Difference between revisions of "John Purvis"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 51: Line 51:
 
:This was followed in 2005 by the MEP becoming a partner in [[Life Science Capital LLP]], a biotech firm set up by his son-in-law.
 
:This was followed in 2005 by the MEP becoming a partner in [[Life Science Capital LLP]], a biotech firm set up by his son-in-law.
  
:Purvis declared the financial interests in his parliamentary register, although he has not disclosed the amount of money he receives from the companies.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006</ref>
+
:Purvis declared the financial interests in his parliamentary register, although he has not disclosed the amount of money he receives from the companies.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006.</ref>
  
  
 
In July 2008, Andy Rowell explained in his report on MEPs:
 
In July 2008, Andy Rowell explained in his report on MEPs:
  
:Until February 2008, when it went into voluntary liquidation, Purvis was a nonexecutive Director and significant shareholder of the European Utilities Trust (EUT).<ref>[http://www.spinwatch.org/files/wiki/Purvis-interests-16-11-2005.pdf Declaration of Members' Financial Interests] by John Purvis, 16 November 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> According to its 2006 annual report, nearly 50 per cent of the investment trust’s assets were in companies with nuclear interests,<ref>[http://www.premierassetmanagement.co.uk/Library/Report&Accounts/Annuals/Trusts/EUT2006.pdf Europen Utilities Trust, ''Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended''] 31 July 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> and in 2007, investments in nuclear represented some 35 per cent of the company’s assets.<ref>European Utilities Trust, ''Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended''] 31 July 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> Many of the companies listed: Iberdrola, RWE, E.On and Suez could benefit financially if there was strong support from the EU for new nuclear build.
+
:Until February 2008, when it went into voluntary liquidation, Purvis was a nonexecutive Director and significant shareholder of the European Utilities Trust (EUT).<ref>[http://www.spinwatch.org/files/wiki/Purvis-interests-16-11-2005.pdf Declaration of Members' Financial Interests] by John Purvis, 16 November 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> According to its 2006 annual report, nearly 50 per cent of the investment trust’s assets were in companies with nuclear interests,<ref>[http://www.premierassetmanagement.co.uk/Library/Report&Accounts/Annuals/Trusts/EUT2006.pdf Europen Utilities Trust, ''Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended''] 31 July 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> and in 2007, investments in nuclear represented some 35 per cent of the company’s assets.<ref>European Utilities Trust, ''Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended''] 31 July 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> Many of the companies listed: Iberdrola, RWE, E.On and Suez could benefit financially if there was strong support from the EU for new nuclear build.
  
