Difference between revisions of "Weber Shandwick"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Gather Intelligence on the Climate Sceptics)
(→‎Principals)
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
"Times letter today from Nigel Lawson and others which seems to be pooh-poohing climate change - anyone know anything about where this lot have popped up from? Any intellgence (sic) gratefully received before we set to work here at WS end trying to find out what's going on..." {{ref|weber2}}
 
"Times letter today from Nigel Lawson and others which seems to be pooh-poohing climate change - anyone know anything about where this lot have popped up from? Any intellgence (sic) gratefully received before we set to work here at WS end trying to find out what's going on..." {{ref|weber2}}
 +
 +
== Good News in the Manifesto ==
 +
 +
When Labour's 2005 Manifesto was published,, the spin doctors were quick to pick up on the following paragraph:
 +
 +
"We have a major programmme to promote renewable energy, as part of a strategy of having a mix of energy sources from nuclear power stations to clean coal to micro generators."
 +
 +
Weber Shandwick sent a note to BNFL:
 +
 +
" To me, at least, this is a step towards a declared pro-nuclear position".
 +
 +
BNFL replied:
 +
 +
"Wow...good news indeed". {{ref|weber3}}
  
 
==Principals==
 
==Principals==

Revision as of 12:01, 12 June 2006

WSW.jpg
Weber Shandwick Worldwide Offices, Central Edinburgh taken on the Spinwatch G8 Spinwalk, 1 July 2005

The UK subsidiary of Weber Shandwick Worldwide

Pro-Nuclear Activity

Documents released under FOI, show that Weber Shandwick worked for BNFL in 2004 and 2005. In February 2006, the PR magazine O'Dwyer's also reported that Weber Shandwick was promoting BNFL's move to sell Westinghouse Electric to Japan's Toshiba for $5.4 billion. U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez had lobbied UK officials in favour of General Electric's bid for Westinghouse. [1]

Working Towards a Nuclear New Build

Since 2004, Weber Shandwick has been working with BNFL towards a new nuclear build in the UK. Part of this strategy has been to position nuclear as clean, safe, secure and climate-friendly (also see BNFL).

By the Autumn of 2004, a year before the government annnounced its "official review," Weber and BNFL were working on thier own one:

  • "To secure from the review a meaningful commitment to a programme of nuclear new build, underpinned by commitments to:
  • Provide the necessary market and fiscal framewrok for replacement build;
  • Begin a programme or review which deals with the question of disposal of nuclear waste from repalcement build;
  • Analyse and bring in the changes needed in the planning and regulation regime which to enable speedy decision-making and construction". [2]

We believe in the Cause

One question people ask is whether PR consultants are neutral on nuclear and just provide professional advice. One email from Weber to BNFL from September 2004 answers this. It said: "As you know, you have agroup of people over here who believe in this cause - we would love to do this work, and already feel excited about it". [3]

Gather Intelligence on the Climate Sceptics

One of the main PR strategies of the nuclear lobby over the last three years has been to use the issue of climate change to push for a resumption in nuclear. The argument they have put forward is that nuclear is a low emitter of greenhouse gases and should therfore be used as a key policy option to fight climate change.

But what about those who deny climate change? They could, by default, undermine the case for nuclear: In September 2004 a letter appeared in The Times signed by Lord Lawson, and known climate sceptics Wilfred Beckerman and Julian Morris from the International Policy Network, amongst others that attacked the need for action on climate:

It said: "Sir, Both the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition made major speeches last week on climate change and the policies that are supposedly required to deal with it (reports, September 14 and 15). It appears that, in this area, Tony Blair and Michael Howard are of one mind. They hold the same alarmist view of the world, and call for much the same radical -and costly programme of action ... There are no solid grounds for assuming, as Messrs Blair and Howard do, that global warming demands immediate and far-reaching action".

On reading this Weber Shandwick emailed BNFL:

"Times letter today from Nigel Lawson and others which seems to be pooh-poohing climate change - anyone know anything about where this lot have popped up from? Any intellgence (sic) gratefully received before we set to work here at WS end trying to find out what's going on..." [4]

Good News in the Manifesto

When Labour's 2005 Manifesto was published,, the spin doctors were quick to pick up on the following paragraph:

"We have a major programmme to promote renewable energy, as part of a strategy of having a mix of energy sources from nuclear power stations to clean coal to micro generators."

Weber Shandwick sent a note to BNFL:

" To me, at least, this is a step towards a declared pro-nuclear position".

BNFL replied:

"Wow...good news indeed". [5]

Principals

clients

Contact

Weber Shandwick
Fox Court
14 Gray's Inn Road
London, WC1X 8WS
United Kingdom
T: 44 20 7067 0000

External Resources

  • ^ P. Simpson (2002)WSW Picks Up BNFL Public Affairs Work, PR Week, 22 April

Resources

Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=Weber_Shandwick&oldid=10795"