Difference between revisions of "Rita Katz"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (link repaired)
m (Terrorist Hunter)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
===The Investigative Project===
 
===The Investigative Project===
  
Katz says she starting working in terrorism research by chance. She was bored in Washington and looking for a job and she responded to a newspaper advert placed by the [[Investigative Project]] which was looking for an Arabic speaking research assistant.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref> At the Investigative Project Katz was initially told by [[Steve Emerson]] that her job would involve a lot of “administrative stuff and copying”.<ref>Aaron Leibel [http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=10948 Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells]' ''Washington Jewish Week'' 29 August 2003</ref> However, she soon became involved in undercover investigations of Arab-American organisations. According to the ''New York Times'' she “began going to pro-Palestinian rallies and fund-raisers disguised as a Muslim woman”.<ref>Eric Lipton and Eric Lichtblau, [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/23/international/worldspecial2/23qaeda.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&position=&oref=slogin Even Near Home, a New Front Is Opening in the Terror Battle], ''New York Times'', 23 September 2004</ref> She would attend events “where non-Muslims would stand out” where she “pretended to be the wife of a radical Iraqi-American businessman”.<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> She has said in an interview that she sometimes felt sympathy when “various people told sob stories about how they were abused because they were Muslims or Arabs”.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>
+
Katz says she starting working in terrorism research by chance. She was bored in Washington and looking for a job and she responded to a newspaper advert placed by the [[Investigative Project]] which was looking for an Arabic speaking research assistant.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref> At the Investigative Project Katz was initially told by its Director [[Steve Emerson]] that her job would involve a lot of “administrative stuff and copying”.<ref>Aaron Leibel [http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=10948 Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells]' ''Washington Jewish Week'' 29 August 2003</ref> However, she would became involved in undercover investigations of Arab-American organisations and would later be referred to as the Research Director at the organisation. She would attend events “where non-Muslims would stand out” where she “pretended to be the wife of a radical Iraqi-American businessman”.<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> She has said in an interview that she sometimes felt sympathy when “various people told sob stories about how they were abused because they were Muslims or Arabs”.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>
  
The purpose of these undercover operations was to expose radical jihadists posing as Muslim community organisations or rights groups. That is the main focus of Steve Emerson’s research and it is a view which Katz evidently shares. She told MSNBC in 2003 that “Islamic fundamentalism in the United States has been in this country for many, many, many years. They have been able to infiltrate this country from Hezbollah to al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad in every corner of our cities of our great cities.” <ref>The Savage Nation, MSNBC, 14 June 2003</ref>
+
The purpose of these undercover operations was to expose radical jihadists posing as Muslim community organisations or rights groups. That such organisations are essentially fronts for terrorists is a major focus of Steve Emerson’s research. It is a view which Katz evidently shares. She told MSNBC in 2003 that “Islamic fundamentalism in the United States has been in this country for many, many, many years. They have been able to infiltrate this country from Hezbollah to al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad in every corner of our cities of our great cities.” <ref>The Savage Nation, MSNBC, 14 June 2003</ref>
  
Katz’s earliest exposé was of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF). She said the investigation was “on [her] own initiative and quite accidentally”<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>. She says she noticed differences between the Arabic and English translations of the group’s literature, and noted that the latter had omitted mentions of groups affiliated with Hamas.<ref>Aaron Leibel [http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=10948 Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells]' ''Washington Jewish Week'' 29 August 2003</ref> She says she “went to a fundraiser of theirs dressed as a Muslim woman. Soon thereafter I was attending conferences, visiting mosques, participating in rallies — and the more I did, the more I discovered the enormity of the problem of radicalism on U.S. soil.”<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref> In late 2001 President Bush announced he was freezing the charity’s assets saying that Hamas had “obtained much of the money it pays for murder abroad right here in the United States.” The government subsequently prosecuted the leaders of the Foundation but did not allege that it paid directly for terrorist attacks - rather that, to quote the ''New York Times'', “it supported terrorism by sending more than $12 million to charitable groups, known as zakat committees, which build hospitals and feed the poor.<ref>Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, ''New York Times'', October 22, 2007</ref> The US government failed to bring a conviction when the case came to trial in 2007<ref>Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, ''New York Times'', October 22, 2007</ref>
+
Katz’s earliest exposé was of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF). She said the investigation began “on [her] own initiative and quite accidentally”<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>. She says she noticed differences between the Arabic and English translations of the group’s literature, and noted that the latter had omitted mentions of groups affiliated with Hamas.<ref>Aaron Leibel [http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=10948 Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells]' ''Washington Jewish Week'' 29 August 2003</ref> She says she “went to a fundraiser of theirs dressed as a Muslim woman. Soon thereafter I was attending conferences, visiting mosques, participating in rallies — and the more I did, the more I discovered the enormity of the problem of radicalism on U.S. soil.”<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref> In late 2001 President Bush announced he was freezing the charity’s assets saying that Hamas had “obtained much of the money it pays for murder abroad right here in the United States.” The government subsequently prosecuted the leaders of the Foundation but did not allege that it paid directly for terrorist attacks - rather that, to quote the ''New York Times'', “it supported terrorism by sending more than $12 million to charitable groups, known as zakat committees, which build hospitals and feed the poor.<ref>Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, ''New York Times'', October 22, 2007</ref> The US government failed to bring a conviction when the case came to trial in 2007.<ref>Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, ''New York Times'', October 22, 2007</ref>
  
