Difference between revisions of "Operation Gamble"
(→Misinformation & Leaks) |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Assistant Commissioner [[Peter Clarke]] stated: | Assistant Commissioner [[Peter Clarke]] stated: | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | "on the morning of the arrests, almost before the detainees had arrived at the police stations to which they were being taken for questioning, it was clear that key details of the investigation and the evidence had been leaked." <ref name="Liberty"/ | + | "on the morning of the arrests, almost before the detainees had arrived at the police stations to which they were being taken for questioning, it was clear that key details of the investigation and the evidence had been leaked." <ref name="Liberty"/> |
Michael Portillo argued that leaking of information regarding Operation Gamble | Michael Portillo argued that leaking of information regarding Operation Gamble | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | "rescued John Reid [because] there was no room left for the story that had filled them in previous days: the crisis over Britain's overfull jails, and Reid's responsibility for the mess … It looks as though someone close to Reid had the bright idea of digging him out of the prison places mire but has landed him in a deeper bog. As the veteran Tory MP Kenneth Clarke (and former home secretary too) put it, if the Home Office is found to have leaked over the terror inquiry, Reid will find himself in a very difficult position. Yet again … We have reached the point where we do not trust anything that the government tells us". <ref> Michael Portillo, 'Britain isn’t a police state, but it’s close to being a liar state', ''The Sunday Times'', 11 February 2007, accessed via LexisNexis on 08.09.10</ref | + | "rescued John Reid [because] there was no room left for the story that had filled them in previous days: the crisis over Britain's overfull jails, and Reid's responsibility for the mess … It looks as though someone close to Reid had the bright idea of digging him out of the prison places mire but has landed him in a deeper bog. As the veteran Tory MP Kenneth Clarke (and former home secretary too) put it, if the Home Office is found to have leaked over the terror inquiry, Reid will find himself in a very difficult position. Yet again … We have reached the point where we do not trust anything that the government tells us". <ref> Michael Portillo, 'Britain isn’t a police state, but it’s close to being a liar state', ''The Sunday Times'', 11 February 2007, accessed via LexisNexis on 08.09.10</ref> |
===Investigation into Misinformation Demanded=== | ===Investigation into Misinformation Demanded=== | ||
Revision as of 10:33, 9 September 2010
This article is part of the Counter-Terrorism Portal project of Spinwatch. |
Operation Gamble was the codename given to a counter-terrorism operation undertaken on 1 February 2007 in which nine Muslim men were arrested in dawn raids in Sparkhill, Washwood Heath, Kingstanding and Edgbaston – all areas of Birmingham. The operation was headed by the regional anti-terrorism command - the West-Midlands Counter-Terrorism Unit and MI5. The suspected individuals were placed under 24 hour surveillance for 6 months, in an operation that cost £10 million and involved up to 250 officers.[1]
The plot allegedly involved abducting a British Muslim soldier, beheading him and posting the video of the beheading online. According to a senior security source: if the group had "not found a suitable Muslim soldier to kill, it is quite possible they would have plucked an innocent member of the public off the streets and beheaded him."[1]
It eventually emerged that the plot to kidnap a soldier was a grave exaggeration by the press and security oficials. Five men appeared in court, facing 12 terrorism charges, however only one of the men - Parviz Khan - was accused on "intention to kidnap and kill a member of the British armed forces". The other four men were convicted with "supplying and funding terrorists" abroad or "withholding information". [2] Four men were released without any charges being brought against them.
