Difference between revisions of "Syngenta"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Industry Areas==
+
==Industry areas==
Seeds (including GM), agrochemicals
+
Seeds (including GM), agrochemicals.
  
 
==Market share/importance==
 
==Market share/importance==
Syngenta is the largest agribusiness company in the world. In 2000 Syngenta was the worlds largest manufacturer of agrochemicals,[1] the third largest owner of plant biotechnology patents[2] and the third largest seed supplier.[3] Syngenta has more than 20,000 employees in 20 countries worldwide[4] and sales of over USD $6 billion.[5]
+
Syngenta is the largest agribusiness company in the world. In 2000 Syngenta was the world's largest manufacturer of agrochemicals,{{ref|1}} the third largest owner of plant biotechnology patents {{ref|2}}and the third largest seed supplier.{{ref|3}} Syngenta has more than 20,000 employees in 20 countries worldwide {{ref|4}} and sales of over USD $6 billion. {{ref|5}}
 +
 
 +
=="Howling conflict of interest" over bee die-off research==
 +
In October 2009 the Soil Association accused Syngenta of a "howling conflict of interest" after it was announced that the company is funding research into the disappearance of honeybees – a problem which some people claim it may have helped cause. Among the products it markets to farmers are neonicotinoid insecticides which have been blamed for harming honeybees. With the UK government's [[BBSRC]], Syngenta is co-funding a GBP 1million project in the UK to research the decline of the bees. But the company has dismissed criticisms of its role in the project as "perverse".<ref>Rob Edwards, [http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport-environment/beekeepers-tell-pesticide-firm-to-buzz-off-1.923822 Beekeepers tell pesticide firm to buzz off], The Herald (Scotland), 4 Oct 2009, accessed 10 Oct 2009</ref>
 +
 
 +
GMWatch commented, "We can expect these research findings to let neonicotinoids off the hook and blame 'natural' causes like the varroa mite and viruses for the bee decline."
 +
 
 +
A film called ''Vanishing Of The Bees'' highlights the global plight of the honeybee and argues that insecticides are partly to blame. It is backed by the Co-operative retail group, which has a strict policy on the use of pesticides on the fruit and vegetables it sells, including a ban on the use of several chemicals. A coalition of environmental groups has launched a campaign for a ban on neonicotinoids in the UK.<ref>Rob Edwards, [http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport-environment/beekeepers-tell-pesticide-firm-to-buzz-off-1.923822 Beekeepers tell pesticide firm to buzz off], The Herald (Scotland), 4 Oct 2009, accessed 10 Oct 2009</ref>
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
Syngenta is a powerful player in the introduction of GM crops both in the UK and globally. Despite being a ‘new’ company, Syngenta inherits the dubious legacies of both its parent companies, Novartis and AstraZeneca, promoters of GM technology and producers of hazardous chemicals. Syngenta was formed in December 1999 with the spin-off and merger of the agrochemical and seed division of Novartis (a Swiss lifesciences company formed in 1996 by the merger of two giant Swiss chemical/pharmaceutical companies Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz), and the agrochemicals and biotechnology research divisions of AstraZeneca (a British lifesciences company formed in 1999 by the acquisition of Astra AB, a Swedish pharmaceutical company, by Zeneca, a British chemicals and biotechnology company, formerly part of ICI). Astra Zeneca has retained its seed interests, a 50% stake in Advanta, a joint venture with Cosun.
+
Syngenta is a powerful player in the introduction of GM crops both in the UK and globally. Despite being a ‘new’ company, Syngenta inherits the dubious legacies of both its parent companies, [[Novartis]] and [[AstraZeneca]], promoters of GM technology and producers of hazardous chemicals. Syngenta was formed in December 1999 with the spin-off and merger of the agrochemical and seed division of Novartis (a Swiss lifesciences company formed in 1996 by the merger of two giant Swiss chemical/pharmaceutical companies [[Ciba-Geigy]] and [[Sandoz]]), and the agrochemicals and biotechnology research divisions of AstraZeneca (a British lifesciences company formed in 1999 by the acquisition of [[Astra AB]], a Swedish pharmaceutical company, by [[Zeneca]], a British chemicals and biotechnology company, formerly part of ICI). AstraZeneca has retained its seed interests, a 50% stake in Advanta, a joint venture with Cosun.
  