 
In 2000 Katz recorded Muslim lobbyist Abdurahman al-Amoudi at a public rally stating his support for Hamas and Hezbollah. She released the recording to the media, ending Abdurahman al-Amoudi’s access to the Clinton White House.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>
 
In 2000 Katz recorded Muslim lobbyist Abdurahman al-Amoudi at a public rally stating his support for Hamas and Hezbollah. She released the recording to the media, ending Abdurahman al-Amoudi’s access to the Clinton White House.<ref>Kathryn Jean Lopez, [http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory062603.asp| ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’], National Review Online, 26 June 2003</ref>
  
Katzs also began writing articles on terrorism. Her first publication appeared in late 1999 in ''The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International''. It was called ‘Trends in Anti-American Terrorism’ and was co-authored with [[Evan Kohlmann]], then a politics undergraduate at Georgetown University and interning at the Investigative Project. The article sought to address what it called three misconceptions about the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah. These were (1) That Hezballah is merely a Lebanese “resistance group, solely interested in ending the Israeli occupation of Lebanese soil” (2) That “enmity of Hezballah is restricted to the state of Israel” and (3) “That Hizballah's tactics and activities are within the scope of what a legitimate resistance group, rather than a terrorist organization, would undertake”. The article argued that Hezbollah was in fact pursuing an aggressive war against the existence of Israel and the Western world more generally, and that in pursuit of that goal they had established a “Terror University” from Iranian funds to “to increase terrorism against the West, Israel, and secular Arab governments.”<ref>''The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International'', Winter 1999 Vol. 6, No. 2</ref>
+
Whilst at the Investigative Project Katzs also began writing articles on terrorism. Her first publication appeared in late 1999 in ''The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International''. It was called ‘Trends in Anti-American Terrorism’ and was co-authored with [[Evan Kohlmann]], then a politics undergraduate at Georgetown University and interning at the Investigative Project. The article sought to address what it called three misconceptions about the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah. These were (1) That Hezballah is merely a Lebanese “resistance group, solely interested in ending the Israeli occupation of Lebanese soil” (2) That “enmity of Hezballah is restricted to the state of Israel” and (3) “That Hizballah's tactics and activities are within the scope of what a legitimate resistance group, rather than a terrorist organization, would undertake”. The article argued that Hezbollah was in fact pursuing an aggressive war against the existence of Israel and the Western world more generally, and that in pursuit of that goal they had established a “Terror University” from Iranian funds to “to increase terrorism against the West, Israel, and secular Arab governments.”<ref>''The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International'', Winter 1999 Vol. 6, No. 2</ref>
  
 
===Site Institute===
 
===Site Institute===
Line 37: Line 37:
 
''The New Yorker'' implies that Katz and Steve Emerson had some sort of falling out, writing that by June 2002 “Katz and Emerson, both combative personalities, had parted ways”.<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> That year Katz left the Investigative Project and established her own organisation [[Search for International Terrorist Entities|SITE]] with fellow Investigative Project employee [[Josh Devon]]. ''The New Yorker'' states that [[Evan Kohlmann]] also left the Investigative Project with Katz and Devon<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> but this seems to be contradicted by continued references to Kohlmann's role at the Investigative Project as well as testimony Kohlmann has given in court. SITE’s stated purpose was to “educate and aid the public, media and government as to the existence and dangers of international terrorism”. It monitored postings on Islamic websites and emailed information to subscribers. It was re-launched in 2008 as the [[SITE Intelligence Group]].
 
