Difference between revisions of "Procter & Gamble"
(→Affiliations) |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
P&G’s famous brands include Ariel, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, Fabreze, Sunny Delight, and Oil of Olaz. About half of P&G's sales come from its top ten brands. | P&G’s famous brands include Ariel, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, Fabreze, Sunny Delight, and Oil of Olaz. About half of P&G's sales come from its top ten brands. | ||
| − | P&G also makes pet food and PUR water filters and produces the soap operas Guiding Light and As the World Turns [1]. Finally, P&G produces chemicals. Today, P&G markets its products to more than five billion consumers in 130 countries. The company has on-the-ground operations in over 70 countries around the world, and employs more than 106,000 people. Last year’s (2000) turnover equalled $37 billion [£25,6 billion]. | + | P&G also makes pet food and PUR water filters and produces the soap operas Guiding Light and As the World Turns<ref> Hoover’s Business Information [http://www.hoovers.com/co/capsule/1/0,2163,11211,00.html Procter & Gamble] viewed 22/10/01</ref>. Finally, P&G produces chemicals. Today, P&G markets its products to more than five billion consumers in 130 countries. The company has on-the-ground operations in over 70 countries around the world, and employs more than 106,000 people. Last year’s (2000) turnover equalled $37 billion [£25,6 billion]. |
| − | P&G is one of the world’s biggest advertisers [ | + | P&G is one of the world’s biggest advertisers<ref>John Millen [http://www.kamcity.com/library/global.htm ‘Plan Global, Win Local’] viewed 22/10/01</ref>. Advertising Age estimate a 1999 media spend of $4.7bn [£3,3bn], of which around $3bn [£3,253bn] was outside the US, making it the world's #2 advertiser<ref> Mind Advertising [http://www.mind-advertising.com/us/pg_us.htm Procter & Gamble Profile] viewed 22/10/01</ref>. |
| − | Fortune 500 lists America’s Top Performing Companies. P&G ranks #39 on the list, before its main competitor Johnson & Johnson (#57) and Kimberly-Clark (#142). P&G also outperforms Unilever and Nestle, the company’s main competitors overseas [ | + | Fortune 500 lists America’s Top Performing Companies. P&G ranks #39 on the list, before its main competitor Johnson & Johnson (#57) and Kimberly-Clark (#142). P&G also outperforms Unilever and Nestle, the company’s main competitors overseas<ref> Hoover’s Business Information [http://www.hoovers.com/cgi-bin/offsite?site=HBN&url=www.fortune.com/fortune/fortune500 Fortune 500] viewed 04/10/01</ref>. |
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Soap&Candles=== | ===Soap&Candles=== | ||
| − | Candlemaker William Procter (an immigrant from England) and soapmaker James Gamble (arrived from Ireland) launched their new enterprise in Cincinnati in 1837. The company gradually grew into a multi-million dollar corporation. ‘During the Civil War, Procter & Gamble was awarded several contracts to supply soap and candles to the Union armies. These orders kept the factory busy day and night, building the Company's reputation as soldiers returned home with their P&G products.’[ | + | Candlemaker William Procter (an immigrant from England) and soapmaker James Gamble (arrived from Ireland) launched their new enterprise in Cincinnati in 1837. The company gradually grew into a multi-million dollar corporation. ‘During the Civil War, Procter & Gamble was awarded several contracts to supply soap and candles to the Union armies. These orders kept the factory busy day and night, building the Company's reputation as soldiers returned home with their P&G products.’<ref> Procter & Gamble [http://www.pg.com/about_pg/overview_facts/history.jhtml History] viewed 05/10/01</ref> |
| − | Once a staple of the company's product line, candles declined in popularity with the invention of the electric light bulb. P&G discontinued candle manufacturing in the 1920s | + | Once a staple of the company's product line, candles declined in popularity with the invention of the electric light bulb. P&G discontinued candle manufacturing in the 1920s <ref>ibid</ref>. Soap is still one of P&G’s core products. P&G was the first company to advertise nationally direct to consumers (Ivory soap in the 1880s) and it literally created the concept of "soap opera" by sponsoring radio and television dramas targeting women<ref> Mind Advertising [http://www.mind-advertising.com/us/pg_us.htm Procter & Gamble Profile] viewed 05/10/01</ref>. |
| − | P&G defined many marketing strategies we now take for granted. Marketing (still gaining importance) is definitely an important key to P&G’s success. As one critic put it: "Within a paternalistic corporate culture, P&G pioneered in brand management, in consumer surveys for marketing research, and in new product research and development. One reason for P&G's domestic success has been their reliance on a combination of consumer research, advertising, and distribution techniques." | + | P&G defined many marketing strategies we now take for granted. Marketing (still gaining importance) is definitely an important key to P&G’s success. As one critic put it: "Within a paternalistic corporate culture, P&G pioneered in brand management, in consumer surveys for marketing research, and in new product research and development. One reason for P&G's domestic success has been their reliance on a combination of consumer research, advertising, and distribution techniques." <ref>A comment by G.W. Goodale on the book titled ‘Soap Opera, the inside story of P&G, by Alesia Swasy</ref> |