In the late 1990s Novartis and AstraZeneca were keen to establish themselves as ‘lifesciences’ companies and exploit the potential synergies between their pharmaceutical, chemical and agricultural sectors. Both invested heavily in acquiring seed and biotechnology companies. However, the strain of having to manage several very different sectors more than out weighed the savings made during basic research ‘synergies’.[6] The Syngenta spin-off was a result of the poor performance of both Novartis’ and AstraZeneca’s agribusiness divisions during 1999, largely caused by the global backlash against GM crops. The creation of Syngenta has enabled parent companies Novartis and AstraZeneca to make considerable savings, and to rid themselves of their controversial agricultural biotechnology ventures. Syngenta has so far managed to avoid the public vilification Monsanto attracted, and has been quietly getting on with developing some of the most controversial applications of agricultural biotechnology including genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs)/traitor technology. End of year results for 2001 show that all is not going well for Syngenta: sales are down by 4% and European opposition to GM crops is said to be costing the company tens of millions of dollars.[7]
+
In the late 1990s Novartis and AstraZeneca were keen to establish themselves as ‘life sciences’ companies and exploit the potential synergies between their pharmaceutical, chemical and agricultural sectors. Both invested heavily in acquiring seed and biotechnology companies. However, the strain of having to manage several very different sectors more than out weighed the savings made during basic research ‘synergies’. {{ref|6}} The Syngenta spin-off was a result of the poor performance of both Novartis’ and AstraZeneca’s agribusiness divisions during 1999, largely caused by the global backlash against GM crops. The creation of Syngenta has enabled parent companies Novartis and AstraZeneca to make considerable savings, and to rid themselves of their controversial agricultural biotechnology ventures. Syngenta has so far managed to avoid the public vilification [[Monsanto]] attracted, and has been quietly getting on with developing some of the most controversial applications of agricultural biotechnology including genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs)/traitor technology. End of year results for 2001 show that all is not going well for Syngenta: sales are down by 4% and European opposition to GM crops is said to be costing the company tens of millions of dollars. {{ref|7}}
 +
 
 +
==Public relations==
 +
*[[Edelman]]<ref> [http://www.appc.org.uk/members/register/register-profile/?company=Edelman Register 1st September 2014 - 30th November 2014] ''APPC'', accessed 29 January 2015 </ref>
 +
Syngenta is reported to be a client of PR firm [[Int/ext Communications]].<ref>Public Relations Organisation International [http://www.proi.com/partners/profiles/intext.htm Int/ext Communications] Accessed 13th February 2008 </ref>
 +
 
 +
==Affiliations==
 +
[[Syngenta]] has been a donor to the [[Science Media Centre]] from 2004-2013 according to the SMC.<ref>Data from Internet Archive holdings of the Science Media Centre website, 2002-2013.
 +
*Oct 2004 http://web.archive.org/web/20041205182639/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/funding.htm ; and http://web.archive.org/web/20051029205959/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/funding.htm
 +
*Nov 2005 http://web.archive.org/web/20051227000834/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/funding.htm
 +
*Apr 2006 http://web.archive.org/web/20060910221525/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/funding.htm
 +
*Feb 2007 http://web.archive.org/web/20070829210611/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/funding.htm
 +
*Jul 2008 http://web.archive.org/web/20081202143334/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/pages/about/funding.htm
 +
*May 2009 http://web.archive.org/web/20090830202526/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/pages/about/funding.htm
 +
*May 2010 http://web.archive.org/web/20100822091312/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/pages/about/funding.htm
 +
*Jun 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/20110807075127/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/pages/about/funding.htm
 +
*Aug 2012 http://web.archive.org/web/20120922235445/http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/pages/about/funding.htm
 +
*Aug 2013 Science Media Centre, 'Funding' August 2013 screengrab of http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/about-us/funding/, taken 16 August 2013.
 +
</ref>
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==
Line 19: Line 44:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
[1] Barbara Dinham, 2001, ‘Corporate Change’, Pesticides Action Network UK available online at http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/pn53/pn53p12.htm (viewed 26,03,02)
+
#{{note|1}} Barbara Dinham, 2001, ‘Corporate Change’, Pesticides Action Network UK available online at http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/pn53/pn53p12.htm (viewed 26,03,02)
[2] ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|2}} ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
[3] ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at http://www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|3}} ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at http://www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
[4] figures from Syngenta available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/syngenta/facts.asp (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|4}} figures from Syngenta available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/syngenta/facts.asp (viewed 26,03,2002)
[5] ‘Syngenta Full Year Results 2001’ published 28,02,2002 available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/downloads/FYR2001.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|5}} ‘Syngenta Full Year Results 2001’ published 28,02,2002 available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/downloads/FYR2001.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
[6] Syngenta CEO Michael Pragnell quoted in ‘Green and Dying’ in The Economist 16.11.00. available on line at http://www.biotech-info.net/green_and_dying.html (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|6}} Syngenta CEO Michael Pragnell quoted in ‘Green and Dying’ in The Economist 16.11.00. available on line at http://www.biotech-info.net/green_and_dying.html (viewed 26,03,2002)
[7] ‘Syngenta earnings flat’, David Firn, Financial Times; 01,03,2002 available on line at http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=020301001747 (viewed 26,03,2002)
+
#{{note|7}} ‘Syngenta earnings flat’, David Firn, Financial Times; 01,03,2002 available on line at http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=020301001747 (viewed 26,03,2002)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
[[Category: Biotech Industry]][[Category: Transnational Corporations]]
+
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
 +
[[Category:GM]][[Category: Biotech Industry]][[Category: Transnational Corporations]] [[Category: Food and Agriculture Industry]][[Category:Science Media Centre]]

Latest revision as of 16:44, 29 January 2015

Industry areas

Seeds (including GM), agrochemicals.