:Purvis is a keen supporter of nuclear power. In October 2005 he was one of the signatories to a European Atomic Forum (FORATOM) declaration in support of increased nuclear power in the EU.<ref>[http://www.foratom.be/ClimateChangeSem/3%203152-05-0004%20MEP%20Declaration%20(signature%20version)%20-%20Rev%20%202005%2010%2025.pdf ''Declaration on Climate Change and Nuclear Energy] 19 October 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> Two years later, Purvis was again one of a number of MEPs who signed another FORATOM declaration calling for EU leaders to recognise that “nuclear energy is an important part of the EU lowcarbon energy mix and will play an increasing role in limiting CO2 emissions.”<ref>[http://www.foratom.org/dmdocuments/Declaration%20(European%20Voice%20).pdf ''Declaration Nuclear Energy - Part of a Low-Carbon Energy Future], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Purvis is a keen supporter of nuclear power. In October 2005 he was one of the signatories to a European Atomic Forum (FORATOM) declaration in support of increased nuclear power in the EU.<ref>[http://www.foratom.be/ClimateChangeSem/3%203152-05-0004%20MEP%20Declaration%20(signature%20version)%20-%20Rev%20%202005%2010%2025.pdf ''Declaration on Climate Change and Nuclear Energy] 19 October 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> Two years later, Purvis was again one of a number of MEPs who signed another FORATOM declaration calling for EU leaders to recognise that “nuclear energy is an important part of the EU lowcarbon energy mix and will play an increasing role in limiting CO2 emissions.”<ref>[http://www.foratom.org/dmdocuments/Declaration%20(European%20Voice%20).pdf ''Declaration Nuclear Energy - Part of a Low-Carbon Energy Future], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
:Purvis is currently involved with biotech investors, Life Science Capital (see the sub-text ''Benefiting from Biotech?'' below). He is also the non-executive Chairman of Belgrave Capital Management (BCM), which “specialises in the research and selection of talented investment advisors”. In 1999 BCM became part of the Banca del Ceresio Group, “a Swiss Bank…considered to be one of the historic and most respected investors in the field of hedge funds.” BCM is the investment manager responsible for Vitruvius, a multi-portfolio fund.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/gestore.php Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Purvis is currently involved with biotech investors, Life Science Capital (see the sub-text ''Benefiting from Biotech?'' below). He is also the non-executive Chairman of Belgrave Capital Management (BCM), which “specialises in the research and selection of talented investment advisors”. In 1999 BCM became part of the Banca del Ceresio Group, “a Swiss Bank…considered to be one of the historic and most respected investors in the field of hedge funds.” BCM is the investment manager responsible for Vitruvius, a multi-portfolio fund.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/gestore.php Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
:Vitruvius holds different investment portfolios. The company’s 2007 accounts show that it has significant investments in biotechnology / pharmaceuticals: 13 per cent of its Swiss Franc 26 million Swiss equity fund; 9 per cent of its $214 million US equity fund; 6 per cent of its $33 million capital opportunities fund; and 3 per cent of its 160 million Euro European equity fund.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/pubblicazioni.php/109/ Audited annual report] 31 December 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> Its European equity portfolio also has significant investments in companies impacted by EU decision-making, for example; car company, Daimler; energy company E.On; and oil companies BP, Shell and Total.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/gestore.php Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Vitruvius holds different investment portfolios. The company’s 2007 accounts show that it has significant investments in biotechnology / pharmaceuticals: 13 per cent of its Swiss Franc 26 million Swiss equity fund; 9 per cent of its $214 million US equity fund; 6 per cent of its $33 million capital opportunities fund; and 3 per cent of its 160 million Euro European equity fund.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/pubblicazioni.php/109/ Audited annual report] 31 December 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> Its European equity portfolio also has significant investments in companies impacted by EU decision-making, for example; car company, Daimler; energy company E.On; and oil companies BP, Shell and Total.<ref>[http://www.vitruvius.lu/gestore.php Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
:Purvis is also faced with a potential conflict of interest over the hedge funds themselves.<ref>Scottish Conservatives, ''A European Legislator's View of Hedge Funds'', 31 August 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> In 2003, he acted as a Rapporteur for the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on an own-initiative report into hedge funds, which proposed a “light-handed and appropriate EU-wide regulatory regime” for the hedge fund industry.<ref>European Parliament, Report on the Future of Hedge Funds and Derivatives, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Papporteur: John Purvis, 17 December 2003, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Purvis is also faced with a potential conflict of interest over the hedge funds themselves.<ref>Scottish Conservatives, ''A European Legislator's View of Hedge Funds'', 31 August 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> In 2003, he acted as a Rapporteur for the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on an own-initiative report into hedge funds, which proposed a “light-handed and appropriate EU-wide regulatory regime” for the hedge fund industry.<ref>European Parliament, Report on the Future of Hedge Funds and Derivatives, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Papporteur: John Purvis, 17 December 2003, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
 
:Purvis does not see any conflicts over his involvement with BCM and his work on hedge funds. He argues that the firm “select managers to manage money for their clients, some of them may be hedge fund managers, or use hedge fund techniques.” On the committee report into hedge funds, Purvis says: “The reason for the light-handed regulation was to have some regulation, because at the moment hedge funds themselves are mostly offshore.”
 