===Bad Results=== | ===Bad Results=== | ||
| − | However, P&G has not been very successful recently. ‘Annual sales growth has been slowing over the last few years, from 5 percent in 1996 to 2.6 percent in 1999’. The company stumbled badly in 2000 missing analysts’ profit expectations and causing its famously reliable stock to plummet from $103 (£71,3) in January 2000 to $64 (£44,3) in June 2001 [ | + | However, P&G has not been very successful recently. ‘Annual sales growth has been slowing over the last few years, from 5 percent in 1996 to 2.6 percent in 1999’. The company stumbled badly in 2000 missing analysts’ profit expectations and causing its famously reliable stock to plummet from $103 (£71,3) in January 2000 to $64 (£44,3) in June 2001<ref> Fast Company Magazine [http://www.fastcompany.com/online/49/bestpractice.html 'Don't Shout, Listen'] August 2001 issue. viewed 22/10/01</ref>. |
In 1999, CEO Durk Jager kicked off Organization 2005 in order to forge better performance. Organization 2005 includes cutting 17,000 workers over the next three years and reorganising the company's corporate structure from four geographic business units to seven global business units based on product categories. | In 1999, CEO Durk Jager kicked off Organization 2005 in order to forge better performance. Organization 2005 includes cutting 17,000 workers over the next three years and reorganising the company's corporate structure from four geographic business units to seven global business units based on product categories. | ||
===Culture Change=== | ===Culture Change=== | ||
| − | ‘Organization 2005 also aims at changing P&G's culture from a conservative, slow-moving, bureaucratic behemoth to that of a modern, fast-moving, Internet-savvy organisation. P&G wants to make faster and better decisions, cut red tape, wring costs out of systems and procedures, fuel innovation, set more aggressive sales goals and nearly double its revenue. The catalyst for all this change is IT.’[10 | + | ‘Organization 2005 also aims at changing P&G's culture from a conservative, slow-moving, bureaucratic behemoth to that of a modern, fast-moving, Internet-savvy organisation. P&G wants to make faster and better decisions, cut red tape, wring costs out of systems and procedures, fuel innovation, set more aggressive sales goals and nearly double its revenue. The catalyst for all this change is IT.’<ref>United Business Media [http://www.internetwk.com/transform/transform110199-3.htm Information Week] viewed 10/10/01</ref> |
| − | In addition, P&G wants to abandon its legacy of secrecy. ‘Its new spirit of openness is most evident on the Internet. A year ago, it was a stodgy, nondescript site where no one other than investors or job seekers had any reason to go to. Today, you see a consumer-friendly portal with loads of information about P&G products.’[ | + | In addition, P&G wants to abandon its legacy of secrecy. ‘Its new spirit of openness is most evident on the Internet. A year ago, it was a stodgy, nondescript site where no one other than investors or job seekers had any reason to go to. Today, you see a consumer-friendly portal with loads of information about P&G products.’<ref> Fast Company Magazine [http://www.fastcompany.com/online/49/bestpractice.html 'Don't Shout, Listen'] August 2001 issue. viewed: 22/10/01</ref> |
| − | So far, Organization 2005 has had little to show. However, P&G stresses the company will pick the fruits of the ambitious restructuring plan in the near future. "This restructuring," former CEO Millen explained, "will ensure that P&G is well placed to address the issues facing manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers at the outset of the 21st century. Examples of these issues are the internationalisation and consolidation of retailing, consumer loyalty and retention, category management, the potential effects of the Euro currency and dramatic advances in information technology."[ | + | So far, Organization 2005 has had little to show. However, P&G stresses the company will pick the fruits of the ambitious restructuring plan in the near future. "This restructuring," former CEO Millen explained, "will ensure that P&G is well placed to address the issues facing manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers at the outset of the 21st century. Examples of these issues are the internationalisation and consolidation of retailing, consumer loyalty and retention, category management, the potential effects of the Euro currency and dramatic advances in information technology."<ref> John Millen, Kamcity [http://www.kamcity.com/library/global.htm ‘Plan Global, Win Local’] viewed 22/10/01</ref> |
===New Alliances=== | ===New Alliances=== | ||
