British Geological Survey

The British Geological Survey (BGS) describes itself as 'the nation's principal supplier of objective, impartial and up-to-date geological expertise and information for decision making for governmental, commercial and individual users'.

It is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).

Affiliations

• All Party Parliamentary Group on Climate Change Group - Associate Member

People

• Dr Nick Riley, Head of Science Policy (Europe)
• Professor Mike Stephenson
• Bob Gatliff
• Dr Rob Ward
• Dr Phil Richards

Press

• Clive Mitchell
• Sarah Nice

Funding

Research grants include funding from Centrica, Cuadrilla., GDF Suez, Total.

Publications

This article is part of the Spinwatch Fracking Portal and project

• Press release, 'Shale gas resource figure released', 27 June 2013
• Published a report on the induced seismic activity of shale gas in November 2016.

Their full summary of it:

'The aims of this project were to better understand the levels of induced seismic activity that could be associated with unconventional oil and gas activities in Scotland and better understand the robust regulatory and non-regulatory actions that can be taken to mitigate any noticeable effects on communities. The research has found that Scotland is characterised by low levels of earthquake activity and the risk of damaging earthquake is low. On average there are eight earthquakes of magnitude 2 or above in Scotland every year, which is approximately the magnitude above which earthquakes might be felt by people. Hydraulic fracturing to recover hydrocarbons is generally accompanied by earthquakes with magnitudes of less than 2 that are too small to be felt. Evidence from the United States and Western Canada suggests that the probability of induced earthquakes that can be felt is small, although there are a number of examples of earthquakes that were large enough to be felt. Improved understanding of the hazard from induced earthquakes and the successful implementation of regulatory measures to mitigate the risk of induced seismicity are likely to require additional data from a number of sources, including improved monitoring capabilities.'

However, a fracking literature review published by Andrew Watterson and William Dinan concluded that:

'Although several reports and papers, including some from the UK government and its agencies, state fracking would be safe assuming there is or will be industry best practice and ‘robust’ regulation, the evidence base for such statements is remarkably sparse [...].

There are multiple serious challenges surrounding location, scale, monitoring and data deficits facing regulators overseeing onshore UGE and fracking in the UK;

The evidence from peer-reviewed papers suggests fracking in the UK will not be effectively regulated. It is highly likely that regulatory agencies may lack the staffing and resources necessary to monitor and enforce effective regulation of the industry;

US and UK peer-reviewed analyses and EU law identify both the precautionary principle and prevention as keys to dealing with fracking. This is underpinned by findings from the peer-reviewed public health literature that already identifies significant hazards and major potential risks from the industry.'

Contact

:Headquarters:

British Geological Survey

Environmental Science Centre

Nicker Hill

Keyworth

Nottingham NG12 5GG

:London Office:

Natural History Museum

Cromwell Road

London SW7 5BD

Phone:+44 (0)20 7589 4090

Website:http://www.bgs.ac.uk/contacts/sites/home.html