:Purvis does not see any conflicts over his involvement with BCM and his work on hedge funds. He argues that the firm “select managers to manage money for their clients, some of them may be hedge fund managers, or use hedge fund techniques.” On the committee report into hedge funds, Purvis says: “The reason for the light-handed regulation was to have some regulation, because at the moment hedge funds themselves are mostly offshore.”
  
:But in 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported how “a bid to cut off funds for terrorism by tightening financial-crime laws has been watered down in the European Parliament with the help of legislators with close ties to the financial industry, including one lawmaker [Purvis] who is chairman of a hedge-fund firm.”<ref>Glenn R. Simpson, "In Europe, Finance Lobby Sways Terror-Funding Law", ''Wall Street Journal, 24 May 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> According to Scotland’s Sunday Herald: “Purvis’s revisions loosened disclosure requirements and attempted to place fewer burdens on firms.”
+
:But in 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported how “a bid to cut off funds for terrorism by tightening financial-crime laws has been watered down in the European Parliament with the help of legislators with close ties to the financial industry, including one lawmaker [Purvis] who is chairman of a hedge-fund firm.”<ref>Glenn R. Simpson, "In Europe, Finance Lobby Sways Terror-Funding Law", ''Wall Street Journal, 24 May 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> According to Scotland’s Sunday Herald: “Purvis’s revisions loosened disclosure requirements and attempted to place fewer burdens on firms.”
  
:The minutes from a meeting of the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum, noted that Purvis “said that while it is necessary to combat money-laundering and terrorist financing effectively”, he is concerned that “methods” being introduced risked “creating a very heavy system”.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> Later that year Purvis complained that “yet more enhanced and rigorous controls on money flows in the fight against terrorism” would “gravely impede” commercial and personal transactions “with red tape and regulatory officiousness”.<ref>European Parliament, Subject: Free Movement of Money and the Fight Against Terrorism, Question Number 27 by John Purvis (H-0635/05), 8 September 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:The minutes from a meeting of the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum, noted that Purvis “said that while it is necessary to combat money-laundering and terrorist financing effectively”, he is concerned that “methods” being introduced risked “creating a very heavy system”.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> Later that year Purvis complained that “yet more enhanced and rigorous controls on money flows in the fight against terrorism” would “gravely impede” commercial and personal transactions “with red tape and regulatory officiousness”.<ref>European Parliament, Subject: Free Movement of Money and the Fight Against Terrorism, Question Number 27 by John Purvis (H-0635/05), 8 September 2005, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
:Still heavily involved in hedge funds, Purvis is currently Vice Chair of Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, whose responsibilities include “the regulation and supervision of financial services, institutions and markets including financial reporting, auditing, accounting rules, corporate governance and other company law matters specifically concerning financial services.”<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=ECON Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Still heavily involved in hedge funds, Purvis is currently Vice Chair of Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, whose responsibilities include “the regulation and supervision of financial services, institutions and markets including financial reporting, auditing, accounting rules, corporate governance and other company law matters specifically concerning financial services.”<ref>[http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=ECON Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
:Purvis sees no conflict of interest with any of his commercial links and work as a Parliamentarian “They are fully declared” he argues. In response to detailed questions about his investments he dismissed inquiries as “clutching at straws”.<ref>John Purvis, ''Interview with Andy Rowell'', May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
:Purvis sees no conflict of interest with any of his commercial links and work as a Parliamentarian “They are fully declared” he argues. In response to detailed questions about his investments he dismissed inquiries as “clutching at straws”.<ref>John Purvis, ''Interview with Andy Rowell'', May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
  
 
::'''Benefiting from Biotech?'''
 