| − | One of P&G's new strategies is linking up with other companies to extract as much value from its brands as possible. Last February (2001) Coke and P&G announced a $4bn [£2,77bn] alliance. The alliance would involve the union of some 40 consumer products (including Sunny Delight, Pringles and Minute Maid) under the umbrella of a Coke-P&G joint venture. P&G was hoping Coke’s far-reaching distribution network could give the company a boost. P&G’s renowned R&D capacities were attractive to Coke. Eight months later the consumer goods behemoths called the wedding off. ‘A spokesman for Coke said: "After many months of due diligence with Procter & Gamble, we felt that we could unlock the value of our brands more effectively and profitably by retaining full control of them."’ | + | One of P&G's new strategies is linking up with other companies to extract as much value from its brands as possible. Last February (2001) Coke and P&G announced a $4bn [£2,77bn] alliance. The alliance would involve the union of some 40 consumer products (including Sunny Delight, Pringles and Minute Maid) under the umbrella of a Coke-P&G joint venture. P&G was hoping Coke’s far-reaching distribution network could give the company a boost. P&G’s renowned R&D capacities were attractive to Coke. Eight months later the consumer goods behemoths called the wedding off. ‘A spokesman for Coke said: "After many months of due diligence with Procter & Gamble, we felt that we could unlock the value of our brands more effectively and profitably by retaining full control of them."’<ref><i>The Grocer</i> ‘Coke and P&G abandon alliance’, September 29th 2001</ref> |
| − | However, P&G successfully tied up with chewing gum giant the Wrigley Company. The deal will allow P&G to cash in on the global gum, mint, and breath-freshener market. This is bigger than the toothpaste market and equal in size to the shampoo or skincare sectors. ‘We will soon be able to sweeten our mouths with Crest gum, Crest mints and Crest breath freshener’, the Guardian reports [14]. P&G has recently announced it will sell the Jif and Crisco brands in a bid to get rid of under-performing brands. P&G and J.M. Smucker Co., which makes a wide variety of jams, jellies and other foods, is acquiring the Jif peanut butter and Crisco cooking oil brands from P&G for $1 billion in stock [ | + | However, P&G successfully tied up with chewing gum giant the Wrigley Company. The deal will allow P&G to cash in on the global gum, mint, and breath-freshener market. This is bigger than the toothpaste market and equal in size to the shampoo or skincare sectors. ‘We will soon be able to sweeten our mouths with Crest gum, Crest mints and Crest breath freshener’, the Guardian reports [14]. P&G has recently announced it will sell the Jif and Crisco brands in a bid to get rid of under-performing brands. P&G and J.M. Smucker Co., which makes a wide variety of jams, jellies and other foods, is acquiring the Jif peanut butter and Crisco cooking oil brands from P&G for $1 billion in stock<ref> Oilprices.com [http://www.oilprices.com/?action=display&article=9778278&template=oilprices/stories.txt&index=recent Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices] viewed 18/10/01</ref>. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Public Relations, Lobbying and Business Intelligence firms== | ||
| + | In January 2008, Procter & Gamble is listed as a client for French PR firm [[I&E]]<ref> Public Relations Organisation International [http://www.proi.org/partners/profiles/ie.htm Profiles] Accessed 17th January 2008</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procter & Gamble is listed as a client of business intelligence firm [[Business Insights]]<ref> Business Insights [http://globalbusinessinsights.com/content/rbhc0019m.pdf Patient Power: The shift towards more informed, more powerful consumers of drugs] Accessed 5th February 2008</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 2008, Procter & Gamble is listed as a client of [[Innovex]]<ref> Innovex [http://www.innovexcareers.com/content_static/c_ourcustomers.asp?session_id={212F403D-EE9F-433B-A03A-E66AB35FB45E} Our Customers] Accessed 12th February 2008</ref>, The [[Gorlin Group]]<ref>The Gorlin Group [http://www.gorlingroup.com/ Clients] Accessed 20th March 2008</ref> and as a member of the [[American Benefits Council]]<ref>American Benefits Council [http://www.americanbenefitscouncil.org/about/memberlist.cfm Memberships] Accessed 26th February 2008</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Affiliations== | ||
| + | Procter & Gamble are donors to the [[Science Media Centre]]. <ref>SMC, [http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/about-us/funding/ Funding], accessed 29 September 2013. See also [[Science Media Centre - Funding]]</ref> | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 52: | ||
* [[Procter & Gamble: Corporate Crimes]] | * [[Procter & Gamble: Corporate Crimes]] | ||
* [[Procter & Gamble: Links, contacts & resources]] | * [[Procter & Gamble: Links, contacts & resources]] | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | <references/> | |
| − | [ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | [[Category:Food and Agriculture Industry]][[Category:Transnational Corporations]][[category:Chemical Industry]][[Category:Science Media Centre]] |
| − | [ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [ | ||
| − | [ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [ | ||
| − | [ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 26 February 2015
Contents
Procter & Gamble (P&G) is America’s biggest maker of household products, with at least 250 brands in six main categories: laundry and cleaning (detergents), paper goods (toilet paper), beauty care (cosmetics, shampoos), food and beverages (coffee, snacks), feminine care (sanitary towels) and health care (toothpaste, medicine).