Market share/importance

Syngenta is the largest agribusiness company in the world. In 2000 Syngenta was the world's largest manufacturer of agrochemicals,[1] the third largest owner of plant biotechnology patents [2]and the third largest seed supplier.[3] Syngenta has more than 20,000 employees in 20 countries worldwide [4] and sales of over USD $6 billion. [5]

"Howling conflict of interest" over bee die-off research

In October 2009 the Soil Association accused Syngenta of a "howling conflict of interest" after it was announced that the company is funding research into the disappearance of honeybees – a problem which some people claim it may have helped cause. Among the products it markets to farmers are neonicotinoid insecticides which have been blamed for harming honeybees. With the UK government's BBSRC, Syngenta is co-funding a GBP 1million project in the UK to research the decline of the bees. But the company has dismissed criticisms of its role in the project as "perverse".[1]

GMWatch commented, "We can expect these research findings to let neonicotinoids off the hook and blame 'natural' causes like the varroa mite and viruses for the bee decline."

A film called Vanishing Of The Bees highlights the global plight of the honeybee and argues that insecticides are partly to blame. It is backed by the Co-operative retail group, which has a strict policy on the use of pesticides on the fruit and vegetables it sells, including a ban on the use of several chemicals. A coalition of environmental groups has launched a campaign for a ban on neonicotinoids in the UK.[2]

History

Syngenta is a powerful player in the introduction of GM crops both in the UK and globally. Despite being a ‘new’ company, Syngenta inherits the dubious legacies of both its parent companies, Novartis and AstraZeneca, promoters of GM technology and producers of hazardous chemicals. Syngenta was formed in December 1999 with the spin-off and merger of the agrochemical and seed division of Novartis (a Swiss lifesciences company formed in 1996 by the merger of two giant Swiss chemical/pharmaceutical companies Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz), and the agrochemicals and biotechnology research divisions of AstraZeneca (a British lifesciences company formed in 1999 by the acquisition of Astra AB, a Swedish pharmaceutical company, by Zeneca, a British chemicals and biotechnology company, formerly part of ICI). AstraZeneca has retained its seed interests, a 50% stake in Advanta, a joint venture with Cosun.

In the late 1990s Novartis and AstraZeneca were keen to establish themselves as ‘life sciences’ companies and exploit the potential synergies between their pharmaceutical, chemical and agricultural sectors. Both invested heavily in acquiring seed and biotechnology companies. However, the strain of having to manage several very different sectors more than out weighed the savings made during basic research ‘synergies’. [6] The Syngenta spin-off was a result of the poor performance of both Novartis’ and AstraZeneca’s agribusiness divisions during 1999, largely caused by the global backlash against GM crops. The creation of Syngenta has enabled parent companies Novartis and AstraZeneca to make considerable savings, and to rid themselves of their controversial agricultural biotechnology ventures. Syngenta has so far managed to avoid the public vilification Monsanto attracted, and has been quietly getting on with developing some of the most controversial applications of agricultural biotechnology including genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs)/traitor technology. End of year results for 2001 show that all is not going well for Syngenta: sales are down by 4% and European opposition to GM crops is said to be costing the company tens of millions of dollars. [7]

Public relations

Syngenta is reported to be a client of PR firm Int/ext Communications.[4]

Affiliations

Syngenta has been a donor to the Science Media Centre from 2004-2013 according to the SMC.[5]

Resources

References

  1. ^ Barbara Dinham, 2001, ‘Corporate Change’, Pesticides Action Network UK available online at http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/pn53/pn53p12.htm (viewed 26,03,02)
  2. ^ ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
  3. ^ ‘Globalization Inc. Concentration in Corporate Power: The Unmentioned Agenda’, ETC Communiqué 2001, available on-line at http://www.rafi.org/documents/com_globilization.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
  4. ^ figures from Syngenta available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/syngenta/facts.asp (viewed 26,03,2002)
  5. ^ ‘Syngenta Full Year Results 2001’ published 28,02,2002 available online at http://www.syngenta.com/en/downloads/FYR2001.pdf (viewed 26,03,2002)
  6. ^ Syngenta CEO Michael Pragnell quoted in ‘Green and Dying’ in The Economist 16.11.00. available on line at http://www.biotech-info.net/green_and_dying.html (viewed 26,03,2002)
  7. ^ ‘Syngenta earnings flat’, David Firn, Financial Times; 01,03,2002 available on line at http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=020301001747 (viewed 26,03,2002)


Notes

  1. Rob Edwards, Beekeepers tell pesticide firm to buzz off, The Herald (Scotland), 4 Oct 2009, accessed 10 Oct 2009
  2. Rob Edwards, Beekeepers tell pesticide firm to buzz off, The Herald (Scotland), 4 Oct 2009, accessed 10 Oct 2009
  3. Register 1st September 2014 - 30th November 2014 APPC, accessed 29 January 2015
  4. Public Relations Organisation International Int/ext Communications Accessed 13th February 2008
  5. Data from Internet Archive holdings of the Science Media Centre website, 2002-2013.