::'''Benefiting from Biotech?'''
::Purvis’s outside interests include being a partner in the firm Life Science Capital LLP, which invests in the biotechnology sector. It is run by his son-in-law, Tom Daniel, who is the controlling interest in the firm.<ref>Life Science Capital LLP, ''Members Report and Financial Statements for the Period February 23, 2005 to March 31, 2006'', p14, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> Daniel also runs the parent company Life Science Capital Management Limited, which is incorporated in the Cayman Islands.<ref>Life Science Capital Service Limited, ''Directors Report and Financial Statements for the Period from May 25, 2005 to March 31, 2006'', cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
::Purvis’s outside interests include being a partner in the firm Life Science Capital LLP, which invests in the biotechnology sector. It is run by his son-in-law, Tom Daniel, who is the controlling interest in the firm.<ref>Life Science Capital LLP, ''Members Report and Financial Statements for the Period February 23, 2005 to March 31, 2006'', p14, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> Daniel also runs the parent company Life Science Capital Management Limited, which is incorporated in the Cayman Islands.<ref>Life Science Capital Service Limited, ''Directors Report and Financial Statements for the Period from May 25, 2005 to March 31, 2006'', cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
::Purvis has long supported the biotechnology sector in Parliament and has been seen as leading on the issue for the Conservatives.<ref>[http://www.conservatives.com/getfile.cfm?file=DeliveringforBritain&ref=GENUPLOAD/2523&type=pdf ''Delivering for Britain''] Undated, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008. ''Linked changed to ''[http://www.conservativeeurope.com/media/Delivering%20For%20Britain%2008.pdf Conservative MEPs, ''Delivering for Britain''] ''last viewed on 05 November 2008''</ref> In 2001, he was the main Rapporteur for an own-initiative report on the future of the biotechnology industry. <ref>[http://www.scottishtorymeps.org.uk/archive/0506/parlRepTopic.asp Scottish Tory MEPs Website Archive, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> In 2002, Purvis hit out at the “Luddite obstruction” against biotech, saying it was “high time” for biotech industries to be promoted.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> In 2005, Purvis hosted a dinner debate at the European Parliament on "The role of biotech in the Lisbon Process" for EuropaBio, a lobby group for the biotech industry in Europe.<ref>[http://www.europabio.org/EBioNews/issue_7.htm Europabio, News, November 2005 - Issue 7], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref> In 2007, Purvis again co-hosted a EuropaBio event to launch the ‘Plants for the Future’ Technology Platform, a ‘forum for the plant sector’ initiated and supported by the European Commission and dominated by industry. The Platform’s report called on Europe to use plant sciences and biotechnology to enhance EU competitiveness and welfare.<ref>Europabio, '' 'Plants for the Future' Invites Europa to Reap Fruits of Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy '', Brussels, 25 June 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
::Purvis has long supported the biotechnology sector in Parliament and has been seen as leading on the issue for the Conservatives.<ref>[http://www.conservatives.com/getfile.cfm?file=DeliveringforBritain&ref=GENUPLOAD/2523&type=pdf ''Delivering for Britain''] Undated, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008. ''Linked changed to'' [http://www.conservativeeurope.com/media/Delivering%20For%20Britain%2008.pdf Conservative MEPs, ''Delivering for Britain''] accessed 05 November 2008.</ref> In 2001, he was the main Rapporteur for an own-initiative report on the future of the biotechnology industry. <ref>[http://www.scottishtorymeps.org.uk/archive/0506/parlRepTopic.asp Scottish Tory MEPs Website Archive, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> In 2002, Purvis hit out at the “Luddite obstruction” against biotech, saying it was “high time” for biotech industries to be promoted.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/54200 Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest"] "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> In 2005, Purvis hosted a dinner debate at the European Parliament on "The role of biotech in the Lisbon Process" for EuropaBio, a lobby group for the biotech industry in Europe.<ref>[http://www.europabio.org/EBioNews/issue_7.htm Europabio, News, November 2005 - Issue 7], cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref> In 2007, Purvis again co-hosted a EuropaBio event to launch the ‘Plants for the Future’ Technology Platform, a ‘forum for the plant sector’ initiated and supported by the European Commission and dominated by industry. The Platform’s report called on Europe to use plant sciences and biotechnology to enhance EU competitiveness and welfare.<ref>Europabio, '' 'Plants for the Future' Invites Europa to Reap Fruits of Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy '', Brussels, 25 June 2007, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
::Purvis’s press spokesperson defends his biotech interests: “John has been a Rapporteur for the biotech industry [sic] in Europe at the Parliament so it obvious that it is something he is extremely interested in. He makes no apology about being in the industry himself.”<ref>John Purvis' Press Spokesperson, Telephone Conversation with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008</ref>
+
::Purvis’s press spokesperson defends his biotech interests: “John has been a Rapporteur for the biotech industry [sic] in Europe at the Parliament so it obvious that it is something he is extremely interested in. He makes no apology about being in the industry himself.”<ref>John Purvis' Press Spokesperson, Telephone Conversation with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort?] by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.</ref>
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==