P&G’s famous brands include Ariel, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, Fabreze, Sunny Delight, and Oil of Olaz. About half of P&G's sales come from its top ten brands.
P&G also makes pet food and PUR water filters and produces the soap operas Guiding Light and As the World Turns[1]. Finally, P&G produces chemicals. Today, P&G markets its products to more than five billion consumers in 130 countries. The company has on-the-ground operations in over 70 countries around the world, and employs more than 106,000 people. Last year’s (2000) turnover equalled $37 billion [£25,6 billion].
P&G is one of the world’s biggest advertisers[2]. Advertising Age estimate a 1999 media spend of $4.7bn [£3,3bn], of which around $3bn [£3,253bn] was outside the US, making it the world's #2 advertiser[3].
Fortune 500 lists America’s Top Performing Companies. P&G ranks #39 on the list, before its main competitor Johnson & Johnson (#57) and Kimberly-Clark (#142). P&G also outperforms Unilever and Nestle, the company’s main competitors overseas[4].
History
Soap&Candles
Candlemaker William Procter (an immigrant from England) and soapmaker James Gamble (arrived from Ireland) launched their new enterprise in Cincinnati in 1837. The company gradually grew into a multi-million dollar corporation. ‘During the Civil War, Procter & Gamble was awarded several contracts to supply soap and candles to the Union armies. These orders kept the factory busy day and night, building the Company's reputation as soldiers returned home with their P&G products.’[5]
Once a staple of the company's product line, candles declined in popularity with the invention of the electric light bulb. P&G discontinued candle manufacturing in the 1920s [6]. Soap is still one of P&G’s core products. P&G was the first company to advertise nationally direct to consumers (Ivory soap in the 1880s) and it literally created the concept of "soap opera" by sponsoring radio and television dramas targeting women[7].
P&G defined many marketing strategies we now take for granted. Marketing (still gaining importance) is definitely an important key to P&G’s success. As one critic put it: "Within a paternalistic corporate culture, P&G pioneered in brand management, in consumer surveys for marketing research, and in new product research and development. One reason for P&G's domestic success has been their reliance on a combination of consumer research, advertising, and distribution techniques." [8]
Bad Results
However, P&G has not been very successful recently. ‘Annual sales growth has been slowing over the last few years, from 5 percent in 1996 to 2.6 percent in 1999’. The company stumbled badly in 2000 missing analysts’ profit expectations and causing its famously reliable stock to plummet from $103 (£71,3) in January 2000 to $64 (£44,3) in June 2001[9].
In 1999, CEO Durk Jager kicked off Organization 2005 in order to forge better performance. Organization 2005 includes cutting 17,000 workers over the next three years and reorganising the company's corporate structure from four geographic business units to seven global business units based on product categories.