''The New Yorker'' implies that Katz and Steve Emerson had some sort of falling out, writing that by June 2002 “Katz and Emerson, both combative personalities, had parted ways”.<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> That year Katz left the Investigative Project and established her own organisation [[Search for International Terrorist Entities|SITE]] with fellow Investigative Project employee [[Josh Devon]]. ''The New Yorker'' states that [[Evan Kohlmann]] also left the Investigative Project with Katz and Devon<ref>Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006</ref> but this seems to be contradicted by continued references to Kohlmann's role at the Investigative Project as well as testimony Kohlmann has given in court. SITE’s stated purpose was to “educate and aid the public, media and government as to the existence and dangers of international terrorism”. It monitored postings on Islamic websites and emailed information to subscribers. It was re-launched in 2008 as the [[SITE Intelligence Group]].
  
===Terrorist Hunter===
+
==Involvement in law and law enforcement agencies==
  
In May 2003 Katz published an anonymous semi-autobiography entitled ''Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America''. She appeared in disguise on the American television show 60 Minutes to promote her book using the pseudonym Sarah, and wearing a wig and a fake nose.<ref>Marc Perelman,[http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref>
+
Katz’s biography at the Greater Talent Network states that:
  
In her book Katz accused The Heritage Education Trust and the Safa Foundation, two north Virginia-based charities, of being sponsors of Al Qaeda. She also accused a Georgia based poultry company Mar-Jac of laundering money for al Qaeda, Hamas and Islamic Jihad. These accusations were repeated on 60 Minutes. Following the broadcast the two charities brought a lawsuit against Katz and CBS as well as its correspondent Bob Simon for slander and libel. The poultry company Mar-Jac bought a separate case in the district court in Gainesville. Katz then broke her anonymity saying that most people who might pose a threat to her as a result of the book knew who she was anyway.<ref>Steven Zeitchik, [http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA305387.html?pubdate=6%2F16%2F2003&display=archive& ‘Anonymous Ecco Title on Terrorism Sparks Lawsuits’], ''Publishers Weekly'', 16 June 2003</ref> Nancy Luque, the Washington based attorney for the two charities claimed that Katz had a personal interest in making the claims, noting that she is a paid consultant for Motley-Rice which filed a $1 trillion lawsuit on behalf of families of the victims of the September 11 attacks.<ref>Marc Perelman,[http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref>
+
“Since well before September 11, she has personally briefed government officials, including former terrorism czar [[Richard Clarke]] and his staff in the White House, as well as investigators in the Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury and the Department of Homeland Security on the financing and recruitment networks of the radical Islamist terrorist movement. Many of her leads have prompted the government to investigate and take legal action against individuals and organizations suspected of ties to terrorism.<ref>[http://www.greatertalent.com/speakers/speakers.php?speakerid=395 Rita Katz] (accessed 20 March 2008)</ref>
  
==Criticism of Katz==
+
===Virginia Raids===
  
There is evidence that Katz’s ''Terrorist Hunter'' is unreliable. The Jewish newspaper ''Forward'' quoted two anonymous sources “privy to the investigations” into the Virginia-based charities. They were quoted as saying that “Katz had exaggerated her role in the Virginia investigation, drawn some reckless conclusions and lost the trust of some investigators from the FBI and Justice Department”.<ref>Marc Perelman,[http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref> After Katz’s mother read the book, Katz says she would call from time and correct some of the details. Katz said these small inaccuracies didn’t matter because they were her memories.<ref>Rahel Musleah, [http://www.hadassah.org/news/content/per_hadassah/archive/2003/03_NOV/profile.htm| ‘Profile: Rita Katz’], ''Hadassah Magazine'', November 2003 Vol. 85 No.3</ref>
+
Katz worked with the FBI on an investigation which led to a series of raids in March 2002 in Northern Virginia. The search warrants targeted the Graduate School of Islamic Thought and Social Sciences (GSITSS) and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), an Islamic research institute and think tank, as well as the private homes of a number of their employees and scholars. One of the raids led to a civil liberty complaint against Rita Katz and David Kane (the FBI agent who signed the search warrant affidavit)<ref>Aysha Nudrat Unus and Hanaa Unus v. David Kane and Rita Katz, Civ. No. 04-312-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 9, 2004)</ref>. The complainants were Aysha Nudrat Unus and Hanaa Unus the wife and daughter respectively of an employee of IIIT whose home was raided. They alleged amongst other things that the affidavit in support of the search warrants contained fabricated material facts regarding non-existent overseas transactions.<ref>[http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/edgar041905.pdf Testimony of the American Civil Liberties Union at an Oversight Hearing on the Implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act (PDF)] 19 April 2005</ref> The lawsuit was dismissed on the ground that probable cause existed to support the underlying search warrants, and the court awarded attorneys fees to Rita Katz.<ref>[http://www.aclu.org/natsec/gen/14468leg20050615.html ACLU Letter to Representative Coble Supplementing Timothy H. Edgar's April 19, 2005 Testimony on the USA PATRIOT Act], 15 June 2005)</ref>
  
