Clive Cookson Science Editor, Financial Times], accessed 15 August 2013</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:08, 15 August 2013
Clive Cookson is the science editor of the Financial Times. He has worked in science journalism for the whole of his professional life.[1]
Contents
Education
Cookson graduated with a First Class degree in chemistry from Oxford University in 1974.[1]
Career
After journalism training on the Luton Evening Post, Cookson became science correspondent of the Times Higher Education Supplement in London and then spent four years in Washington as American Editor of THES. He returned to London in 1981 as technology correspondent of The Times and moved to BBC Radio as science correspondent in 1983. He joined the Financial Times as technology editor in 1987 and has been Science Editor of the FT since 1991.[1]
views
On science journalism
According to Cookson:
- At the FT the policy of our editor – all FT editors in my memory – has been that if it’s a science-based issue, the voice of scientists is paramount. If the vast majority of scientists are saying one thing, well, you should reflect that opinion, even if there’s a small number of scientists saying something different. Obviously on climate change there are some scientists, even a few who know quite a lot about climatology, who challenge the orthodoxy. But when the vast majority of scientists say one thing, we follow them. Likewise on the safety of genetically modified foods and other issues.[2]
On the issue of climate change:
- on the issue of climate change, climate sceptics regard the BBC as being very much against them, very much the voice of scientific orthodoxy. Whereas from the point of view of most scientists, the BBC gives too much weight to the skeptics. The BBC is particularly exposed, and on this sort of debate it just can’t win. I rather sympathise with them on this. Yes, they give probably too much voice to very minority views, but in their position they have to really.[2]
On the question 'What is the role of science journalism in the 21st century?'
- science journalism is the medium by which scientists communicate with the general public. So looking at it from the scientist’s point of view, even with the latest technology, very few scientists can get through to very many people. For most scientists, if they want the world to know about their research – and more and more of them do – then science journalists are the best medium, the best means of communication. And you can look at it from the other way around, from the point of view of the general interested reader or viewer or listener. Then you would like to find out about what’s going on through science journalism because the average person is not going to read Nature or Science or any other primary journal, so you’re going to have to use a secondary or tertiary source. For most people, that’s going to be science journalism and the mass media.[2]
Conference speaker
- Cookson was listed as a speaker at CORDIA, the biotechnology convention. Ann Mettler, Founding Partner of the Lisbon Council, was listed as chair for the debate, on October 11 2005.
- Other panel members will include Dr Johan Vanhemelrijck (Secretary General of EuropaBio), Sir Tom McKillop (CEO of AstraZeneca). [3]
- Cookson spoke on 'Bioscience in the media' at The Best Practice In Communications seminar on Monday 15 January 2007 organised by the BioIndustry Association[4]
- Voice of Young Science/Sense About Science WARRIORS AGAINST CLAPTRAP Are myth busters the new generation of civic scientists? ESOF 2010 Annual Meeting Room 3 Lingotto Conference and Exhibition Centre Turin, Italy 15:45 – 17:00 pm Monday, 5th July 2010
Career
- 1991 – present Science editor, Financial Times
- 1987 - 1991 technology editor, Financial Times
- 1983 – 1987 BBC Science correspondent
- 1981 – 1983 technology correspondent The Times
- 1977-1981 American Editor of THES
- 1974 - 1977 Luton Evening Post, then Science correspondent, THES
Affiliations
member 'Science Policy Advisory Group', Royal Society[5]
- Science Media Centre member of the board (2002-2012), then of the advisory committee (2012- )
Resources
- Benat Gurrutxaga-Lerma and Nina Kearsey Reporting Science in Financial Times Felix, Thursday February 9, 2012
Talks and presentations
- Clive Cookson Communicating science Keynote talk at EurOCEAN 2004, 11 May 2004
- Clive Cookson Science in the media, State of Säo Paulo Research Foundation 16 April 2012.
Contact
- email: clive DOT cookson AT ft DOT com
- Twitter: @clivecookson
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Biovision Clive Cookson Science Editor, Financial Times, accessed 15 August 2013
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Benat Gurrutxaga-Lerma and Nina Kearsey Reporting Science in Financial Times Felix, Thursday February 9, 2012
- ↑ Six Months to Save Lisbon Business Wire June 13, 2005 Monday 5:09 PM GMT.
- ↑ Bioscience group to stage seminar PR Week, January 12, 2007, Pg. 12
- ↑ Royal Society Science Policy Advisory Group, accessed 15 august 2013
