Difference between revisions of "Royal Academy of Engineering"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Related Links)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
*Mark Henderson, [http://www.world-nuclear.org/opinion/times180803.htm "Nuclear power 'is critical to Britain's future'"], ''The Times'', August 18, 2003
 
*Mark Henderson, [http://www.world-nuclear.org/opinion/times180803.htm "Nuclear power 'is critical to Britain's future'"], ''The Times'', August 18, 2003
 
*Mark Henderson, "Renewable energy policy is unrealistic, say engineers", ''The Times'', August 30, 2002
 
*Mark Henderson, "Renewable energy policy is unrealistic, say engineers", ''The Times'', August 30, 2002
 +
*Ben Richardson, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4457210.stm "Nuclear power's cost conundrum"], ''BBC News'', November 23, 2005

Revision as of 00:15, 29 January 2006

The Royal Academy of Engineering[1] is a pro-Nuclear British body that claims to "lead debate by guiding informed thinking and influencing public policy." According to The Times, "[r]eports from the Royal Academy of Engineers and the Institution of Civil Engineers have told ministers that they will have to approve new nuclear power stations to guarantee future supplies." Its president, Sir Alec Broers, who is also the former Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University, has called nuclear energy critical for Britain's future.[2] In response to the Cabinet Office's 2002 Energy Review, the body published a report calling the government's interest in renewable energy "hopelessly unrealistic". Ian Fells, a member of the body, called the energy policy's aims "laudable" but declared them "largely wishful thinking". (The Times, August 30, 2002) In 2005 the body issued a report claiming that Nuclear power would be much cheaper than other energy sources. [3]

Key Personnel

President: Alec Broers
Chief Executive: Philip Greenish

Contact Details

Web address:http://www.raeng.org.uk
Address: 29 Great Peter Street
London
SW1P 3LW
Phone:020 7227 0500
E-mail: tom.mclaughlan@raeng.org.uk

Related Links