==Legal testimony==
+
After the publishing of Katz’s book the Jewish newspaper ''Forward'' quoted two anonymous sources “privy to the investigations” as saying that “Katz had exaggerated her role in the Virginia investigation, drawn some reckless conclusions and lost the trust of some investigators from the FBI and Justice Department”.<ref>Marc Perelman,[ http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref>
  
===Al Rajhi-v-Wall Street Journal===
+
===Al Rajhi v. Wall Street Journal===
  
In ''Al Rajhi-v-Wall Street Journal''<ref>[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2003/1776.html Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation v The Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL] [2003] EWHC 1776 (QB) (21 July 2003)</ref> the Saudi bank Al-Rajhi bought a libel case against ''The Wall Street Journal'' for its front page article headed ‘Saudi Officials Monitor Certain Bank Accounts: Focus Is On Those With Potential Terrorist Ties’. In that article the paper had stated that accounts at the bank “belong to legitimate entities and businessmen who may in the past have had an association with institutions suspected of terrorism”. The case was bought in England because of the libel laws are unusually favourable to claimants in comparison with the United States and other European countries. ''The Wall Street Journal'' applied for permission to plead justification (i.e. that the libellous claims they made were true), and called Katz, as well as fellow terror expert [[Jean-Charles Brisard]], to testify that their accusations were true.
+
In ''Al Rajhi v. Wall Street Journal''<ref>[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2003/1776.html Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation v The Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL] [2003] EWHC 1776 (QB) (21 July 2003)</ref> the Saudi bank Al-Rajhi brought a libel case against ''The Wall Street Journal'' for its front page article headed ‘Saudi Officials Monitor Certain Bank Accounts: Focus Is On Those With Potential Terrorist Ties’. In that article the paper had stated that accounts at the bank “belong to legitimate entities and businessmen who may in the past have had an association with institutions suspected of terrorism”. The case was brought in England because of the libel laws are unusually favourable to claimants in comparison with the United States and other European countries. ''The Wall Street Journal'' applied for permission to plead justification (i.e. that the libellous claims they made were true), and called Katz, as well as fellow terror expert [[Jean-Charles Brisard]], to testify that their accusations were true.
  
 
===Al-Hussayen===
 
===Al-Hussayen===
Line 58: Line 58:
  
 
It would appear that following her assistance in the case, the prosecution had intended to use Katz as an expert witness. It was originally intended that Katz would testify about Islamic websites, but the Judge barred her from doing so on the basis that the prosecution had not established any link between the websites and the defendant. Katz appeared at the trial again several weeks later and was allowed to read the jury portions of four fatwas on suicide attacks that had been posted on a Web site that Al-Hussayen helped maintain. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's office in Idaho confirmed that Katz was a fact witness and added that “Fact witnesses may have expertise in certain areas, like Arabic language, how to get around on the Internet.” <ref>Betsy Z. Russell, [http://www.spokesmanreview.com/pf.asp?date=051604&ID=s1520351 ‘Consultant gives limited testimony; Katz's court role in Al-Hussayen case mundane’], Spokesman Review (Idaho Edition), 16 May 2004</ref> After al-Hussayen was acquitted, Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Terry Derden]], the prosecutor in the case, admitted that the charges were weak, but said that what mattered was that they'd disrupted Al-Hussayen from engaging in actions for which they were unable to secure a conviction. <ref>Maureen O'Hagan, [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002097570_sami22m.html ‘A terrorism case that went awry’], ''Seattle Times'', 22 November 2004</ref>
 