The operation was overshadowed by allegations that the plot was moved forward to move attention away from the intense criticism surrounding the 'cash for honours' inquiry that had engulfed Downing Street and the reports that Britain's prisons were over-populated due to John Reid, the then Home Secretary. The lead agency in the investigation, the West Midlands counter-terrorism unit believed that such misinformation and leaks were made specifically to "deflect attention from the prisons crisis and the cash for honours inquiry." [3] The misinformation that was disseminated was alleged to have come from Whitehall and Home Office officials.[4]
Contents
Police Operation
Operation Gamble was a six-month intense police and MI5 surveillance operation. It was the first major counter-terrorism operation that was controlled and undertaken by the newly formed West Midlands Counter-Terrorism Unit. Assistant Chief Constable David Shaw was commanding it.[5]
The surveillance operation was meant to continue for 2 extra months, but police police were warned that because the "group were becoming becoming increasingly agitated" and were "arguing about when to strike" the police decided to act.[6]At 4am, more than 700 (armed and unarmed) police officers simultaneously raided eight homes and four businesses. The raids included eight residential properties, a corner shop, two Islamic bookshops and an internet cafe. A ninth man was arrested on the A38 motorway (near Birmingham) at 3pm.[6]
An undisclosed officer from West Midlands Police said: "this terror raid has come at a very convenient time for the Government as it has taken a number of embarrassing stories off the news agenda. But it must be stressed that the timing of the operation was an independent police decision."[1]
The total cost of the operation was £10 million pounds.[1]Over 4,5000 items of evidence were seized.[7]
What 'Secret Sources' Said
Misinformation & Leaks
Non-Existent Hit-List
Live Bait Story
One day after the arrests, The Daily Mail reported that "senior military sources" stated that they had been informed by police of a possible abduction several weeks ago after a "list of potential victims was narrowed down to just two". The two soldiers, "instead of being taken into protective custody … agreed to act as bait to their would-be attackers." The "courageous pair” the story continued "agreed to act as 'tethered goats' in an attempt to flush out the extremists planning to kidnap them. The soldiers were placed under round-the clock surveillance for weeks as officers waited for a strike. They bravely carried on with their ordinary duties while believing that the gang could strike at any time. To protect them, security forces mounted an operation reminiscent of a spy drama, tracking the soldiers with the latest technology." A military insider stated: "It was a brave thing to do".Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag
Investigation into Misinformation Demanded
An investigation was demanded by politicians into why and how information that was so sensitive and operational had been leaked to the press. Liberty argued that in the case of, amongst others, Operation Gamble, the “situation” was so serious that in addition to an official inquiry,
"... it [was] ... important that more systemic issues are considered with future counter-terrorist operations in mind…” Irresponsible off the record briefings during police counter-terrorist operation are a real danger …[to]…the free flow of information, and the free press [that is required] to guarantee it. [Misinformation] fosters mistrust in the general population who are left wondering if the ‘sources’ are telling the truth or spreading misinformation designed to justify unpopular operations or promote unpopular policies; such as the extension of pre-charge detention periods for terrorists suspects. Many people fear that if this situation is not addressed we will see … draconian and counter-productive legislation [being] ‘sold’ on the basis of misinformation … addressing the issue of the practice of off the record briefings during police counter-terrorist operations is one way of dealing with this." [4]
Outcome
Police State
SAS Training
See Also
- Operation Crevice
- 2008 Counter-Terrorism advertising campaign
- Counter-Terrorism Timeline
- CONTEST
- PREVENT
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Stephen Wright and Ben Taylor, 'Al Qaeda was behind plot to behead soldier; British gang planned to kidnap British Muslim serviceman', The Daily Mail, 1 February 2007, accessed via LexisNexis on 08.09.10
- ↑ Rod Chaytor, 12 Terror Charges..only one mentions kidnap and kill plot, The Mirror, 10 February 2007, accessed on 08.09.10
- ↑ Ian Cobain, Steven Morris, Michael White and Sandra Laville, ‘Police fear lurid terror briefings being used to divert attention from Whitehall problems, The Guardian, 3 February 2007, accessed on 08.09.10
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 'Setting the Record Straight: The Dangers of 'Off-the Record' Briefings to the Media During Police Counter-Terror Operations', Liberty, May 2007, accessed 08.09.10
- ↑ Jason Bennetto, 'Suspects 'had list of targets', The Independent, 2 February 2007, accessed via LexisNexis on 08.09.10
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Russell Jenkins and Daniel McGrory, 'How al-Qaeda tried to bring Baghdad to Birmingham', The Times, 1 February 2007, accessed via LexisNexis on 09.09.10
- ↑ Duncan Gardham and Richard Holt, Sixth man due in court charged with terror offences, The Telegraph, 10 February 2007, accessed 09.09.10