Revision as of 17:17, 5 November 2008

John Purvis is Conservative MEP for the south of Scotland. He is the Vice Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and substitute member for the Industry, Research and Energy Committee.[1] He has a history of work in the European Parliament on financial services and on biotechnology. He also has direct financial interests in both industries.

He is a 'founding member' of the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum a lobby group set up by the financial services industry to get close to MEPs. It is run by lobbying firm Houston Consulting.

Houston has written two 'own initiative' reports, one on financial services and one on biotech. On 17 March 2005, he made an additional declaration in the Register of members interests which disclosed that Purvis has a remunerated position as 'Partner, Life Science Capital LLP, London, England', which is of course a venture capital firm set up to fund biotech industry developments.[2]

Register of interests

(*shareholder of company)[3]

Conflicts of Interest

In February 2006 the Sunday Herald reported:

Purvis's alleged conflict of interest was first apparent during last year's passage of the Third Money Laundering Directive, which committed member states to combating terrorism by clamping down on illegal transactions.
The legislation requires EU members to make firms report suspicious dealings, as well as tightening the regulations on the financial vehicles used for 'dirty money' transactions, such as trusts and hedge funds, which are largely unregulated investment portfolios.
Bankers and others in the financial world were unhappy with the original draft of the directive because they felt it placed extra burdens on business.
These fears were shared by Purvis, a member of the European parliament's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, who last year tabled amendments, the effect of which arguably watered down the document.
His revisions, some of which were accepted, loosened disclosure requirements and tried to place fewer burdens on firms.
A minute of a January 2005 meeting of the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum, which acts as forum for the industry, showed Purvis's unease with the general plans:
'John Purvis MEP said that while it is necessary to combat money-laundering and terrorist financing effectively, he is concerned that the methods introduced recently or being introduced risked creating a very heavy system and practical problems for both commerce and individuals.'
He also asked an oral question on how the fight against terrorism could be achieved without 'gravely impeding commercial and personal transactions'.
Other opponents of the directive ensured that one of the original proposals, which would have required anyone owning more than 10% of a trust to be identified in legal records, was amended to 25%.
Purvis's actions have caused concern because he is the non-executive chairman of Belgrave Capital Management, a financial services firm. Established in 1994, the company then became part of the Banca del Ceresio Group, a Lugano-based Swiss bank and an investor in hedge funds.
But the MEP's interest in the subject predates his proposed parliamentary amendments to the money-laundering directive. In 2004, the European parliament approved his plans for the introduction of an EU-wide 'passport' for hedge funds.
Purvis said at the time that his proposals, which have still to be adopted by member states, were about creating a 'light-handed' regulatory regime that would help the sector - 'It is vital that we encourage hedge funds into the EU'.
His role in championing the biotechnology sector is also coming under scrutiny after it emerged that he is a partner in a life sciences firm.
Purvis has long supported biotech, as in 2001 when he helped write a report that called for the industry to be given greater help from government.
In 2002, he hit out at the 'Luddite obstruction' which he believed would harm Scottish scientists and farmers, while he also said it was 'high time' for European biotech industries to be promoted.
This was followed in 2005 by the MEP becoming a partner in Life Science Capital LLP, a biotech firm set up by his son-in-law.
Purvis declared the financial interests in his parliamentary register, although he has not disclosed the amount of money he receives from the companies.[4]