It would appear that following her assistance in the case, the prosecution had intended to use Katz as an expert witness. It was originally intended that Katz would testify about Islamic websites, but the Judge barred her from doing so on the basis that the prosecution had not established any link between the websites and the defendant. Katz appeared at the trial again several weeks later and was allowed to read the jury portions of four fatwas on suicide attacks that had been posted on a Web site that Al-Hussayen helped maintain. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's office in Idaho confirmed that Katz was a fact witness and added that “Fact witnesses may have expertise in certain areas, like Arabic language, how to get around on the Internet.” <ref>Betsy Z. Russell, [http://www.spokesmanreview.com/pf.asp?date=051604&ID=s1520351 ‘Consultant gives limited testimony; Katz's court role in Al-Hussayen case mundane’], Spokesman Review (Idaho Edition), 16 May 2004</ref> After al-Hussayen was acquitted, Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Terry Derden]], the prosecutor in the case, admitted that the charges were weak, but said that what mattered was that they'd disrupted Al-Hussayen from engaging in actions for which they were unable to secure a conviction. <ref>Maureen O'Hagan, [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002097570_sami22m.html ‘A terrorism case that went awry’], ''Seattle Times'', 22 November 2004</ref>
 +
 +
==Terrorist hunter==
 +
 +
In May 2003 Katz published an anonymous semi-autobiography entitled ''Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America''. She appeared in disguise on the American television show 60 Minutes to promote her book using the pseudonym Sarah, and wearing a wig and a fake nose.<ref>Marc Perelman,[http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref>
 +
 +
In her book Katz accused The Heritage Education Trust and the Safa Foundation, two north Virginia-based charities, of being sponsors of Al Qaeda. She also accused a Georgia based poultry company Mar-Jac of laundering money for al Qaeda, Hamas and Islamic Jihad. These accusations were repeated on 60 Minutes. Following the broadcast the two charities brought a lawsuit against Katz and CBS as well as its correspondent Bob Simon for slander and libel. The poultry company Mar-Jac bought a separate case in the district court in Gainesville. Katz then broke her anonymity saying that most people who might pose a threat to her as a result of the book knew who she was anyway.<ref>Steven Zeitchik, [http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA305387.html?pubdate=6%2F16%2F2003&display=archive& ‘Anonymous Ecco Title on Terrorism Sparks Lawsuits’], ''Publishers Weekly'', 16 June 2003</ref> Nancy Luque, the Washington based attorney for the two charities claimed that Katz had a personal interest in making the claims, noting that she is a paid consultant for Motley-Rice which filed a $1 trillion lawsuit on behalf of families of the victims of the September 11 attacks.<ref>Marc Perelman,[http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], ''Forward'', 13 June 2003</ref>
  
 
==Publications==
 
==Publications==
Line 106: Line 112:
  
 
*[[Steve Emerson]]
 
*[[Steve Emerson]]
 +
*[[Richard Clarke]]
 
*[[Evan Kohlmann]]
 
*[[Evan Kohlmann]]
 
*[[Josh Devon]]
 
*[[Josh Devon]]
Line 115: Line 122:
 
*[http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=202123-1&showVid=true Video of Testimony to the US House Committee on Homeland Security]
 
*[http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=202123-1&showVid=true Video of Testimony to the US House Committee on Homeland Security]
 
*Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006
 
*Benjamin Wallace-Wells, [http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/29/060529fa_fact 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business'], ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2006
*<ref>[http://armedservices.house.gov/pdfs/TUTC021407/Katz_Testimony021407.pdf Testimony before the House Armed Services Committee on Terrorism (PDF)] 14 February 2007</ref>
+
*[http://armedservices.house.gov/pdfs/TUTC021407/Katz_Testimony021407.pdf Testimony before the House Armed Services Committee on Terrorism (PDF)] 14 February 2007
 +
*[http://homeland.house.gov/SiteDocuments/20071106144438-11991.pdf Testimony to the Homeland Security Committee Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing and Terrorism (PDF)] 6 November 2007
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[Category:Terrorologist|Katz, Rita]]  
+
[[Category:Terrorologist|Katz, Rita]]
[[category:Terrorexpertise]]
+
[[Category:Terrorism Spin|Katz, Rita]]
 +
[[Category:Islam Critics|Katz, Rita]]

Latest revision as of 03:32, 7 May 2015

Rita Katz

Rita Katz (born 1963) is an Israeli-American terrorism expert formerly of the Investigative Project. She is co-founder of the SITE Institute with Josh Devon which she re-launched in 2008 as the SITE Intelligence Group.

