Difference between revisions of "Roger Alton"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
('Lobbying hard for war')
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Roger Alton''' was the editor (1998–2007) of ''The Observer'', in April 2008, he was appointed senior editor of the ''Independent'' (seemingly in line to replace Simon Kelner -- who at the time was 'editor-in-chief'. <ref>Stephen Glover, [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/comment/stephen-glover/stephen-glover-on-the-press-808594.html Onward, upward: the road Mr. Alton should follow], ''Independent'', 14 April 2008.</ref>  And about his role:
+
'''Roger Alton''' was the editor (1998–2007) of ''The Observer'', in April 2008, he was appointed senior editor of the ''Independent'' (seemingly in line to replace Simon Kelner -- who at the time was 'editor-in-chief'. <ref>Stephen Glover, '[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/comment/stephen-glover/stephen-glover-on-the-press-808594.html Onward, upward: the road Mr. Alton should follow]', ''Independent'', 14 April 2008.</ref>  And about his role:
 
:Is Mr Alton the right man for the job? He was a very successful editor of ''The Observer'', but he tended to take that paper a shade downmarket. He should do the opposite with The Independent. Mr Kelner is evidently going to burnish the brand so that the paper is again seen as the fashionable, must-read accessory of the intellectual elite. If Mr Alton produces an exciting and upmarket newspaper, they could be in business. <ref>ibid.</ref>
 
:Is Mr Alton the right man for the job? He was a very successful editor of ''The Observer'', but he tended to take that paper a shade downmarket. He should do the opposite with The Independent. Mr Kelner is evidently going to burnish the brand so that the paper is again seen as the fashionable, must-read accessory of the intellectual elite. If Mr Alton produces an exciting and upmarket newspaper, they could be in business. <ref>ibid.</ref>
 +
 +
=='Lobbying hard for war'==
 +
In February 2003, the ''Independent'' columnist [[Johann Hari]] (who has since apologised for his pro-war stance <ref>Johann Hari, [http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=831 After three years, after 150,000 dead, why I was wrong about Iraq], JohannHari.com, 18 March 2006</ref>) identified Alton as one of a group of centre-left figures 'lobbying hard' for the US/UK invasion of Iraq:
 +
 +
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">A year ago, the proposals for a second Gulf War seemed very much the brainchild of the American right. The intellectual arguments backing the conflict emerged almost entirely from hard-right US think-tanks and senators. But then, a funny thing happened: a significant portion of the dissident left began to come out, in dribs and drabs, for overthrowing Saddam by force. There is now a considerable school of British centre-left thinkers and commentators who are lobbying hard for war, so that the Iraqi people can be freed: [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Nick Cohen]], [[John Lloyd]], [[Julie Burchill]], Roger Alton and [[David Aaronovitch]].<ref>Johann Hari, ‘[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/whose-side-are-you-on-598732.html Whose side are you on?]’, ''Independent'', 25 February 2003</ref></blockquote>
  
 
==Views==
 
==Views==
 
On Tony Blair:
 
On Tony Blair:
  
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">'''You've been one of Fleet Street's most loyal supporters of Tony Blair. How do you feel about him now?'''<p>I think he's a very good prime minister and an exceptional politician who will be much missed when he's gone. Some of the hostility to him is quite baffling. I just can't understand it. It doesn't logically relate to things - I mean, if you think of civil partnerships, the minimum wage, improvements in health ...</p><p>'''Aren't we forgetting Iraq?'''</p><p>Well, you can rerun the tapes and cuttings but personally I can't find any kind of point of view which says the world would be a better place if Saddam Hussein was in power. <ref>Jane Thynne, '[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/roger-alton--the-guardian-of-old-fleet-street-424838.html Roger Alton - The guardian of old Fleet Street]', Independent on Sunday, 19 November 2006</ref></p></blockquote>
+
<blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt">'''You've been one of Fleet Street's most loyal supporters of Tony Blair. How do you feel about him now?'''<p>I think he's a very good prime minister and an exceptional politician who will be much missed when he's gone. Some of the hostility to him is quite baffling. I just can't understand it. It doesn't logically relate to things - I mean, if you think of civil partnerships, the minimum wage, improvements in health ...</p><p>'''Aren't we forgetting Iraq?'''</p><p>Well, you can rerun the tapes and cuttings but personally I can't find any kind of point of view which says the world would be a better place if Saddam Hussein was in power. <ref>Jane Thynne, '[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/roger-alton--the-guardian-of-old-fleet-street-424838.html Roger Alton - The guardian of old Fleet Street]', ''Independent on Sunday'', 19 November 2006</ref></p></blockquote>
  
 
==Contact, References and Resources==
 
==Contact, References and Resources==

Latest revision as of 11:14, 22 September 2009

Roger Alton was the editor (1998–2007) of The Observer, in April 2008, he was appointed senior editor of the Independent (seemingly in line to replace Simon Kelner -- who at the time was 'editor-in-chief'. [1] And about his role:

Is Mr Alton the right man for the job? He was a very successful editor of The Observer, but he tended to take that paper a shade downmarket. He should do the opposite with The Independent. Mr Kelner is evidently going to burnish the brand so that the paper is again seen as the fashionable, must-read accessory of the intellectual elite. If Mr Alton produces an exciting and upmarket newspaper, they could be in business. [2]

'Lobbying hard for war'

In February 2003, the Independent columnist Johann Hari (who has since apologised for his pro-war stance [3]) identified Alton as one of a group of centre-left figures 'lobbying hard' for the US/UK invasion of Iraq:

A year ago, the proposals for a second Gulf War seemed very much the brainchild of the American right. The intellectual arguments backing the conflict emerged almost entirely from hard-right US think-tanks and senators. But then, a funny thing happened: a significant portion of the dissident left began to come out, in dribs and drabs, for overthrowing Saddam by force. There is now a considerable school of British centre-left thinkers and commentators who are lobbying hard for war, so that the Iraqi people can be freed: Christopher Hitchens, Nick Cohen, John Lloyd, Julie Burchill, Roger Alton and David Aaronovitch.[4]

Views

On Tony Blair:

You've been one of Fleet Street's most loyal supporters of Tony Blair. How do you feel about him now?

I think he's a very good prime minister and an exceptional politician who will be much missed when he's gone. Some of the hostility to him is quite baffling. I just can't understand it. It doesn't logically relate to things - I mean, if you think of civil partnerships, the minimum wage, improvements in health ...

Aren't we forgetting Iraq?

Well, you can rerun the tapes and cuttings but personally I can't find any kind of point of view which says the world would be a better place if Saddam Hussein was in power. [5]

Contact, References and Resources

Contact

Resources

References

  1. Stephen Glover, 'Onward, upward: the road Mr. Alton should follow', Independent, 14 April 2008.
  2. ibid.
  3. Johann Hari, After three years, after 150,000 dead, why I was wrong about Iraq, JohannHari.com, 18 March 2006
  4. Johann Hari, ‘Whose side are you on?’, Independent, 25 February 2003
  5. Jane Thynne, 'Roger Alton - The guardian of old Fleet Street', Independent on Sunday, 19 November 2006