Progressive Policies Forum

Progressive Policies Forum (PPF; aka Progressive Policy Forum) is a shell organization that "employs no staff and has apparently not published any work since its inception in December 2006," and the only person known to associated with it is Peter Hain, the (2008) Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.

The Guardian reports:

A hitherto unknown thinktank that passed tens of thousands of pounds to Peter Hain's deputy leadership campaign has never published any work or held any meetings since its incorporation in December 2006. Concerns over the exact role of the Progressive Policies Forum mounted yesterday and threatened to undermine efforts by the work and pensions secretary to clear his name and explain how he and his team had failed to register more than £100,000 in donations to the Electoral Commission.

Hain admitted that four donors to the PPF had agreed for money to be given to his campaign to clear late debts. Just over £50,000 worth of donations or loans were transferred. However, there were questions at Westminster last night over why the PPF was set up in the first place. There is no evidence that it has published anything or held any meetings. It also has no website.

Registered as a limited company, it was set up just over a year ago - three months after Hain declared his candidacy for the deputy leadership of the Labour party. But the PPF has not filed any accounts to Companies House. There is only one director, Gregory McEwen, a solicitor from Chorleywood, Hertfordshire with a practice in Wimpole Street, London. Other senior members of Labour thinktanks have never heard of the body or any work it has undertaken...

John Underwood, who was a key figure in the Hain campaign and is thought to be a driving force behind the PPF, issued a statement last night saying that the think-tank had been set up to "advance progressive policies through research and other political activities".

He said: "It received contributions from several individuals, monies that were available to be used by PPF in different ways. After the Labour deputy leadership campaign it became clear that Hain4Labour had significantly overspent and it was decided that contributions made to PPF should be used to help meet this overspend. This is entirely permissible. Peter Hain has accepted that these contributions to Hain4Labour were not reported in a timely fashion.

"I can confirm that, as several of these donors have now said publicly, they were content for their contributions to PPF subsequently to be donated to Peter Hain's campaign and I understand that accordingly their names were reported to the Electoral Commission."

One of the donors who gave cash through PPF was Willie Nagel, a diamond dealer, who had previously been approached by Underwood to give money to the campaign, but had said he would only do so if his name was kept private.

On July 9 Nagel gave a £5,000 donation and on October 10 a £25,000 three- month interest-free loan to the PPF that was then transferred to the Hain campaign.

A statement by his solicitors, Ashurst LLP, said: "Mr Nagel donated and loaned money to PPF and had no objection that this money be used to support Peter Hain's campaign."

It added that Nagel, 83, had known Hain since they worked together on establishing the Kimberley Process to stem the flow of "blood diamonds" in Africa in 2000 and respected his activities "both nationally and internationally".