Biography

Iraq

Katz was born in Basra, Iraq in 1963, one of four children of a wealthy Iraqi Jewish businessman[1] called Fuad Gabbay.[2] Her mother Salima was from a family who had been one of the wealthiest in Iraq for generations[3] Growing up in Basra Katz she says she “lived in a huge mansion and went to a private school” and had “servants who took care of all [her] needs.” [4]

In 1969, when she was six, her father was arrested by the Iraqi authorities, accused of being an Israeli spy. He was hanged along with eight other men after making a televised confession. Katz was not aware of her father’s death at the time and only discovered it later when she was 17.[5] She says her father was, “hanged in broad daylight, in Baghdad's central square, to the cheers of a half a million spectators”.[6] The family’s property was confiscated by the state[7] after which she says they were placed under house arrest in Baghdad. Two years later they fled through Northern Iraqi to Iran (then under the Shah) and then to Israel. [8]

Israel

In Israel the family settled in a small seaside town called Bat-Yam. Katz served in the Israel Defence Forces after high school, and studied politics and history at Tel Aviv University where she met her husband who was a Russian-Israeli medical student at the university.[9] After graduating Katz joined her mother’s business, manufacturing and selling clothes to Orthodox Jews.[10]

Washington

As a committed Zionist Katz was reluctant to ever leave Israel saying, “I believed that Jews belong in Israel”.[11] Nevertheless in 1997 Katz’s husband was offered a research fellowship in endocrinology at the National Institutes of Health and they moved to Washington.[12] Katz has acknowledged that at this time she worked in violation of the provisions of her visa. This was disclosed whilst she was acting as a witness against a defendant accused amongst other things of visa fraud.[13]

Terrorism Research

The Investigative Project

Katz says she starting working in terrorism research by chance. She was bored in Washington and looking for a job and she responded to a newspaper advert placed by the Investigative Project which was looking for an Arabic speaking research assistant.[14] At the Investigative Project Katz was initially told by its Director Steve Emerson that her job would involve a lot of “administrative stuff and copying”.[15] However, she would became involved in undercover investigations of Arab-American organisations and would later be referred to as the Research Director at the organisation. She would attend events “where non-Muslims would stand out” where she “pretended to be the wife of a radical Iraqi-American businessman”.[16] She has said in an interview that she sometimes felt sympathy when “various people told sob stories about how they were abused because they were Muslims or Arabs”.[17]

The purpose of these undercover operations was to expose radical jihadists posing as Muslim community organisations or rights groups. That such organisations are essentially fronts for terrorists is a major focus of Steve Emerson’s research. It is a view which Katz evidently shares. She told MSNBC in 2003 that “Islamic fundamentalism in the United States has been in this country for many, many, many years. They have been able to infiltrate this country from Hezbollah to al Qaeda, Palestinian Islamic Jihad in every corner of our cities of our great cities.” [18]

Katz’s earliest exposé was of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF). She said the investigation began “on [her] own initiative and quite accidentally”[19]. She says she noticed differences between the Arabic and English translations of the group’s literature, and noted that the latter had omitted mentions of groups affiliated with Hamas.[20] She says she “went to a fundraiser of theirs dressed as a Muslim woman. Soon thereafter I was attending conferences, visiting mosques, participating in rallies — and the more I did, the more I discovered the enormity of the problem of radicalism on U.S. soil.”[21] In late 2001 President Bush announced he was freezing the charity’s assets saying that Hamas had “obtained much of the money it pays for murder abroad right here in the United States.” The government subsequently prosecuted the leaders of the Foundation but did not allege that it paid directly for terrorist attacks - rather that, to quote the New York Times, “it supported terrorism by sending more than $12 million to charitable groups, known as zakat committees, which build hospitals and feed the poor.[22] The US government failed to bring a conviction when the case came to trial in 2007.[23]

In 2000 Katz recorded Muslim lobbyist Abdurahman al-Amoudi at a public rally stating his support for Hamas and Hezbollah. She released the recording to the media, ending Abdurahman al-Amoudi’s access to the Clinton White House.[24]

Whilst at the Investigative Project Katzs also began writing articles on terrorism. Her first publication appeared in late 1999 in The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International. It was called ‘Trends in Anti-American Terrorism’ and was co-authored with Evan Kohlmann, then a politics undergraduate at Georgetown University and interning at the Investigative Project. The article sought to address what it called three misconceptions about the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah. These were (1) That Hezballah is merely a Lebanese “resistance group, solely interested in ending the Israeli occupation of Lebanese soil” (2) That “enmity of Hezballah is restricted to the state of Israel” and (3) “That Hizballah's tactics and activities are within the scope of what a legitimate resistance group, rather than a terrorist organization, would undertake”. The article argued that Hezbollah was in fact pursuing an aggressive war against the existence of Israel and the Western world more generally, and that in pursuit of that goal they had established a “Terror University” from Iranian funds to “to increase terrorism against the West, Israel, and secular Arab governments.”[25]

Site Institute

The New Yorker implies that Katz and Steve Emerson had some sort of falling out, writing that by June 2002 “Katz and Emerson, both combative personalities, had parted ways”.[26] That year Katz left the Investigative Project and established her own organisation SITE with fellow Investigative Project employee Josh Devon. The New Yorker states that Evan Kohlmann also left the Investigative Project with Katz and Devon[27] but this seems to be contradicted by continued references to Kohlmann's role at the Investigative Project as well as testimony Kohlmann has given in court. SITE’s stated purpose was to “educate and aid the public, media and government as to the existence and dangers of international terrorism”. It monitored postings on Islamic websites and emailed information to subscribers. It was re-launched in 2008 as the SITE Intelligence Group.

