Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tommy"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| − | + | Tommy, yes the lack of disclosure to the APPC is a breach of their code. We need to think about how to pursue this. Not sure about the GPC/F-H thing, I guess they are just using old names? do you think it has any significance? | |
| + | |||
| + | But let's discuss via email as when the profiles go online, this discussion will not be private! | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 21 December 2005
So, how do you know it has an office in Edin? Put a link in?
David
Halogen: You put in a quote about their mission: Can you put in a closing quote mark and a link to the source in [brackets] David
Tommy,
I see that the data on Greenhaus is not quite right. They didn't start working for the WIC until after May this year.
I think we need to think about how best to capture the dat from the APPC register given that it may change. It may be a good idea to have a separate page for each year eg: Greenhaus Clients 2003/04 Greenhaus clients 2004/05
or something similar which would be linked to their main page.
What do you think?
Tommy, yes the lack of disclosure to the APPC is a breach of their code. We need to think about how to pursue this. Not sure about the GPC/F-H thing, I guess they are just using old names? do you think it has any significance?
But let's discuss via email as when the profiles go online, this discussion will not be private!
