Difference between revisions of "The New Republic"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[The New Republic]] is a US arts and politics magazine known for its liberal views on the economy, and extreme hawkishness on foreign policy. Once an influential liberal publication, the magazine has moved increasingly to the right since its purchase in 1974 by [[neoconservative]] [[Martin Peretz]]. In 2007, Peretz sold the publication to the Canadian [[CanWest]] corporation.<ref name="ea">Eric Alterman, [http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=my_marty_peretz_problem_and_ours My Marty Peretz Problem -- And Ours], ''The American Prospect'', 18 June 2007</ref> | [[The New Republic]] is a US arts and politics magazine known for its liberal views on the economy, and extreme hawkishness on foreign policy. Once an influential liberal publication, the magazine has moved increasingly to the right since its purchase in 1974 by [[neoconservative]] [[Martin Peretz]]. In 2007, Peretz sold the publication to the Canadian [[CanWest]] corporation.<ref name="ea">Eric Alterman, [http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=my_marty_peretz_problem_and_ours My Marty Peretz Problem -- And Ours], ''The American Prospect'', 18 June 2007</ref> | ||
| + | ==History== | ||
| + | The magazine was founded in 1914 by [[Willard Straight]], [[Herbert Croly]], [[Walter Lippmann]], and others. In 1974 it was bought from Gilbert Harrison by Martin Peretz with $380,000 acquired from his wife, the Singer Sewing machine heiress [[Anne Labouisse Farnsworth]].<ref name="ea"/> | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
For media scholar Eric Alterman, under Peretz the once liberal publication was turned into 'a kind of ideological police dog' which sought to define 'the borders of "responsible" liberal discourse, thereby tarring anyone who disagreed as irresponsible or untrustworthy. But he did so on the basis of a politics simultaneously so narrow and idiosyncratic -- in thrall almost entirely to an Israel-centric [[neoconservatism]] -- that it's difficult to understand how the magazine's politics might be considered liberal anymore.'<ref name="ea"/> He adds: | For media scholar Eric Alterman, under Peretz the once liberal publication was turned into 'a kind of ideological police dog' which sought to define 'the borders of "responsible" liberal discourse, thereby tarring anyone who disagreed as irresponsible or untrustworthy. But he did so on the basis of a politics simultaneously so narrow and idiosyncratic -- in thrall almost entirely to an Israel-centric [[neoconservatism]] -- that it's difficult to understand how the magazine's politics might be considered liberal anymore.'<ref name="ea"/> He adds: | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 15 September 2010
The New Republic is a US arts and politics magazine known for its liberal views on the economy, and extreme hawkishness on foreign policy. Once an influential liberal publication, the magazine has moved increasingly to the right since its purchase in 1974 by neoconservative Martin Peretz. In 2007, Peretz sold the publication to the Canadian CanWest corporation.[1]
History
The magazine was founded in 1914 by Willard Straight, Herbert Croly, Walter Lippmann, and others. In 1974 it was bought from Gilbert Harrison by Martin Peretz with $380,000 acquired from his wife, the Singer Sewing machine heiress Anne Labouisse Farnsworth.[1]
Criticism
For media scholar Eric Alterman, under Peretz the once liberal publication was turned into 'a kind of ideological police dog' which sought to define 'the borders of "responsible" liberal discourse, thereby tarring anyone who disagreed as irresponsible or untrustworthy. But he did so on the basis of a politics simultaneously so narrow and idiosyncratic -- in thrall almost entirely to an Israel-centric neoconservatism -- that it's difficult to understand how the magazine's politics might be considered liberal anymore.'[1] He adds:
- TNR under Peretz has been a vehicle that proved extremely helpful to Ronald Reagan's wars in Central America and George Bush's war in Iraq. It provided seminal service to Newt Gingrich's and William Kristol's efforts to kill the Clinton plan for universal health care and offered intellectual legitimacy to Charles Murray's efforts to portray black people as intellectually inferior to whites. As for liberal causes, however … well, not so much.[1]
Principals
- Martin Peretz - Editor-in-chief (also the owner)
Editors
- Herbert Croly (1914–1930)
- Bruce Bliven (1930–1946)
- Henry A. Wallace (1946–1948)
- Michael Straight (1948–1956)
- Gilbert A. Harrison (1956–1975)
- Martin Peretz (1975–1979)
- Michael Kinsley (1979–1981; 1985–1989)
- Hendrik Hertzberg (1981–1985; 1989–1991)
- Andrew Sullivan (1991–1996)
- Michael Kelly (1996–1997)
- Charles Lane (1997–1999)
- Peter Beinart (1999–2006)
- Franklin Foer (2006–present)[2]
External Resources
- Sourcewatch The New Republic
Contact
- Website http://www.tnr.com/
Notes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Eric Alterman, My Marty Peretz Problem -- And Ours, The American Prospect, 18 June 2007
- ↑ David Carr, Franklin Foer Is Named Top Editor of New Republic, The New York Times, 28 February 2006