Involvement in law and law enforcement agencies

Katz’s biography at the Greater Talent Network states that:

“Since well before September 11, she has personally briefed government officials, including former terrorism czar Richard Clarke and his staff in the White House, as well as investigators in the Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury and the Department of Homeland Security on the financing and recruitment networks of the radical Islamist terrorist movement. Many of her leads have prompted the government to investigate and take legal action against individuals and organizations suspected of ties to terrorism.”[28]

Virginia Raids

Katz worked with the FBI on an investigation which led to a series of raids in March 2002 in Northern Virginia. The search warrants targeted the Graduate School of Islamic Thought and Social Sciences (GSITSS) and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), an Islamic research institute and think tank, as well as the private homes of a number of their employees and scholars. One of the raids led to a civil liberty complaint against Rita Katz and David Kane (the FBI agent who signed the search warrant affidavit)[29]. The complainants were Aysha Nudrat Unus and Hanaa Unus the wife and daughter respectively of an employee of IIIT whose home was raided. They alleged amongst other things that the affidavit in support of the search warrants contained fabricated material facts regarding non-existent overseas transactions.[30] The lawsuit was dismissed on the ground that probable cause existed to support the underlying search warrants, and the court awarded attorneys fees to Rita Katz.[31]

After the publishing of Katz’s book the Jewish newspaper Forward quoted two anonymous sources “privy to the investigations” as saying that “Katz had exaggerated her role in the Virginia investigation, drawn some reckless conclusions and lost the trust of some investigators from the FBI and Justice Department”.[32]

Al Rajhi v. Wall Street Journal

In Al Rajhi v. Wall Street Journal[33] the Saudi bank Al-Rajhi brought a libel case against The Wall Street Journal for its front page article headed ‘Saudi Officials Monitor Certain Bank Accounts: Focus Is On Those With Potential Terrorist Ties’. In that article the paper had stated that accounts at the bank “belong to legitimate entities and businessmen who may in the past have had an association with institutions suspected of terrorism”. The case was brought in England because of the libel laws are unusually favourable to claimants in comparison with the United States and other European countries. The Wall Street Journal applied for permission to plead justification (i.e. that the libellous claims they made were true), and called Katz, as well as fellow terror expert Jean-Charles Brisard, to testify that their accusations were true.

Al-Hussayen

In 2004, Katz spent several months helping the Department of Justice prepare a case against Sami Omar al-Hussayen[34] a doctoral student at the University of Idaho in Moscow, Idaho. Al-Hussayen was charged with supplying material support to a terrorist group because he volunteered to setup and maintain a website for the Islamic Assembly of North America (IANA), a group that has been investigated by the Federal Government, but never charged.[35] Al-Hussayen was detained for 1 1/2 years before his trial in which the jury acquitted him on all terrorist-related charges, two of the immigration charges and hung on the immigration charges. The government alleged that he was guilty of immigration violations because he had worked as a volunteer as IANA webmaster, and may have received $300 for this work spread out over multiple years.[36]

It would appear that following her assistance in the case, the prosecution had intended to use Katz as an expert witness. It was originally intended that Katz would testify about Islamic websites, but the Judge barred her from doing so on the basis that the prosecution had not established any link between the websites and the defendant. Katz appeared at the trial again several weeks later and was allowed to read the jury portions of four fatwas on suicide attacks that had been posted on a Web site that Al-Hussayen helped maintain. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's office in Idaho confirmed that Katz was a fact witness and added that “Fact witnesses may have expertise in certain areas, like Arabic language, how to get around on the Internet.” [37] After al-Hussayen was acquitted, Assistant U.S. Attorney Terry Derden, the prosecutor in the case, admitted that the charges were weak, but said that what mattered was that they'd disrupted Al-Hussayen from engaging in actions for which they were unable to secure a conviction. [38]

Terrorist hunter

In May 2003 Katz published an anonymous semi-autobiography entitled Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America. She appeared in disguise on the American television show 60 Minutes to promote her book using the pseudonym Sarah, and wearing a wig and a fake nose.[39]

