Difference between revisions of "Human Genetics Commission"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Publications)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The HGC was established in 1999 following a comprehensive review of the regulatory and advisory framework for biotechnology by the UK Government in May 1999.<ref>HGC (2012) [http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/Content_wide.asp?ContentId=6 Background], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 
The HGC was established in 1999 following a comprehensive review of the regulatory and advisory framework for biotechnology by the UK Government in May 1999.<ref>HGC (2012) [http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/Content_wide.asp?ContentId=6 Background], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 +
 +
The HGC was closed down following the UK government's review of Arm's Length Bodies.<ref>HGC (2012) [http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/index.asp?ContentId=1 Home], acc 27 Nov 2012</ref> In 2010 the chair, Jonathan Montgomery, wrote to the HGC Commissioners to tell them of this news, saying "This shift reflects the need to reduce costs and I would like to reassure you that I do not believe that it reflects a change in the Government’s attitude towards genetics and genomics."<ref>Jonathan Montgomery (2010), [http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/document.asp?DocId=292&CAtegoryId=8 Letter to all HGC Commissioners Re Announcement of the Arm’s Length Bodies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies review], 14 Oct, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
  
 
In its Final Report of 2012, the chair, Prof [[Jonathan Montgomery]], emphasised its success in influencing policy:
 
In its Final Report of 2012, the chair, Prof [[Jonathan Montgomery]], emphasised its success in influencing policy:
 
:Since its creation in 1999, the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has played an important role in helping UK Governments and the wider public grapple with the issues opened up by advances in our understanding of human genetics. Its work has led to policy and legislative changes, and the principles that have underpinned its reports have established a framework for responding to the possibilities that our enhanced scientific knowledge is creating.<ref>HGC (2012) [Human Genetics Commission Final Report http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?NewsId=166], Apr 2012, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 
:Since its creation in 1999, the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has played an important role in helping UK Governments and the wider public grapple with the issues opened up by advances in our understanding of human genetics. Its work has led to policy and legislative changes, and the principles that have underpinned its reports have established a framework for responding to the possibilities that our enhanced scientific knowledge is creating.<ref>HGC (2012) [Human Genetics Commission Final Report http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?NewsId=166], Apr 2012, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
  
−
==Affiliations==
+
In 2012 the UK government replaced the HGC with a new committee, the [[Emerging Science and Bioethics Advisory Committee]] (ESBAC). According to an article for BioNews, "While ESBAC will take on the responsibilities of the HGC, it also has a broader remit than human genetics."<ref>Rebecca Hill (2012), [http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_149450.asp Human Genetics Commission publish final report], 7 Jun, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 +
 
 +
==People==
 +
From HGC website of 24 February 2010:<ref>National Archives [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100419143351/hgc.gov.uk/client/content_wide.asp?contentid=21 Our members], HGC website, archived version, page updated 24 Feb 2012</ref>
 +
 
 +
'''Chairs'''
 +
*Professor [[Jonathan Montgomery]] - Chair
 +
*Professor [[Sarah Cunningham-Burley]] - Vice-Chair
 +
 
 +
'''Members'''
 +
*Professor [[Timothy Aitman]] - Professor of Clinical and Molecular Genetics at [[Imperial College London]], and Head of the Physiological Genomics and Medicine Group at the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre.
 +
*Professor Thomas Baldwin - Professor of Philosophy, University of York.
 +
*Dr [[Paul Debenham]] - Director, Technology and Innovation, LGC
 +
*Mrs [[Nicola Drury]] - Genetic Counsellor Nottingham Regional Clinical Genetics Service and Genetic Education Facilitator East Midlands Region for NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre (NGEDC).
 +
*Dr [[Frances Flinter]] - Consultant Clinical Geneticist and Caldicott Guardian, Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
 +
*Mrs Ros Gardner
 +
*Professor [[John Harris]] - Professor of Bioethics, School Of Law, University of Manchester
 +
*[[Caroline Harrison]] - Barrister
 +
*Professor [[Lisa Jardine]] (ex officio) - Chair, [[Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority]].
 +
*Mr [[Alastair Kent]] - Director, [[Genetic Interest Group]] (GIG).
 +
*Professor [[Anneke Lucassen]] - Professor of Clinical Genetics and Honorary Consultant Clinical Geneticist, University of Southampton Cancer Sciences division and Wessex Clinical Genetics Service.
 +
*Dr [[Duncan McHale]] - Vice President, Translational Science, [[AstraZeneca]], Chair of the European Industry (EFPIA) Pharmacogenetics group, member of the International Conference on Harmonization genomics group and member of the MRC Pharmaceuticals Forum.
 +
*Dr [[Alice Maynard]] - Managing Director of Future Inclusion organisation.
 +
*Dr [[Lola Oni]] OBE - Professional Services Manager Heamoglobinopathies, Brent Sickle Cell/Thalassaemia Centre
  
−
==Funding==
+
==Publications==
 +
*HGC (2010), [http://bit.ly/1187wIJ Intellectual Property and DNA Diagnostics: A Report of a Seminar on the Impact of DNA Patents on Diagnostic Innovation], October. This report was launched with the [[Science Media Centre]].<ref>HGC (2012) [Human Genetics Commission Final Report http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?NewsId=166], Apr 2012, acc 27 Nov 2012</ref> The report summarises a seminar convened by the Human Genetics Commission in October 2010 on the impact of DNA patents on diagnostic innovation. The report states, "The seminar revealed a profound tension between the industry’s desire to exploit the financial value of biomarker patents and the routine infringement of such IP [intellectual property] in NHS laboratories. This tension between public and private interest is reflected in the academic research community which, supported by public policy, continues to patent publicly-funded biomarker discoveries in the hope of capturing their commercial value."<ref>HGC (2010), [http://bit.ly/1187wIJ Intellectual Property and DNA Diagnostics: A Report of a Seminar on the Impact of DNA Patents on Diagnostic Innovation], October.</ref>
  