In July 2008, Andy Rowell explained in his report on MEPs:

Until February 2008, when it went into voluntary liquidation, Purvis was a nonexecutive Director and significant shareholder of the European Utilities Trust (EUT).[5] According to its 2006 annual report, nearly 50 per cent of the investment trust’s assets were in companies with nuclear interests,[6] and in 2007, investments in nuclear represented some 35 per cent of the company’s assets.[7] Many of the companies listed: Iberdrola, RWE, E.On and Suez could benefit financially if there was strong support from the EU for new nuclear build.
Purvis is a keen supporter of nuclear power. In October 2005 he was one of the signatories to a European Atomic Forum (FORATOM) declaration in support of increased nuclear power in the EU.[8] Two years later, Purvis was again one of a number of MEPs who signed another FORATOM declaration calling for EU leaders to recognise that “nuclear energy is an important part of the EU lowcarbon energy mix and will play an increasing role in limiting CO2 emissions.”[9]
Purvis is currently involved with biotech investors, Life Science Capital (see the sub-text Benefiting from Biotech? below). He is also the non-executive Chairman of Belgrave Capital Management (BCM), which “specialises in the research and selection of talented investment advisors”. In 1999 BCM became part of the Banca del Ceresio Group, “a Swiss Bank…considered to be one of the historic and most respected investors in the field of hedge funds.” BCM is the investment manager responsible for Vitruvius, a multi-portfolio fund.[10]
Vitruvius holds different investment portfolios. The company’s 2007 accounts show that it has significant investments in biotechnology / pharmaceuticals: 13 per cent of its Swiss Franc 26 million Swiss equity fund; 9 per cent of its $214 million US equity fund; 6 per cent of its $33 million capital opportunities fund; and 3 per cent of its 160 million Euro European equity fund.[11] Its European equity portfolio also has significant investments in companies impacted by EU decision-making, for example; car company, Daimler; energy company E.On; and oil companies BP, Shell and Total.[12]
Purvis is also faced with a potential conflict of interest over the hedge funds themselves.[13] In 2003, he acted as a Rapporteur for the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on an own-initiative report into hedge funds, which proposed a “light-handed and appropriate EU-wide regulatory regime” for the hedge fund industry.[14]
Purvis does not see any conflicts over his involvement with BCM and his work on hedge funds. He argues that the firm “select managers to manage money for their clients, some of them may be hedge fund managers, or use hedge fund techniques.” On the committee report into hedge funds, Purvis says: “The reason for the light-handed regulation was to have some regulation, because at the moment hedge funds themselves are mostly offshore.”
But in 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported how “a bid to cut off funds for terrorism by tightening financial-crime laws has been watered down in the European Parliament with the help of legislators with close ties to the financial industry, including one lawmaker [Purvis] who is chairman of a hedge-fund firm.”[15] According to Scotland’s Sunday Herald: “Purvis’s revisions loosened disclosure requirements and attempted to place fewer burdens on firms.”
The minutes from a meeting of the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum, noted that Purvis “said that while it is necessary to combat money-laundering and terrorist financing effectively”, he is concerned that “methods” being introduced risked “creating a very heavy system”.[16] Later that year Purvis complained that “yet more enhanced and rigorous controls on money flows in the fight against terrorism” would “gravely impede” commercial and personal transactions “with red tape and regulatory officiousness”.[17]
Still heavily involved in hedge funds, Purvis is currently Vice Chair of Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, whose responsibilities include “the regulation and supervision of financial services, institutions and markets including financial reporting, auditing, accounting rules, corporate governance and other company law matters specifically concerning financial services.”[18]
Purvis sees no conflict of interest with any of his commercial links and work as a Parliamentarian “They are fully declared” he argues. In response to detailed questions about his investments he dismissed inquiries as “clutching at straws”.[19]