In her book Katz accused The Heritage Education Trust and the Safa Foundation, two north Virginia-based charities, of being sponsors of Al Qaeda. She also accused a Georgia based poultry company Mar-Jac of laundering money for al Qaeda, Hamas and Islamic Jihad. These accusations were repeated on 60 Minutes. Following the broadcast the two charities brought a lawsuit against Katz and CBS as well as its correspondent Bob Simon for slander and libel. The poultry company Mar-Jac bought a separate case in the district court in Gainesville. Katz then broke her anonymity saying that most people who might pose a threat to her as a result of the book knew who she was anyway.[40] Nancy Luque, the Washington based attorney for the two charities claimed that Katz had a personal interest in making the claims, noting that she is a paid consultant for Motley-Rice which filed a $1 trillion lawsuit on behalf of families of the victims of the September 11 attacks.[41]

Publications

Books

  • Rita Katz, Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America (New York: HarperCollins, 2003) ISBN: 0060528192 9780060528195

Articles

  • Rita Katz and Michael Kern, ‘Online jihadist captured, but 007's legacy lives on’, Wayne Journal-Gazette (Indiana), 2 April 2006

Affiliations

Organisations

Friends and Associates

Resources

Notes

  1. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  2. Rahel Musleah, ‘Profile: Rita Katz’, Hadassah Magazine, November 2003 Vol. 85 No.3
  3. Rahel Musleah, ‘Profile: Rita Katz’, Hadassah Magazine, November 2003 Vol. 85 No.3
  4. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  5. Rahel Musleah, ‘Profile: Rita Katz’, Hadassah Magazine, November 2003 Vol. 85 No.3
  6. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  7. Aaron Leibel Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells' Washington Jewish Week 29 August 2003
  8. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003; Rahel Musleah, ‘Profile: Rita Katz’, Hadassah Magazine, November 2003 Vol. 85 No.3
  9. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  10. Aaron Leibel Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells' Washington Jewish Week 29 August 2003.
  11. Aaron Leibel Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells' Washington Jewish Week 29 August 2003
  12. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  13. Bob Fick, ‘Jurors in Saudi computer student's terrorism trial can view’, Associated Press, 13 May 2004
  14. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  15. Aaron Leibel Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells' Washington Jewish Week 29 August 2003
  16. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  17. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  18. The Savage Nation, MSNBC, 14 June 2003
  19. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  20. Aaron Leibel Author Infiltrates Islamic Terror Cells' Washington Jewish Week 29 August 2003
  21. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  22. Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, New York Times, October 22, 2007
  23. Leslie Eaton, ‘No Convictions in Trial Against Muslim Charity’, New York Times, October 22, 2007
  24. Kathryn Jean Lopez, ‘The Terrorist Hunter Speaks’, National Review Online, 26 June 2003
  25. The Journal of Counterterrorism & Security International, Winter 1999 Vol. 6, No. 2
  26. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  27. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  28. Rita Katz (accessed 20 March 2008)
  29. Aysha Nudrat Unus and Hanaa Unus v. David Kane and Rita Katz, Civ. No. 04-312-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 9, 2004)
  30. Testimony of the American Civil Liberties Union at an Oversight Hearing on the Implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act (PDF) 19 April 2005
  31. ACLU Letter to Representative Coble Supplementing Timothy H. Edgar's April 19, 2005 Testimony on the USA PATRIOT Act, 15 June 2005)
  32. Marc Perelman,[ http://www.forward.com/articles/7490/ ‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’], Forward, 13 June 2003
  33. Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation v The Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2003] EWHC 1776 (QB) (21 July 2003)
  34. Benjamin Wallace-Wells, 'PRIVATE JIHAD: How Rita Katz got into the spying business', The New Yorker, 29 May 2006
  35. Maureen O'Hagan, ‘A terrorism case that went awry’, Seattle Times, 22 November 2004
  36. Maureen O'Hagan, ‘A terrorism case that went awry’, Seattle Times, 22 November 2004
  37. Betsy Z. Russell, ‘Consultant gives limited testimony; Katz's court role in Al-Hussayen case mundane’, Spokesman Review (Idaho Edition), 16 May 2004
  38. Maureen O'Hagan, ‘A terrorism case that went awry’, Seattle Times, 22 November 2004
  39. Marc Perelman,‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’, Forward, 13 June 2003
  40. Steven Zeitchik, ‘Anonymous Ecco Title on Terrorism Sparks Lawsuits’, Publishers Weekly, 16 June 2003
  41. Marc Perelman,‘Muslim Charities Sue CBS, Investigator’, Forward, 13 June 2003