 
==Contact==
 
==Contact==

Latest revision as of 12:05, 29 November 2012

The Human Genetics Commission described itself as "the UK Government's advisory body on new developments in human genetics and how they impact on individual lives. We give the Government advice on human genetics with a particular focus on the social, ethical and legal issues."[1]

The HGC was established in 1999 following a comprehensive review of the regulatory and advisory framework for biotechnology by the UK Government in May 1999.[2]

The HGC was closed down following the UK government's review of Arm's Length Bodies.[3] In 2010 the chair, Jonathan Montgomery, wrote to the HGC Commissioners to tell them of this news, saying "This shift reflects the need to reduce costs and I would like to reassure you that I do not believe that it reflects a change in the Government’s attitude towards genetics and genomics."[4]

In its Final Report of 2012, the chair, Prof Jonathan Montgomery, emphasised its success in influencing policy:

Since its creation in 1999, the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has played an important role in helping UK Governments and the wider public grapple with the issues opened up by advances in our understanding of human genetics. Its work has led to policy and legislative changes, and the principles that have underpinned its reports have established a framework for responding to the possibilities that our enhanced scientific knowledge is creating.[5]

In 2012 the UK government replaced the HGC with a new committee, the Emerging Science and Bioethics Advisory Committee (ESBAC). According to an article for BioNews, "While ESBAC will take on the responsibilities of the HGC, it also has a broader remit than human genetics."[6]

People

From HGC website of 24 February 2010:[7]

Chairs

Members

  • Professor Timothy Aitman - Professor of Clinical and Molecular Genetics at Imperial College London, and Head of the Physiological Genomics and Medicine Group at the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre.
  • Professor Thomas Baldwin - Professor of Philosophy, University of York.
  • Dr Paul Debenham - Director, Technology and Innovation, LGC
  • Mrs Nicola Drury - Genetic Counsellor Nottingham Regional Clinical Genetics Service and Genetic Education Facilitator East Midlands Region for NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre (NGEDC).
  • Dr Frances Flinter - Consultant Clinical Geneticist and Caldicott Guardian, Genetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Mrs Ros Gardner
  • Professor John Harris - Professor of Bioethics, School Of Law, University of Manchester
  • Caroline Harrison - Barrister
  • Professor Lisa Jardine (ex officio) - Chair, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
  • Mr Alastair Kent - Director, Genetic Interest Group (GIG).
  • Professor Anneke Lucassen - Professor of Clinical Genetics and Honorary Consultant Clinical Geneticist, University of Southampton Cancer Sciences division and Wessex Clinical Genetics Service.
  • Dr Duncan McHale - Vice President, Translational Science, AstraZeneca, Chair of the European Industry (EFPIA) Pharmacogenetics group, member of the International Conference on Harmonization genomics group and member of the MRC Pharmaceuticals Forum.
  • Dr Alice Maynard - Managing Director of Future Inclusion organisation.
  • Dr Lola Oni OBE - Professional Services Manager Heamoglobinopathies, Brent Sickle Cell/Thalassaemia Centre

Publications

  • HGC (2010), Intellectual Property and DNA Diagnostics: A Report of a Seminar on the Impact of DNA Patents on Diagnostic Innovation, October. This report was launched with the Science Media Centre.[8] The report summarises a seminar convened by the Human Genetics Commission in October 2010 on the impact of DNA patents on diagnostic innovation. The report states, "The seminar revealed a profound tension between the industry’s desire to exploit the financial value of biomarker patents and the routine infringement of such IP [intellectual property] in NHS laboratories. This tension between public and private interest is reflected in the academic research community which, supported by public policy, continues to patent publicly-funded biomarker discoveries in the hope of capturing their commercial value."[9]

Contact

Address:
...
...
...
...
Phone:
...
Email:
...
Website:
...

Resources

Notes

  1. ↑ HGC (2012) About, acc 27 Nov 2012
  2. ↑ HGC (2012) Background, acc 27 Nov 2012
  3. ↑ HGC (2012) Home, acc 27 Nov 2012
  4. ↑ Jonathan Montgomery (2010), Letter to all HGC Commissioners Re Announcement of the Arm’s Length Bodies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies review, 14 Oct, acc 27 Nov 2012
  5. ↑ HGC (2012) [Human Genetics Commission Final Report http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?NewsId=166], Apr 2012, acc 27 Nov 2012
  6. ↑ Rebecca Hill (2012), Human Genetics Commission publish final report, 7 Jun, acc 27 Nov 2012
  7. ↑ National Archives Our members, HGC website, archived version, page updated 24 Feb 2012
  8. ↑ HGC (2012) [Human Genetics Commission Final Report http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/news_item.asp?NewsId=166], Apr 2012, acc 27 Nov 2012
  9. ↑ HGC (2010), Intellectual Property and DNA Diagnostics: A Report of a Seminar on the Impact of DNA Patents on Diagnostic Innovation, October.
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Human_Genetics_Commission&oldid=179723"