Benefiting from Biotech?
Purvis’s outside interests include being a partner in the firm Life Science Capital LLP, which invests in the biotechnology sector. It is run by his son-in-law, Tom Daniel, who is the controlling interest in the firm.[20] Daniel also runs the parent company Life Science Capital Management Limited, which is incorporated in the Cayman Islands.[21]
Purvis has long supported the biotechnology sector in Parliament and has been seen as leading on the issue for the Conservatives.[22] In 2001, he was the main Rapporteur for an own-initiative report on the future of the biotechnology industry. [23] In 2002, Purvis hit out at the “Luddite obstruction” against biotech, saying it was “high time” for biotech industries to be promoted.[24] In 2005, Purvis hosted a dinner debate at the European Parliament on "The role of biotech in the Lisbon Process" for EuropaBio, a lobby group for the biotech industry in Europe.[25] In 2007, Purvis again co-hosted a EuropaBio event to launch the ‘Plants for the Future’ Technology Platform, a ‘forum for the plant sector’ initiated and supported by the European Commission and dominated by industry. The Platform’s report called on Europe to use plant sciences and biotechnology to enhance EU competitiveness and welfare.[26]
Purvis’s press spokesperson defends his biotech interests: “John has been a Rapporteur for the biotech industry [sic] in Europe at the Parliament so it obvious that it is something he is extremely interested in. He makes no apology about being in the industry himself.”[27]

Resources

References

  1. Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, July 2008.
  2. Addition to Declaration of Members' Financial Interests by John Purvis, 17 March 2005.
  3. Declaration of Members' Financial Interests by John Purvis, 16 November 2005.
  4. Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest" "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006.
  5. Declaration of Members' Financial Interests by John Purvis, 16 November 2005, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  6. Europen Utilities Trust, Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended 31 July 2006, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  7. European Utilities Trust, Annual Report & Accounts for the Year Ended] 31 July 2007, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  8. Declaration on Climate Change and Nuclear Energy 19 October 2005, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  9. Declaration Nuclear Energy - Part of a Low-Carbon Energy Future, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  10. Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  11. Audited annual report 31 December 2007, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  12. Vitruvius, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  13. Scottish Conservatives, A European Legislator's View of Hedge Funds, 31 August 2006, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  14. European Parliament, Report on the Future of Hedge Funds and Derivatives, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Papporteur: John Purvis, 17 December 2003, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  15. Glenn R. Simpson, "In Europe, Finance Lobby Sways Terror-Funding Law", Wall Street Journal, 24 May 2005, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  16. Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest" "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  17. European Parliament, Subject: Free Movement of Money and the Fight Against Terrorism, Question Number 27 by John Purvis (H-0635/05), 8 September 2005, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  18. Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  19. John Purvis, Interview with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  20. Life Science Capital LLP, Members Report and Financial Statements for the Period February 23, 2005 to March 31, 2006, p14, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  21. Life Science Capital Service Limited, Directors Report and Financial Statements for the Period from May 25, 2005 to March 31, 2006, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  22. Delivering for Britain Undated, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008. Linked changed to Conservative MEPs, Delivering for Britain accessed 05 November 2008.
  23. Scottish Tory MEPs Website Archive, cited in [http://spinwatch.org/images/too%20close%20for%20comfort.pdf Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  24. Tory MEP accused of having "conflicts of interest" "Sunday Herald", 19 February 2006, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  25. Europabio, News, November 2005 - Issue 7, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  26. Europabio, 'Plants for the Future' Invites Europa to Reap Fruits of Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy , Brussels, 25 June 2007, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.
  27. John Purvis' Press Spokesperson, Telephone Conversation with Andy Rowell, May 2008, cited in Too Close for Comfort? by Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.