Culture Change
‘Organization 2005 also aims at changing P&G's culture from a conservative, slow-moving, bureaucratic behemoth to that of a modern, fast-moving, Internet-savvy organisation. P&G wants to make faster and better decisions, cut red tape, wring costs out of systems and procedures, fuel innovation, set more aggressive sales goals and nearly double its revenue. The catalyst for all this change is IT.’[10]
In addition, P&G wants to abandon its legacy of secrecy. ‘Its new spirit of openness is most evident on the Internet. A year ago, it was a stodgy, nondescript site where no one other than investors or job seekers had any reason to go to. Today, you see a consumer-friendly portal with loads of information about P&G products.’[11]
So far, Organization 2005 has had little to show. However, P&G stresses the company will pick the fruits of the ambitious restructuring plan in the near future. "This restructuring," former CEO Millen explained, "will ensure that P&G is well placed to address the issues facing manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers at the outset of the 21st century. Examples of these issues are the internationalisation and consolidation of retailing, consumer loyalty and retention, category management, the potential effects of the Euro currency and dramatic advances in information technology."[12]
New Alliances
One of P&G's new strategies is linking up with other companies to extract as much value from its brands as possible. Last February (2001) Coke and P&G announced a $4bn [£2,77bn] alliance. The alliance would involve the union of some 40 consumer products (including Sunny Delight, Pringles and Minute Maid) under the umbrella of a Coke-P&G joint venture. P&G was hoping Coke’s far-reaching distribution network could give the company a boost. P&G’s renowned R&D capacities were attractive to Coke. Eight months later the consumer goods behemoths called the wedding off. ‘A spokesman for Coke said: "After many months of due diligence with Procter & Gamble, we felt that we could unlock the value of our brands more effectively and profitably by retaining full control of them."’[13]
However, P&G successfully tied up with chewing gum giant the Wrigley Company. The deal will allow P&G to cash in on the global gum, mint, and breath-freshener market. This is bigger than the toothpaste market and equal in size to the shampoo or skincare sectors. ‘We will soon be able to sweeten our mouths with Crest gum, Crest mints and Crest breath freshener’, the Guardian reports [14]. P&G has recently announced it will sell the Jif and Crisco brands in a bid to get rid of under-performing brands. P&G and J.M. Smucker Co., which makes a wide variety of jams, jellies and other foods, is acquiring the Jif peanut butter and Crisco cooking oil brands from P&G for $1 billion in stock[14].
Public Relations, Lobbying and Business Intelligence firms
In January 2008, Procter & Gamble is listed as a client for French PR firm I&E[15].
Procter & Gamble is listed as a client of business intelligence firm Business Insights[16]
In 2008, Procter & Gamble is listed as a client of Innovex[17], The Gorlin Group[18] and as a member of the American Benefits Council[19]
Affiliations
Procter & Gamble are donors to the Science Media Centre. [20]
Resources
- Procter & Gamble: Products and Projects
- Procter & Gamble: Who, Where, How Much?
- Procter & Gamble: Influence / Lobbying
- Procter & Gamble: Corporate Crimes
- Procter & Gamble: Links, contacts & resources
References
- ↑ Hoover’s Business Information Procter & Gamble viewed 22/10/01
- ↑ John Millen ‘Plan Global, Win Local’ viewed 22/10/01
- ↑ Mind Advertising Procter & Gamble Profile viewed 22/10/01
- ↑ Hoover’s Business Information Fortune 500 viewed 04/10/01
- ↑ Procter & Gamble History viewed 05/10/01
- ↑ ibid
- ↑ Mind Advertising Procter & Gamble Profile viewed 05/10/01
- ↑ A comment by G.W. Goodale on the book titled ‘Soap Opera, the inside story of P&G, by Alesia Swasy
- ↑ Fast Company Magazine 'Don't Shout, Listen' August 2001 issue. viewed 22/10/01
- ↑ United Business Media Information Week viewed 10/10/01
- ↑ Fast Company Magazine 'Don't Shout, Listen' August 2001 issue. viewed: 22/10/01
- ↑ John Millen, Kamcity ‘Plan Global, Win Local’ viewed 22/10/01
- ↑ The Grocer ‘Coke and P&G abandon alliance’, September 29th 2001
- ↑ Oilprices.com Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices viewed 18/10/01
- ↑ Public Relations Organisation International Profiles Accessed 17th January 2008
- ↑ Business Insights Patient Power: The shift towards more informed, more powerful consumers of drugs Accessed 5th February 2008
- ↑ Innovex Our Customers Accessed 12th February 2008
- ↑ The Gorlin Group Clients Accessed 20th March 2008
- ↑ American Benefits Council Memberships Accessed 26th February 2008
- ↑ SMC, Funding, accessed 29 September 2013. See also Science Media Centre - Funding
